Asus VG248QE, VG278HE & HR, BenQ XL270T checkerboard-pattern in 3D-mode (no FullHD per Frame)
  11 / 12    
The problem is that (at least in my country) it's pretty much n longer for sale. If anything, I can find it's "updated" version VG278HR, but doesn't it have worse inversion/checkerboard issues? If you'd have to name one monitor that does not have this problem, or at least it's so minor that you can't notice it - which one would it be (it must be 1080p and either 24 or 27 inch)? I mean, based on what I saw on the screenshots in this thread posted in the past, especially the stuff FlyingRocket posted: [quote]Here is a screenshot of the red-green test image at 70% contrast: [URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/600/3mbw.jpg/]IMAGE 1[/URL] And here is a screenshot of the same image at 100%: [URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/838/55wg.jpg/]IMAGE 2[/URL][/quote] That's unacceptable, I couldn't ever get used to such image degradation, I'd rather not bother with 3D at all than look at something like this :(
The problem is that (at least in my country) it's pretty much n longer for sale. If anything, I can find it's "updated" version VG278HR, but doesn't it have worse inversion/checkerboard issues?

If you'd have to name one monitor that does not have this problem, or at least it's so minor that you can't notice it - which one would it be (it must be 1080p and either 24 or 27 inch)?

I mean, based on what I saw on the screenshots in this thread posted in the past, especially the stuff FlyingRocket posted:

Here is a screenshot of the red-green test image at 70% contrast:
IMAGE 1
And here is a screenshot of the same image at 100%:
IMAGE 2

That's unacceptable, I couldn't ever get used to such image degradation, I'd rather not bother with 3D at all than look at something like this :(

Posted 12/28/2014 11:30 PM   
Hi guys!!! Im from spain and have the problem of double image in a monitor vg278hr, in spain there aren´t nothing information about this problem, the alienware monitor has that problem and also vg278he. do not think this design flaw so we should pay consumers. happens to all 3D monitors that I've come across, people think it's wrong driver or programming of games but really the problem is with the monitors, including stop playing in 3d discouraged by visual discomfort, I tried I vr with cardboard bound to the computer and perfect 3d reproduces without double image. The problem is the speed at which a pixel changes color depending on the eye that this showing in this interval, we have sold an expensive product that was even halfway to develop. if anyone has further news please help. Should trying to solve this problem if we do not want it bad reviews
Hi guys!!! Im from spain and have the problem of double image in a monitor vg278hr, in spain there aren´t nothing information about this problem, the alienware monitor has that problem and also vg278he.
do not think this design flaw so we should pay consumers.
happens to all 3D monitors that I've come across, people think it's wrong driver or programming of games but really the problem is with the monitors, including stop playing in 3d discouraged by visual discomfort, I tried I vr with cardboard bound to the computer and perfect 3d reproduces without double image.
The problem is the speed at which a pixel changes color depending on the eye that this showing in this interval, we have sold an expensive product that was even halfway to develop.
if anyone has further news please help.
Should trying to solve this problem if we do not want it bad reviews

Posted 01/19/2015 09:49 PM   
Well I've got my new monitor and the 3D Vision 2 kit and... I'm disappointed :( First off, the inversion artifacts are there and they're CLEARLY visible. So clearly that I don't believe anyone who isn't near-blind can not see them. In fact, I think anyone who claims they don't see it simply doesn't know what they look like and may think that this is "normal". Another disappointment - while I'm in 3D mode, I can't make ANY adjustments to my monitor's color settings, I can only change the contrast and the Lightboost level so the 3D experience is basically a preset image based on what the manufacturer considers "good looking" (which I just can't accept). And finally, the 3D experience itself. I tried to be as open-minded about it as possible and of course try it myself before ever passing any judgement on 3D and now that I did, I have to say... it's a laughable gimmick. I know, I'm posting it on the 3D community so... yeah, I'm leaving now, don't worry, please lower your weapons ;) But seriously... yes, it's "fun" for the first few minutes, but then... I just want a beautiful flawless Full HD picture and 3D can't offer it to me. It offers preset settings, a crippled resolution due to the VERY clear and impossible to overlook checkerboard pattern than exposes every second pixel making it seem like I'm looking at this... remember this effect they used to put on old PlayStation 1 games where every pixel had this "glow" around it to imitate some smoothing on old CRT screens? Bottom line - sorry guys, I don't know what you see in 3D that makes it attractive to you, but it just doesn't appeal to me at all :( I hope VR will address all these issues and may be "a thing" in near future, but until then 3D is dead to me.
Well I've got my new monitor and the 3D Vision 2 kit and... I'm disappointed :(

First off, the inversion artifacts are there and they're CLEARLY visible. So clearly that I don't believe anyone who isn't near-blind can not see them. In fact, I think anyone who claims they don't see it simply doesn't know what they look like and may think that this is "normal".

Another disappointment - while I'm in 3D mode, I can't make ANY adjustments to my monitor's color settings, I can only change the contrast and the Lightboost level so the 3D experience is basically a preset image based on what the manufacturer considers "good looking" (which I just can't accept).

And finally, the 3D experience itself. I tried to be as open-minded about it as possible and of course try it myself before ever passing any judgement on 3D and now that I did, I have to say... it's a laughable gimmick. I know, I'm posting it on the 3D community so... yeah, I'm leaving now, don't worry, please lower your weapons ;)

But seriously... yes, it's "fun" for the first few minutes, but then... I just want a beautiful flawless Full HD picture and 3D can't offer it to me. It offers preset settings, a crippled resolution due to the VERY clear and impossible to overlook checkerboard pattern than exposes every second pixel making it seem like I'm looking at this... remember this effect they used to put on old PlayStation 1 games where every pixel had this "glow" around it to imitate some smoothing on old CRT screens?

Bottom line - sorry guys, I don't know what you see in 3D that makes it attractive to you, but it just doesn't appeal to me at all :(

I hope VR will address all these issues and may be "a thing" in near future, but until then 3D is dead to me.

Posted 01/20/2015 06:49 PM   
Yah 3D gameplay isn't for the plug and play type of people, so you'd never be happy it sounds like. "A laughable gimmick" lol@VarHyid so yah...go away...you're entitled to your opinion but there are plenty of us that enjoy it and completely disagree with you. Your loss imho
Yah 3D gameplay isn't for the plug and play type of people, so you'd never be happy it sounds like.

"A laughable gimmick"

lol@VarHyid

so yah...go away...you're entitled to your opinion but there are plenty of us that enjoy it and completely disagree with you.

Your loss imho

Posted 01/20/2015 07:39 PM   
If you're going to do a single post and then vanish, why post at all. Not all screens have the same image quality in 3D mode and either 3D makes you ignore insignificant issues or you really missing the point of 3D. We all love 3D otherwise we wouldn't make the effort of playing games in 3D and converting 2D games into 3D. Like D-Man11 said it is not plug and play. I sometimes wish it was more plug and play than currently and have considered how it would be if there was a geforce experience tool but for 3D and less dumbed down.
If you're going to do a single post and then vanish, why post at all. Not all screens have the same image quality in 3D mode and either 3D makes you ignore insignificant issues or you really missing the point of 3D. We all love 3D otherwise we wouldn't make the effort of playing games in 3D and converting 2D games into 3D.

Like D-Man11 said it is not plug and play. I sometimes wish it was more plug and play than currently and have considered how it would be if there was a geforce experience tool but for 3D and less dumbed down.

Thanks to everybody using my assembler it warms my heart.
To have a critical piece of code that everyone can enjoy!
What more can you ask for?

donations: ulfjalmbrant@hotmail.com

Posted 01/20/2015 07:51 PM   
OK, so it's not plug and play - fine, then the first thing I want to do to enjoy it is to adjust all settings in my monitor, color balance etc. just like I do in 2D to enjoy a great picture, but... I can't do it in 3D mode. This make it look like they wanted to make it plug & play. What else can I set? The depth? I did try multiple depth settings, but it didn't really help. And no, I'm anything but a "plug & play type of person", I never use GeForce experience because I want to set everything up in every game manually, I never use monitor presets because I want to calibrate the picture manually, but again... what exactly must I set up in 3D because I just don't see these options except for "depth" and "enable 3D"? [quote="Flugan"]If you're going to do a single post and then vanish, why post at all.[/quote] Because I've posted earlier, before the purchase and said I'll post my feedback on how the artifacts look like on this screen or if there are any so I kept my promise (partially, I thought I'll make a more in-depth review).
OK, so it's not plug and play - fine, then the first thing I want to do to enjoy it is to adjust all settings in my monitor, color balance etc. just like I do in 2D to enjoy a great picture, but... I can't do it in 3D mode. This make it look like they wanted to make it plug & play. What else can I set? The depth? I did try multiple depth settings, but it didn't really help.

And no, I'm anything but a "plug & play type of person", I never use GeForce experience because I want to set everything up in every game manually, I never use monitor presets because I want to calibrate the picture manually, but again... what exactly must I set up in 3D because I just don't see these options except for "depth" and "enable 3D"?

Flugan said:If you're going to do a single post and then vanish, why post at all.

Because I've posted earlier, before the purchase and said I'll post my feedback on how the artifacts look like on this screen or if there are any so I kept my promise (partially, I thought I'll make a more in-depth review).

Posted 01/20/2015 08:06 PM   
Load up DSCF1490.mpo from http://1drv.ms/10sMcTD and open it at remember to ctrl+v for full screen. Then you can play around with convergence and depth combined using keys 'd' and 'f'. I like the realism of real 3D photographs. I fully agree that you loose all ways of configure the image in 3D mode. Just contrast remains to reduce cross-talk. If you don't enjoy watching 3D images then you have this pointless 3D mode. These monitors work at 120hz+ so there will be compromises in the end product. I don't think there is a monitor with perfect 3D picture quality. Highest depth usually result in hyperstereo, gameworld distance between eye's greater than 6,5cm and the default 15% is usually smaller than 6,5cm in the gameworld. 100% is pretty close to 6,5cm on screen. You can configure the 3D camera in loads of different ways from realistic to hyperstereo. convergence 3m away while you sit 60cm from your monitor. It's about taste but high convergence is punished when something comes between the character and the screen poking out your eye twice. One of my 3D blu-ray had the equivalent of depth 40% on my 27" screen. I find it interesting just playing around with settings producing different results.
Load up DSCF1490.mpo from http://1drv.ms/10sMcTD and open it at remember to ctrl+v for full screen.
Then you can play around with convergence and depth combined using keys 'd' and 'f'.

I like the realism of real 3D photographs.

I fully agree that you loose all ways of configure the image in 3D mode.
Just contrast remains to reduce cross-talk.
If you don't enjoy watching 3D images then you have this pointless 3D mode.
These monitors work at 120hz+ so there will be compromises in the end product.

I don't think there is a monitor with perfect 3D picture quality.
Highest depth usually result in hyperstereo, gameworld distance between eye's greater than 6,5cm and the default 15% is usually smaller than 6,5cm in the gameworld. 100% is pretty close to 6,5cm on screen.
You can configure the 3D camera in loads of different ways from realistic to hyperstereo.
convergence 3m away while you sit 60cm from your monitor. It's about taste but high convergence is punished when something comes between the character and the screen poking out your eye twice.
One of my 3D blu-ray had the equivalent of depth 40% on my 27" screen.

I find it interesting just playing around with settings producing different results.

Thanks to everybody using my assembler it warms my heart.
To have a critical piece of code that everyone can enjoy!
What more can you ask for?

donations: ulfjalmbrant@hotmail.com

Posted 01/20/2015 08:40 PM   
If you want a "great" 2D picture why would you even consider buying anything but a IPS panel of sometype? Want to tweak the in-game visuals? Have you ever heard of ENBSeries or SweetFX. Just want to add some digital vibrance? Change the control to the nvcp. The fact that the Display manufacturer locks adjustments isn't Nvidia's fault, but it is typically the norm once 3D is enabled. Most people adjust the color to tweak the monitor into displaying as much as the color gamut as possible. This is only done once at setup and then again as necessary after the break-in period. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamut You said "I just want a beautiful flawless Full HD picture". umm flawless.... this wouldn't include adjusting the colors on the fly while gaming, everrrrr As far as 3D goes, did you enable the hot-keys, so that you can adjust the convergence to your liking? It makes a huge difference in the achieved stereo effect. http://3dvision-blog.com/111-changing-the-convergence-level-in-3d-vision/
If you want a "great" 2D picture why would you even consider buying anything but a IPS panel of sometype?

Want to tweak the in-game visuals? Have you ever heard of ENBSeries or SweetFX.

Just want to add some digital vibrance? Change the control to the nvcp.

The fact that the Display manufacturer locks adjustments isn't Nvidia's fault, but it is typically the norm once 3D is enabled.

Most people adjust the color to tweak the monitor into displaying as much as the color gamut as possible. This is only done once at setup and then again as necessary after the break-in period. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamut

You said "I just want a beautiful flawless Full HD picture".
umm flawless.... this wouldn't include adjusting the colors on the fly while gaming, everrrrr

As far as 3D goes, did you enable the hot-keys, so that you can adjust the convergence to your liking? It makes a huge difference in the achieved stereo effect.
http://3dvision-blog.com/111-changing-the-convergence-level-in-3d-vision/

Posted 01/20/2015 08:51 PM   
A-ha! So there are menus I haven't discovered yet ;) I'll play around with it, thanks for your tips guys. BTW, reg. changing colors - that's not what I meant (changing it in each game), I set it up once and stick with it, but given that when the monitor goes into 3D mode it changes the picture, I wanted to set it up once in 3D mode... but couldn't which IMO is a bit weird, why would any manufacturer block these options. Yes, IPS is the way to go, for now I wanted a 120Hz monitor with little ghosting and I'm happy with the screen in general, I just expected more settings for 3D, didn't found the convergence settings or "frustum" (which I'm not even sure what it is) so again - thanks for the info, I'll look into it.
A-ha! So there are menus I haven't discovered yet ;) I'll play around with it, thanks for your tips guys.

BTW, reg. changing colors - that's not what I meant (changing it in each game), I set it up once and stick with it, but given that when the monitor goes into 3D mode it changes the picture, I wanted to set it up once in 3D mode... but couldn't which IMO is a bit weird, why would any manufacturer block these options.

Yes, IPS is the way to go, for now I wanted a 120Hz monitor with little ghosting and I'm happy with the screen in general, I just expected more settings for 3D, didn't found the convergence settings or "frustum" (which I'm not even sure what it is) so again - thanks for the info, I'll look into it.

Posted 01/20/2015 09:17 PM   
Well then you should know that it's up to game developers to properly implement 3D in their games so that everything is drawn with a second view. Unfortunately, this does not happen. Too often, certain effects will only render in one eye. Thankfully, members of the community have stepped up with patches to correct this shortcoming in quite a few games. http://helixmod.blogspot.com/2013/10/game-list-automatically-updated.html Perhaps 3D gaming might not be for you. But all of us here would gladly make sacrifices to game in 3D vs 2D. Anyway, if you have trouble with a specific game. Search the forum and post in the related thread. I also suggest that you check out some in-game pics posted by users http://photos.3dvisionlive.com/ As well as this post https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/467750/?comment=3786634 gaming in 3D can be quite a hassle sometimes, but the end result is well worth it. EDIT: BTW Acer announced a 144Hz 1440P IPS monitor at CES 2015. ( XB270HU, non 3D I think)
Well then you should know that it's up to game developers to properly implement 3D in their games so that everything is drawn with a second view. Unfortunately, this does not happen. Too often, certain effects will only render in one eye.

Thankfully, members of the community have stepped up with patches to correct this shortcoming in quite a few games.
http://helixmod.blogspot.com/2013/10/game-list-automatically-updated.html

Perhaps 3D gaming might not be for you. But all of us here would gladly make sacrifices to game in 3D vs 2D.

Anyway, if you have trouble with a specific game. Search the forum and post in the related thread.

I also suggest that you check out some in-game pics posted by users
http://photos.3dvisionlive.com/
As well as this post
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/467750/?comment=3786634

gaming in 3D can be quite a hassle sometimes, but the end result is well worth it.

EDIT: BTW Acer announced a 144Hz 1440P IPS monitor at CES 2015. ( XB270HU, non 3D I think)

Posted 01/20/2015 10:09 PM   
Thanks, I'll check it all out tomorrow :) Regarding sacrifices... here's the thing. I'm someone who sometimes (if a game looks great) stands in one place in the game for a moment and looks around just to enjoy the view (and make some screenshots for Steam) so I like to see a nice picture. I've calibrated the monitor to the best of my abilities (and preference), I launched some games - all looks great, rich colors (well, as "rich" as a TN panel goes, that is), nice contrast, all fine. Then I launch it in 3D mode and in order to compensate for the diminished brightness with the shutter glasses, BenQ decided to boost the brightness in 3D mode so much that even at contrast = 0 and Lightboost = OFF (my only 2 options), it's still soooo bright (in 3D!) that colors seem kind of washed-out, there are no "deep blacks" (again - as "deep" as a TN panel, or any non-OLED screen can go) and I just can't enjoy it as much as I enjoy a nice-looking picture (color-wise). So as much as I could patch games to look/behave "correctly" in 3D, how can I patch the screen to reproduce the same picture quality I get in 2D? If that's the sacrifice I'd have to make, then I'm afraid I'm not willing to make it. Anyway, I'll still try some things out (heck, I don't even have any 3D Blu-rays yet, will definitely get some maybe I'll enjoy the 3D movie experience more than 3D gaming), I think racing games could be a thing in 3D as there's no time for enjoying the scenery there anyway so getting depth on the road would make sense. Oh and yeah - 144Hz IPS monitor, nice. Though I think my next monitor upgrade will (hopefully) be a 4K OLED display. I hope by that time graphics cards will be powerful enough that a single card will easily run any new game in 4K at max settings and above 60fps ;)
Thanks, I'll check it all out tomorrow :)

Regarding sacrifices... here's the thing. I'm someone who sometimes (if a game looks great) stands in one place in the game for a moment and looks around just to enjoy the view (and make some screenshots for Steam) so I like to see a nice picture. I've calibrated the monitor to the best of my abilities (and preference), I launched some games - all looks great, rich colors (well, as "rich" as a TN panel goes, that is), nice contrast, all fine.

Then I launch it in 3D mode and in order to compensate for the diminished brightness with the shutter glasses, BenQ decided to boost the brightness in 3D mode so much that even at contrast = 0 and Lightboost = OFF (my only 2 options), it's still soooo bright (in 3D!) that colors seem kind of washed-out, there are no "deep blacks" (again - as "deep" as a TN panel, or any non-OLED screen can go) and I just can't enjoy it as much as I enjoy a nice-looking picture (color-wise).

So as much as I could patch games to look/behave "correctly" in 3D, how can I patch the screen to reproduce the same picture quality I get in 2D? If that's the sacrifice I'd have to make, then I'm afraid I'm not willing to make it.

Anyway, I'll still try some things out (heck, I don't even have any 3D Blu-rays yet, will definitely get some maybe I'll enjoy the 3D movie experience more than 3D gaming), I think racing games could be a thing in 3D as there's no time for enjoying the scenery there anyway so getting depth on the road would make sense.

Oh and yeah - 144Hz IPS monitor, nice. Though I think my next monitor upgrade will (hopefully) be a 4K OLED display. I hope by that time graphics cards will be powerful enough that a single card will easily run any new game in 4K at max settings and above 60fps ;)

Posted 01/21/2015 12:27 AM   
Ladies and gentlemen, it seems taboo to speak of the problem is with the monitors. Asus has just released the first monitor with 1ms response, and it seems that there is no longer such crosstalk that all monitors 3d're used to suffer (I'm willing to try to review it), if that is suffering view all imajenes, videos and games with double imajen. In fact surely cause long-term vision problems, of concentration, nausea, dizziness and a large etc .... Have cast us with these monitors half to develop. For the first time I managed to watch a game (Crysis 3) and some pictures without crosstalk, with cardboard google and my galaxy note 3 spending shame that I did in 3d monitors. Nvidia is not to blame, because the 3d develops great, the problem is the alliance they have done for marketing 3d monitors half to develop. Many people stop using these monitors in 3d by visual problems that cause them. I am very disappointed that my money back, please.
Ladies and gentlemen, it seems taboo to speak of the problem is with the monitors.

Asus has just released the first monitor with 1ms response, and it seems that there is no longer such crosstalk that all monitors 3d're used to suffer (I'm willing to try to review it), if that is suffering view all imajenes, videos and games with double imajen.

In fact surely cause long-term vision problems, of concentration, nausea, dizziness and a large etc ....

Have cast us with these monitors half to develop.

For the first time I managed to watch a game (Crysis 3) and some pictures without crosstalk, with cardboard google and my galaxy note 3 spending shame that I did in 3d monitors.
Nvidia is not to blame, because the 3d develops great, the problem is the alliance they have done for marketing 3d monitors half to develop.

Many people stop using these monitors in 3d by visual problems that cause them.

I am very disappointed that my money back, please.

Posted 01/22/2015 09:54 PM   
Hmm.. I just enabled a game in 3d mode, alt tabbed out to desktop (3d mode still engaged), used the "adjust desktop color settings" in the nv control panel and used that to adjust my color quality for 3d gaming, and saved a profile. So when just on desktop in 2d, I used default settings and my monitors color adjustments, and for 3d gaming, i switch to my nvidia saved color profile and use that for 3d gaming. works fine for me. was able to adjust brightness, gamma, and those washed out colors. I'm sure it's different for every display, but I just played around with it till I found something that was better than default. 3d gaming is awesome.
Hmm.. I just enabled a game in 3d mode, alt tabbed out to desktop (3d mode still engaged), used the "adjust desktop color settings" in the nv control panel and used that to adjust my color quality for 3d gaming, and saved a profile. So when just on desktop in 2d, I used default settings and my monitors color adjustments, and for 3d gaming, i switch to my nvidia saved color profile and use that for 3d gaming. works fine for me. was able to adjust brightness, gamma, and those washed out colors. I'm sure it's different for every display, but I just played around with it till I found something that was better than default. 3d gaming is awesome.

AsRock X58 Extreme6 mobo
Intel Core-i7 950 @ 4ghz
12gb Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600
ASUS DirectCU II GTX 780 3gb
Corsair TX 950w PSU
NZXT Phantom Red/Black Case
3d Vision 1 w/ Samsung 2233rz Monitor
3d Vision 2 w/ ASUS VG278HE Monitor

Posted 01/22/2015 10:58 PM   
Have the same thing. But i don't care. At all =)
Have the same thing.
But i don't care. At all =)

Posted 01/23/2015 06:12 PM   
AcidBong, I can see in your firm that you have 2 different 3D monitors, and I have the 1st one (Samsung 2233RZ). As I am thinkint these days to change and buy a new monitor, can you tell me the real difference you find between those two monitor you have, specially in terms of 3D gaming? I really do not find anything wrong with my 2233RZ moinitor, as it is only 1680x1050 res but at the same time it is smaller (22"). It is only Nvidia 3d vision 1 compatible, but, as far as I understand, the Nvidia 3d vision 2 only provides more brightness, and maybe that is not specially a good idea in some circunstances, specially if you prefer deeper blacks. Particularly I am thinking on BenQ XL2420G, even though it is expensive for a 24", but apparently it has other pros. I am scared about what I read about the checkerboard-pattern shown in many monitors, and everythig seems to indicate that it is going to happen whith this monitor too. 2233RZ is very easy to deal with, it does not let me change anything when playing 3D, so the image is what it is (for the good and for the bad). I don't even know if my monitor deals better in respect to ghosting..., maybe.
AcidBong, I can see in your firm that you have 2 different 3D monitors, and I have the 1st one (Samsung 2233RZ). As I am thinkint these days to change and buy a new monitor, can you tell me the real difference you find between those two monitor you have, specially in terms of 3D gaming?

I really do not find anything wrong with my 2233RZ moinitor, as it is only 1680x1050 res but at the same time it is smaller (22"). It is only Nvidia 3d vision 1 compatible, but, as far as I understand, the Nvidia 3d vision 2 only provides more brightness, and maybe that is not specially a good idea in some circunstances, specially if you prefer deeper blacks.

Particularly I am thinking on BenQ XL2420G, even though it is expensive for a 24", but apparently it has other pros. I am scared about what I read about the checkerboard-pattern shown in many monitors, and everythig seems to indicate that it is going to happen whith this monitor too.

2233RZ is very easy to deal with, it does not let me change anything when playing 3D, so the image is what it is (for the good and for the bad). I don't even know if my monitor deals better in respect to ghosting..., maybe.

- Windows 7 64bits (SSD OCZ-Vertez2 128Gb)
- "ASUS P6X58D-E" motherboard
- "MSI GTX 660 TI"
- "Intel Xeon X5670" @4000MHz CPU (20.0[12-25]x200MHz)
- RAM 16 Gb DDR3 1600
- "Dell S2716DG" monitor (2560x1440 @144Hz)
- "Corsair Carbide 600C" case
- Labrador dog (cinnamon edition)

Posted 07/19/2015 12:28 PM   
  11 / 12    
Scroll To Top