I wasn't sure at first when I went to see my first 3D movies, but after discussing the experiences of what we all saw, I came to realize that I was not seeing what everyone else was seeing. When I looked at the screen, the picture started at the screen and then had depth back into the screen. That is 3D and it seemed great to me. To my surprise, everyone else said that frequently during the film, people. objects, etc. would extend out of the screen into the audience sometimes quite far. Realizing I had a vision problem I went to see an eye doctor to check out what was causing the problem. Apparently one of my eyes was doing a lot more of the work which did not allow for the alternating of left right images to generate the 3D effect properly. I got a pair of glasses and thought the problem solved. I purchased a VT25 Viera TV and a new PC thinking like the rest of you that I would be using 3DTV Play right away to play games. Like many of you I dabbled with IZ3D out of desperation, and I found out that I still only see 3D from the screen inward. I chalked it up to the driver being beta and not meant for this TV. Then like many of you I'm sure, I purchased "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" the first 3D Blu-ray last week. I watched it and thought wow, incredible, until I showed the movie to someone else who commented on how things were coming right out of the TV. They didn't for me. I'm a bit saddened at this fact and will be getting an eye appointment next week to see if there is any further correction that can be done with lenses. I am curious if anyone else has come across this problem and if they were able to correct it just with eyeglasses? I spent a fortune on all this new equipment and it would be a shame and pretty ironic if I couldn't even see things in 3D properly.
I wasn't sure at first when I went to see my first 3D movies, but after discussing the experiences of what we all saw, I came to realize that I was not seeing what everyone else was seeing. When I looked at the screen, the picture started at the screen and then had depth back into the screen. That is 3D and it seemed great to me. To my surprise, everyone else said that frequently during the film, people. objects, etc. would extend out of the screen into the audience sometimes quite far. Realizing I had a vision problem I went to see an eye doctor to check out what was causing the problem. Apparently one of my eyes was doing a lot more of the work which did not allow for the alternating of left right images to generate the 3D effect properly. I got a pair of glasses and thought the problem solved. I purchased a VT25 Viera TV and a new PC thinking like the rest of you that I would be using 3DTV Play right away to play games. Like many of you I dabbled with IZ3D out of desperation, and I found out that I still only see 3D from the screen inward. I chalked it up to the driver being beta and not meant for this TV. Then like many of you I'm sure, I purchased "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" the first 3D Blu-ray last week. I watched it and thought wow, incredible, until I showed the movie to someone else who commented on how things were coming right out of the TV. They didn't for me. I'm a bit saddened at this fact and will be getting an eye appointment next week to see if there is any further correction that can be done with lenses. I am curious if anyone else has come across this problem and if they were able to correct it just with eyeglasses? I spent a fortune on all this new equipment and it would be a shame and pretty ironic if I couldn't even see things in 3D properly.
I've seen a thread on the mtbs3d about a guy who didn't see 3d at all (somebody help me find it. :( ). With practice he managed to make 3d working more and more until a satisfying degree. I use prescriptionglasses myself and have an astigmatic error in both eyes. However it doesn't matter for the stereoscopic viewing if i use glasses or not. The image just becomes blurry but is still 3d.
I believe from the description that you have one especially dominant eye and that this reduces the effect a bit (note: i'm guessing). In real world the brain get it's depthinformation by several sources (movement, memory, stereoscopy etc) and it seems like people actually uses the "depthsenses" in a different fashion and degree. The 3d-vision as well as other stereoscopic solution provides you with the stereoscopic part but lacks the movement part (similar like in johnny lee's wii-motevid which isn't about stereoscopy).
It's not impossible that the stereoscopysense can be trained but i don't know exactly how (except by simply using it). I hope others comes in with better info than i had.
I've seen a thread on the mtbs3d about a guy who didn't see 3d at all (somebody help me find it. :( ). With practice he managed to make 3d working more and more until a satisfying degree. I use prescriptionglasses myself and have an astigmatic error in both eyes. However it doesn't matter for the stereoscopic viewing if i use glasses or not. The image just becomes blurry but is still 3d.
I believe from the description that you have one especially dominant eye and that this reduces the effect a bit (note: i'm guessing). In real world the brain get it's depthinformation by several sources (movement, memory, stereoscopy etc) and it seems like people actually uses the "depthsenses" in a different fashion and degree. The 3d-vision as well as other stereoscopic solution provides you with the stereoscopic part but lacks the movement part (similar like in johnny lee's wii-motevid which isn't about stereoscopy).
It's not impossible that the stereoscopysense can be trained but i don't know exactly how (except by simply using it). I hope others comes in with better info than i had.
I believe from the description that you have one especially dominant eye and that this reduces the effect a bit (note: i'm guessing). In real world the brain get it's depthinformation by several sources (movement, memory, stereoscopy etc) and it seems like people actually uses the "depthsenses" in a different fashion and degree. The 3d-vision as well as other stereoscopic solution provides you with the stereoscopic part but lacks the movement part (similar like in johnny lee's wii-motevid which isn't about stereoscopy).
It's not impossible that the stereoscopysense can be trained but i don't know exactly how (except by simply using it). I hope others comes in with better info than i had.
I believe from the description that you have one especially dominant eye and that this reduces the effect a bit (note: i'm guessing). In real world the brain get it's depthinformation by several sources (movement, memory, stereoscopy etc) and it seems like people actually uses the "depthsenses" in a different fashion and degree. The 3d-vision as well as other stereoscopic solution provides you with the stereoscopic part but lacks the movement part (similar like in johnny lee's wii-motevid which isn't about stereoscopy).
It's not impossible that the stereoscopysense can be trained but i don't know exactly how (except by simply using it). I hope others comes in with better info than i had.
Mb: Asus P5W DH Deluxe
Cpu: C2D E6600
Gb: Nvidia 7900GT + 8800GTX
3D:100" passive projector polarized setup + 22" IZ3D
Stereodrivers: Iz3d & Tridef ignition and nvidia old school.