Well i deffintly think someone should make a thread about 3d preformance with the GTX480/470 when they get them anyway.
Will help to see if there really worth the £££.
Im personaly on the fence as i think they are to expensive atm :mellow: Significant 3d preformance would deffintly sway my veiw tho, my 8800Gtx in sli just carnt hack the new titles at high settings anymore /down.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':down:' />
Well i deffintly think someone should make a thread about 3d preformance with the GTX480/470 when they get them anyway.
Will help to see if there really worth the £££.
Im personaly on the fence as i think they are to expensive atm :mellow: Significant 3d preformance would deffintly sway my veiw tho, my 8800Gtx in sli just carnt hack the new titles at high settings anymore /down.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':down:' />
[quote name='Adz 3000' post='1039187' date='Apr 13 2010, 01:16 PM']Well i deffintly think someone should make a thread about 3d preformance with the GTX480/470 when they get them anyway.
Will help to see if there really worth the £££.
Im personaly on the fence as i think they are to expensive atm :mellow: Significant 3d preformance would deffintly sway my veiw tho, my 8800Gtx in sli just carnt hack the new titles at high settings anymore /down.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':down:' />[/quote]
Well according to UPS I should have my first eVGA 480 GTX SC on Friday afternoon; so I will definitly come give you guys the rundown of what I find.
[quote name='Adz 3000' post='1039187' date='Apr 13 2010, 01:16 PM']Well i deffintly think someone should make a thread about 3d preformance with the GTX480/470 when they get them anyway.
Will help to see if there really worth the £££.
Im personaly on the fence as i think they are to expensive atm :mellow: Significant 3d preformance would deffintly sway my veiw tho, my 8800Gtx in sli just carnt hack the new titles at high settings anymore /down.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':down:' />
Well according to UPS I should have my first eVGA 480 GTX SC on Friday afternoon; so I will definitly come give you guys the rundown of what I find.
[quote name='MistaP' post='1039231' date='Apr 13 2010, 10:16 PM']Well according to UPS I should have my first eVGA 480 GTX SC on Friday afternoon; so I will definitly come give you guys the rundown of what I find.[/quote]
Good to hear! /stud.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':stud:' />
Will be intresting to see its 3d vison preformance.
[quote name='MistaP' post='1039231' date='Apr 13 2010, 10:16 PM']Well according to UPS I should have my first eVGA 480 GTX SC on Friday afternoon; so I will definitly come give you guys the rundown of what I find.
Good to hear! /stud.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':stud:' />
Will be intresting to see its 3d vison preformance.
[quote name='MistaP' post='1039231' date='Apr 13 2010, 10:16 PM']Well according to UPS I should have my first eVGA 480 GTX SC on Friday afternoon; so I will definitly come give you guys the rundown of what I find.[/quote]
That would be really great ! I'm looking forward to see your findings with 480. Based on this i might change my view and go for single 480.
[quote name='MistaP' post='1039231' date='Apr 13 2010, 10:16 PM']Well according to UPS I should have my first eVGA 480 GTX SC on Friday afternoon; so I will definitly come give you guys the rundown of what I find.
That would be really great ! I'm looking forward to see your findings with 480. Based on this i might change my view and go for single 480.
[quote name='Dimek' post='1039244' date='Apr 13 2010, 05:10 PM']That would be really great ! I'm looking forward to see your findings with 480. Based on this i might change my view and go for single 480.[/quote]
No worries I dont work Saturday or Sunday so that is what my weekend will be for. I can't wait for it to get here Friday. It is so bad this is going to be the longest week ever. lol!
[quote name='Dimek' post='1039244' date='Apr 13 2010, 05:10 PM']That would be really great ! I'm looking forward to see your findings with 480. Based on this i might change my view and go for single 480.
No worries I dont work Saturday or Sunday so that is what my weekend will be for. I can't wait for it to get here Friday. It is so bad this is going to be the longest week ever. lol!
For 3D @ 1080p, I'd say 1x470 or 1x480 for a good gaming experience, but at least 2x470 for an excellent gaming experience. I just upgraded from 2x280 in SLI to a single 480 and just today 480 SLI and I'd say a single 480 is more of a sidegrade for 3D, sometimes an improvement, but sometimes a downgrade. 480 SLI is just awesome though, improvements across the board and maxed out settings in even the most demanding games. Assassin's Creed 2, maxed and capped at 60FPS. BFBC2 50+ FPS, Just Cause 2 45-60FPS, DoW2 60 FPS capped, Dragon Age Origins 60 FPS capped. I'd say a lot of this decision depends on what you're upgrading from, if you already have GTX 200 in SLI a single GTX 400 won't really be an upgrade, especially in 3D Vision due to various stereo driver nuances.
Anyways if you have some specific games you want me to provide feedback for lmk, I found GTX 280 SLI to be very good in terms of 3D Vision, there were just a handful of games that couldn't sustain close to 60FPS, often in the sub-30 FPS range that really had me itching to upgrade. 480 SLI has scratched that itch. Very happy now with the end result! /stud.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':stud:' /> Now we just need our 256 drivers and synchronous 3D driver releases.
For 3D @ 1080p, I'd say 1x470 or 1x480 for a good gaming experience, but at least 2x470 for an excellent gaming experience. I just upgraded from 2x280 in SLI to a single 480 and just today 480 SLI and I'd say a single 480 is more of a sidegrade for 3D, sometimes an improvement, but sometimes a downgrade. 480 SLI is just awesome though, improvements across the board and maxed out settings in even the most demanding games. Assassin's Creed 2, maxed and capped at 60FPS. BFBC2 50+ FPS, Just Cause 2 45-60FPS, DoW2 60 FPS capped, Dragon Age Origins 60 FPS capped. I'd say a lot of this decision depends on what you're upgrading from, if you already have GTX 200 in SLI a single GTX 400 won't really be an upgrade, especially in 3D Vision due to various stereo driver nuances.
Anyways if you have some specific games you want me to provide feedback for lmk, I found GTX 280 SLI to be very good in terms of 3D Vision, there were just a handful of games that couldn't sustain close to 60FPS, often in the sub-30 FPS range that really had me itching to upgrade. 480 SLI has scratched that itch. Very happy now with the end result! /stud.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':stud:' /> Now we just need our 256 drivers and synchronous 3D driver releases.
Really pleased with my GTX 480. Playing Bad Company 2, with EVERYTHING maxed out in 1920x1080, I was getting 30-45 FPS still [b]with 3D on[/b]. Ran very smooth and looked AMAZING.
I may consider going SLI just to be sure I never dip below 30. But we'll see, it runs satisfactory as is, and I really don't mind turning down AA a little to increase performance.
Really pleased with my GTX 480. Playing Bad Company 2, with EVERYTHING maxed out in 1920x1080, I was getting 30-45 FPS still with 3D on. Ran very smooth and looked AMAZING.
I may consider going SLI just to be sure I never dip below 30. But we'll see, it runs satisfactory as is, and I really don't mind turning down AA a little to increase performance.
[quote name='Robertski' post='1032878' date='Apr 2 2010, 05:30 PM']Compared to the ati 5870 the gtx480 is massively overpriced. 10-15% more performance but costs about 25%-30% more. This card whilst very good is still not as good as many were expecting and take into account the locked cores, high energy consumption, heat performance and you can see this GPU is overpriced. Still i will get one when the price is more sensible, but if not for 3D i would have bought the ATI.[/quote]
I've seen many of these "I would have bought ATI" posts from you rob, my one question is, didn't anyone tell you that ATI has a 3d solution of their own coming very soon? This way you won't have to troll these boards anymore with senseless ATI fanboy garbage.
Your point doesn't combat or argue anything I said, instead it just reitterates exactly why this 480 is worth every dollor.
[quote name='Robertski' post='1032878' date='Apr 2 2010, 05:30 PM']Compared to the ati 5870 the gtx480 is massively overpriced. 10-15% more performance but costs about 25%-30% more. This card whilst very good is still not as good as many were expecting and take into account the locked cores, high energy consumption, heat performance and you can see this GPU is overpriced. Still i will get one when the price is more sensible, but if not for 3D i would have bought the ATI.
I've seen many of these "I would have bought ATI" posts from you rob, my one question is, didn't anyone tell you that ATI has a 3d solution of their own coming very soon? This way you won't have to troll these boards anymore with senseless ATI fanboy garbage.
Your point doesn't combat or argue anything I said, instead it just reitterates exactly why this 480 is worth every dollor.
From what I understand, ATI's '3D solution' is just support for 3rd Party 3D companies, which seems pretty unsatisfactory to me.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.
From what I understand, ATI's '3D solution' is just support for 3rd Party 3D companies, which seems pretty unsatisfactory to me.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.
[quote name='Chukibu' post='1039547' date='Apr 14 2010, 01:34 PM']From what I understand, ATI's '3D solution' is just support for 3rd Party 3D companies, which seems pretty unsatisfactory to me.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.[/quote]
[quote name='Chukibu' post='1039547' date='Apr 14 2010, 01:34 PM']From what I understand, ATI's '3D solution' is just support for 3rd Party 3D companies, which seems pretty unsatisfactory to me.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.
[quote name='Chukibu' post='1039547' date='Apr 14 2010, 01:34 PM']From what I understand, ATI's '3D solution' is just support for 3rd Party 3D companies, which seems pretty unsatisfactory to me.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.[/quote]
[quote name='Chukibu' post='1039547' date='Apr 14 2010, 01:34 PM']From what I understand, ATI's '3D solution' is just support for 3rd Party 3D companies, which seems pretty unsatisfactory to me.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.
For those of you who already have a GTX 480/470 single or SLI, is it true that you can turn AA8x, 4X without losing that much of frame rate???
I mean, let's pick two of the most GPU horsepower demanding games for 3D Vison, Metro 2033 and Just Cause 2. I have SLI GTX 280 and I play those games with an average of 30fps, 1680 x 1050 and all settings maximized, but AA is Off, AF I let 16x cause it doesn't affect the frame rate. I always turn Vsync on, always, cause I hate tearing...
If I turn AA2x or 4x in those games it just becomes unplayable, all the way.
How does those new Fermi works with Anti Aliasing on?? I read that if you play a game with AA off and your FPS count is 40 for example, if you turn AA to 8x, you will lose less than 10fps the most, is that true?? With GTX 280 SLi or not, AA kills the frame rate in some games, not all, but the graphics demanding ones.
I was a little bit curious about that. I'm just waiting to get 2 GTX 480 and replace my 280,s. I guess I'll gain at least 70% better performance.
Anyway, do you guys actually notice a difference from AA turned on 8x or 4x compared to AA off in 3D?? I don't see it, in 2D it was obvious the difference, but in 3D, I've never notice aliasing at all.
Even when I was playing Crysis in 2D last year, I never notice any difference from AA4x to AA8x or AAQ16x, it was all the same to me, despite the huge drop of performance. I could tell a huge difference in 2D from AA turned off to AA2x or 4X, but beyond that I could not tell any difference.
For those of you who already have a GTX 480/470 single or SLI, is it true that you can turn AA8x, 4X without losing that much of frame rate???
I mean, let's pick two of the most GPU horsepower demanding games for 3D Vison, Metro 2033 and Just Cause 2. I have SLI GTX 280 and I play those games with an average of 30fps, 1680 x 1050 and all settings maximized, but AA is Off, AF I let 16x cause it doesn't affect the frame rate. I always turn Vsync on, always, cause I hate tearing...
If I turn AA2x or 4x in those games it just becomes unplayable, all the way.
How does those new Fermi works with Anti Aliasing on?? I read that if you play a game with AA off and your FPS count is 40 for example, if you turn AA to 8x, you will lose less than 10fps the most, is that true?? With GTX 280 SLi or not, AA kills the frame rate in some games, not all, but the graphics demanding ones.
I was a little bit curious about that. I'm just waiting to get 2 GTX 480 and replace my 280,s. I guess I'll gain at least 70% better performance.
Anyway, do you guys actually notice a difference from AA turned on 8x or 4x compared to AA off in 3D?? I don't see it, in 2D it was obvious the difference, but in 3D, I've never notice aliasing at all.
Even when I was playing Crysis in 2D last year, I never notice any difference from AA4x to AA8x or AAQ16x, it was all the same to me, despite the huge drop of performance. I could tell a huge difference in 2D from AA turned off to AA2x or 4X, but beyond that I could not tell any difference.
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bits - Core i7 2600K @ 4.5ghz - Asus Maximus IV Extreme Z68 - Geforce EVGA GTX 690 - 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 (2T) - Thermaltake Armor+ - SSD Intel 510 Series Sata3 256GB - HD WD Caviar Black Sata3 64mb 2TB - HD WD Caviar Black 1TB Sata3 64mb - Bose Sound System - LG H20L GGW Blu Ray/DVD/CD RW - LG GH20 DVD RAM - PSU Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W - Samsung S27A950D 3D Vision Ready + 3D HDTV SAMSUNG PL63C7000 3DTVPLAY + ROLLERMOD CHECKERBOARD
For those of you who already have a GTX 480/470 single or SLI, is it true that you can turn AA8x, 4X without losing that much of frame rate???
I mean, let's pick two of the most GPU horsepower demanding games for 3D Vison, Metro 2033 and Just Cause 2. I have SLI GTX 280 and I play those games with an average of 30fps, 1680 x 1050 and all settings maximized, but AA is Off, AF I let 16x cause it doesn't affect the frame rate. I always turn Vsync on, always, cause I hate tearing...
If I turn AA2x or 4x in those games it just becomes unplayable, all the way.
How does those new Fermi works with Anti Aliasing on?? I read that if you play a game with AA off and your FPS count is 40 for example, if you turn AA to 8x, you will lose less than 10fps the most, is that true?? With GTX 280 SLi or not, AA kills the frame rate in some games, not all, but the graphics demanding ones.
I was a little bit curious about that. I'm just waiting to get 2 GTX 480 and replace my 280,s. I guess I'll gain at least 70% better performance.
Anyway, do you guys actually notice a difference from AA turned on 8x or 4x compared to AA off in 3D?? I don't see it, in 2D it was obvious the difference, but in 3D, I've never notice aliasing at all.
Even when I was playing Crysis in 2D last year, I never notice any difference from AA4x to AA8x or AAQ16x, it was all the same to me, despite the huge drop of performance. I could tell a huge difference in 2D from AA turned off to AA2x or 4X, but beyond that I could not tell any difference.
For those of you who already have a GTX 480/470 single or SLI, is it true that you can turn AA8x, 4X without losing that much of frame rate???
I mean, let's pick two of the most GPU horsepower demanding games for 3D Vison, Metro 2033 and Just Cause 2. I have SLI GTX 280 and I play those games with an average of 30fps, 1680 x 1050 and all settings maximized, but AA is Off, AF I let 16x cause it doesn't affect the frame rate. I always turn Vsync on, always, cause I hate tearing...
If I turn AA2x or 4x in those games it just becomes unplayable, all the way.
How does those new Fermi works with Anti Aliasing on?? I read that if you play a game with AA off and your FPS count is 40 for example, if you turn AA to 8x, you will lose less than 10fps the most, is that true?? With GTX 280 SLi or not, AA kills the frame rate in some games, not all, but the graphics demanding ones.
I was a little bit curious about that. I'm just waiting to get 2 GTX 480 and replace my 280,s. I guess I'll gain at least 70% better performance.
Anyway, do you guys actually notice a difference from AA turned on 8x or 4x compared to AA off in 3D?? I don't see it, in 2D it was obvious the difference, but in 3D, I've never notice aliasing at all.
Even when I was playing Crysis in 2D last year, I never notice any difference from AA4x to AA8x or AAQ16x, it was all the same to me, despite the huge drop of performance. I could tell a huge difference in 2D from AA turned off to AA2x or 4X, but beyond that I could not tell any difference.
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bits - Core i7 2600K @ 4.5ghz - Asus Maximus IV Extreme Z68 - Geforce EVGA GTX 690 - 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 (2T) - Thermaltake Armor+ - SSD Intel 510 Series Sata3 256GB - HD WD Caviar Black Sata3 64mb 2TB - HD WD Caviar Black 1TB Sata3 64mb - Bose Sound System - LG H20L GGW Blu Ray/DVD/CD RW - LG GH20 DVD RAM - PSU Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W - Samsung S27A950D 3D Vision Ready + 3D HDTV SAMSUNG PL63C7000 3DTVPLAY + ROLLERMOD CHECKERBOARD
I would say one of the most impressive things about teh GTX 480 is it's ability to handle all of the bells and whistles with only a slight drop in FPS. There are threads on this out there. If I run across any I will post here for you.
I would say one of the most impressive things about teh GTX 480 is it's ability to handle all of the bells and whistles with only a slight drop in FPS. There are threads on this out there. If I run across any I will post here for you.
4770k @ 4.2 Water cooled
32 Gigs DDR 3 2400
GTX Titan X SLI
Obsidian 800D
EVGA 1300 watt
1 Terabyte SSD raid 0
ASUS 27 inch 3D monitor 3D vision 2.
I would say one of the most impressive things about teh GTX 480 is it's ability to handle all of the bells and whistles with only a slight drop in FPS. There are threads on this out there. If I run across any I will post here for you.
I would say one of the most impressive things about teh GTX 480 is it's ability to handle all of the bells and whistles with only a slight drop in FPS. There are threads on this out there. If I run across any I will post here for you.
4770k @ 4.2 Water cooled
32 Gigs DDR 3 2400
GTX Titan X SLI
Obsidian 800D
EVGA 1300 watt
1 Terabyte SSD raid 0
ASUS 27 inch 3D monitor 3D vision 2.
Will help to see if there really worth the £££.
Im personaly on the fence as i think they are to expensive atm :mellow: Significant 3d preformance would deffintly sway my veiw tho, my 8800Gtx in sli just carnt hack the new titles at high settings anymore
Will help to see if there really worth the £££.
Im personaly on the fence as i think they are to expensive atm :mellow: Significant 3d preformance would deffintly sway my veiw tho, my 8800Gtx in sli just carnt hack the new titles at high settings anymore
Will help to see if there really worth the £££.
Im personaly on the fence as i think they are to expensive atm :mellow: Significant 3d preformance would deffintly sway my veiw tho, my 8800Gtx in sli just carnt hack the new titles at high settings anymore
Well according to UPS I should have my first eVGA 480 GTX SC on Friday afternoon; so I will definitly come give you guys the rundown of what I find.
Will help to see if there really worth the £££.
Im personaly on the fence as i think they are to expensive atm :mellow: Significant 3d preformance would deffintly sway my veiw tho, my 8800Gtx in sli just carnt hack the new titles at high settings anymore
Well according to UPS I should have my first eVGA 480 GTX SC on Friday afternoon; so I will definitly come give you guys the rundown of what I find.
Good to hear!
Will be intresting to see its 3d vison preformance.
Good to hear!
Will be intresting to see its 3d vison preformance.
That would be really great ! I'm looking forward to see your findings with 480. Based on this i might change my view and go for single 480.
That would be really great ! I'm looking forward to see your findings with 480. Based on this i might change my view and go for single 480.
No worries I dont work Saturday or Sunday so that is what my weekend will be for. I can't wait for it to get here Friday. It is so bad this is going to be the longest week ever. lol!
No worries I dont work Saturday or Sunday so that is what my weekend will be for. I can't wait for it to get here Friday. It is so bad this is going to be the longest week ever. lol!
Anyways if you have some specific games you want me to provide feedback for lmk, I found GTX 280 SLI to be very good in terms of 3D Vision, there were just a handful of games that couldn't sustain close to 60FPS, often in the sub-30 FPS range that really had me itching to upgrade. 480 SLI has scratched that itch. Very happy now with the end result!
Anyways if you have some specific games you want me to provide feedback for lmk, I found GTX 280 SLI to be very good in terms of 3D Vision, there were just a handful of games that couldn't sustain close to 60FPS, often in the sub-30 FPS range that really had me itching to upgrade. 480 SLI has scratched that itch. Very happy now with the end result!
-=HeliX=- Mod 3DV Game Fixes
My 3D Vision Games List Ratings
Intel Core i7 5930K @4.5GHz | Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5 | Win10 x64 Pro | Corsair H105
Nvidia GeForce Titan X SLI Hybrid | ROG Swift PG278Q 144Hz + 3D Vision/G-Sync | 32GB Adata DDR4 2666
Intel Samsung 950Pro SSD | Samsung EVO 4x1 RAID 0 |
Yamaha VX-677 A/V Receiver | Polk Audio RM6880 7.1 | LG Blu-Ray
Auzen X-Fi HT HD | Logitech G710/G502/G27 | Corsair Air 540 | EVGA P2-1200W
I may consider going SLI just to be sure I never dip below 30. But we'll see, it runs satisfactory as is, and I really don't mind turning down AA a little to increase performance.
I may consider going SLI just to be sure I never dip below 30. But we'll see, it runs satisfactory as is, and I really don't mind turning down AA a little to increase performance.
I've seen many of these "I would have bought ATI" posts from you rob, my one question is, didn't anyone tell you that ATI has a 3d solution of their own coming very soon? This way you won't have to troll these boards anymore with senseless ATI fanboy garbage.
Your point doesn't combat or argue anything I said, instead it just reitterates exactly why this 480 is worth every dollor.
I've seen many of these "I would have bought ATI" posts from you rob, my one question is, didn't anyone tell you that ATI has a 3d solution of their own coming very soon? This way you won't have to troll these boards anymore with senseless ATI fanboy garbage.
Your point doesn't combat or argue anything I said, instead it just reitterates exactly why this 480 is worth every dollor.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.[/quote]
Exactly!
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.
Exactly!
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.[/quote]
Exactly!
Nvidia has the connections to work with developers and have games ship 3D ready, or have drivers released shortly after. And we've even Nvidia has some issues, how do you think some no-name 3rd party company is going to do?
It's like they're supporting it just so they can say 'We have 3D too!!!!!' even though it's performance is subpar.
Also Robertski, it's still on very new drivers. Give them some time to mature and that 10-15% performance increase could extend up to 25% or higher.
Exactly!
I mean, let's pick two of the most GPU horsepower demanding games for 3D Vison, Metro 2033 and Just Cause 2. I have SLI GTX 280 and I play those games with an average of 30fps, 1680 x 1050 and all settings maximized, but AA is Off, AF I let 16x cause it doesn't affect the frame rate. I always turn Vsync on, always, cause I hate tearing...
If I turn AA2x or 4x in those games it just becomes unplayable, all the way.
How does those new Fermi works with Anti Aliasing on?? I read that if you play a game with AA off and your FPS count is 40 for example, if you turn AA to 8x, you will lose less than 10fps the most, is that true?? With GTX 280 SLi or not, AA kills the frame rate in some games, not all, but the graphics demanding ones.
I was a little bit curious about that. I'm just waiting to get 2 GTX 480 and replace my 280,s. I guess I'll gain at least 70% better performance.
Anyway, do you guys actually notice a difference from AA turned on 8x or 4x compared to AA off in 3D?? I don't see it, in 2D it was obvious the difference, but in 3D, I've never notice aliasing at all.
Even when I was playing Crysis in 2D last year, I never notice any difference from AA4x to AA8x or AAQ16x, it was all the same to me, despite the huge drop of performance. I could tell a huge difference in 2D from AA turned off to AA2x or 4X, but beyond that I could not tell any difference.
I mean, let's pick two of the most GPU horsepower demanding games for 3D Vison, Metro 2033 and Just Cause 2. I have SLI GTX 280 and I play those games with an average of 30fps, 1680 x 1050 and all settings maximized, but AA is Off, AF I let 16x cause it doesn't affect the frame rate. I always turn Vsync on, always, cause I hate tearing...
If I turn AA2x or 4x in those games it just becomes unplayable, all the way.
How does those new Fermi works with Anti Aliasing on?? I read that if you play a game with AA off and your FPS count is 40 for example, if you turn AA to 8x, you will lose less than 10fps the most, is that true?? With GTX 280 SLi or not, AA kills the frame rate in some games, not all, but the graphics demanding ones.
I was a little bit curious about that. I'm just waiting to get 2 GTX 480 and replace my 280,s. I guess I'll gain at least 70% better performance.
Anyway, do you guys actually notice a difference from AA turned on 8x or 4x compared to AA off in 3D?? I don't see it, in 2D it was obvious the difference, but in 3D, I've never notice aliasing at all.
Even when I was playing Crysis in 2D last year, I never notice any difference from AA4x to AA8x or AAQ16x, it was all the same to me, despite the huge drop of performance. I could tell a huge difference in 2D from AA turned off to AA2x or 4X, but beyond that I could not tell any difference.
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bits - Core i7 2600K @ 4.5ghz - Asus Maximus IV Extreme Z68 - Geforce EVGA GTX 690 - 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 (2T) - Thermaltake Armor+ - SSD Intel 510 Series Sata3 256GB - HD WD Caviar Black Sata3 64mb 2TB - HD WD Caviar Black 1TB Sata3 64mb - Bose Sound System - LG H20L GGW Blu Ray/DVD/CD RW - LG GH20 DVD RAM - PSU Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W - Samsung S27A950D 3D Vision Ready + 3D HDTV SAMSUNG PL63C7000 3DTVPLAY + ROLLERMOD CHECKERBOARD
I mean, let's pick two of the most GPU horsepower demanding games for 3D Vison, Metro 2033 and Just Cause 2. I have SLI GTX 280 and I play those games with an average of 30fps, 1680 x 1050 and all settings maximized, but AA is Off, AF I let 16x cause it doesn't affect the frame rate. I always turn Vsync on, always, cause I hate tearing...
If I turn AA2x or 4x in those games it just becomes unplayable, all the way.
How does those new Fermi works with Anti Aliasing on?? I read that if you play a game with AA off and your FPS count is 40 for example, if you turn AA to 8x, you will lose less than 10fps the most, is that true?? With GTX 280 SLi or not, AA kills the frame rate in some games, not all, but the graphics demanding ones.
I was a little bit curious about that. I'm just waiting to get 2 GTX 480 and replace my 280,s. I guess I'll gain at least 70% better performance.
Anyway, do you guys actually notice a difference from AA turned on 8x or 4x compared to AA off in 3D?? I don't see it, in 2D it was obvious the difference, but in 3D, I've never notice aliasing at all.
Even when I was playing Crysis in 2D last year, I never notice any difference from AA4x to AA8x or AAQ16x, it was all the same to me, despite the huge drop of performance. I could tell a huge difference in 2D from AA turned off to AA2x or 4X, but beyond that I could not tell any difference.
I mean, let's pick two of the most GPU horsepower demanding games for 3D Vison, Metro 2033 and Just Cause 2. I have SLI GTX 280 and I play those games with an average of 30fps, 1680 x 1050 and all settings maximized, but AA is Off, AF I let 16x cause it doesn't affect the frame rate. I always turn Vsync on, always, cause I hate tearing...
If I turn AA2x or 4x in those games it just becomes unplayable, all the way.
How does those new Fermi works with Anti Aliasing on?? I read that if you play a game with AA off and your FPS count is 40 for example, if you turn AA to 8x, you will lose less than 10fps the most, is that true?? With GTX 280 SLi or not, AA kills the frame rate in some games, not all, but the graphics demanding ones.
I was a little bit curious about that. I'm just waiting to get 2 GTX 480 and replace my 280,s. I guess I'll gain at least 70% better performance.
Anyway, do you guys actually notice a difference from AA turned on 8x or 4x compared to AA off in 3D?? I don't see it, in 2D it was obvious the difference, but in 3D, I've never notice aliasing at all.
Even when I was playing Crysis in 2D last year, I never notice any difference from AA4x to AA8x or AAQ16x, it was all the same to me, despite the huge drop of performance. I could tell a huge difference in 2D from AA turned off to AA2x or 4X, but beyond that I could not tell any difference.
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bits - Core i7 2600K @ 4.5ghz - Asus Maximus IV Extreme Z68 - Geforce EVGA GTX 690 - 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 (2T) - Thermaltake Armor+ - SSD Intel 510 Series Sata3 256GB - HD WD Caviar Black Sata3 64mb 2TB - HD WD Caviar Black 1TB Sata3 64mb - Bose Sound System - LG H20L GGW Blu Ray/DVD/CD RW - LG GH20 DVD RAM - PSU Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W - Samsung S27A950D 3D Vision Ready + 3D HDTV SAMSUNG PL63C7000 3DTVPLAY + ROLLERMOD CHECKERBOARD
I would say one of the most impressive things about teh GTX 480 is it's ability to handle all of the bells and whistles with only a slight drop in FPS. There are threads on this out there. If I run across any I will post here for you.
I would say one of the most impressive things about teh GTX 480 is it's ability to handle all of the bells and whistles with only a slight drop in FPS. There are threads on this out there. If I run across any I will post here for you.
4770k @ 4.2 Water cooled
32 Gigs DDR 3 2400
GTX Titan X SLI
Obsidian 800D
EVGA 1300 watt
1 Terabyte SSD raid 0
ASUS 27 inch 3D monitor 3D vision 2.
I would say one of the most impressive things about teh GTX 480 is it's ability to handle all of the bells and whistles with only a slight drop in FPS. There are threads on this out there. If I run across any I will post here for you.
I would say one of the most impressive things about teh GTX 480 is it's ability to handle all of the bells and whistles with only a slight drop in FPS. There are threads on this out there. If I run across any I will post here for you.
4770k @ 4.2 Water cooled
32 Gigs DDR 3 2400
GTX Titan X SLI
Obsidian 800D
EVGA 1300 watt
1 Terabyte SSD raid 0
ASUS 27 inch 3D monitor 3D vision 2.