Just Cause 2 with GTX480 SLI Benchmark on Concrete Jungle
2 / 2
[quote name='Qramohn' post='1045354' date='Apr 26 2010, 02:24 PM']Try to turn off the "motion blur" from the settings. This should get the SLI working with JC2. Try and see if that helps you.
I run my 480s in SLI-mode with JC2 and I'm getting good framerates.
This is run on the streamversion of the game with the latest drivers installed.[/quote]
Do you have everything on highest settings except motion blur? What do you call good framerates?
[quote name='Qramohn' post='1045354' date='Apr 26 2010, 02:24 PM']Try to turn off the "motion blur" from the settings. This should get the SLI working with JC2. Try and see if that helps you.
I run my 480s in SLI-mode with JC2 and I'm getting good framerates.
This is run on the streamversion of the game with the latest drivers installed.
Do you have everything on highest settings except motion blur? What do you call good framerates?
This is nice. I have in this benchmark 15 fps with GTX 295 (settings maximum, no AA), so if I upgrade to 2 x GTX480 for 1000Eur I will have 10 fps for 1000 Eur. Good deal.
This is nice. I have in this benchmark 15 fps with GTX 295 (settings maximum, no AA), so if I upgrade to 2 x GTX480 for 1000Eur I will have 10 fps for 1000 Eur. Good deal.
[quote name='TrekCZ' post='1047052' date='Apr 29 2010, 01:43 AM']This is nice. I have in this benchmark 15 fps with GTX 295 (settings maximum, no AA), so if I upgrade to 2 x GTX480 for 1000Eur I will have 10 fps for 1000 Eur. Good deal.[/quote]
You will also have tesselation, DX11 and a heated room. The drivers obviously aren't anywhere near optimised yet and in the next few months I'm hoping to see some vast improvements. I think choosing this
benchmark doesn't do the 480s justice as it appears to have a low fps count using any graphics card. I'd still recommend the cards to anyone but I am biased towards nvidia, not least because of 3d vision.
[quote name='TrekCZ' post='1047052' date='Apr 29 2010, 01:43 AM']This is nice. I have in this benchmark 15 fps with GTX 295 (settings maximum, no AA), so if I upgrade to 2 x GTX480 for 1000Eur I will have 10 fps for 1000 Eur. Good deal.
You will also have tesselation, DX11 and a heated room. The drivers obviously aren't anywhere near optimised yet and in the next few months I'm hoping to see some vast improvements. I think choosing this
benchmark doesn't do the 480s justice as it appears to have a low fps count using any graphics card. I'd still recommend the cards to anyone but I am biased towards nvidia, not least because of 3d vision.
[quote name='TrekCZ' post='1047267' date='Apr 29 2010, 10:52 AM']Can you run all 3 benchmarks in 3D Vision with all settings maxed and no AA and share results?[/quote]
Ok, I've just completed runs on all 3 Benchmarks with Motion Blur OFF, no AA and everything else on the highest possible setting.
Results:
[quote name='TrekCZ' post='1047267' date='Apr 29 2010, 10:52 AM']Can you run all 3 benchmarks in 3D Vision with all settings maxed and no AA and share results?
Ok, I've just completed runs on all 3 Benchmarks with Motion Blur OFF, no AA and everything else on the highest possible setting.
Results:
Dark Tower = 47.31 fps
Desert Sunrise = 53.48 fps
Concrete Jungle = 22.88 fps
I'm happy with the first 2 results and they did look stunning. There is something wrong with Concrete Jungle.
[quote name='TrekCZ' post='1047494' date='Apr 29 2010, 11:48 AM']1680x1050, we both have samsung[/quote]
I will give it a shot later today and post back. I do know that yeah, the first 2 benchies run a LOT smoother than the Concrete jungle so I wonder how much the whole cuda water has to do with it but then again, it still runs slow when you go to the city areas
[quote name='TrekCZ' post='1047494' date='Apr 29 2010, 11:48 AM']1680x1050, we both have samsung
I will give it a shot later today and post back. I do know that yeah, the first 2 benchies run a LOT smoother than the Concrete jungle so I wonder how much the whole cuda water has to do with it but then again, it still runs slow when you go to the city areas
Seems "Concrete jungle" is a much more demanding test. Either it's a future benchmarking demo or it's just unoptimized code. Both from developer and the current Nvidia drivers.
Well. Atleast the game is a blast to play and I never experienced any slowdowns. /devil.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':devil:' />
My benchmark results with watercooled and overclocked(875/1750/2300) GTX480s.
1680x1050 and everything turned on(except AA) and all maxed out.
dark tower - 50.65
desert sunrise - 51.81
concrete jungle - 23.60
Seems "Concrete jungle" is a much more demanding test. Either it's a future benchmarking demo or it's just unoptimized code. Both from developer and the current Nvidia drivers.
Well. Atleast the game is a blast to play and I never experienced any slowdowns. /devil.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':devil:' />
I run my 480s in SLI-mode with JC2 and I'm getting good framerates.
This is run on the streamversion of the game with the latest drivers installed.[/quote]
Do you have everything on highest settings except motion blur? What do you call good framerates?
I run my 480s in SLI-mode with JC2 and I'm getting good framerates.
This is run on the streamversion of the game with the latest drivers installed.
Do you have everything on highest settings except motion blur? What do you call good framerates?
You will also have tesselation, DX11 and a heated room. The drivers obviously aren't anywhere near optimised yet and in the next few months I'm hoping to see some vast improvements. I think choosing this
benchmark doesn't do the 480s justice as it appears to have a low fps count using any graphics card. I'd still recommend the cards to anyone but I am biased towards nvidia, not least because of 3d vision.
You will also have tesselation, DX11 and a heated room. The drivers obviously aren't anywhere near optimised yet and in the next few months I'm hoping to see some vast improvements. I think choosing this
benchmark doesn't do the 480s justice as it appears to have a low fps count using any graphics card. I'd still recommend the cards to anyone but I am biased towards nvidia, not least because of 3d vision.
Ok, I've just completed runs on all 3 Benchmarks with Motion Blur OFF, no AA and everything else on the highest possible setting.
Results:
Dark Tower = 47.31 fps
Desert Sunrise = 53.48 fps
Concrete Jungle = 22.88 fps
I'm happy with the first 2 results and they did look stunning. There is something wrong with Concrete Jungle.
Ok, I've just completed runs on all 3 Benchmarks with Motion Blur OFF, no AA and everything else on the highest possible setting.
Results:
Dark Tower = 47.31 fps
Desert Sunrise = 53.48 fps
Concrete Jungle = 22.88 fps
I'm happy with the first 2 results and they did look stunning. There is something wrong with Concrete Jungle.
yep, definetely there is something strange with concrete jungle. I have tried to lower settings but it does not have much influence on framerate.
My results with GTX 295
dark tower - 36.42
desert sunrise - 34.65
concrete jungle - 14.78
yep, definetely there is something strange with concrete jungle. I have tried to lower settings but it does not have much influence on framerate.
My results with GTX 295
dark tower - 36.42
desert sunrise - 34.65
concrete jungle - 14.78
yep, definetely there is something strange with concrete jungle. I have tried to lower settings but it does not have much influence on framerate.
My results with GTX 295
dark tower - 36.42
desert sunrise - 34.65
concrete jungle - 14.78[/quote]
What res are you guys using?
yep, definetely there is something strange with concrete jungle. I have tried to lower settings but it does not have much influence on framerate.
My results with GTX 295
dark tower - 36.42
desert sunrise - 34.65
concrete jungle - 14.78
What res are you guys using?
*CPU: i7 920 DO @ 4.1Ghz 1.35v HT On*CPU Cooler: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Extreme*Mobo: Evga X58 SLI / RAM: 12GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer DDR3 1600 7-7-7-21 1.5v*Video Cards:Tri Sli Evga GTX 660 ti x 2 & MSI GTX 660 ti *Speakers:CBM-170 SE*PSU: Corsair HX1000W*Display: Mitusbishi 60" DLP (3D Vision ) Qnix QX2710 27" 1440P*Case: CoolerMaster HAF X (932 side) *Windows 7 64Bit on Samsung 840 256GB*Others: Roccat Kone XTD | Roccat Alumic | Logitech G15 | *Mobile: Galaxy Note 2
I will give it a shot later today and post back. I do know that yeah, the first 2 benchies run a LOT smoother than the Concrete jungle so I wonder how much the whole cuda water has to do with it but then again, it still runs slow when you go to the city areas
I will give it a shot later today and post back. I do know that yeah, the first 2 benchies run a LOT smoother than the Concrete jungle so I wonder how much the whole cuda water has to do with it but then again, it still runs slow when you go to the city areas
*CPU: i7 920 DO @ 4.1Ghz 1.35v HT On*CPU Cooler: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Extreme*Mobo: Evga X58 SLI / RAM: 12GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer DDR3 1600 7-7-7-21 1.5v*Video Cards:Tri Sli Evga GTX 660 ti x 2 & MSI GTX 660 ti *Speakers:CBM-170 SE*PSU: Corsair HX1000W*Display: Mitusbishi 60" DLP (3D Vision ) Qnix QX2710 27" 1440P*Case: CoolerMaster HAF X (932 side) *Windows 7 64Bit on Samsung 840 256GB*Others: Roccat Kone XTD | Roccat Alumic | Logitech G15 | *Mobile: Galaxy Note 2
1680x1050 and everything turned on(except AA) and all maxed out.
dark tower - 50.65
desert sunrise - 51.81
concrete jungle - 23.60
Seems "Concrete jungle" is a much more demanding test. Either it's a future benchmarking demo or it's just unoptimized code. Both from developer and the current Nvidia drivers.
Well. Atleast the game is a blast to play and I never experienced any slowdowns.
1680x1050 and everything turned on(except AA) and all maxed out.
dark tower - 50.65
desert sunrise - 51.81
concrete jungle - 23.60
Seems "Concrete jungle" is a much more demanding test. Either it's a future benchmarking demo or it's just unoptimized code. Both from developer and the current Nvidia drivers.
Well. Atleast the game is a blast to play and I never experienced any slowdowns.