One of the best 3d Vision games, Trine 2, chugs at 30 fps and less with these new drivers. Nothing I tried fixed it. Put 337.88 back in and runs perfect at 60 fps.
Also Borderlands the Prequel has slowdowns with these 2 new drivers. Again 337.88 runs perfect.
These are only 2 games I tried with newer drivers and had to revert back. Anyone else confirm 3d vision slow performance with newer drivers?
One of the best 3d Vision games, Trine 2, chugs at 30 fps and less with these new drivers. Nothing I tried fixed it. Put 337.88 back in and runs perfect at 60 fps.
Also Borderlands the Prequel has slowdowns with these 2 new drivers. Again 337.88 runs perfect.
These are only 2 games I tried with newer drivers and had to revert back. Anyone else confirm 3d vision slow performance with newer drivers?
Yup, I'm under the same impression. 3D performance in Batman: Arkham Origins with the 344.65 driver dipped way below the usual 60 fps. The old driver managed to keep it above 60 fps with the same settings.
Yup, I'm under the same impression. 3D performance in Batman: Arkham Origins with the 344.65 driver dipped way below the usual 60 fps. The old driver managed to keep it above 60 fps with the same settings.
I am seeing some performance degradation all around the board with the latest drivers... especially in 3D.
1x Palit RTX 2080Ti Pro Gaming OC(watercooled and overclocked to hell)
3x 3D Vision Ready Asus VG278HE monitors (5760x1080).
Intel i9 9900K (overclocked to 5.3 and watercooled ofc).
Asus Maximus XI Hero Mobo.
16 GB Team Group T-Force Dark Pro DDR4 @ 3600.
Lots of Disks:
- Raid 0 - 256GB Sandisk Extreme SSD.
- Raid 0 - WD Black - 2TB.
- SanDisk SSD PLUS 480 GB.
- Intel 760p 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD.
Creative Sound Blaster Z.
Windows 10 x64 Pro.
etc
Interesting. I didn't do it for 3D Vision reasons, but I rolled back to 344.11 the other day. And even that was a random choice. Could have chosen further back.
Interesting. I didn't do it for 3D Vision reasons, but I rolled back to 344.11 the other day. And even that was a random choice. Could have chosen further back.
Yes, bad performance regardless of settings Pirateguybrush. I think the drivers are bad for 3d along with the previous 3-4 sets. Even 344.11 had slow 3d performance on Trine 2 and others. The 337.88 set is the last driverset I found to have optimal 3d vision drivers. Others may want to verify by playing Trine 2.
Yes, bad performance regardless of settings Pirateguybrush. I think the drivers are bad for 3d along with the previous 3-4 sets. Even 344.11 had slow 3d performance on Trine 2 and others. The 337.88 set is the last driverset I found to have optimal 3d vision drivers. Others may want to verify by playing Trine 2.
[quote="Pirateguybrush"]I'm seeing similar framerates regardless of whether my settings are maxed out, or all turned right down. Same for you guys?[/quote]
Yep. Maxxed or lowest quality results in same poor 3DVision performance.
I know this is an old one but the problem persists for me. and it has gone worse.
Trine 1 & 3 are ok in 3D but Trine 2 isn't.
I can play Trine 2 with everything maxed out at 60fps, fsync. GPU-usage is around 5-10%. This is in 2D with 3D disabled in NVidia-Options.
When 3D is enabled in the Control-Panel (not ingame) FPS drops to 5-10! The same when 3D is enabled ingame.
I tested all Pascal Win10 drivers, but the problem is always the same.
(It's only Trine 2 btw. Other games are ok.)
Also Borderlands the Prequel has slowdowns with these 2 new drivers. Again 337.88 runs perfect.
These are only 2 games I tried with newer drivers and had to revert back. Anyone else confirm 3d vision slow performance with newer drivers?
GTX 1080ti - Rampage III Extreme - XEON i7 920 @ 4.0 GHz - 24 GB Ram - Windows 7 64 - ASUS PG278QR
Gigabyte Gaming 5 Z170X, i7-6700K @ 4.4ghz, Asus GTX 2080 ti Strix OC , 16gb DDR4 Corsair Vengence 2666, LG 60uh8500 and 49ub8500 passive 4K 3D EDID, Dell S2716DG.
I am seeing some performance degradation all around the board with the latest drivers... especially in 3D.
1x Palit RTX 2080Ti Pro Gaming OC(watercooled and overclocked to hell)
3x 3D Vision Ready Asus VG278HE monitors (5760x1080).
Intel i9 9900K (overclocked to 5.3 and watercooled ofc).
Asus Maximus XI Hero Mobo.
16 GB Team Group T-Force Dark Pro DDR4 @ 3600.
Lots of Disks:
- Raid 0 - 256GB Sandisk Extreme SSD.
- Raid 0 - WD Black - 2TB.
- SanDisk SSD PLUS 480 GB.
- Intel 760p 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD.
Creative Sound Blaster Z.
Windows 10 x64 Pro.
etc
My website with my fixes and OpenGL to 3D Vision wrapper:
http://3dsurroundgaming.com
(If you like some of the stuff that I've done and want to donate something, you can do it with PayPal at tavyhome@gmail.com)
Yep. Maxxed or lowest quality results in same poor 3DVision performance.
Trine 1 & 3 are ok in 3D but Trine 2 isn't.
I can play Trine 2 with everything maxed out at 60fps, fsync. GPU-usage is around 5-10%. This is in 2D with 3D disabled in NVidia-Options.
When 3D is enabled in the Control-Panel (not ingame) FPS drops to 5-10! The same when 3D is enabled ingame.
I tested all Pascal Win10 drivers, but the problem is always the same.
(It's only Trine 2 btw. Other games are ok.)
i9-7900X @ 4,5GHz
Gigabyte X299 UD4-Pro
G.Skill 32Gb DDR4
2 x GTX 1070 FE
bequiet! Straight Power 11 1000W
Acer GN276HL DVI
Win 10 x64