Any word on Splinter Cell's compat. w/3d vision?
  3 / 5    
I really don't want to attempt to play a game in s3d if I have to turn depth down below 50%, or if I have to disable shadows. I'm just picky like that, and there are lots of other things I can spend my money on.
I really don't want to attempt to play a game in s3d if I have to turn depth down below 50%, or if I have to disable shadows. I'm just picky like that, and there are lots of other things I can spend my money on.

Asus Maximus Hero VII
i7 4790k @ 4.8ghz
SLI MSI Gaming 980 @ 1.5ghz
16gb Gskill @ 2400mhz
2x Samsung 840 500gb
Corsair HX1000i
Custom water loop
un78hu9000 with 3dplay on checkerboard 1080p

#31
Posted 04/30/2010 01:19 AM   
[quote name='redcubelilj' post='1047729' date='Apr 30 2010, 03:19 AM']I really don't want to attempt to play a game in s3d if I have to turn depth down below 50%, or if I have to disable shadows. I'm just picky like that, and there are lots of other things I can spend my money on.[/quote]

Did you even look at the screenshots I posted ?
especially the last one ,gives a good idea on how it looks with a good converence...
Doesn't this look playable to you ? (looks great imo)
A high converence feels almost the same as a good depth.... (because it it's in a way... but then backwards...)
[quote name='redcubelilj' post='1047729' date='Apr 30 2010, 03:19 AM']I really don't want to attempt to play a game in s3d if I have to turn depth down below 50%, or if I have to disable shadows. I'm just picky like that, and there are lots of other things I can spend my money on.



Did you even look at the screenshots I posted ?

especially the last one ,gives a good idea on how it looks with a good converence...

Doesn't this look playable to you ? (looks great imo)

A high converence feels almost the same as a good depth.... (because it it's in a way... but then backwards...)

Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.

#32
Posted 04/30/2010 12:41 PM   
I agree with Ferry...

When doing above mentioned fixes this game looks very good and the depth is equal to "standard" depth even though its using convergence.
Even the crosshair is properly lined up.

Only thing missing is the shadows wich according to my opinion are pretty bad even if you play in 2d.
I agree with Ferry...



When doing above mentioned fixes this game looks very good and the depth is equal to "standard" depth even though its using convergence.

Even the crosshair is properly lined up.



Only thing missing is the shadows wich according to my opinion are pretty bad even if you play in 2d.

#33
Posted 04/30/2010 05:36 PM   
I was going to pick this game up too, until I read the above about how to get it working properly in S3D.

Seems like too much of a hassle, just one more thing to tweak and spend time figuring out how to get to
work correctly... not that it's hard, just doesn't appeal to me.

Definitely a fan of the Splinter Cell series.. but I think this one can wait :)
I was going to pick this game up too, until I read the above about how to get it working properly in S3D.



Seems like too much of a hassle, just one more thing to tweak and spend time figuring out how to get to

work correctly... not that it's hard, just doesn't appeal to me.



Definitely a fan of the Splinter Cell series.. but I think this one can wait :)

#34
Posted 04/30/2010 06:03 PM   
[quote name='Ferry' post='1047949' date='Apr 30 2010, 05:41 AM']Did you even look at the screenshots I posted ?
especially the last one ,gives a good idea on how it looks with a good converence...
Doesn't this look playable to you ? (looks great imo)
A high converence feels almost the same as a good depth.... (because it it's in a way... but then backwards...)[/quote]

No, I dont have 3d here at work and trying the crosseyed method almost made my eyes bleed. Maybe I'm being dense, but I fail to see how really high convergance can feel like high depth, without actual depth. Convergance is the position that the 3d, or almost 2d image with low depth set, is displayed relative to the viewer, where as depth is the difference between the object closest and furthest away from the viewer.

I might be totaly wrong here, but this is just my opinion on the matter. I'd just rather spend my money on a game that plays great in 3sd than try workaround after workaround to play a game that becomes essentialy less than you payed for. I didnt even finish Bioshock 2, and Bioshock1 was in my all time top 3 fave games.
[quote name='Ferry' post='1047949' date='Apr 30 2010, 05:41 AM']Did you even look at the screenshots I posted ?

especially the last one ,gives a good idea on how it looks with a good converence...

Doesn't this look playable to you ? (looks great imo)

A high converence feels almost the same as a good depth.... (because it it's in a way... but then backwards...)



No, I dont have 3d here at work and trying the crosseyed method almost made my eyes bleed. Maybe I'm being dense, but I fail to see how really high convergance can feel like high depth, without actual depth. Convergance is the position that the 3d, or almost 2d image with low depth set, is displayed relative to the viewer, where as depth is the difference between the object closest and furthest away from the viewer.



I might be totaly wrong here, but this is just my opinion on the matter. I'd just rather spend my money on a game that plays great in 3sd than try workaround after workaround to play a game that becomes essentialy less than you payed for. I didnt even finish Bioshock 2, and Bioshock1 was in my all time top 3 fave games.

Asus Maximus Hero VII
i7 4790k @ 4.8ghz
SLI MSI Gaming 980 @ 1.5ghz
16gb Gskill @ 2400mhz
2x Samsung 840 500gb
Corsair HX1000i
Custom water loop
un78hu9000 with 3dplay on checkerboard 1080p

#35
Posted 04/30/2010 06:31 PM   
Went home for lunch and checked out the screens, they look ok. Not a ton of depth to them though. As it stands now I'm gona pass on this game though.
Went home for lunch and checked out the screens, they look ok. Not a ton of depth to them though. As it stands now I'm gona pass on this game though.

Asus Maximus Hero VII
i7 4790k @ 4.8ghz
SLI MSI Gaming 980 @ 1.5ghz
16gb Gskill @ 2400mhz
2x Samsung 840 500gb
Corsair HX1000i
Custom water loop
un78hu9000 with 3dplay on checkerboard 1080p

#36
Posted 04/30/2010 07:28 PM   
To bad...it's really fun game to play...

Here are some more shots...
To bad...it's really fun game to play...



Here are some more shots...

Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.

#37
Posted 04/30/2010 09:29 PM   
Hmmmm. I do have the next 4 days off...We'll see. Maybe I'll buy. I do really want to get Dead Space, although that's a night time only game. :unsure:
Hmmmm. I do have the next 4 days off...We'll see. Maybe I'll buy. I do really want to get Dead Space, although that's a night time only game. :unsure:

Asus Maximus Hero VII
i7 4790k @ 4.8ghz
SLI MSI Gaming 980 @ 1.5ghz
16gb Gskill @ 2400mhz
2x Samsung 840 500gb
Corsair HX1000i
Custom water loop
un78hu9000 with 3dplay on checkerboard 1080p

#38
Posted 04/30/2010 11:26 PM   
This game is amazing! I'm just playing in 2D though. Shadows make this game!!
This game is amazing! I'm just playing in 2D though. Shadows make this game!!

i7 930 - GTX470SLI

#39
Posted 05/01/2010 05:34 PM   
Mike Z...
How did you set the screen frequency in the game ?
Here it is set to 60hz ,but in nvidia it is set to 100HZ

When I turn it to 100hz in the game,I get terrible gosting and other crazy looking effects.
The game needs alot of gpu power,maybe that has something to do with it ?
I'm using a single gtx285 videocard,and get +-10-25 fps in 3dvision...+-35-45 without.
Mike Z...

How did you set the screen frequency in the game ?

Here it is set to 60hz ,but in nvidia it is set to 100HZ



When I turn it to 100hz in the game,I get terrible gosting and other crazy looking effects.

The game needs alot of gpu power,maybe that has something to do with it ?

I'm using a single gtx285 videocard,and get +-10-25 fps in 3dvision...+-35-45 without.

Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.

#40
Posted 05/01/2010 05:39 PM   
[quote name='Ferry' post='1048611' date='May 1 2010, 05:39 PM']Mike Z...
How did you set the screen frequency in the game ?
Here it is set to 60hz ,but in nvidia it is set to 100HZ

When I turn it to 100hz in the game,I get terrible gosting and other crazy looking effects.
The game needs alot of gpu power,maybe that has something to do with it ?
I'm using a single gtx285 videocard,and get +-10-25 fps in 3dvision...+-35-45 without.[/quote]

I use 60hz...

I also had some problems with really low fps but i changed "anistropic filering" & "anti-aliasing" to 4x and this helped a lot!
(i use a single gtx275)
[quote name='Ferry' post='1048611' date='May 1 2010, 05:39 PM']Mike Z...

How did you set the screen frequency in the game ?

Here it is set to 60hz ,but in nvidia it is set to 100HZ



When I turn it to 100hz in the game,I get terrible gosting and other crazy looking effects.

The game needs alot of gpu power,maybe that has something to do with it ?

I'm using a single gtx285 videocard,and get +-10-25 fps in 3dvision...+-35-45 without.



I use 60hz...



I also had some problems with really low fps but i changed "anistropic filering" & "anti-aliasing" to 4x and this helped a lot!

(i use a single gtx275)

#41
Posted 05/01/2010 07:46 PM   
Okay,good to know aboud that 60Hz.
Then there is nothing wrong with my system...
Okay,good to know aboud that 60Hz.

Then there is nothing wrong with my system...

Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.

#42
Posted 05/01/2010 08:18 PM   
There are more issues that just shadows. The fact that some stuff is only drawn for one eye will give you a headache faster than it takes to read this post...
Check this [url="http://www.mtbs3d.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=10086"]link[/url]... and you'll see what I mean.

disappointing...
There are more issues that just shadows. The fact that some stuff is only drawn for one eye will give you a headache faster than it takes to read this post...

Check this link... and you'll see what I mean.



disappointing...

#43
Posted 05/05/2010 04:38 PM   
I don't have those problems...?!

I only turned off all shadows and dynamic lighting...
Played almost all co-op missions and five singleplayer missions,and everything looks fine here...

Btw can you post some jps files,I cannot get your to view in 3d....
I don't have those problems...?!



I only turned off all shadows and dynamic lighting...

Played almost all co-op missions and five singleplayer missions,and everything looks fine here...



Btw can you post some jps files,I cannot get your to view in 3d....

Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.

#44
Posted 05/05/2010 04:49 PM   
Okay,one more thing...
I just got an GTX480 and now I can turn the lcd frequency in the game to 100hz without any problems...
Okay,one more thing...

I just got an GTX480 and now I can turn the lcd frequency in the game to 100hz without any problems...

Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.

#45
Posted 05/05/2010 04:53 PM   
  3 / 5    
Scroll To Top