Concerns about display formats.
Okay I'm making this one short since the forums logged me out and erased my entire post. I was basically asking what will happen now that displayport 1.2 is out and hdmi 2.0 is on the way with dvi going the way of vga. will there be 30 inch and up 2560x1600 120hz monitors in 3D? Is this the big secret under nda at nvidia for 3d Vision 3? It has to be, 4K monitors will soon be a reality. Will 4k monitors finally replace the 2560x1600 monitors, and will the 2560x1600 monitors finally be 120hz and capable of 3d output?It would finally get us past this FULL HD 1080P nonsense we've been imprisoned in for far too long. I know this is speculation, but I have not seen a discussion recently about this and thought I would start one.
Okay I'm making this one short since the forums logged me out and erased my entire post.
I was basically asking what will happen now that displayport 1.2 is out and hdmi 2.0 is on the way with dvi going the way of vga.
will there be 30 inch and up 2560x1600 120hz monitors in 3D?
Is this the big secret under nda at nvidia for 3d Vision 3? It has to be, 4K monitors will soon be a reality.
Will 4k monitors finally replace the 2560x1600 monitors, and will the 2560x1600 monitors finally be 120hz and capable of 3d output?It would finally get us past this FULL HD 1080P nonsense we've been imprisoned in for far too long.
I know this is speculation, but I have not seen a discussion recently about this and thought I would start one.

#1
Posted 03/14/2013 10:06 AM   
I hate when that happens, I usually select all and copy before I post, lesson learned. :D I won't knock 4K 3D, obviously any advancement in 3D will eventually trickle down to me but where I'm sitting I don't feel imprisoned @1080p60 3D, quite the contrary considering 720p is the norm on 3DTVs. 4K 3D will be a big jump in clarity but also in price, which will be fine maybe for smaller displays/monitors but I'm playing on a 65" DLP and technically I want move up in size, not down. I can't see any display over 65" being even remotely affordable at those resolutions other than being a DLP, but since it seems like Mitsubishi was the last company that was manufacturing rear projection DLPs and they're giving up on the tech too, it doesn't leave much hope for someone like me. I paid less than $1000 for it, going on 3 years ago, I still can't find anything comparable to it, size/value-wise. DLP in itself is a pretty incredible technology, no need for an emitter, with the right glasses no noticeable crosstalk whatsoever. Sure it has it's flaws but when you want a big affordable display it's really hard to knock it.
I hate when that happens, I usually select all and copy before I post, lesson learned. :D

I won't knock 4K 3D, obviously any advancement in 3D will eventually trickle down to me but where I'm sitting I don't feel imprisoned @1080p60 3D, quite the contrary considering 720p is the norm on 3DTVs. 4K 3D will be a big jump in clarity but also in price, which will be fine maybe for smaller displays/monitors but I'm playing on a 65" DLP and technically I want move up in size, not down. I can't see any display over 65" being even remotely affordable at those resolutions other than being a DLP, but since it seems like Mitsubishi was the last company that was manufacturing rear projection DLPs and they're giving up on the tech too, it doesn't leave much hope for someone like me. I paid less than $1000 for it, going on 3 years ago, I still can't find anything comparable to it, size/value-wise.

DLP in itself is a pretty incredible technology, no need for an emitter, with the right glasses no noticeable crosstalk whatsoever. Sure it has it's flaws but when you want a big affordable display it's really hard to knock it.
#2
Posted 03/14/2013 01:22 PM   
4K 3D isn't happening for a long time, seems pointless to market something like that because less than 0.1% of people have enough GPU power to run a resoultion that stupid in 3D.
4K 3D isn't happening for a long time, seems pointless to market something like that because less than 0.1% of people have enough GPU power to run a resoultion that stupid in 3D.

#3
Posted 03/14/2013 05:05 PM   
Isn't it only roughly 4x the resolution of 1080p? [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/Digital_video_resolutions_%28VCD_to_4K%29.svg/500px-Digital_video_resolutions_%28VCD_to_4K%29.svg.png[/img] Aren't people already doing close to that with 3D Vision Surround?
Isn't it only roughly 4x the resolution of 1080p?

Image

Aren't people already doing close to that with 3D Vision Surround?
#4
Posted 03/14/2013 05:12 PM   
Sure they are, but not with 650ti's. Pretty expensive I'd imagine.
Sure they are, but not with 650ti's. Pretty expensive I'd imagine.

#5
Posted 03/14/2013 05:22 PM   
Scroll To Top