I'm buying a projector....
  2 / 2    
[quote="jaymc"]9 inches extra top an bottom of the picture..... Thats a foot an a half longer picture... it's a hell of a lot bigger an the 3d effect should be better with the bigger picture. I can just increase the resolution, but I will get a much larger screen as a result of using a square picture..[/quote] Oh really? [img]http://www.kenstone6.net/fcp_homepage/images_faking_it/01_faking_it.jpg[/img] [img]https://s3.amazonaws.com/red_3/uploads/asset_image/image/51bf8fa017ef02442c00032f/standards1.png[/img]
jaymc said:9 inches extra top an bottom of the picture.....

Thats a foot an a half longer picture... it's a hell of a lot bigger an the 3d effect should be better with the bigger picture. I can just increase the resolution, but I will get a much larger screen as a result of using a square picture..



Oh really?

Image


Image

#16
Posted 06/10/2016 01:55 AM   
it might have more width but it's still a smaller picture on my projector screen... I can make the sq pic much bigger. is it not possible then to just change the fieid of view in the settings in the game after I have the picture filling the hole screen ?? An for that matter does the game not put the same fov into either shape picture automatically I would of taught that it did ??? Jay
it might have more width but it's still a smaller picture on my projector screen... I can make the sq pic much bigger.

is it not possible then to just change the fieid of view in the settings in the game after I have the picture filling the hole screen ??

An for that matter does the game not put the same fov into either shape picture automatically I would of taught that it did ???

Jay

#17
Posted 06/10/2016 02:00 AM   
???
???

#18
Posted 06/10/2016 02:16 AM   
[quote="jaymc"]9 inches extra top an bottom of the picture..... Thats a foot an a half longer picture... it's a hell of a lot bigger an the 3d effect should be better with the bigger picture. I can just increase the resolution, but I will get a much larger screen as a result of using a square picture..[/quote] Adding resolution to wide Fov makes the image more imersive, not so much the height
jaymc said:9 inches extra top an bottom of the picture.....

Thats a foot an a half longer picture... it's a hell of a lot bigger an the 3d effect should be better with the bigger picture. I can just increase the resolution, but I will get a much larger screen as a result of using a square picture..


Adding resolution to wide Fov makes the image more imersive, not so much the height

CoreX9 Custom watercooling (valkswagen polo radiator)
I7-8700k@stock
TitanX pascal with shitty stock cooler
Win7/10
Video: Passive 3D fullhd 3D@60hz/channel Denon x1200w /Hc5 x 2 Geobox501->eeColorBoxes->polarizers/omega filttersCustom made silverscreen
Ocupation: Enterprenior.Painting/surfacing/constructions
Interests/skills:
3D gaming,3D movies, 3D printing,Drums, Bass and guitar.
Suomi - FINLAND - perkele

#19
Posted 06/10/2016 09:41 AM   
[quote="jaymc"]???[/quote] I take it the ???? is you getting impatient again, thanks for refraining from making a new thread. In most game it's about having more real estate and getting the UI crap off to the sides. Plus most movies are 16:9 http://clutchround.com/csgo-the-ultimate-resolution-guide/ [img]http://clutchround.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/csgo_resolution_comparison.gif[/img] But yah, whatever floats your boat.
jaymc said:???



I take it the ???? is you getting impatient again, thanks for refraining from making a new thread.


In most game it's about having more real estate and getting the UI crap off to the sides.

Plus most movies are 16:9

http://clutchround.com/csgo-the-ultimate-resolution-guide/

Image

But yah, whatever floats your boat.

#20
Posted 06/10/2016 10:09 AM   
I just tested it in game... You do loose some from the side's... but also from from the top and bottom (which shouldn't be the case). There is a FOV slider in the advanced settings an if you increase it by 3 notches this more than compensates giving me a little more than 16:9 at the sides and at the top and bottom.... But this then means I got a way bogger screen size an a better 3d effect. It also seems to play well an is not noticeable when turning etc.... Jay
I just tested it in game...

You do loose some from the side's... but also from from the top and bottom (which shouldn't be the case).

There is a FOV slider in the advanced settings an if you increase it by 3 notches this more than compensates giving me a little more than 16:9 at the sides and at the top and bottom....

But this then means I got a way bogger screen size an a better 3d effect.

It also seems to play well an is not noticeable when turning etc....

Jay

#21
Posted 06/10/2016 12:32 PM   
16:9 probably matches human field of view a little better, also. See [url]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripheral_vision#/media/File%3AField_of_view.svg[/url]. Nice visuals, D-Man11. By the way, some of us appreciate the breadth of your technology tracking and support. Thanks...
16:9 probably matches human field of view a little better, also. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripheral_vision#/media/File%3AField_of_view.svg.

Nice visuals, D-Man11. By the way, some of us appreciate the breadth of your technology tracking and support. Thanks...

#22
Posted 06/10/2016 12:39 PM   
I'm with whyme466 on this, 16:9 is more visually appealing than 4:3. But it's all about user preference, as long as your happy with it, that's all that matters.
I'm with whyme466 on this, 16:9 is more visually appealing than 4:3.

But it's all about user preference, as long as your happy with it, that's all that matters.

#23
Posted 06/11/2016 12:57 AM   
Only Cyclops prefer 4:3 :P
Only Cyclops prefer 4:3 :P

Win7 64bit Pro
CPU: 4790K 4.8 GHZ
GPU: Aurus 1080 TI 2.08 GHZ - 100% Watercooled !
Monitor: Asus PG278QR
And lots of ram and HD's ;)

#24
Posted 06/11/2016 08:25 AM   
Fov has nothing to do with aspectratio (4/3,16/9 and so on)
Fov has nothing to do with aspectratio (4/3,16/9 and so on)

CoreX9 Custom watercooling (valkswagen polo radiator)
I7-8700k@stock
TitanX pascal with shitty stock cooler
Win7/10
Video: Passive 3D fullhd 3D@60hz/channel Denon x1200w /Hc5 x 2 Geobox501->eeColorBoxes->polarizers/omega filttersCustom made silverscreen
Ocupation: Enterprenior.Painting/surfacing/constructions
Interests/skills:
3D gaming,3D movies, 3D printing,Drums, Bass and guitar.
Suomi - FINLAND - perkele

#25
Posted 06/11/2016 10:01 AM   
anyone recommend a projector that support 1920X180@60hz? i am using a sony passtive tv 1920X180@24hz hdmi1.4 tv only support SBS T&B......... using checkerboard T&B dx11game for now
anyone recommend a projector that support 1920X180@60hz?
i am using a sony passtive tv 1920X180@24hz hdmi1.4
tv only support SBS T&B.........
using checkerboard T&B dx11game for now

#26
Posted 06/14/2016 01:58 AM   
Jesus... how could anyone in this day and age even consider 4:3. Also pretty much nothing is designed with this perceptive in mind anymore, you are just asking for pain.
Jesus... how could anyone in this day and age even consider 4:3. Also pretty much nothing is designed with this perceptive in mind anymore, you are just asking for pain.

i7-4790K CPU 4.8Ghz stable overclock.
16 GB RAM Corsair
EVGA 1080TI SLI
Samsung SSD 840Pro
ASUS Z97-WS
3D Surround ASUS Rog Swift PG278Q(R), 2x PG278Q (yes it works)
Obutto R3volution.
Windows 10 pro 64x (Windows 7 Dual boot)

#27
Posted 06/14/2016 02:16 AM   
I'm surprised there isn't 4k projectors with 3d support by now since there are ridiculously cheap 4k tvs everywhere, maybe a limitation of projector tech?
I'm surprised there isn't 4k projectors with 3d support by now since there are ridiculously cheap 4k tvs everywhere, maybe a limitation of projector tech?

All hail 3d modders DHR, MasterOtaku, Losti, Necropants, Helifax, bo3b, mike_ar69, Flugan, DarkStarSword, 4everAwake, 3d4dd and so many more helping to keep the 3d dream alive, find their 3d fixes at http://helixmod.blogspot.com/ Also check my site for spanish VR and mobile gaming news: www.gamermovil.com

#28
Posted 06/14/2016 10:37 AM   
[quote="birthright"]I'm surprised there isn't 4k projectors with 3d support by now since there are ridiculously cheap 4k tvs everywhere, maybe a limitation of projector tech? [/quote] The full chip DLP exists, made by TI, but is punishingly expensive at $2K or so, just for the chip. There is a weird hybrid version that uses a 4M micro-mirror DLP to switch multiple pixels in a frame, since they switch so fast. Supposed to be cheaper. Keep in mind though that 4K on a projector really makes no sense, unless you are sitting extra close. You don't want to be paying the 4K cost to push pixels that you can't see.
birthright said:I'm surprised there isn't 4k projectors with 3d support by now since there are ridiculously cheap 4k tvs everywhere, maybe a limitation of projector tech?

The full chip DLP exists, made by TI, but is punishingly expensive at $2K or so, just for the chip. There is a weird hybrid version that uses a 4M micro-mirror DLP to switch multiple pixels in a frame, since they switch so fast. Supposed to be cheaper.

Keep in mind though that 4K on a projector really makes no sense, unless you are sitting extra close. You don't want to be paying the 4K cost to push pixels that you can't see.

Acer H5360 (1280x720@120Hz) - ASUS VG248QE with GSync mod - 3D Vision 1&2 - Driver 372.54
GTX 970 - i5-4670K@4.2GHz - 12GB RAM - Win7x64+evilKB2670838 - 4 Disk X25 RAID
SAGER NP9870-S - GTX 980 - i7-6700K - Win10 Pro 1607
Latest 3Dmigoto Release
Bo3b's School for ShaderHackers

#29
Posted 06/15/2016 12:11 AM   
[quote="bo3b"][quote="birthright"]I'm surprised there isn't 4k projectors with 3d support by now since there are ridiculously cheap 4k tvs everywhere, maybe a limitation of projector tech? [/quote] The full chip DLP exists, made by TI, but is punishingly expensive at $2K or so, just for the chip. There is a weird hybrid version that uses a 4M micro-mirror DLP to switch multiple pixels in a frame, since they switch so fast. Supposed to be cheaper. Keep in mind though that 4K on a projector really makes no sense, unless you are sitting extra close. You don't want to be paying the 4K cost to push pixels that you can't see.[/quote] Interesting, thanks for the info
bo3b said:
birthright said:I'm surprised there isn't 4k projectors with 3d support by now since there are ridiculously cheap 4k tvs everywhere, maybe a limitation of projector tech?

The full chip DLP exists, made by TI, but is punishingly expensive at $2K or so, just for the chip. There is a weird hybrid version that uses a 4M micro-mirror DLP to switch multiple pixels in a frame, since they switch so fast. Supposed to be cheaper.

Keep in mind though that 4K on a projector really makes no sense, unless you are sitting extra close. You don't want to be paying the 4K cost to push pixels that you can't see.


Interesting, thanks for the info

All hail 3d modders DHR, MasterOtaku, Losti, Necropants, Helifax, bo3b, mike_ar69, Flugan, DarkStarSword, 4everAwake, 3d4dd and so many more helping to keep the 3d dream alive, find their 3d fixes at http://helixmod.blogspot.com/ Also check my site for spanish VR and mobile gaming news: www.gamermovil.com

#30
Posted 06/15/2016 01:39 PM   
  2 / 2    
Scroll To Top