I'm a bit worried about monitor size and distance when trying to show photos to the world. If I make an image that looks great when I'm sitting at arm's length from my 22" monitor then try to show that image on a much bigger monitor that's just as far away, the depth is going to be greatly increased. So much so that objects that are supposed to be far away will diverge and break completely. On the other side of things, a photo that is supposed to be on a big screen has almost no depth at all when scaled down to fit on my monitor.
Something that might work a little better would be to have people input their screen size and distance then provide an option to "true up" the depth. The website could do the math and make the apparent size of the image match what the author intended. So an image I make would be shrunk down when displayed on a big screen and an image made on a big screen would only display part of the image and give me scroll bars to see the rest. Images made for movies would probably start getting a bit insane but they could be done. I wonder if that could be done on the website?
The 3D Photo Viewer has an option to increase/decrease the separation between the two images. That sounds like something that would be pretty easy to do on the web page, too. It certainly wouldn't solve all the problems but it would give people with big monitors a way to at least try to stop the divergence.
I'm a bit worried about monitor size and distance when trying to show photos to the world. If I make an image that looks great when I'm sitting at arm's length from my 22" monitor then try to show that image on a much bigger monitor that's just as far away, the depth is going to be greatly increased. So much so that objects that are supposed to be far away will diverge and break completely. On the other side of things, a photo that is supposed to be on a big screen has almost no depth at all when scaled down to fit on my monitor.
Something that might work a little better would be to have people input their screen size and distance then provide an option to "true up" the depth. The website could do the math and make the apparent size of the image match what the author intended. So an image I make would be shrunk down when displayed on a big screen and an image made on a big screen would only display part of the image and give me scroll bars to see the rest. Images made for movies would probably start getting a bit insane but they could be done. I wonder if that could be done on the website?
The 3D Photo Viewer has an option to increase/decrease the separation between the two images. That sounds like something that would be pretty easy to do on the web page, too. It certainly wouldn't solve all the problems but it would give people with big monitors a way to at least try to stop the divergence.
I'm a bit worried about monitor size and distance when trying to show photos to the world. If I make an image that looks great when I'm sitting at arm's length from my 22" monitor then try to show that image on a much bigger monitor that's just as far away, the depth is going to be greatly increased. So much so that objects that are supposed to be far away will diverge and break completely. On the other side of things, a photo that is supposed to be on a big screen has almost no depth at all when scaled down to fit on my monitor.
Something that might work a little better would be to have people input their screen size and distance then provide an option to "true up" the depth. The website could do the math and make the apparent size of the image match what the author intended. So an image I make would be shrunk down when displayed on a big screen and an image made on a big screen would only display part of the image and give me scroll bars to see the rest. Images made for movies would probably start getting a bit insane but they could be done. I wonder if that could be done on the website?
The 3D Photo Viewer has an option to increase/decrease the separation between the two images. That sounds like something that would be pretty easy to do on the web page, too. It certainly wouldn't solve all the problems but it would give people with big monitors a way to at least try to stop the divergence.
I'm a bit worried about monitor size and distance when trying to show photos to the world. If I make an image that looks great when I'm sitting at arm's length from my 22" monitor then try to show that image on a much bigger monitor that's just as far away, the depth is going to be greatly increased. So much so that objects that are supposed to be far away will diverge and break completely. On the other side of things, a photo that is supposed to be on a big screen has almost no depth at all when scaled down to fit on my monitor.
Something that might work a little better would be to have people input their screen size and distance then provide an option to "true up" the depth. The website could do the math and make the apparent size of the image match what the author intended. So an image I make would be shrunk down when displayed on a big screen and an image made on a big screen would only display part of the image and give me scroll bars to see the rest. Images made for movies would probably start getting a bit insane but they could be done. I wonder if that could be done on the website?
The 3D Photo Viewer has an option to increase/decrease the separation between the two images. That sounds like something that would be pretty easy to do on the web page, too. It certainly wouldn't solve all the problems but it would give people with big monitors a way to at least try to stop the divergence.
Something that might work a little better would be to have people input their screen size and distance then provide an option to "true up" the depth. The website could do the math and make the apparent size of the image match what the author intended. So an image I make would be shrunk down when displayed on a big screen and an image made on a big screen would only display part of the image and give me scroll bars to see the rest. Images made for movies would probably start getting a bit insane but they could be done. I wonder if that could be done on the website?
The 3D Photo Viewer has an option to increase/decrease the separation between the two images. That sounds like something that would be pretty easy to do on the web page, too. It certainly wouldn't solve all the problems but it would give people with big monitors a way to at least try to stop the divergence.
Something that might work a little better would be to have people input their screen size and distance then provide an option to "true up" the depth. The website could do the math and make the apparent size of the image match what the author intended. So an image I make would be shrunk down when displayed on a big screen and an image made on a big screen would only display part of the image and give me scroll bars to see the rest. Images made for movies would probably start getting a bit insane but they could be done. I wonder if that could be done on the website?
The 3D Photo Viewer has an option to increase/decrease the separation between the two images. That sounds like something that would be pretty easy to do on the web page, too. It certainly wouldn't solve all the problems but it would give people with big monitors a way to at least try to stop the divergence.
Something that might work a little better would be to have people input their screen size and distance then provide an option to "true up" the depth. The website could do the math and make the apparent size of the image match what the author intended. So an image I make would be shrunk down when displayed on a big screen and an image made on a big screen would only display part of the image and give me scroll bars to see the rest. Images made for movies would probably start getting a bit insane but they could be done. I wonder if that could be done on the website?
The 3D Photo Viewer has an option to increase/decrease the separation between the two images. That sounds like something that would be pretty easy to do on the web page, too. It certainly wouldn't solve all the problems but it would give people with big monitors a way to at least try to stop the divergence.
Something that might work a little better would be to have people input their screen size and distance then provide an option to "true up" the depth. The website could do the math and make the apparent size of the image match what the author intended. So an image I make would be shrunk down when displayed on a big screen and an image made on a big screen would only display part of the image and give me scroll bars to see the rest. Images made for movies would probably start getting a bit insane but they could be done. I wonder if that could be done on the website?
The 3D Photo Viewer has an option to increase/decrease the separation between the two images. That sounds like something that would be pretty easy to do on the web page, too. It certainly wouldn't solve all the problems but it would give people with big monitors a way to at least try to stop the divergence.