Download and install:
Link 1: [url="http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven-DirectX-11-benchmark-2.1-download-2549.html"]http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven...nload-2549.html[/url]
Link 2: [url="http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/Unigine_Heaven_DX11_Benchmark_2.1.html"]http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/...chmark_2.1.html[/url]
Post your results in either a screenshot or by linking the saved benchmark file. Be sure to include which video card you're using, the Core / Shader / Memory Frequencies and Core Voltage. Include the peak temperature, if you can.
Please run the test in the following configuration:
API: DirectX 11
Stereo 3D: 3D Vision
Shaders: high
Tessellation: extreme
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Full screen: Checked
Resolution 1680x1050
I'll go first.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Um... nevermind. I can't run it in 3D Vision. My 3D Vision is working fine in all other programs, but when I select 3D Vision from the drop down list and press Run, it launches my browser as if it was trying to visit a web page.
It's trying to go here: d3d11app3dvision/?-extern_define%20RELEASE,STEREO_3D_VISION,EXTREME%20-engine_config%20data/unigine.cfg%20-data_path%20./%20-system_script%20demos/heaven/unigine.cpp%20-video_app%20direct3d11%20-video_mode%20-1%20-video_width%201680%20-video_height%201050%20-video_fullscreen%201%20-video_multisample%202%20-sound_app%20openal%20-console_command%20%20render_shaders%202%20&&%20render_anisotropy%202%20&&%20d3d11_render_use_tessellation%203%20&&%20gl_render_use_arb_tessellation_shader%203%20&&%20render_restart
Post your results in either a screenshot or by linking the saved benchmark file. Be sure to include which video card you're using, the Core / Shader / Memory Frequencies and Core Voltage. Include the peak temperature, if you can.
Please run the test in the following configuration:
API: DirectX 11
Stereo 3D: 3D Vision
Shaders: high
Tessellation: extreme
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Full screen: Checked
Resolution 1680x1050
I'll go first.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Um... nevermind. I can't run it in 3D Vision. My 3D Vision is working fine in all other programs, but when I select 3D Vision from the drop down list and press Run, it launches my browser as if it was trying to visit a web page.
It's trying to go here: d3d11app3dvision/?-extern_define%20RELEASE,STEREO_3D_VISION,EXTREME%20-engine_config%20data/unigine.cfg%20-data_path%20./%20-system_script%20demos/heaven/unigine.cpp%20-video_app%20direct3d11%20-video_mode%20-1%20-video_width%201680%20-video_height%201050%20-video_fullscreen%201%20-video_multisample%202%20-sound_app%20openal%20-console_command%20%20render_shaders%202%20&&%20render_anisotropy%202%20&&%20d3d11_render_use_tessellation%203%20&&%20gl_render_use_arb_tessellation_shader%203%20&&%20render_restart
Download and install:
Link 1: [url="http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven-DirectX-11-benchmark-2.1-download-2549.html"]http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven...nload-2549.html[/url]
Link 2: [url="http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/Unigine_Heaven_DX11_Benchmark_2.1.html"]http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/...chmark_2.1.html[/url]
Post your results in either a screenshot or by linking the saved benchmark file. Be sure to include which video card you're using, the Core / Shader / Memory Frequencies and Core Voltage. Include the peak temperature, if you can.
Please run the test in the following configuration:
API: DirectX 11
Stereo 3D: 3D Vision
Shaders: high
Tessellation: extreme
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Full screen: Checked
Resolution 1680x1050
I'll go first.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Um... nevermind. I can't run it in 3D Vision. My 3D Vision is working fine in all other programs, but when I select 3D Vision from the drop down list and press Run, it launches my browser as if it was trying to visit a web page.
It's trying to go here: d3d11app3dvision/?-extern_define%20RELEASE,STEREO_3D_VISION,EXTREME%20-engine_config%20data/unigine.cfg%20-data_path%20./%20-system_script%20demos/heaven/unigine.cpp%20-video_app%20direct3d11%20-video_mode%20-1%20-video_width%201680%20-video_height%201050%20-video_fullscreen%201%20-video_multisample%202%20-sound_app%20openal%20-console_command%20%20render_shaders%202%20&&%20render_anisotropy%202%20&&%20d3d11_render_use_tessellation%203%20&&%20gl_render_use_arb_tessellation_shader%203%20&&%20render_restart
Post your results in either a screenshot or by linking the saved benchmark file. Be sure to include which video card you're using, the Core / Shader / Memory Frequencies and Core Voltage. Include the peak temperature, if you can.
Please run the test in the following configuration:
API: DirectX 11
Stereo 3D: 3D Vision
Shaders: high
Tessellation: extreme
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Full screen: Checked
Resolution 1680x1050
I'll go first.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Um... nevermind. I can't run it in 3D Vision. My 3D Vision is working fine in all other programs, but when I select 3D Vision from the drop down list and press Run, it launches my browser as if it was trying to visit a web page.
It's trying to go here: d3d11app3dvision/?-extern_define%20RELEASE,STEREO_3D_VISION,EXTREME%20-engine_config%20data/unigine.cfg%20-data_path%20./%20-system_script%20demos/heaven/unigine.cpp%20-video_app%20direct3d11%20-video_mode%20-1%20-video_width%201680%20-video_height%201050%20-video_fullscreen%201%20-video_multisample%202%20-sound_app%20openal%20-console_command%20%20render_shaders%202%20&&%20render_anisotropy%202%20&&%20d3d11_render_use_tessellation%203%20&&%20gl_render_use_arb_tessellation_shader%203%20&&%20render_restart
Visual quality like that isn't going to be playable in S3D for a *LONG* time sadly.
GTX 480 at stock clocks, E8600 @ 4.4ghz
The weird thing is that when the benchmark is finished, it lists the GTX 280 1024 rather than GTX 480 1536...I have the GTX 480 connected to my TV via the mini-HDMI cable in the top slot, with the GTX 280 not connected to anything and placed in the bottom slot. In the Nvidia control panel, under the physx section, the pointer is set on the GTX 280. In the main section I have CUDA devices set to all.
Visual quality like that isn't going to be playable in S3D for a *LONG* time sadly.
GTX 480 at stock clocks, E8600 @ 4.4ghz
The weird thing is that when the benchmark is finished, it lists the GTX 280 1024 rather than GTX 480 1536...I have the GTX 480 connected to my TV via the mini-HDMI cable in the top slot, with the GTX 280 not connected to anything and placed in the bottom slot. In the Nvidia control panel, under the physx section, the pointer is set on the GTX 280. In the main section I have CUDA devices set to all.
Visual quality like that isn't going to be playable in S3D for a *LONG* time sadly.
GTX 480 at stock clocks, E8600 @ 4.4ghz
The weird thing is that when the benchmark is finished, it lists the GTX 280 1024 rather than GTX 480 1536...I have the GTX 480 connected to my TV via the mini-HDMI cable in the top slot, with the GTX 280 not connected to anything and placed in the bottom slot. In the Nvidia control panel, under the physx section, the pointer is set on the GTX 280. In the main section I have CUDA devices set to all.
Visual quality like that isn't going to be playable in S3D for a *LONG* time sadly.
GTX 480 at stock clocks, E8600 @ 4.4ghz
The weird thing is that when the benchmark is finished, it lists the GTX 280 1024 rather than GTX 480 1536...I have the GTX 480 connected to my TV via the mini-HDMI cable in the top slot, with the GTX 280 not connected to anything and placed in the bottom slot. In the Nvidia control panel, under the physx section, the pointer is set on the GTX 280. In the main section I have CUDA devices set to all.
Your score makes me feel better, at least I know my 480 is performing as it should. It also shows that you were right about the 480 being the better buy over a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade.
I don't get why it lists the 280 at the end of the benchmark though. But I've been having a problem with EVGA precision as well, it won't let me overclock the core on my 480 at all, its not even listed, its grayed out.
***UPDATE***
(Apparently the core is supposed to be grayed out in EVGA precision, according to EVGA the shader and core clocks are forever linked)
Your score makes me feel better, at least I know my 480 is performing as it should. It also shows that you were right about the 480 being the better buy over a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade.
I don't get why it lists the 280 at the end of the benchmark though. But I've been having a problem with EVGA precision as well, it won't let me overclock the core on my 480 at all, its not even listed, its grayed out.
***UPDATE***
(Apparently the core is supposed to be grayed out in EVGA precision, according to EVGA the shader and core clocks are forever linked)
Your score makes me feel better, at least I know my 480 is performing as it should. It also shows that you were right about the 480 being the better buy over a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade.
I don't get why it lists the 280 at the end of the benchmark though. But I've been having a problem with EVGA precision as well, it won't let me overclock the core on my 480 at all, its not even listed, its grayed out.
***UPDATE***
(Apparently the core is supposed to be grayed out in EVGA precision, according to EVGA the shader and core clocks are forever linked)
Your score makes me feel better, at least I know my 480 is performing as it should. It also shows that you were right about the 480 being the better buy over a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade.
I don't get why it lists the 280 at the end of the benchmark though. But I've been having a problem with EVGA precision as well, it won't let me overclock the core on my 480 at all, its not even listed, its grayed out.
***UPDATE***
(Apparently the core is supposed to be grayed out in EVGA precision, according to EVGA the shader and core clocks are forever linked)
[quote name='redman223' post='1062670' date='May 26 2010, 06:25 PM']Your score makes me feel better, at least I know my 480 is performing as it should. It also shows that you were right about the 480 being the better buy over a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade.[/quote]
Yes,..and I think my cpu is clocked at 3.7 ghz.
It's faster with some games,but only by a little bit.
Tommorow ,or the day after I will have a third ram chip,to use the I7 triple channel configuration...
Just to see if that makes any difference. (I like to experimentate,been so..the day I overclocked my first pc by soldering new x-tals on the motherboard :) good old days ,sx/dx machines)
[quote name='redman223' post='1062670' date='May 26 2010, 06:25 PM']Your score makes me feel better, at least I know my 480 is performing as it should. It also shows that you were right about the 480 being the better buy over a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade.
Yes,..and I think my cpu is clocked at 3.7 ghz.
It's faster with some games,but only by a little bit.
Tommorow ,or the day after I will have a third ram chip,to use the I7 triple channel configuration...
Just to see if that makes any difference. (I like to experimentate,been so..the day I overclocked my first pc by soldering new x-tals on the motherboard :) good old days ,sx/dx machines)
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.
[quote name='redman223' post='1062670' date='May 26 2010, 06:25 PM']Your score makes me feel better, at least I know my 480 is performing as it should. It also shows that you were right about the 480 being the better buy over a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade.[/quote]
Yes,..and I think my cpu is clocked at 3.7 ghz.
It's faster with some games,but only by a little bit.
Tommorow ,or the day after I will have a third ram chip,to use the I7 triple channel configuration...
Just to see if that makes any difference. (I like to experimentate,been so..the day I overclocked my first pc by soldering new x-tals on the motherboard :) good old days ,sx/dx machines)
[quote name='redman223' post='1062670' date='May 26 2010, 06:25 PM']Your score makes me feel better, at least I know my 480 is performing as it should. It also shows that you were right about the 480 being the better buy over a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade.
Yes,..and I think my cpu is clocked at 3.7 ghz.
It's faster with some games,but only by a little bit.
Tommorow ,or the day after I will have a third ram chip,to use the I7 triple channel configuration...
Just to see if that makes any difference. (I like to experimentate,been so..the day I overclocked my first pc by soldering new x-tals on the motherboard :) good old days ,sx/dx machines)
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.
Download and install:
Link 1: [url="http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven-DirectX-11-benchmark-2.1-download-2549.html"]http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven...nload-2549.html[/url]
Link 2: [url="http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/Unigine_Heaven_DX11_Benchmark_2.1.html"]http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/...chmark_2.1.html[/url]
Post your results in either a screenshot or by linking the saved benchmark file. Be sure to include which video card you're using, the Core / Shader / Memory Frequencies and Core Voltage. Include the peak temperature, if you can.
Please run the test in the following configuration:
API: DirectX 11
Stereo 3D: 3D Vision
Shaders: high
Tessellation: extreme
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Full screen: Checked
Resolution 1680x1050
I'll go first.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Um... nevermind. I can't run it in 3D Vision. My 3D Vision is working fine in all other programs, but when I select 3D Vision from the drop down list and press Run, it launches my browser as if it was trying to visit a web page.
It's trying to go here: d3d11app3dvision/?-extern_define%20RELEASE,STEREO_3D_VISION,EXTREME%20-engine_config%20data/unigine.cfg%20-data_path%20./%20-system_script%20demos/heaven/unigine.cpp%20-video_app%20direct3d11%20-video_mode%20-1%20-video_width%201680%20-video_height%201050%20-video_fullscreen%201%20-video_multisample%202%20-sound_app%20openal%20-console_command%20%20render_shaders%202%20&&%20render_anisotropy%202%20&&%20d3d11_render_use_tessellation%203%20&&%20gl_render_use_arb_tessellation_shader%203%20&&%20render_restart
Looks like a script is messed up.
Download and install:
Link 1: http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven...nload-2549.html
Link 2: http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/...chmark_2.1.html
Post your results in either a screenshot or by linking the saved benchmark file. Be sure to include which video card you're using, the Core / Shader / Memory Frequencies and Core Voltage. Include the peak temperature, if you can.
Please run the test in the following configuration:
API: DirectX 11
Stereo 3D: 3D Vision
Shaders: high
Tessellation: extreme
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Full screen: Checked
Resolution 1680x1050
I'll go first.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Um... nevermind. I can't run it in 3D Vision. My 3D Vision is working fine in all other programs, but when I select 3D Vision from the drop down list and press Run, it launches my browser as if it was trying to visit a web page.
It's trying to go here: d3d11app3dvision/?-extern_define%20RELEASE,STEREO_3D_VISION,EXTREME%20-engine_config%20data/unigine.cfg%20-data_path%20./%20-system_script%20demos/heaven/unigine.cpp%20-video_app%20direct3d11%20-video_mode%20-1%20-video_width%201680%20-video_height%201050%20-video_fullscreen%201%20-video_multisample%202%20-sound_app%20openal%20-console_command%20%20render_shaders%202%20&&%20render_anisotropy%202%20&&%20d3d11_render_use_tessellation%203%20&&%20gl_render_use_arb_tessellation_shader%203%20&&%20render_restart
Looks like a script is messed up.
EVGA 3-way SLI E758 (Mobo) | Intel i7 920 @ 4GHz (CPU) | Intel X-25M 80gb G2 (SSD) | 3 x Seagate 7200.12 1TB (HDD) | Corsair H50 (HSF) | 3x1GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 2000 CL8 (RAM) | SLI Galaxy GTX 480's (GPU) | Kingwin LZG-1000 1kW (PSU) | Asus Xonar DX (Sound Card) | Antec Twelve Hundred (Case) | Razer Mako (Speakers) | Logitech G19 (Keyboard) | Razer Mamba (Mouse) | NVIDIA 3D Vision Surround with 3 x Samsung 2233rz (Monitor) | e-peen == huge
Download and install:
Link 1: [url="http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven-DirectX-11-benchmark-2.1-download-2549.html"]http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven...nload-2549.html[/url]
Link 2: [url="http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/Unigine_Heaven_DX11_Benchmark_2.1.html"]http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/...chmark_2.1.html[/url]
Post your results in either a screenshot or by linking the saved benchmark file. Be sure to include which video card you're using, the Core / Shader / Memory Frequencies and Core Voltage. Include the peak temperature, if you can.
Please run the test in the following configuration:
API: DirectX 11
Stereo 3D: 3D Vision
Shaders: high
Tessellation: extreme
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Full screen: Checked
Resolution 1680x1050
I'll go first.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Um... nevermind. I can't run it in 3D Vision. My 3D Vision is working fine in all other programs, but when I select 3D Vision from the drop down list and press Run, it launches my browser as if it was trying to visit a web page.
It's trying to go here: d3d11app3dvision/?-extern_define%20RELEASE,STEREO_3D_VISION,EXTREME%20-engine_config%20data/unigine.cfg%20-data_path%20./%20-system_script%20demos/heaven/unigine.cpp%20-video_app%20direct3d11%20-video_mode%20-1%20-video_width%201680%20-video_height%201050%20-video_fullscreen%201%20-video_multisample%202%20-sound_app%20openal%20-console_command%20%20render_shaders%202%20&&%20render_anisotropy%202%20&&%20d3d11_render_use_tessellation%203%20&&%20gl_render_use_arb_tessellation_shader%203%20&&%20render_restart
Looks like a script is messed up.
Download and install:
Link 1: http://downloads.guru3d.com/Unigine-Heaven...nload-2549.html
Link 2: http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1799/...chmark_2.1.html
Post your results in either a screenshot or by linking the saved benchmark file. Be sure to include which video card you're using, the Core / Shader / Memory Frequencies and Core Voltage. Include the peak temperature, if you can.
Please run the test in the following configuration:
API: DirectX 11
Stereo 3D: 3D Vision
Shaders: high
Tessellation: extreme
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Full screen: Checked
Resolution 1680x1050
I'll go first.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Um... nevermind. I can't run it in 3D Vision. My 3D Vision is working fine in all other programs, but when I select 3D Vision from the drop down list and press Run, it launches my browser as if it was trying to visit a web page.
It's trying to go here: d3d11app3dvision/?-extern_define%20RELEASE,STEREO_3D_VISION,EXTREME%20-engine_config%20data/unigine.cfg%20-data_path%20./%20-system_script%20demos/heaven/unigine.cpp%20-video_app%20direct3d11%20-video_mode%20-1%20-video_width%201680%20-video_height%201050%20-video_fullscreen%201%20-video_multisample%202%20-sound_app%20openal%20-console_command%20%20render_shaders%202%20&&%20render_anisotropy%202%20&&%20d3d11_render_use_tessellation%203%20&&%20gl_render_use_arb_tessellation_shader%203%20&&%20render_restart
Looks like a script is messed up.
EVGA 3-way SLI E758 (Mobo) | Intel i7 920 @ 4GHz (CPU) | Intel X-25M 80gb G2 (SSD) | 3 x Seagate 7200.12 1TB (HDD) | Corsair H50 (HSF) | 3x1GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 2000 CL8 (RAM) | SLI Galaxy GTX 480's (GPU) | Kingwin LZG-1000 1kW (PSU) | Asus Xonar DX (Sound Card) | Antec Twelve Hundred (Case) | Razer Mako (Speakers) | Logitech G19 (Keyboard) | Razer Mamba (Mouse) | NVIDIA 3D Vision Surround with 3 x Samsung 2233rz (Monitor) | e-peen == huge
My 3D Vision Blog - 3dvision-blog.com
My 3D Vision Blog - 3dvision-blog.com
Max: 30.0
Avg: 14.1
Visual quality like that isn't going to be playable in S3D for a *LONG* time sadly.
GTX 480 at stock clocks, E8600 @ 4.4ghz
The weird thing is that when the benchmark is finished, it lists the GTX 280 1024 rather than GTX 480 1536...I have the GTX 480 connected to my TV via the mini-HDMI cable in the top slot, with the GTX 280 not connected to anything and placed in the bottom slot. In the Nvidia control panel, under the physx section, the pointer is set on the GTX 280. In the main section I have CUDA devices set to all.
Maybe someone with a physx card could chime in...
Max: 30.0
Avg: 14.1
Visual quality like that isn't going to be playable in S3D for a *LONG* time sadly.
GTX 480 at stock clocks, E8600 @ 4.4ghz
The weird thing is that when the benchmark is finished, it lists the GTX 280 1024 rather than GTX 480 1536...I have the GTX 480 connected to my TV via the mini-HDMI cable in the top slot, with the GTX 280 not connected to anything and placed in the bottom slot. In the Nvidia control panel, under the physx section, the pointer is set on the GTX 280. In the main section I have CUDA devices set to all.
Maybe someone with a physx card could chime in...
Max: 30.0
Avg: 14.1
Visual quality like that isn't going to be playable in S3D for a *LONG* time sadly.
GTX 480 at stock clocks, E8600 @ 4.4ghz
The weird thing is that when the benchmark is finished, it lists the GTX 280 1024 rather than GTX 480 1536...I have the GTX 480 connected to my TV via the mini-HDMI cable in the top slot, with the GTX 280 not connected to anything and placed in the bottom slot. In the Nvidia control panel, under the physx section, the pointer is set on the GTX 280. In the main section I have CUDA devices set to all.
Maybe someone with a physx card could chime in...
Max: 30.0
Avg: 14.1
Visual quality like that isn't going to be playable in S3D for a *LONG* time sadly.
GTX 480 at stock clocks, E8600 @ 4.4ghz
The weird thing is that when the benchmark is finished, it lists the GTX 280 1024 rather than GTX 480 1536...I have the GTX 480 connected to my TV via the mini-HDMI cable in the top slot, with the GTX 280 not connected to anything and placed in the bottom slot. In the Nvidia control panel, under the physx section, the pointer is set on the GTX 280. In the main section I have CUDA devices set to all.
Maybe someone with a physx card could chime in...
Min fps 10
Max fps 32,3
Min fps 10
Max fps 32,3
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.
Min fps 10
Max fps 32,3
Min fps 10
Max fps 32,3
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.
I don't get why it lists the 280 at the end of the benchmark though. But I've been having a problem with EVGA precision as well, it won't let me overclock the core on my 480 at all, its not even listed, its grayed out.
***UPDATE***
(Apparently the core is supposed to be grayed out in EVGA precision, according to EVGA the shader and core clocks are forever linked)
I don't get why it lists the 280 at the end of the benchmark though. But I've been having a problem with EVGA precision as well, it won't let me overclock the core on my 480 at all, its not even listed, its grayed out.
***UPDATE***
(Apparently the core is supposed to be grayed out in EVGA precision, according to EVGA the shader and core clocks are forever linked)
I don't get why it lists the 280 at the end of the benchmark though. But I've been having a problem with EVGA precision as well, it won't let me overclock the core on my 480 at all, its not even listed, its grayed out.
***UPDATE***
(Apparently the core is supposed to be grayed out in EVGA precision, according to EVGA the shader and core clocks are forever linked)
I don't get why it lists the 280 at the end of the benchmark though. But I've been having a problem with EVGA precision as well, it won't let me overclock the core on my 480 at all, its not even listed, its grayed out.
***UPDATE***
(Apparently the core is supposed to be grayed out in EVGA precision, according to EVGA the shader and core clocks are forever linked)
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.
Yes,..and I think my cpu is clocked at 3.7 ghz.
It's faster with some games,but only by a little bit.
Tommorow ,or the day after I will have a third ram chip,to use the I7 triple channel configuration...
Just to see if that makes any difference. (I like to experimentate,been so..the day I overclocked my first pc by soldering new x-tals on the motherboard :) good old days ,sx/dx machines)
Yes,..and I think my cpu is clocked at 3.7 ghz.
It's faster with some games,but only by a little bit.
Tommorow ,or the day after I will have a third ram chip,to use the I7 triple channel configuration...
Just to see if that makes any difference. (I like to experimentate,been so..the day I overclocked my first pc by soldering new x-tals on the motherboard :) good old days ,sx/dx machines)
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.
Yes,..and I think my cpu is clocked at 3.7 ghz.
It's faster with some games,but only by a little bit.
Tommorow ,or the day after I will have a third ram chip,to use the I7 triple channel configuration...
Just to see if that makes any difference. (I like to experimentate,been so..the day I overclocked my first pc by soldering new x-tals on the motherboard :) good old days ,sx/dx machines)
Yes,..and I think my cpu is clocked at 3.7 ghz.
It's faster with some games,but only by a little bit.
Tommorow ,or the day after I will have a third ram chip,to use the I7 triple channel configuration...
Just to see if that makes any difference. (I like to experimentate,been so..the day I overclocked my first pc by soldering new x-tals on the motherboard :) good old days ,sx/dx machines)
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C[/quote]
Specs ?
835/1670/2025 @ 1125mv
Maxed at °C
Specs ?
Intel I7 3820 3.8 Ghz,MSI MS7760 Motherboard, 6GB )2x MSI GTX670 (SLI),OCZ Vertex 230Gb SSD,OCZ Agility 120Gb SSD, Asus 3D VG278HR ,Optoma HD67 3D DLP Beamer with 95inch 2.5 gain screen.