can you use SLI and stereoscopic 3d together.
Hi everyone, i have a 970 SLI and my monitor supports 3d vision. i have a asus rog swift with 144hz 1ms and gsync and ULMB. i got the 3d vision kit and it is awsome when i play crysis. i leave the reality of sitting on my comfortable chair at night and enter other worlds, really cool it gives me that immersion. I wanted to play starwars battlefront but i have like half the FR i normally would, i think it is not using my SLI capability. when i play crysis i also have a lower FPS, but it is not as low, or maybe that game does not have good SLI profile. does 3d stereoscopic disable SLI capability?
Hi everyone, i have a 970 SLI and my monitor supports 3d vision. i have a asus rog swift with 144hz 1ms and gsync and ULMB. i got the 3d vision kit and it is awsome when i play crysis. i leave the reality of sitting on my comfortable chair at night and enter other worlds, really cool it gives me that immersion. I wanted to play starwars battlefront but i have like half the FR i normally would, i think it is not using my SLI capability. when i play crysis i also have a lower FPS, but it is not as low, or maybe that game does not have good SLI profile. does 3d stereoscopic disable SLI capability?

#1
Posted 07/01/2016 09:03 PM   
Not that I am aware of but theyre could be issues.. Maybesomeone with a SLI setup can chime in..There are tons of posts here with SLI and 3D..
Not that I am aware of but theyre could be issues.. Maybesomeone with a SLI setup can chime in..There are tons of posts here with SLI and 3D..

Intel i5 7600K @ 4.8ghz / MSI Z270 SLI / Asus 1080GTX - 416.16 / Optoma HD142x Projector / 1 4'x10' Curved Screen PVC / TrackIR / HOTAS Cougar / Cougar MFD's / Track IR / NVidia 3D Vision / Win 10 64bit

#2
Posted 07/01/2016 09:15 PM   
Hi, I heard there were problems with gsync or something like that I play 3D Vision with SLI
Hi, I heard there were problems with gsync or something like that

I play 3D Vision with SLI

#3
Posted 07/01/2016 09:32 PM   
as far as i know, gsync and 3d stereoscopic cannot work together, but i may be wrong. i turn of gsync when i use stereoscopic, heck now that i think about it i will try 3d stereoscopic with it on see what happens lol.
as far as i know, gsync and 3d stereoscopic cannot work together, but i may be wrong. i turn of gsync when i use stereoscopic, heck now that i think about it i will try 3d stereoscopic with it on see what happens lol.

#4
Posted 07/01/2016 09:47 PM   
You can use SLI and 3DVision together, but it still requires the game to have a working SLI profile. The good news is that if there is a working profile, then SLI tends to scale even better with 3DVision than it would in non-stereoscopic 3D.
You can use SLI and 3DVision together, but it still requires the game to have a working SLI profile. The good news is that if there is a working profile, then SLI tends to scale even better with 3DVision than it would in non-stereoscopic 3D.

3D Gaming Rig: CPU: i7 7700K @ 4.9Ghz | Mobo: Asus Maximus Hero VIII | RAM: Corsair Dominator 16GB | GPU: 2 x GTX 1080 Ti SLI | 3xSSDs for OS and Apps, 2 x HDD's for 11GB storage | PSU: Seasonic X-1250 M2| Case: Corsair C70 | Cooling: Corsair H115i Hydro cooler | Displays: Asus PG278QR, BenQ XL2420TX & BenQ HT1075 | OS: Windows 10 Pro + Windows 7 dual boot

Like my fixes? Dontations can be made to: www.paypal.me/DShanz or rshannonca@gmail.com
Like electronic music? Check out: www.soundcloud.com/dj-ryan-king

#5
Posted 07/01/2016 09:49 PM   
in starwars battlefront where i would get 140 fps with SLI enables and gsync, no stereoscopic 3d. but when i use stereoscopic 3d where i would get 140 fps i now get 57 fps. i just want to pin down the problem. is it my monitor, or is it software related to drivers?
in starwars battlefront where i would get 140 fps with SLI enables and gsync, no stereoscopic 3d. but when i use stereoscopic 3d where i would get 140 fps i now get 57 fps. i just want to pin down the problem. is it my monitor, or is it software related to drivers?

#6
Posted 07/01/2016 10:23 PM   
Sorry I cannot tell you more personnaly, I use SLI + 3D Vision Perhaps gsync users or people having the same monitor could tell you more
Sorry I cannot tell you more personnaly, I use SLI + 3D Vision

Perhaps gsync users or people having the same monitor could tell you more

#7
Posted 07/01/2016 10:32 PM   
there are forum post with people having the same issue with this monitor. if it is the monitor that sucks man, at least it is a perfect monitor for everything else and it is not cheap. it is a tn panel , but it is better color quality than the older tn panels, it is a 144hz max refresh rate and 1ms response time and it has gsync and ULMB. i love this monitor, i hope it is not the monitor.
there are forum post with people having the same issue with this monitor. if it is the monitor that sucks man, at least it is a perfect monitor for everything else and it is not cheap. it is a tn panel , but it is better color quality than the older tn panels, it is a 144hz max refresh rate and 1ms response time and it has gsync and ULMB. i love this monitor, i hope it is not the monitor.

#8
Posted 07/01/2016 10:55 PM   
in 2014 there is a forum post , they have concluded there is a bug in the monitor. i found no driver fix for the monitor. my SLI works fine at least, when i run valley benchmark. when i enable 3d stereoscopic i get half the frame rate. idk what else to say my conclusion is this monitor in conjuction with a 970 sli does not work, and there is no solution, software related that i have found. darn TT
in 2014 there is a forum post , they have concluded there is a bug in the monitor. i found no driver fix for the monitor. my SLI works fine at least, when i run valley benchmark. when i enable 3d stereoscopic i get half the frame rate. idk what else to say my conclusion is this monitor in conjuction with a 970 sli does not work, and there is no solution, software related that i have found. darn TT

#9
Posted 07/01/2016 11:17 PM   
Sorry, you should ask on the SLI section perhaps?
Sorry, you should ask on the SLI section perhaps?

#10
Posted 07/02/2016 12:52 AM   
I'm currently playing tomb raider at 1440p in 3d with maximum settings (including pure hair) in SLI at 50-60 fps with 99% utilization on both cards. But SLI in general is a bit of a headache and usually requires messing and tweaking to get working. If you are talking about the ROG swift. I have one and the driver problem is fixed. However some games just run alot worse in 3d vision, it's pretty inconsistent. Witcher 3 runs at 120 fps on my setup in 2d then drops right down to 45fps at times in 3d despite decent SLI scaling.
I'm currently playing tomb raider at 1440p in 3d with maximum settings (including pure hair) in SLI at 50-60 fps with 99% utilization on both cards.

But SLI in general is a bit of a headache and usually requires messing and tweaking to get working.

If you are talking about the ROG swift. I have one and the driver problem is fixed.
However some games just run alot worse in 3d vision, it's pretty inconsistent.

Witcher 3 runs at 120 fps on my setup in 2d then drops right down to 45fps at times in 3d despite decent SLI scaling.

i7-4790K CPU 4.8Ghz stable overclock.
16 GB RAM Corsair
EVGA 1080TI SLI
Samsung SSD 840Pro
ASUS Z97-WS
3D Surround ASUS Rog Swift PG278Q(R), 2x PG278Q (yes it works)
Obutto R3volution.
Windows 10 pro 64x (Windows 7 Dual boot)

#11
Posted 07/02/2016 03:09 AM   
[quote="necropants"]I'm currently playing tomb raider at 1440p in 3d with maximum settings (including pure hair) in SLI at 50-60 fps with 99% utilization on both cards. But SLI in general is a bit of a headache and usually requires messing and tweaking to get working.[/quote] Tomb Raider or Rise of the Tomb Raider?
necropants said:I'm currently playing tomb raider at 1440p in 3d with maximum settings (including pure hair) in SLI at 50-60 fps with 99% utilization on both cards.

But SLI in general is a bit of a headache and usually requires messing and tweaking to get working.


Tomb Raider or Rise of the Tomb Raider?

#12
Posted 07/02/2016 03:10 AM   
When you are rendering in 3D, you are rendering right and left offset images for each frame. So 60 FPS is essentially 120 FPS. Depending on the game, you'll take a roughly 50% or more hit to your performance.
When you are rendering in 3D, you are rendering right and left offset images for each frame. So 60 FPS is essentially 120 FPS. Depending on the game, you'll take a roughly 50% or more hit to your performance.

#13
Posted 07/02/2016 06:28 AM   
Scroll To Top