Hi all. I'm not sure if this is the correct board for this, but here it goes: I'm building a rig on a budget. I've done a lot of research and really want to get something that is at least partially future proof, but I don't necessarily need full settings (just as nice as possible with good FPS). I was looking at getting a 560ti and the 3d vision kit and maybe in six months to year or so, I would go SLI with it and I figured I would be set for a while in 3D. On another board, however, someone told me that I really won't be able to play anything at decent settings with a good FPS with a single 560 and the best I could do would be going dual 570's in SLI. The problem is, I can't afford that. My options are getting the 560 ti with a 3D vision kit and upgrading to SLI in 6 months to a year OR getting a 570, waiting 3-4 months and picking up the 3D vision kit and then going SLI in a year and a half or 2 years (or whenever the 570 drops below the $200 mark)
What do you guys think? Which is the better route?
Hi all. I'm not sure if this is the correct board for this, but here it goes: I'm building a rig on a budget. I've done a lot of research and really want to get something that is at least partially future proof, but I don't necessarily need full settings (just as nice as possible with good FPS). I was looking at getting a 560ti and the 3d vision kit and maybe in six months to year or so, I would go SLI with it and I figured I would be set for a while in 3D. On another board, however, someone told me that I really won't be able to play anything at decent settings with a good FPS with a single 560 and the best I could do would be going dual 570's in SLI. The problem is, I can't afford that. My options are getting the 560 ti with a 3D vision kit and upgrading to SLI in 6 months to a year OR getting a 570, waiting 3-4 months and picking up the 3D vision kit and then going SLI in a year and a half or 2 years (or whenever the 570 drops below the $200 mark)
What do you guys think? Which is the better route?
[quote name='Kneppy18' date='08 April 2011 - 05:33 PM' timestamp='1302309210' post='1221705']
Hi all. I'm not sure if this is the correct board for this, but here it goes: I'm building a rig on a budget. I've done a lot of research and really want to get something that is at least partially future proof, but I don't necessarily need full settings (just as nice as possible with good FPS). I was looking at getting a 560ti and the 3d vision kit and maybe in six months to year or so, I would go SLI with it and I figured I would be set for a while in 3D. On another board, however, someone told me that I really won't be able to play anything at decent settings with a good FPS with a single 560 and the best I could do would be going dual 570's in SLI. The problem is, I can't afford that. My options are getting the 560 ti with a 3D vision kit and upgrading to SLI in 6 months to a year OR getting a 570, waiting 3-4 months and picking up the 3D vision kit and then going SLI in a year and a half or 2 years (or whenever the 570 drops below the $200 mark)
What do you guys think? Which is the better route?
[/quote]
----------------
well what i would do, is just get a GTX 560 ti SLI setup when you can afford it and hold off on 3d vision until you can save up for it again. at full HD resolutions, the only single card i see that will give you decent performance in 3d would be a GTX 580 that has been overclocked or the GTX 590. i wouldnt go with either of those routes because of the price. And the 570 is not really all that worth it right now with the GTX 560 out and its insane overclocking abilities. its basically an awesome bang for your buck card. and in SLI should tear up 3d games for breakfast /biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':biggrin:' />
[quote name='Kneppy18' date='08 April 2011 - 05:33 PM' timestamp='1302309210' post='1221705']
Hi all. I'm not sure if this is the correct board for this, but here it goes: I'm building a rig on a budget. I've done a lot of research and really want to get something that is at least partially future proof, but I don't necessarily need full settings (just as nice as possible with good FPS). I was looking at getting a 560ti and the 3d vision kit and maybe in six months to year or so, I would go SLI with it and I figured I would be set for a while in 3D. On another board, however, someone told me that I really won't be able to play anything at decent settings with a good FPS with a single 560 and the best I could do would be going dual 570's in SLI. The problem is, I can't afford that. My options are getting the 560 ti with a 3D vision kit and upgrading to SLI in 6 months to a year OR getting a 570, waiting 3-4 months and picking up the 3D vision kit and then going SLI in a year and a half or 2 years (or whenever the 570 drops below the $200 mark)
What do you guys think? Which is the better route?
----------------
well what i would do, is just get a GTX 560 ti SLI setup when you can afford it and hold off on 3d vision until you can save up for it again. at full HD resolutions, the only single card i see that will give you decent performance in 3d would be a GTX 580 that has been overclocked or the GTX 590. i wouldnt go with either of those routes because of the price. And the 570 is not really all that worth it right now with the GTX 560 out and its insane overclocking abilities. its basically an awesome bang for your buck card. and in SLI should tear up 3d games for breakfast /biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':biggrin:' />
Really? I heard from another guy that the 560's in SLI won't give me nearly the power to play most modern games in 3D let alone future stuff. If that truly is the case, I'll definitely stick with the 560 solution. The only concern I have though is that I'm deathly afraid of overclocking... I've never touched it before and I can just imagine my new $1600 investment going up in smoke (literally).
Really? I heard from another guy that the 560's in SLI won't give me nearly the power to play most modern games in 3D let alone future stuff. If that truly is the case, I'll definitely stick with the 560 solution. The only concern I have though is that I'm deathly afraid of overclocking... I've never touched it before and I can just imagine my new $1600 investment going up in smoke (literally).
[quote name='Kneppy18' date='08 April 2011 - 06:43 PM' timestamp='1302313392' post='1221717']
Really? I heard from another guy that the 560's in SLI won't give me nearly the power to play most modern games in 3D let alone future stuff. If that truly is the case, I'll definitely stick with the 560 solution. The only concern I have though is that I'm deathly afraid of overclocking... I've never touched it before and I can just imagine my new $1600 investment going up in smoke (literally).
[/quote]
well thankfully, overclocking is very easy to do on graphics cards although your CPU overclocking is a different story. in order to utilize any SLI solution you will need to overclock whichever processor you currently have. otherwise the second GTX 460 wont be doin much except sitting at idle due to a major CPU bottleneck. So before you jump on the SLI boat we should make sure we know what the rest of your system is or is going to be.
[quote name='Kneppy18' date='08 April 2011 - 06:43 PM' timestamp='1302313392' post='1221717']
Really? I heard from another guy that the 560's in SLI won't give me nearly the power to play most modern games in 3D let alone future stuff. If that truly is the case, I'll definitely stick with the 560 solution. The only concern I have though is that I'm deathly afraid of overclocking... I've never touched it before and I can just imagine my new $1600 investment going up in smoke (literally).
well thankfully, overclocking is very easy to do on graphics cards although your CPU overclocking is a different story. in order to utilize any SLI solution you will need to overclock whichever processor you currently have. otherwise the second GTX 460 wont be doin much except sitting at idle due to a major CPU bottleneck. So before you jump on the SLI boat we should make sure we know what the rest of your system is or is going to be.
Factory installed liquid cooling: Asetek 510LC Liquid Cooling System 120MM Radiator & Fan (Enhanced Cooling Performance + Extreme Silent at 20dBA) Single Standard 120MM Fan
I was told the i7-2600K isn't really needed if I'm not doing any graphic design stuff (and I can't really afford the upgrade anyway). I also heard OCing your CPU is massively harder than OCing your GPU. I wouldn't want to ruin both my MOBO and CPU.
Thanks so much for your help. I've been on other boards (mostly gaming ones) and they've just mocked my lack of hardware knowledge and wouldn't help me.
Edit: forgot my PSU
850 Watts - Corsair CMPSU-850TX 80 Plus Power Supply - Quad SLI Ready
Factory installed liquid cooling: Asetek 510LC Liquid Cooling System 120MM Radiator & Fan (Enhanced Cooling Performance + Extreme Silent at 20dBA) Single Standard 120MM Fan
I was told the i7-2600K isn't really needed if I'm not doing any graphic design stuff (and I can't really afford the upgrade anyway). I also heard OCing your CPU is massively harder than OCing your GPU. I wouldn't want to ruin both my MOBO and CPU.
Thanks so much for your help. I've been on other boards (mostly gaming ones) and they've just mocked my lack of hardware knowledge and wouldn't help me.
Edit: forgot my PSU
850 Watts - Corsair CMPSU-850TX 80 Plus Power Supply - Quad SLI Ready
I'm running a i7-2600k and a GTX570 for rendering plus a GTX280 for physix and I can play games like Mafia II in 3D on maximum settings including physx without any problems.
There is no need to get an SLI setup right away imho.
I'm running a i7-2600k and a GTX570 for rendering plus a GTX280 for physix and I can play games like Mafia II in 3D on maximum settings including physx without any problems.
There is no need to get an SLI setup right away imho.
The i5 2500k that you are thinking of is a famtastic processor and is as easy as overcloking as i have ever seen, all you have to do is change the multiplier to 34 or 35, cant remember exactly, it overclocks to 4.4.ghz without any FSB adjustment, it could not be an easier.
Fantastic for gaming.
I am running a gtx 580 alongside it, and i get fantastic performance in 3d.
The i5 2500k that you are thinking of is a famtastic processor and is as easy as overcloking as i have ever seen, all you have to do is change the multiplier to 34 or 35, cant remember exactly, it overclocks to 4.4.ghz without any FSB adjustment, it could not be an easier.
Fantastic for gaming.
I am running a gtx 580 alongside it, and i get fantastic performance in 3d.
Dave
I5 2500K 4.4ghz H60 Corsair cooling
GTX 780 Ti
8GB DDR3 1600mhz
Windows 7 64bit
NXZT Phantom (white)
HMZ-T1 and 50" panasonic 3d plasma
I'm using a GTX 470, and I can run literally any game in 3D with good performance provided I tweak the settings. Just as an example, in Metro 2033 if I set all graphics to "low", then I can get a smooth 80FPS in 3D! Most normal games can be run at medium to high settings and still smooth 60FPS frame-rates in 3D.
I'm using a GTX 470, and I can run literally any game in 3D with good performance provided I tweak the settings. Just as an example, in Metro 2033 if I set all graphics to "low", then I can get a smooth 80FPS in 3D! Most normal games can be run at medium to high settings and still smooth 60FPS frame-rates in 3D.
Well, you can't get 80FPS in stereoscopic 3D because it automatically caps the FPS at 60 (unless you figured out some way of finding a 160mHz monitor. But if you're getting good FPS using a 470, the 560 ti should be even better than that, right?
Well, you can't get 80FPS in stereoscopic 3D because it automatically caps the FPS at 60 (unless you figured out some way of finding a 160mHz monitor. But if you're getting good FPS using a 470, the 560 ti should be even better than that, right?
[quote name='cybereality' date='10 April 2011 - 05:41 PM' timestamp='1302475279' post='1222496']
I'm using a GTX 470, and I can run literally any game in 3D with good performance provided I tweak the settings. Just as an example, in Metro 2033 if I set all graphics to "low", then I can get a smooth 80FPS in 3D! Most normal games can be run at medium to high settings and still smooth 60FPS frame-rates in 3D.
[/quote]
I use a 460 and I can run most modern games on high with 3D Vision with Phys-x(if they support it).
There really aren't any pc games that push the hardware that hard anymore. And if they do its because they are unoptimized ports of 360 games.
[quote name='cybereality' date='10 April 2011 - 05:41 PM' timestamp='1302475279' post='1222496']
I'm using a GTX 470, and I can run literally any game in 3D with good performance provided I tweak the settings. Just as an example, in Metro 2033 if I set all graphics to "low", then I can get a smooth 80FPS in 3D! Most normal games can be run at medium to high settings and still smooth 60FPS frame-rates in 3D.
I use a 460 and I can run most modern games on high with 3D Vision with Phys-x(if they support it).
There really aren't any pc games that push the hardware that hard anymore. And if they do its because they are unoptimized ports of 360 games.
AMD Phenom II X3 720 @ 2.8GHZ
8GB RAM
Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2070sb @ 2048x1536 @ 85hz
Edimensional glasses and Nvidia 3D Vision
[quote name='oracletriplex' date='11 April 2011 - 02:39 AM' timestamp='1302482379' post='1222532']
I use a 460 and I can run most modern games on high with 3D Vision with Phys-x(if they support it).
There really aren't any pc games that push the hardware that hard anymore. And if they do its because they are unoptimized ports of 360 games.
[/quote]
I hope it was a joke, i have GTX580, 6 Core overclocked to 4.1Ghz and 8GB ram, also games are on separate HDD so no slowdowns.
OH my monitor is just 1650 Samsung 2233 and almost no game works in full speed if I set everything to maximum i get like 30FPS
::Sigh:: I guess the world may never know... I don't need to play everything at max, but if I can get moderately high detail with playable fps (consistant 30 would be fine for me, I'm not used to constantly getting 60 anyway on my old 9600gts). If I can pretty much max everything out without 3D and play on mostly high settings sub 1080p with 3D, I'll be happy.
::Sigh:: I guess the world may never know... I don't need to play everything at max, but if I can get moderately high detail with playable fps (consistant 30 would be fine for me, I'm not used to constantly getting 60 anyway on my old 9600gts). If I can pretty much max everything out without 3D and play on mostly high settings sub 1080p with 3D, I'll be happy.
[quote name='Benny_27' date='10 April 2011 - 09:32 PM' timestamp='1302485565' post='1222552']
I hope it was a joke, i have GTX580, 6 Core overclocked to 4.1Ghz and 8GB ram, also games are on separate HDD so no slowdowns.
OH my monitor is just 1650 Samsung 2233 and almost no game works in full speed if I set everything to maximum i get like 30FPS
[/quote]
This sounds about right...
For 3D vision you want GTX560 SLI. Thats the best performance value for $$ right now.
What resolution do you plan on running at? 1080 @60? or 720p using a TV?
Have you checked out the VGA charts at Toms hardware guide? They benchmark just about every card and variation and put them all in a list and have tools for comparing just a two (or so?) cards across benchmarks.
What resolution do you plan on running at? 1080 @60? or 720p using a TV?
Have you checked out the VGA charts at Toms hardware guide? They benchmark just about every card and variation and put them all in a list and have tools for comparing just a two (or so?) cards across benchmarks.
What do you guys think? Which is the better route?
What do you guys think? Which is the better route?
Hi all. I'm not sure if this is the correct board for this, but here it goes: I'm building a rig on a budget. I've done a lot of research and really want to get something that is at least partially future proof, but I don't necessarily need full settings (just as nice as possible with good FPS). I was looking at getting a 560ti and the 3d vision kit and maybe in six months to year or so, I would go SLI with it and I figured I would be set for a while in 3D. On another board, however, someone told me that I really won't be able to play anything at decent settings with a good FPS with a single 560 and the best I could do would be going dual 570's in SLI. The problem is, I can't afford that. My options are getting the 560 ti with a 3D vision kit and upgrading to SLI in 6 months to a year OR getting a 570, waiting 3-4 months and picking up the 3D vision kit and then going SLI in a year and a half or 2 years (or whenever the 570 drops below the $200 mark)
What do you guys think? Which is the better route?
[/quote]
----------------
well what i would do, is just get a GTX 560 ti SLI setup when you can afford it and hold off on 3d vision until you can save up for it again. at full HD resolutions, the only single card i see that will give you decent performance in 3d would be a GTX 580 that has been overclocked or the GTX 590. i wouldnt go with either of those routes because of the price. And the 570 is not really all that worth it right now with the GTX 560 out and its insane overclocking abilities. its basically an awesome bang for your buck card. and in SLI should tear up 3d games for breakfast
Hi all. I'm not sure if this is the correct board for this, but here it goes: I'm building a rig on a budget. I've done a lot of research and really want to get something that is at least partially future proof, but I don't necessarily need full settings (just as nice as possible with good FPS). I was looking at getting a 560ti and the 3d vision kit and maybe in six months to year or so, I would go SLI with it and I figured I would be set for a while in 3D. On another board, however, someone told me that I really won't be able to play anything at decent settings with a good FPS with a single 560 and the best I could do would be going dual 570's in SLI. The problem is, I can't afford that. My options are getting the 560 ti with a 3D vision kit and upgrading to SLI in 6 months to a year OR getting a 570, waiting 3-4 months and picking up the 3D vision kit and then going SLI in a year and a half or 2 years (or whenever the 570 drops below the $200 mark)
What do you guys think? Which is the better route?
----------------
well what i would do, is just get a GTX 560 ti SLI setup when you can afford it and hold off on 3d vision until you can save up for it again. at full HD resolutions, the only single card i see that will give you decent performance in 3d would be a GTX 580 that has been overclocked or the GTX 590. i wouldnt go with either of those routes because of the price. And the 570 is not really all that worth it right now with the GTX 560 out and its insane overclocking abilities. its basically an awesome bang for your buck card. and in SLI should tear up 3d games for breakfast
Really? I heard from another guy that the 560's in SLI won't give me nearly the power to play most modern games in 3D let alone future stuff. If that truly is the case, I'll definitely stick with the 560 solution. The only concern I have though is that I'm deathly afraid of overclocking... I've never touched it before and I can just imagine my new $1600 investment going up in smoke (literally).
[/quote]
well thankfully, overclocking is very easy to do on graphics cards although your CPU overclocking is a different story. in order to utilize any SLI solution you will need to overclock whichever processor you currently have. otherwise the second GTX 460 wont be doin much except sitting at idle due to a major CPU bottleneck. So before you jump on the SLI boat we should make sure we know what the rest of your system is or is going to be.
Really? I heard from another guy that the 560's in SLI won't give me nearly the power to play most modern games in 3D let alone future stuff. If that truly is the case, I'll definitely stick with the 560 solution. The only concern I have though is that I'm deathly afraid of overclocking... I've never touched it before and I can just imagine my new $1600 investment going up in smoke (literally).
well thankfully, overclocking is very easy to do on graphics cards although your CPU overclocking is a different story. in order to utilize any SLI solution you will need to overclock whichever processor you currently have. otherwise the second GTX 460 wont be doin much except sitting at idle due to a major CPU bottleneck. So before you jump on the SLI boat we should make sure we know what the rest of your system is or is going to be.
CPU: Intel® Core™ i5-2500K 3.30 GHz 6M Intel Smart Cache LGA1155 (All Venom OC Certified)
HDD: 1TB SATA-II 3.0Gb/s 16MB Cache 7200RPM HDD (Single Hard Drive)
MEMORY: G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
MOTHERBOARD: [CrossFireX/SLI] MSI P67A-GD55 (B3) Intel P67 Chipset DDR3 ATX Mainboard w/ 7.1 HD Audio, GbLAN, USB3.0, 2x SATA-III RAID, 2 Gen2 PCIe, 3 PCIe X1 & 2 PCI [B3 Stepping]
Factory installed liquid cooling: Asetek 510LC Liquid Cooling System 120MM Radiator & Fan (Enhanced Cooling Performance + Extreme Silent at 20dBA) Single Standard 120MM Fan
I was told the i7-2600K isn't really needed if I'm not doing any graphic design stuff (and I can't really afford the upgrade anyway). I also heard OCing your CPU is massively harder than OCing your GPU. I wouldn't want to ruin both my MOBO and CPU.
Thanks so much for your help. I've been on other boards (mostly gaming ones) and they've just mocked my lack of hardware knowledge and wouldn't help me.
Edit: forgot my PSU
850 Watts - Corsair CMPSU-850TX 80 Plus Power Supply - Quad SLI Ready
CPU: Intel® Core™ i5-2500K 3.30 GHz 6M Intel Smart Cache LGA1155 (All Venom OC Certified)
HDD: 1TB SATA-II 3.0Gb/s 16MB Cache 7200RPM HDD (Single Hard Drive)
MEMORY: G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
MOTHERBOARD: [CrossFireX/SLI] MSI P67A-GD55 (B3) Intel P67 Chipset DDR3 ATX Mainboard w/ 7.1 HD Audio, GbLAN, USB3.0, 2x SATA-III RAID, 2 Gen2 PCIe, 3 PCIe X1 & 2 PCI [B3 Stepping]
Factory installed liquid cooling: Asetek 510LC Liquid Cooling System 120MM Radiator & Fan (Enhanced Cooling Performance + Extreme Silent at 20dBA) Single Standard 120MM Fan
I was told the i7-2600K isn't really needed if I'm not doing any graphic design stuff (and I can't really afford the upgrade anyway). I also heard OCing your CPU is massively harder than OCing your GPU. I wouldn't want to ruin both my MOBO and CPU.
Thanks so much for your help. I've been on other boards (mostly gaming ones) and they've just mocked my lack of hardware knowledge and wouldn't help me.
Edit: forgot my PSU
850 Watts - Corsair CMPSU-850TX 80 Plus Power Supply - Quad SLI Ready
There is no need to get an SLI setup right away imho.
There is no need to get an SLI setup right away imho.
Fantastic for gaming.
I am running a gtx 580 alongside it, and i get fantastic performance in 3d.
Dave
Fantastic for gaming.
I am running a gtx 580 alongside it, and i get fantastic performance in 3d.
Dave
I5 2500K 4.4ghz H60 Corsair cooling
GTX 780 Ti
8GB DDR3 1600mhz
Windows 7 64bit
NXZT Phantom (white)
HMZ-T1 and 50" panasonic 3d plasma
check my blog - cybereality.com
I'm using a GTX 470, and I can run literally any game in 3D with good performance provided I tweak the settings. Just as an example, in Metro 2033 if I set all graphics to "low", then I can get a smooth 80FPS in 3D! Most normal games can be run at medium to high settings and still smooth 60FPS frame-rates in 3D.
[/quote]
I use a 460 and I can run most modern games on high with 3D Vision with Phys-x(if they support it).
There really aren't any pc games that push the hardware that hard anymore. And if they do its because they are unoptimized ports of 360 games.
I'm using a GTX 470, and I can run literally any game in 3D with good performance provided I tweak the settings. Just as an example, in Metro 2033 if I set all graphics to "low", then I can get a smooth 80FPS in 3D! Most normal games can be run at medium to high settings and still smooth 60FPS frame-rates in 3D.
I use a 460 and I can run most modern games on high with 3D Vision with Phys-x(if they support it).
There really aren't any pc games that push the hardware that hard anymore. And if they do its because they are unoptimized ports of 360 games.
AMD Phenom II X3 720 @ 2.8GHZ
8GB RAM
Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2070sb @ 2048x1536 @ 85hz
Edimensional glasses and Nvidia 3D Vision
I use a 460 and I can run most modern games on high with 3D Vision with Phys-x(if they support it).
There really aren't any pc games that push the hardware that hard anymore. And if they do its because they are unoptimized ports of 360 games.
[/quote]
I hope it was a joke, i have GTX580, 6 Core overclocked to 4.1Ghz and 8GB ram, also games are on separate HDD so no slowdowns.
OH my monitor is just 1650 Samsung 2233 and almost no game works in full speed if I set everything to maximum i get like 30FPS
I use a 460 and I can run most modern games on high with 3D Vision with Phys-x(if they support it).
There really aren't any pc games that push the hardware that hard anymore. And if they do its because they are unoptimized ports of 360 games.
I hope it was a joke, i have GTX580, 6 Core overclocked to 4.1Ghz and 8GB ram, also games are on separate HDD so no slowdowns.
OH my monitor is just 1650 Samsung 2233 and almost no game works in full speed if I set everything to maximum i get like 30FPS
750W PSU | SyncMaster 2233 3D Monitor | Samsung 46C7000 46in 3DTV | PS3 320GB | Jasper X360 120GB
I hope it was a joke, i have GTX580, 6 Core overclocked to 4.1Ghz and 8GB ram, also games are on separate HDD so no slowdowns.
OH my monitor is just 1650 Samsung 2233 and almost no game works in full speed if I set everything to maximum i get like 30FPS
[/quote]
This sounds about right...
For 3D vision you want GTX560 SLI. Thats the best performance value for $$ right now.
I hope it was a joke, i have GTX580, 6 Core overclocked to 4.1Ghz and 8GB ram, also games are on separate HDD so no slowdowns.
OH my monitor is just 1650 Samsung 2233 and almost no game works in full speed if I set everything to maximum i get like 30FPS
This sounds about right...
For 3D vision you want GTX560 SLI. Thats the best performance value for $$ right now.
Have you checked out the VGA charts at Toms hardware guide? They benchmark just about every card and variation and put them all in a list and have tools for comparing just a two (or so?) cards across benchmarks.
Have you checked out the VGA charts at Toms hardware guide? They benchmark just about every card and variation and put them all in a list and have tools for comparing just a two (or so?) cards across benchmarks.
46" Samsung ES7500 3DTV (checkerboard, high FOV as desktop monitor, highly recommend!) - Metro 2033 3D PNG screens - Metro LL filter realism mod - Flugan's Deus Ex:HR Depth changers - Nvidia tech support online form - Nvidia support: 1-800-797-6530