[quote name='Manippy' post='982858' date='Jan 17 2010, 01:42 PM']With 3D on, only one eye of the glasses is black,
and the performance..... its unplayable,
I think the game doesnt support quad sli?
2x 295 on à Mitsubishi DLP.[/quote]
3d vision only supports dual sli not triple or quad
[quote name='ik911' post='982928' date='Jan 17 2010, 06:00 PM']which thread! ?[/quote]
QUOTE (johnyz333 @ Jan 6 2010, 09:01 PM)
We should start a petition to get nvidia moving on this. It has been almost a year now.
Cmon nvidia, atleasr give us an ETA.....
ummm .. there is nothing wrong with Nvidia's drivers, they fully support QuadSLI. QuadSLI is now in it's 3rd generation (7900/7950GX2, 9800GX2 and GTX295) and is simply a "niche" type setup.
Support for (Quad) SLI is in the hands of the game developers primarily, and QuadSLI simply does not scale well past the 3rd GPU .. simply the nature of the beast, it has been this way since the dawn of the "GX2" style cards.
QuadSLI, while sounding sweet, really is meant for benching ... not real world gaming.
If you want more gaming performance, get out from under those and either wait for Fermi, or go with a 3-way SLI GTX285 setup.. the extra vram and bus width alone is worth it.
We should start a petition to get nvidia moving on this. It has been almost a year now.
Cmon nvidia, atleasr give us an ETA.....
ummm .. there is nothing wrong with Nvidia's drivers, they fully support QuadSLI. QuadSLI is now in it's 3rd generation (7900/7950GX2, 9800GX2 and GTX295) and is simply a "niche" type setup.
Support for (Quad) SLI is in the hands of the game developers primarily, and QuadSLI simply does not scale well past the 3rd GPU .. simply the nature of the beast, it has been this way since the dawn of the "GX2" style cards.
QuadSLI, while sounding sweet, really is meant for benching ... not real world gaming.
If you want more gaming performance, get out from under those and either wait for Fermi, or go with a 3-way SLI GTX285 setup.. the extra vram and bus width alone is worth it.
and the performance..... its unplayable,
I think the game doesnt support quad sli?
2x 295 on à Mitsubishi DLP.
and the performance..... its unplayable,
I think the game doesnt support quad sli?
2x 295 on à Mitsubishi DLP.
and the performance..... its unplayable,
I think the game doesnt support quad sli?
2x 295 on à Mitsubishi DLP.[/quote]
3d vision only supports dual sli not triple or quad
and the performance..... its unplayable,
I think the game doesnt support quad sli?
2x 295 on à Mitsubishi DLP.
3d vision only supports dual sli not triple or quad
Dell 24" U2410 / Acer H5360 / Viewsonic 22" vx2268wm 120hz / Nvidia 3D Vision / Antec 300 / Intel quad Q6600 @ 3.2ghz 400x8 1.35v Msi p35 / OCZ Plat 1GBX4 DDR2 @ 970MHZ 2.1V / Nvidia GTX260 896MB / Hiper 630W Type-M / Windows 7 64BIT
In another treath they sayd that the drivers already
support quad in DX10,
In another treath they sayd that the drivers already
support quad in DX10,
Dell 24" U2410 / Acer H5360 / Viewsonic 22" vx2268wm 120hz / Nvidia 3D Vision / Antec 300 / Intel quad Q6600 @ 3.2ghz 400x8 1.35v Msi p35 / OCZ Plat 1GBX4 DDR2 @ 970MHZ 2.1V / Nvidia GTX260 896MB / Hiper 630W Type-M / Windows 7 64BIT
QUOTE (johnyz333 @ Jan 6 2010, 09:01 PM)
We should start a petition to get nvidia moving on this. It has been almost a year now.
Cmon nvidia, atleasr give us an ETA.....
ummm .. there is nothing wrong with Nvidia's drivers, they fully support QuadSLI. QuadSLI is now in it's 3rd generation (7900/7950GX2, 9800GX2 and GTX295) and is simply a "niche" type setup.
Support for (Quad) SLI is in the hands of the game developers primarily, and QuadSLI simply does not scale well past the 3rd GPU .. simply the nature of the beast, it has been this way since the dawn of the "GX2" style cards.
QuadSLI, while sounding sweet, really is meant for benching ... not real world gaming.
If you want more gaming performance, get out from under those and either wait for Fermi, or go with a 3-way SLI GTX285 setup.. the extra vram and bus width alone is worth it.
~Nutz
On the second page
QUOTE (johnyz333 @ Jan 6 2010, 09:01 PM)
We should start a petition to get nvidia moving on this. It has been almost a year now.
Cmon nvidia, atleasr give us an ETA.....
ummm .. there is nothing wrong with Nvidia's drivers, they fully support QuadSLI. QuadSLI is now in it's 3rd generation (7900/7950GX2, 9800GX2 and GTX295) and is simply a "niche" type setup.
Support for (Quad) SLI is in the hands of the game developers primarily, and QuadSLI simply does not scale well past the 3rd GPU .. simply the nature of the beast, it has been this way since the dawn of the "GX2" style cards.
QuadSLI, while sounding sweet, really is meant for benching ... not real world gaming.
If you want more gaming performance, get out from under those and either wait for Fermi, or go with a 3-way SLI GTX285 setup.. the extra vram and bus width alone is worth it.
~Nutz
On the second page
Dell 24" U2410 / Acer H5360 / Viewsonic 22" vx2268wm 120hz / Nvidia 3D Vision / Antec 300 / Intel quad Q6600 @ 3.2ghz 400x8 1.35v Msi p35 / OCZ Plat 1GBX4 DDR2 @ 970MHZ 2.1V / Nvidia GTX260 896MB / Hiper 630W Type-M / Windows 7 64BIT
yeah
yeah
Dell 24" U2410 / Acer H5360 / Viewsonic 22" vx2268wm 120hz / Nvidia 3D Vision / Antec 300 / Intel quad Q6600 @ 3.2ghz 400x8 1.35v Msi p35 / OCZ Plat 1GBX4 DDR2 @ 970MHZ 2.1V / Nvidia GTX260 896MB / Hiper 630W Type-M / Windows 7 64BIT