Glasses Free Stereoscopic 3D Monitor Kickstarter
  5 / 7    
One further thought, is really about whether or not two viewers sat side by side changes that optimal viewing distance in any way, in your own opinion.
One further thought, is really about whether or not two viewers sat side by side changes that optimal viewing distance in any way, in your own opinion.

Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.4Ghz, 3x GTX Titan, 16GB Tactical Tracer LED, CPU/GPU Dual-Loop Water-Cooled - Driver 331.82, DX11.0

#61
Posted 12/02/2014 07:26 PM   
@ToThePoint, We had fun showing that to the people at Boeing. If you go to flightradar24.com (they provided the data for us to visualize) you will see the hornets nest of planes I was referring to. It looks a lot less dangerous on our 3D monitor.
@ToThePoint,
We had fun showing that to the people at Boeing. If you go to flightradar24.com (they provided the data for us to visualize) you will see the hornets nest of planes I was referring to. It looks a lot less dangerous on our 3D monitor.

#62
Posted 12/02/2014 09:18 PM   
I would not think that it would. But I always like to check with tech before making any firm statements.
I would not think that it would. But I always like to check with tech before making any firm statements.

#63
Posted 12/02/2014 09:23 PM   
Woah, this is super exciting! Looking forward to see this develop as time goes on.
Woah, this is super exciting! Looking forward to see this develop as time goes on.

#64
Posted 12/02/2014 10:05 PM   
@Glasses-FreeTC, I can see exactly what you're referring to. That's definitely a hornet's nest alright. edit
@Glasses-FreeTC,

I can see exactly what you're referring to. That's definitely a hornet's nest alright.

edit

Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.4Ghz, 3x GTX Titan, 16GB Tactical Tracer LED, CPU/GPU Dual-Loop Water-Cooled - Driver 331.82, DX11.0

#65
Posted 12/02/2014 11:23 PM   
@ToThePoint We show it 2D then 3D on the same display...amazing the difference once all of the planes are sorted by altitude...the separation is based on actual flight data, not special effects.
@ToThePoint
We show it 2D then 3D on the same display...amazing the difference once all of the planes are sorted by altitude...the separation is based on actual flight data, not special effects.

#66
Posted 12/04/2014 01:15 AM   
@Glasses-FreeTC It's quite clear that technology like this will have the potential to save who knows how many lives in the future, as well as elongate the careers of those who do an incredibly stressful and demanding job. That's pretty special, and something I'm sure that all those that work for DTI must feel very proud of.
@Glasses-FreeTC

It's quite clear that technology like this will have the potential to save who knows how many lives in the future, as well as elongate the careers of those who do an incredibly stressful and demanding job. That's pretty special, and something I'm sure that all those that work for DTI must feel very proud of.

Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.4Ghz, 3x GTX Titan, 16GB Tactical Tracer LED, CPU/GPU Dual-Loop Water-Cooled - Driver 331.82, DX11.0

#67
Posted 12/04/2014 06:31 AM   
I didn't read all thread so excuse me if there was an answer my quastion. Glasses-free 3D technology isn't big news. First glasses-free 3D TV appeared many years ago on market. Is this kickstarter technology some better?
I didn't read all thread so excuse me if there was an answer my quastion.
Glasses-free 3D technology isn't big news. First glasses-free 3D TV appeared many years ago on market.
Is this kickstarter technology some better?

#68
Posted 12/04/2014 08:23 PM   
@ksyon Yes. Unlike almost all other glasses-free 3D, there is nothing on the front of the screen -- no lenticular or parallax barrier. We are able to deliver 1920x1080p to each eye with depth of field equal to glasses. http://kck.st/1FglQRL Tom's Hardware had a look at Immersed in Toronto. http://www.tomshardware.com/news/immersed-vr-ar-conference,28136.html Our demo was called "very convincing".
@ksyon
Yes. Unlike almost all other glasses-free 3D, there is nothing on the front of the screen -- no lenticular or parallax barrier. We are able to deliver 1920x1080p to each eye with depth of field equal to glasses. http://kck.st/1FglQRL Tom's Hardware had a look at Immersed in Toronto. http://www.tomshardware.com/news/immersed-vr-ar-conference,28136.html Our demo was called "very convincing".

#69
Posted 12/04/2014 09:57 PM   
Hm it's interesting
Hm it's interesting

#70
Posted 12/05/2014 08:29 AM   
Well, I just backed it :)
Well, I just backed it :)

2x Geforce GTX 980 in SLI provided by NVIDIA, i7 6700K 4GHz CPU, Asus 27" VG278HE 144Hz 3D Monitor, BenQ W1070 3D Projector, 120" Elite Screens YardMaster 2, 32GB Corsair DDR4 3200MHz RAM, Samsung 850 EVO 500G SSD, 4x750GB HDD in RAID5, Gigabyte Z170X-Gaming 7 Motherboard, Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition Case, Corsair RM850i PSU, HTC Vive, Win 10 64bit

Alienware M17x R4 w/ built in 3D, Intel i7 3740QM, GTX 680m 2GB, 16GB DDR3 1600MHz RAM, Win7 64bit, 1TB SSD, 1TB HDD, 750GB HDD

Pre-release 3D fixes, shadertool.py and other goodies: http://github.com/DarkStarSword/3d-fixes
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/DarkStarSword or PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/DarkStarSword

#71
Posted 12/08/2014 02:36 PM   
I'd be happy to buy one right off the bat, but pretty much solely for gaming purposes. I absolutely also loathe glossy displays which I thought was the more common opinion, until I stumbled on the post here that absolutely demanded it. With gaming in mind, how's the input lag on it and other relevant factors related to gaming? I'd absolutely love a good glasses-free display, but not at a cost of needing another display whenever I feel like playing competitive games. Right now the current 3D displays offer the very best of both worlds, thanks to Lightboost.
I'd be happy to buy one right off the bat, but pretty much solely for gaming purposes. I absolutely also loathe glossy displays which I thought was the more common opinion, until I stumbled on the post here that absolutely demanded it.


With gaming in mind, how's the input lag on it and other relevant factors related to gaming? I'd absolutely love a good glasses-free display, but not at a cost of needing another display whenever I feel like playing competitive games. Right now the current 3D displays offer the very best of both worlds, thanks to Lightboost.

#72
Posted 12/08/2014 03:51 PM   
@zynerd Our Mission Critical 3D monitor will be 120Hz and less than 5ms gray to gray. It will be 1920 x 1080p in both 3D and 2D; with depth of field equal to glasses-based 3D.
@zynerd
Our Mission Critical 3D monitor will be 120Hz and less than 5ms gray to gray.
It will be 1920 x 1080p in both 3D and 2D; with depth of field equal to glasses-based 3D.

#73
Posted 12/09/2014 09:55 PM   
I love this idea.
I love this idea.

|CPU: i7-2700k @ 4.5Ghz
|Cooler: Zalman 9900 Max
|MB: MSI Military Class II Z68 GD-80
|RAM: Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3
|SSDs: Seagate 600 240GB; Crucial M4 128GB
|HDDs: Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Seagate Barracuda 500GB
|PS: OCZ ZX Series 1250watt
|Case: Antec 1200 V3
|Monitors: Asus 3D VG278HE; Asus 3D VG236H; Samsung 3D 51" Plasma;
|GPU:MSI 1080GTX "Duke"
|OS: Windows 10 Pro X64

#74
Posted 12/10/2014 11:33 PM   
[quote="Glasses-FreeTC"]@zynerd Our Mission Critical 3D monitor will be 120Hz and less than 5ms gray to gray. It will be 1920 x 1080p in both 3D and 2D; with depth of field equal to glasses-based 3D. [/quote] Will it also include a LightBoost-like feature? There are displays popping up now that use something similar, but aren't calling it LightBoost. So it's probably not a patented tech in any way, just can't advertise it by that name. In case you're wondering why this feature is pretty great: http://www.blurbusters.com/zero-motion-blur/lightboost/
Glasses-FreeTC said:@zynerd
Our Mission Critical 3D monitor will be 120Hz and less than 5ms gray to gray.
It will be 1920 x 1080p in both 3D and 2D; with depth of field equal to glasses-based 3D.

Will it also include a LightBoost-like feature? There are displays popping up now that use something similar, but aren't calling it LightBoost. So it's probably not a patented tech in any way, just can't advertise it by that name.

In case you're wondering why this feature is pretty great: http://www.blurbusters.com/zero-motion-blur/lightboost/

#75
Posted 12/11/2014 12:50 PM   
  5 / 7    
Scroll To Top