[quote name='Chopper' date='30 November 2011 - 07:55 AM' timestamp='1322668532' post='1335330']
Hi Guys!
Just a heads up that we recently discovered that some GG3D submissions were disappearing without warning. We found the problem, so you can submit with the confidence that your work won't mysteriously vanish. When you log in to GG3D, there is a "My Submissions" button so you can see everything you have shared. If there is anything missing, please resubmit! Sorry for the inconvenience.
The breakdown is currently 148 entries for Nvidia, and 229 for the two alternates (and it's gradually balancing out). If you already have Nvidia submissions from the old M3GA service, try updating them with the new edit functionality and add 3D screenshots and comments to demonstrate how good (and not so good) the games are in 3D. I bet some of the results have improved with driver updates, and it would be good to see that Nvidia's continued work is well reflected.
Regards,
Chopper
[/quote]
This is truly awesome, thanks for the hard work. Especially since nvidia lost any credibility after rating Battlefield 3 "3D Vision Ready".
[quote name='Chopper' date='30 November 2011 - 07:55 AM' timestamp='1322668532' post='1335330']
Hi Guys!
Just a heads up that we recently discovered that some GG3D submissions were disappearing without warning. We found the problem, so you can submit with the confidence that your work won't mysteriously vanish. When you log in to GG3D, there is a "My Submissions" button so you can see everything you have shared. If there is anything missing, please resubmit! Sorry for the inconvenience.
The breakdown is currently 148 entries for Nvidia, and 229 for the two alternates (and it's gradually balancing out). If you already have Nvidia submissions from the old M3GA service, try updating them with the new edit functionality and add 3D screenshots and comments to demonstrate how good (and not so good) the games are in 3D. I bet some of the results have improved with driver updates, and it would be good to see that Nvidia's continued work is well reflected.
Regards,
Chopper
This is truly awesome, thanks for the hard work. Especially since nvidia lost any credibility after rating Battlefield 3 "3D Vision Ready".
[quote]This is truly awesome, thanks for the hard work. Especially since nvidia lost any credibility after rating Battlefield 3 "3D Vision Ready".[/quote]
Thanks for your kind words. I wouldn't be so hard on Nvidia. We ourselves had to change our rating formula with GG3D from the original system because a lot of gamers like depth-only situations, so we made it so depth flexibility is an indicator rather than a scoring penalty. So if BF3 has few to no anomalies, it could rate as high as Gold-D to Platinum-D where D indicates that it's a depth-only situation. I would have personally liked to see convergence controls, but that's an artistic choice (mind you, GG3D has a subjective scoring part at the end too).
It would be helpful if we could get more Nvidia user participation, though. I'm certain there are submissions that have been improved on, we can include 3D screenshots now, and the more up to date the database is, the better. With enough participation, we will be able to further trend and balance the scoring too. I think there is a lot of potential if it's something 3D gamers will participate with. Anyways, thanks for your encouragement, it means a lot.
This is truly awesome, thanks for the hard work. Especially since nvidia lost any credibility after rating Battlefield 3 "3D Vision Ready".
Thanks for your kind words. I wouldn't be so hard on Nvidia. We ourselves had to change our rating formula with GG3D from the original system because a lot of gamers like depth-only situations, so we made it so depth flexibility is an indicator rather than a scoring penalty. So if BF3 has few to no anomalies, it could rate as high as Gold-D to Platinum-D where D indicates that it's a depth-only situation. I would have personally liked to see convergence controls, but that's an artistic choice (mind you, GG3D has a subjective scoring part at the end too).
It would be helpful if we could get more Nvidia user participation, though. I'm certain there are submissions that have been improved on, we can include 3D screenshots now, and the more up to date the database is, the better. With enough participation, we will be able to further trend and balance the scoring too. I think there is a lot of potential if it's something 3D gamers will participate with. Anyways, thanks for your encouragement, it means a lot.
[quote name='Chopper' date='01 December 2011 - 12:32 PM' timestamp='1322771544' post='1335995']
Thanks for your kind words. I wouldn't be so hard on Nvidia. We ourselves had to change our rating formula with GG3D from the original system because a lot of gamers like depth-only situations, so we made it so depth flexibility is an indicator rather than a scoring penalty.
[/quote]
And that's fine, because we'll know there isn't a conflict of interest since you're not also trying to sell us a product. BF3 was announced as 3D-Ready before it came out, and convergence is just one of many problems left. I will continue to be very hard on nvidia since their "3D Vision Ready" rating is based far more on marketing dollars and backroom deals with publishers than the quality of the experience.
[quote name='Chopper' date='01 December 2011 - 12:32 PM' timestamp='1322771544' post='1335995']
Thanks for your kind words. I wouldn't be so hard on Nvidia. We ourselves had to change our rating formula with GG3D from the original system because a lot of gamers like depth-only situations, so we made it so depth flexibility is an indicator rather than a scoring penalty.
And that's fine, because we'll know there isn't a conflict of interest since you're not also trying to sell us a product. BF3 was announced as 3D-Ready before it came out, and convergence is just one of many problems left. I will continue to be very hard on nvidia since their "3D Vision Ready" rating is based far more on marketing dollars and backroom deals with publishers than the quality of the experience.
Hi Guys!
Just a heads up that we recently discovered that some GG3D submissions were disappearing without warning. We found the problem, so you can submit with the confidence that your work won't mysteriously vanish. When you log in to GG3D, there is a "My Submissions" button so you can see everything you have shared. If there is anything missing, please resubmit! Sorry for the inconvenience.
The breakdown is currently 148 entries for Nvidia, and 229 for the two alternates (and it's gradually balancing out). If you already have Nvidia submissions from the old M3GA service, try updating them with the new edit functionality and add 3D screenshots and comments to demonstrate how good (and not so good) the games are in 3D. I bet some of the results have improved with driver updates, and it would be good to see that Nvidia's continued work is well reflected.
Regards,
Chopper
[/quote]
This is truly awesome, thanks for the hard work. Especially since nvidia lost any credibility after rating Battlefield 3 "3D Vision Ready".
Hi Guys!
Just a heads up that we recently discovered that some GG3D submissions were disappearing without warning. We found the problem, so you can submit with the confidence that your work won't mysteriously vanish. When you log in to GG3D, there is a "My Submissions" button so you can see everything you have shared. If there is anything missing, please resubmit! Sorry for the inconvenience.
The breakdown is currently 148 entries for Nvidia, and 229 for the two alternates (and it's gradually balancing out). If you already have Nvidia submissions from the old M3GA service, try updating them with the new edit functionality and add 3D screenshots and comments to demonstrate how good (and not so good) the games are in 3D. I bet some of the results have improved with driver updates, and it would be good to see that Nvidia's continued work is well reflected.
Regards,
Chopper
This is truly awesome, thanks for the hard work. Especially since nvidia lost any credibility after rating Battlefield 3 "3D Vision Ready".
Thanks for your kind words. I wouldn't be so hard on Nvidia. We ourselves had to change our rating formula with GG3D from the original system because a lot of gamers like depth-only situations, so we made it so depth flexibility is an indicator rather than a scoring penalty. So if BF3 has few to no anomalies, it could rate as high as Gold-D to Platinum-D where D indicates that it's a depth-only situation. I would have personally liked to see convergence controls, but that's an artistic choice (mind you, GG3D has a subjective scoring part at the end too).
It would be helpful if we could get more Nvidia user participation, though. I'm certain there are submissions that have been improved on, we can include 3D screenshots now, and the more up to date the database is, the better. With enough participation, we will be able to further trend and balance the scoring too. I think there is a lot of potential if it's something 3D gamers will participate with. Anyways, thanks for your encouragement, it means a lot.
Regards,
Chopper
Thanks for your kind words. I wouldn't be so hard on Nvidia. We ourselves had to change our rating formula with GG3D from the original system because a lot of gamers like depth-only situations, so we made it so depth flexibility is an indicator rather than a scoring penalty. So if BF3 has few to no anomalies, it could rate as high as Gold-D to Platinum-D where D indicates that it's a depth-only situation. I would have personally liked to see convergence controls, but that's an artistic choice (mind you, GG3D has a subjective scoring part at the end too).
It would be helpful if we could get more Nvidia user participation, though. I'm certain there are submissions that have been improved on, we can include 3D screenshots now, and the more up to date the database is, the better. With enough participation, we will be able to further trend and balance the scoring too. I think there is a lot of potential if it's something 3D gamers will participate with. Anyways, thanks for your encouragement, it means a lot.
Regards,
Chopper
Thanks for your kind words. I wouldn't be so hard on Nvidia. We ourselves had to change our rating formula with GG3D from the original system because a lot of gamers like depth-only situations, so we made it so depth flexibility is an indicator rather than a scoring penalty.
[/quote]
And that's fine, because we'll know there isn't a conflict of interest since you're not also trying to sell us a product. BF3 was announced as 3D-Ready before it came out, and convergence is just one of many problems left. I will continue to be very hard on nvidia since their "3D Vision Ready" rating is based far more on marketing dollars and backroom deals with publishers than the quality of the experience.
Thanks for your kind words. I wouldn't be so hard on Nvidia. We ourselves had to change our rating formula with GG3D from the original system because a lot of gamers like depth-only situations, so we made it so depth flexibility is an indicator rather than a scoring penalty.
And that's fine, because we'll know there isn't a conflict of interest since you're not also trying to sell us a product. BF3 was announced as 3D-Ready before it came out, and convergence is just one of many problems left. I will continue to be very hard on nvidia since their "3D Vision Ready" rating is based far more on marketing dollars and backroom deals with publishers than the quality of the experience.