Keep an eye on avsforums. Quite a few people (including me) are waiting for confirmation that it supports 120Hz input, then the floodgates should open!
There are also the new Acer models, again, all using the new .47 DMD which has lower native res and shifts 4 times to get to 4k. The 0.66 version shifts twice.
It seems all the 0.47 versions have low contrast and light spill issues though, which probably won't improve until the 2nd gen models.
Keep an eye on avsforums. Quite a few people (including me) are waiting for confirmation that it supports 120Hz input, then the floodgates should open!
There are also the new Acer models, again, all using the new .47 DMD which has lower native res and shifts 4 times to get to 4k. The 0.66 version shifts twice.
It seems all the 0.47 versions have low contrast and light spill issues though, which probably won't improve until the 2nd gen models.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
Interesting post at that link.
[quote="Mark from Blur Busters"]Yes, I created a brand new TestUFO based on having seen that ShaderToy and collaborating. It amplifies refresh rate by frame-packing extra frames in the temporal wobulation -- achieving up to 240Hz on some 60Hz projectors (4X pixel shifting cycles) and 120Hz on some 60Hz projectors (2X pixel shifting cycles) even some nearly-10-year-old DLP HDTVs, provided 1:1 pixel mapping is achievable via PC input.
[/quote]
So basically, he's interlacing a frame into fourths, instead of of halves.
Edit: I think he meant to say 120 instead of 60
"achieving up to 240Hz on some 60Hz projectors"
So half on everything, no fourths :P
Mark from Blur Busters said:Yes, I created a brand new TestUFO based on having seen that ShaderToy and collaborating. It amplifies refresh rate by frame-packing extra frames in the temporal wobulation -- achieving up to 240Hz on some 60Hz projectors (4X pixel shifting cycles) and 120Hz on some 60Hz projectors (2X pixel shifting cycles) even some nearly-10-year-old DLP HDTVs, provided 1:1 pixel mapping is achievable via PC input.
So basically, he's interlacing a frame into fourths, instead of of halves.
Edit: I think he meant to say 120 instead of 60
"achieving up to 240Hz on some 60Hz projectors"
So half on everything, no fourths :P
Nice so this projector indeed supports 1920x1080 @ 120hz in 2D mode at least. I'm really excited if 3D Vision will also work with this resolution (maybe with EDID override?).
However on BenQ Website ([url]https://www.benq.com/en/projector/cinehome-home-cinema/w1700/specifications.html[/url]) there is still the info that frame sequential is limited to 1280x720@120hz. I hope this is not an artificial firmware limitation. Would not make any sense to limit this to 720p...
Nice so this projector indeed supports 1920x1080 @ 120hz in 2D mode at least. I'm really excited if 3D Vision will also work with this resolution (maybe with EDID override?).
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 | Core I7-7700K | 16GB RAM | Win10 Pro x64
Asus ROG Swift PG278Q 3D Vision Monitor
Optoma UHD 40 3D Vision Projector
Paypal donations for 3D Fix Manager: duselpaul86@gmx.de
This looks extremely promising, i hope someone can confirm this working with 3d vision.
All hail 3d modders DHR, MasterOtaku, Losti, Necropants, Helifax, bo3b, mike_ar69, Flugan, DarkStarSword, 4everAwake, 3d4dd and so many more helping to keep the 3d dream alive, find their 3d fixes at http://helixmod.blogspot.com/ Also check my site for spanish VR and mobile gaming news: www.gamermovil.com
Check out the threads here:
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/68-digital-projectors-under-3-000-usd-msrp/
You'll see separate threads for the various projectors. Unfortunately there is quite a bit of negative feedback about these new 4k 3d dlps, but obviously it also depends what you're upgrading from.
I'm pretty confident we'll be able to engage 1920x1080x120Hz so will be able to use an EDID override and CRT mode, but as far as I'm aware this hasn't been confirmed by anyone yet.
You'll see separate threads for the various projectors. Unfortunately there is quite a bit of negative feedback about these new 4k 3d dlps, but obviously it also depends what you're upgrading from.
I'm pretty confident we'll be able to engage 1920x1080x120Hz so will be able to use an EDID override and CRT mode, but as far as I'm aware this hasn't been confirmed by anyone yet.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
The W1700 is using the 0.47 DMD with a 1920x1080 mirror array, so it must be doing a pixel shift thing like JVC to achieve 4K. So 4K will not look as good as the 2K dmd chip.
lol@their maketing "Producing 4K UHD 3840x2160 resolution with 8.3 million distinct pixels for each frame"
They forgot to include "via sub frames"
I'm hoping the 0.66 will allow 2560x1400@120Hz native gaming or Checkerboard at 4K using wobulation, like on their old DLP 3D HDTVs.
The W1700 is using the 0.47 DMD with a 1920x1080 mirror array, so it must be doing a pixel shift thing like JVC to achieve 4K. So 4K will not look as good as the 2K dmd chip.
lol@their maketing "Producing 4K UHD 3840x2160 resolution with 8.3 million distinct pixels for each frame"
They forgot to include "via sub frames"
I'm hoping the 0.66 will allow 2560x1400@120Hz native gaming or Checkerboard at 4K using wobulation, like on their old DLP 3D HDTVs.
You're absolutely right D-man. The .47 shifts 4 times and the larger chip only shifts twice as it has a higher native resolution.
More shifts = more pixel overlap, so the smaller cheaper DLPs will not be as sharp as the larger dlps when producing a 4k image. There are comparisons around in various places but I expect a lot more in the next days/weeks to come as more reviews start appearing.
Kraine (http://www.projection-homecinema.fr) has pointed out flaws with the new .47 DMDs to do with extra pixels not being masked, which contributes to a visible light border and reduction in contrast. BenQ are aware at least, but a 'fix' will require a dynamic iris and other modifications, hence me saying before about a 2nd gen product at some point. Who knows though, probably not this year.
Take your point about the marketing, the whole 'faux-k v 4k' debate is something that pollutes all the projector threads. The difference with XPR on the DLPs compared to the LCD epsons (4k enhanced) however is that all the pixels are individually addressable on the TI DLP devices.
There are other issues with the bandwidth of the DMD controllers and I've not seen it confirmed anywhere that the higher end .66 projectors support 120Hz input.
HDMI 2.0 has opened the door as it has the bandwidth we require, but we need the right input resolutions to be addressable and ideally some control over the XPR modes as well.
If you read around a lot there are names like Battleaxevr, 3dbob and RLBurnside on AVforums (and here on occasion) who seem to be trying to achieve the same goal as us, but I'm not sure if they're active 3d vision users or not.
Away from the passive dual projector route, there have probably been other projectors in the past where active fullhd was a possibility but they were all well out of our meagre price range :-)
Anyway exciting times (I hope)! It does feel like we're almost there at last....
You're absolutely right D-man. The .47 shifts 4 times and the larger chip only shifts twice as it has a higher native resolution.
More shifts = more pixel overlap, so the smaller cheaper DLPs will not be as sharp as the larger dlps when producing a 4k image. There are comparisons around in various places but I expect a lot more in the next days/weeks to come as more reviews start appearing.
Kraine (http://www.projection-homecinema.fr) has pointed out flaws with the new .47 DMDs to do with extra pixels not being masked, which contributes to a visible light border and reduction in contrast. BenQ are aware at least, but a 'fix' will require a dynamic iris and other modifications, hence me saying before about a 2nd gen product at some point. Who knows though, probably not this year.
Take your point about the marketing, the whole 'faux-k v 4k' debate is something that pollutes all the projector threads. The difference with XPR on the DLPs compared to the LCD epsons (4k enhanced) however is that all the pixels are individually addressable on the TI DLP devices.
There are other issues with the bandwidth of the DMD controllers and I've not seen it confirmed anywhere that the higher end .66 projectors support 120Hz input.
HDMI 2.0 has opened the door as it has the bandwidth we require, but we need the right input resolutions to be addressable and ideally some control over the XPR modes as well.
If you read around a lot there are names like Battleaxevr, 3dbob and RLBurnside on AVforums (and here on occasion) who seem to be trying to achieve the same goal as us, but I'm not sure if they're active 3d vision users or not.
Away from the passive dual projector route, there have probably been other projectors in the past where active fullhd was a possibility but they were all well out of our meagre price range :-)
Anyway exciting times (I hope)! It does feel like we're almost there at last....
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
[quote="rustyk21"]
I'm pretty confident we'll be able to engage 1920x1080x120Hz so will be able to use an EDID override and CRT mode, but as far as I'm aware this hasn't been confirmed by anyone yet.[/quote]
Does anybody volunteer here for testing this projector concerning 3D vision compatibility as soon as it is available? :P
rustyk21 said:
I'm pretty confident we'll be able to engage 1920x1080x120Hz so will be able to use an EDID override and CRT mode, but as far as I'm aware this hasn't been confirmed by anyone yet.
Does anybody volunteer here for testing this projector concerning 3D vision compatibility as soon as it is available? :P
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 | Core I7-7700K | 16GB RAM | Win10 Pro x64
Asus ROG Swift PG278Q 3D Vision Monitor
Optoma UHD 40 3D Vision Projector
Paypal donations for 3D Fix Manager: duselpaul86@gmx.de
I will if I get one of course. I'm posting on Avsforums as we speak as there are a few of us waiting for someone else to do the testing first! :-)
Brightness might still be an issue but full hd 3d on a projector is the holy grail as the temporal resolution and Z-axis benefits blow 4k out of the water.
In theory it's possible with the new 7 series OLEDs too, as they support a 120hz input out of the box. I expect the brightness to take a hit though versus the native passive 3d support on the 6 series.
I will if I get one of course. I'm posting on Avsforums as we speak as there are a few of us waiting for someone else to do the testing first! :-)
Brightness might still be an issue but full hd 3d on a projector is the holy grail as the temporal resolution and Z-axis benefits blow 4k out of the water.
In theory it's possible with the new 7 series OLEDs too, as they support a 120hz input out of the box. I expect the brightness to take a hit though versus the native passive 3d support on the 6 series.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
I would be very interested to here about that pj in 3d vision too. Brightness issue will probably be dependant on your screen size and screen material - there are screens with 30% or more gain. And as I recently moved from projector to 55" oled, and while image quality is awesome, but I'm fining ghosting distracting, and immersion is really worse than it was on 135" projector screen.
I would be very interested to here about that pj in 3d vision too. Brightness issue will probably be dependant on your screen size and screen material - there are screens with 30% or more gain. And as I recently moved from projector to 55" oled, and while image quality is awesome, but I'm fining ghosting distracting, and immersion is really worse than it was on 135" projector screen.
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/68-digital-projectors-under-3-000-usd-msrp/2929784-benq-w1700-4k-hdr-3d-dlp-projector-25.html#post55598300
Finally it's confirmed that this projector supports 120Hz input at 1920x1080.
I don't think it will be the only one of the new 0.47dmd projectors that does. The yet to be released Optoma UHD50 is supposed to support 'PC 3d' which I take to mean frame sequential and the others probably will dependent on firmware.
My main concern with this new wave of projectors is the light spill issue and low ansi contrast.
My plan is to wait for more reviews but if I take the plunge of course I'll be trying to get this to work with 3d vision.
Finally it's confirmed that this projector supports 120Hz input at 1920x1080.
I don't think it will be the only one of the new 0.47dmd projectors that does. The yet to be released Optoma UHD50 is supposed to support 'PC 3d' which I take to mean frame sequential and the others probably will dependent on firmware.
My main concern with this new wave of projectors is the light spill issue and low ansi contrast.
My plan is to wait for more reviews but if I take the plunge of course I'll be trying to get this to work with 3d vision.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
These are very good news! Thx rustyk21.
So even when Benq HT2550/W1700 has a firmware limitation not allowing to enable 3D mode in the projector menu when input signal is 1920x1080@120hz we have very good chances that at least Optoma UHD50 does not have this limitation. I say this because I once tried a full hd Optoma projector and it didn't even require to enable 3D in the projector menu to make this work with 3D vision. Stereo images were swapped then but you could correct this with 3dmigoto.
Optoma also announced another 0.47" DMD projector: Optoma UHD51. It's basically the same as UHD50 but supports Amazon Alexa.
So even when Benq HT2550/W1700 has a firmware limitation not allowing to enable 3D mode in the projector menu when input signal is 1920x1080@120hz we have very good chances that at least Optoma UHD50 does not have this limitation. I say this because I once tried a full hd Optoma projector and it didn't even require to enable 3D in the projector menu to make this work with 3D vision. Stereo images were swapped then but you could correct this with 3dmigoto.
Optoma also announced another 0.47" DMD projector: Optoma UHD51. It's basically the same as UHD50 but supports Amazon Alexa.
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 | Core I7-7700K | 16GB RAM | Win10 Pro x64
Asus ROG Swift PG278Q 3D Vision Monitor
Optoma UHD 40 3D Vision Projector
Paypal donations for 3D Fix Manager: duselpaul86@gmx.de
As hinted previously by rustyk21 and D-Man11, there is also the UHD60 and UHD65 with RGBRGB x6 speed color wheel, both of which have the 0.66" DMD, a native resolution of 2716 x 1528, and double scan to 4k instead of quadruple scanning.
Although they too work internally at 120Hz, and certainly HDMI 2.0 supplies enough bandwidth, their respective datasheets do not show that they might support 120Hz input.
For me personally, 2716 x 1528 would be a worthy upgrade from my current 1280x800, as it doubles both horizontal and vertical resolutions - I already play at 2560 x 1600 resolution with DSR. I would indeed be very interested in finding out if UHD60/65 can manage 120Hz input, as at "only" 25% to 50% price increase over a UHD50, it would be worth it for me personally (in my humble opinion).
I think rustyk21 is wise to wait for more reviews and details of more projectors before taking the plunge and potentially ending up needing a plunger ;-)
As hinted previously by rustyk21 and D-Man11, there is also the UHD60 and UHD65 with RGBRGB x6 speed color wheel, both of which have the 0.66" DMD, a native resolution of 2716 x 1528, and double scan to 4k instead of quadruple scanning.
Although they too work internally at 120Hz, and certainly HDMI 2.0 supplies enough bandwidth, their respective datasheets do not show that they might support 120Hz input.
For me personally, 2716 x 1528 would be a worthy upgrade from my current 1280x800, as it doubles both horizontal and vertical resolutions - I already play at 2560 x 1600 resolution with DSR. I would indeed be very interested in finding out if UHD60/65 can manage 120Hz input, as at "only" 25% to 50% price increase over a UHD50, it would be worth it for me personally (in my humble opinion).
I think rustyk21 is wise to wait for more reviews and details of more projectors before taking the plunge and potentially ending up needing a plunger ;-)
Windows 10 64-bit, Intel 7700K @ 5.1GHz, 16GB 3600MHz CL15 DDR4 RAM, 2x GTX 1080 SLI, Asus Maximus IX Hero, Sound Blaster ZxR, PCIe Quad SSD, Oculus Rift CV1, DLP Link PGD-150 glasses, ViewSonic PJD6531w 3D DLP Projector @ 1280x800 120Hz native / 2560x1600 120Hz DSR 3D Gaming.
Windows 7 64 bit, i5 6600k 4.6 Ghz , ASUS Z170-P D3, 16GB DDR3 2400Mhz CL 10 , 980 Ti , BenQ XL2411Z 3D Monitor, BenQ W1080ST+ DLP 3D Projector , 135 Elite Screens M135UWH2 1.1 gain, Darbee 5000s
There are also the new Acer models, again, all using the new .47 DMD which has lower native res and shifts 4 times to get to 4k. The 0.66 version shifts twice.
It seems all the 0.47 versions have low contrast and light spill issues though, which probably won't improve until the 2nd gen models.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
So basically, he's interlacing a frame into fourths, instead of of halves.
Edit: I think he meant to say 120 instead of 60
"achieving up to 240Hz on some 60Hz projectors"
So half on everything, no fourths :P
However on BenQ Website (https://www.benq.com/en/projector/cinehome-home-cinema/w1700/specifications.html) there is still the info that frame sequential is limited to 1280x720@120hz. I hope this is not an artificial firmware limitation. Would not make any sense to limit this to 720p...
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 | Core I7-7700K | 16GB RAM | Win10 Pro x64
Asus ROG Swift PG278Q 3D Vision Monitor
Optoma UHD 40 3D Vision Projector
Paypal donations for 3D Fix Manager: duselpaul86@gmx.de
All hail 3d modders DHR, MasterOtaku, Losti, Necropants, Helifax, bo3b, mike_ar69, Flugan, DarkStarSword, 4everAwake, 3d4dd and so many more helping to keep the 3d dream alive, find their 3d fixes at http://helixmod.blogspot.com/ Also check my site for spanish VR and mobile gaming news: www.gamermovil.com
Windows 10 64-bit, Intel 7700K @ 5.1GHz, 16GB 3600MHz CL15 DDR4 RAM, 2x GTX 1080 SLI, Asus Maximus IX Hero, Sound Blaster ZxR, PCIe Quad SSD, Oculus Rift CV1, DLP Link PGD-150 glasses, ViewSonic PJD6531w 3D DLP Projector @ 1280x800 120Hz native / 2560x1600 120Hz DSR 3D Gaming.
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/68-digital-projectors-under-3-000-usd-msrp/
You'll see separate threads for the various projectors. Unfortunately there is quite a bit of negative feedback about these new 4k 3d dlps, but obviously it also depends what you're upgrading from.
I'm pretty confident we'll be able to engage 1920x1080x120Hz so will be able to use an EDID override and CRT mode, but as far as I'm aware this hasn't been confirmed by anyone yet.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
lol@their maketing "Producing 4K UHD 3840x2160 resolution with 8.3 million distinct pixels for each frame"
They forgot to include "via sub frames"
I'm hoping the 0.66 will allow 2560x1400@120Hz native gaming or Checkerboard at 4K using wobulation, like on their old DLP 3D HDTVs.
More shifts = more pixel overlap, so the smaller cheaper DLPs will not be as sharp as the larger dlps when producing a 4k image. There are comparisons around in various places but I expect a lot more in the next days/weeks to come as more reviews start appearing.
Kraine (http://www.projection-homecinema.fr) has pointed out flaws with the new .47 DMDs to do with extra pixels not being masked, which contributes to a visible light border and reduction in contrast. BenQ are aware at least, but a 'fix' will require a dynamic iris and other modifications, hence me saying before about a 2nd gen product at some point. Who knows though, probably not this year.
Take your point about the marketing, the whole 'faux-k v 4k' debate is something that pollutes all the projector threads. The difference with XPR on the DLPs compared to the LCD epsons (4k enhanced) however is that all the pixels are individually addressable on the TI DLP devices.
There are other issues with the bandwidth of the DMD controllers and I've not seen it confirmed anywhere that the higher end .66 projectors support 120Hz input.
HDMI 2.0 has opened the door as it has the bandwidth we require, but we need the right input resolutions to be addressable and ideally some control over the XPR modes as well.
If you read around a lot there are names like Battleaxevr, 3dbob and RLBurnside on AVforums (and here on occasion) who seem to be trying to achieve the same goal as us, but I'm not sure if they're active 3d vision users or not.
Away from the passive dual projector route, there have probably been other projectors in the past where active fullhd was a possibility but they were all well out of our meagre price range :-)
Anyway exciting times (I hope)! It does feel like we're almost there at last....
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
Does anybody volunteer here for testing this projector concerning 3D vision compatibility as soon as it is available? :P
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 | Core I7-7700K | 16GB RAM | Win10 Pro x64
Asus ROG Swift PG278Q 3D Vision Monitor
Optoma UHD 40 3D Vision Projector
Paypal donations for 3D Fix Manager: duselpaul86@gmx.de
Brightness might still be an issue but full hd 3d on a projector is the holy grail as the temporal resolution and Z-axis benefits blow 4k out of the water.
In theory it's possible with the new 7 series OLEDs too, as they support a 120hz input out of the box. I expect the brightness to take a hit though versus the native passive 3d support on the 6 series.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
Finally it's confirmed that this projector supports 120Hz input at 1920x1080.
I don't think it will be the only one of the new 0.47dmd projectors that does. The yet to be released Optoma UHD50 is supposed to support 'PC 3d' which I take to mean frame sequential and the others probably will dependent on firmware.
My main concern with this new wave of projectors is the light spill issue and low ansi contrast.
My plan is to wait for more reviews but if I take the plunge of course I'll be trying to get this to work with 3d vision.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
So even when Benq HT2550/W1700 has a firmware limitation not allowing to enable 3D mode in the projector menu when input signal is 1920x1080@120hz we have very good chances that at least Optoma UHD50 does not have this limitation. I say this because I once tried a full hd Optoma projector and it didn't even require to enable 3D in the projector menu to make this work with 3D vision. Stereo images were swapped then but you could correct this with 3dmigoto.
Optoma also announced another 0.47" DMD projector: Optoma UHD51. It's basically the same as UHD50 but supports Amazon Alexa.
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 | Core I7-7700K | 16GB RAM | Win10 Pro x64
Asus ROG Swift PG278Q 3D Vision Monitor
Optoma UHD 40 3D Vision Projector
Paypal donations for 3D Fix Manager: duselpaul86@gmx.de
Although they too work internally at 120Hz, and certainly HDMI 2.0 supplies enough bandwidth, their respective datasheets do not show that they might support 120Hz input.
For me personally, 2716 x 1528 would be a worthy upgrade from my current 1280x800, as it doubles both horizontal and vertical resolutions - I already play at 2560 x 1600 resolution with DSR. I would indeed be very interested in finding out if UHD60/65 can manage 120Hz input, as at "only" 25% to 50% price increase over a UHD50, it would be worth it for me personally (in my humble opinion).
I think rustyk21 is wise to wait for more reviews and details of more projectors before taking the plunge and potentially ending up needing a plunger ;-)
Windows 10 64-bit, Intel 7700K @ 5.1GHz, 16GB 3600MHz CL15 DDR4 RAM, 2x GTX 1080 SLI, Asus Maximus IX Hero, Sound Blaster ZxR, PCIe Quad SSD, Oculus Rift CV1, DLP Link PGD-150 glasses, ViewSonic PJD6531w 3D DLP Projector @ 1280x800 120Hz native / 2560x1600 120Hz DSR 3D Gaming.