I dont mind 45 fps instead of 60. The problem is need a limiter then. What I hate is dips. If I constantly ride 60 but I keep consistently dropping to 45. Id be happier with 45 FPS. It just takes me out of it when its not fluid.
I dont mind 45 fps instead of 60. The problem is need a limiter then. What I hate is dips. If I constantly ride 60 but I keep consistently dropping to 45. Id be happier with 45 FPS. It just takes me out of it when its not fluid.
For those who didn`t play the previous Witcher titles there is 66% off on Steam this weekend.
Other good news from E3 are that Nvidia still work very close with CD Project RED end they are adding several new features to this new engine for The Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk 2077.
This is part of the tekst from E3 conference.
"At this point we got to see a demo of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt showing off some of the new fur and hair tech Nvidia is working with CD Projekt Red to implement. It was an exclusive demo, too, as I got to see The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt today and those wolves did not have the sort of fur Nvidia was showing us. Imagine the softest, most gorgeous coat of fur and then imagine it on a wolf that could tear your throat out. It was beautiful in motion and I doubt any game could pull it off like The Witcher 3 could. How will Cyberpunk 2077 add fur to the game though? Hmm..."
I cant find the source anymore but its legit.
They do work together and that means 3D is still there. I do belive.
EDIT:
Here is a video and picture of this features.
http://www.strategyinformer.com/news/23482/nvidia-confirm-pc-technology-present-in-the-witcher-3-batman-arkham-origins
For those who didn`t play the previous Witcher titles there is 66% off on Steam this weekend.
Other good news from E3 are that Nvidia still work very close with CD Project RED end they are adding several new features to this new engine for The Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk 2077.
This is part of the tekst from E3 conference.
"At this point we got to see a demo of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt showing off some of the new fur and hair tech Nvidia is working with CD Projekt Red to implement. It was an exclusive demo, too, as I got to see The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt today and those wolves did not have the sort of fur Nvidia was showing us. Imagine the softest, most gorgeous coat of fur and then imagine it on a wolf that could tear your throat out. It was beautiful in motion and I doubt any game could pull it off like The Witcher 3 could. How will Cyberpunk 2077 add fur to the game though? Hmm..."
I cant find the source anymore but its legit.
They do work together and that means 3D is still there. I do belive.
@skaut
Could go either way imo. It depends on how much nvidia is willing to pay for 3D support. [Which is why everyone should legitimately buy 3d tv play/3d vision]
Developers expect compensation for "Nvidia features."
Though apparently Witcher 3 is same engine as witcher 2 but revamped.
Cyberpunk 2077 is new engine but tbh cyberpunk 2077 is at least 2-4 years down the line I have a feeling.
Not gonna lie.... fur/hair [enhancements] is the dumbest idea I've ever heard. Maybe its small steps to the bigger picture but I just see it as competition AMD's tressfx[hair] but its not worth fighting about.... dumb idea. I may be wrong and forced to eat my words but I dunno. Other areas can be improved better. Like hair/fur reacts perfectly to breeze. What about cloth, grass, etc? It requires two parts, Tressfx/fur[whatever its called] + physx. Physx the first part makes sense. It effects everything equally, physx alone does a good job at this. But when you enhance hair/fur it just stands out as opposed to rest of world. Its never dirty, its sheens, ugh. Like I know its going to be more of the same for a long time. In tomb raider she'd go through mud, blood, dirt but always look out of a Maybelene commerical.
I remember watching natural selection 2's [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnaJLk8MhL4[/url] dynamic infestation and being amazed. Innovation is so rare nowadays due to costs. Its just sad that videocard companies are handing out the paychecks for features. I really don't care if hair/fur is perfected in my life time......I didn't play with barbie as a child. Its like getting models down perfect but not doing facial animations. It just creates something perfect that looks odd in contrast.
This is gonna sound strange but one thing I've never seen a developer attempt is realistic musculature[Tendons, muscles, veins etc]. I just want to live to see the day when an enemy strains to pick up a warhammer [veins popping at neck,muscles tighten in arm, and legs are braced to ground]. Like witcher 2 I see the fur moving perfectly, okay. But seriously watch video and I will say they got a very furry animal down pat right? But all it does is make the wolf look flabby. Underneath that fur coat is static. It tries to hide this fact by making it ridiculous furry which in turn makes it look more flabby.
Maybe its just me but I hate these features that don't change the game visually[imo]. It just feels like a trick being played on people.
@skaut
Could go either way imo. It depends on how much nvidia is willing to pay for 3D support. [Which is why everyone should legitimately buy 3d tv play/3d vision]
Developers expect compensation for "Nvidia features."
Though apparently Witcher 3 is same engine as witcher 2 but revamped.
Cyberpunk 2077 is new engine but tbh cyberpunk 2077 is at least 2-4 years down the line I have a feeling.
Not gonna lie.... fur/hair [enhancements] is the dumbest idea I've ever heard. Maybe its small steps to the bigger picture but I just see it as competition AMD's tressfx[hair] but its not worth fighting about.... dumb idea. I may be wrong and forced to eat my words but I dunno. Other areas can be improved better. Like hair/fur reacts perfectly to breeze. What about cloth, grass, etc? It requires two parts, Tressfx/fur[whatever its called] + physx. Physx the first part makes sense. It effects everything equally, physx alone does a good job at this. But when you enhance hair/fur it just stands out as opposed to rest of world. Its never dirty, its sheens, ugh. Like I know its going to be more of the same for a long time. In tomb raider she'd go through mud, blood, dirt but always look out of a Maybelene commerical.
I remember watching natural selection 2's " rel="nofollow" target = "_blank"> dynamic infestation and being amazed. Innovation is so rare nowadays due to costs. Its just sad that videocard companies are handing out the paychecks for features. I really don't care if hair/fur is perfected in my life time......I didn't play with barbie as a child. Its like getting models down perfect but not doing facial animations. It just creates something perfect that looks odd in contrast.
This is gonna sound strange but one thing I've never seen a developer attempt is realistic musculature[Tendons, muscles, veins etc]. I just want to live to see the day when an enemy strains to pick up a warhammer [veins popping at neck,muscles tighten in arm, and legs are braced to ground]. Like witcher 2 I see the fur moving perfectly, okay. But seriously watch video and I will say they got a very furry animal down pat right? But all it does is make the wolf look flabby. Underneath that fur coat is static. It tries to hide this fact by making it ridiculous furry which in turn makes it look more flabby.
Maybe its just me but I hate these features that don't change the game visually[imo]. It just feels like a trick being played on people.
I really hope the game will support native 3D.
It is the third time I am playing through The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings and I still cannot phantom how beautilful this game is with 3D Vision. Looks absolutely stunning and you can see all the details clearly as they were meant to be.
It is the third time I am playing through The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings and I still cannot phantom how beautilful this game is with 3D Vision. Looks absolutely stunning and you can see all the details clearly as they were meant to be.
OS: Windows 7 64 bit Ultimate
CPU: Core i7 990X 3.47 Ghz
CPU cooling: Corsair H110 Hydro series
RAM: 12 GB DDR3 Kingston HyperX (1600 MHz)
Sound card: SB X-Fi Fata1ty Platinum THX Certified
Speaker set: Creative Labs GigaWorks 5.1 ProGamer G500 THX Certified
Mouse: Steelseries Sensei Frost Blue
Keyboard: Logitech G19
Motherboard: ASUS Rampage III Extreme
Case: Corsair Obsidian 650D
Harddisk 1: WD Caviar 500 Gb (7200 rpm)
Harddisk 2: Seagate Barracude 2 TB (7200 rpm)
SSD: OZC Vertex 3 120 Gb
PSU: OZC 1250 ZX Gold Certified
GPU: EVGA Signature NVidia GeForce GTX690
Monitor: ASUS VG236 3D Vision Ready
3 pair of 3D Vision 1 glasses and 1 pair of 3D Vision 2 glasses
http://en.thewitcher.com/forum/index.php?/topic/37488-witcher-3-is-nvidia-3d-vision-ready/
i can't belive that more users criticize something (3D vision in this case) before try it.
sorry my bad enghish!!
Face it - most of them can`t aford to buy powerful rig to run 3D (and 3D setup itself) so feel ashamed and defend themself this way. Something like - Lamborgini is a shity car because it burns lots of fuel (when You got already in your head - yea it does to create this incredible power).
Anyway - i am waiting for this weekend to see this new awesome (obviously) gameplay from VGX show.
Face it - most of them can`t aford to buy powerful rig to run 3D (and 3D setup itself) so feel ashamed and defend themself this way. Something like - Lamborgini is a shity car because it burns lots of fuel (when You got already in your head - yea it does to create this incredible power).
Anyway - i am waiting for this weekend to see this new awesome (obviously) gameplay from VGX show.
I get that not everyone is into it ... I don't get how passionate they can be sometimes about something they're not even into, something they aren't going to use, and something that doesn't even affect them at all. :)
I get that not everyone is into it ... I don't get how passionate they can be sometimes about something they're not even into, something they aren't going to use, and something that doesn't even affect them at all. :)
[quote="TsaebehT"]I get that not everyone is into it ... I don't get how passionate they can be sometimes about something they're not even into, something they aren't going to use, and something that doesn't even affect them at all. :)[/quote]
Heh, you pretty much described gay marriage opponents.
TsaebehT said:I get that not everyone is into it ... I don't get how passionate they can be sometimes about something they're not even into, something they aren't going to use, and something that doesn't even affect them at all. :)
Heh, you pretty much described gay marriage opponents.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0i88t0Kacs
I like the witcher for its mature story so many games are lacking.
I've read all the books when I was younger so I was familiar with the characters and the game got me in pretty fast. I would love to play TW3 in 3d thats for sure.
I like the witcher for its mature story so many games are lacking.
I've read all the books when I was younger so I was familiar with the characters and the game got me in pretty fast. I would love to play TW3 in 3d thats for sure.
[quote="Pirateguybrush"][quote="TsaebehT"]I get that not everyone is into it ... I don't get how passionate they can be sometimes about something they're not even into, something they aren't going to use, and something that doesn't even affect them at all. :)[/quote]
Heh, you pretty much described gay marriage opponents.[/quote]
All this made me laugh so bad :) Brilliant.
Edit : Aparently new trailer is made out of in-game fotages. We all love theirs CGI animations (not less then Blizzards) but this time i think we need engine`s build gameplay.
TsaebehT said:I get that not everyone is into it ... I don't get how passionate they can be sometimes about something they're not even into, something they aren't going to use, and something that doesn't even affect them at all. :)
Heh, you pretty much described gay marriage opponents.
All this made me laugh so bad :) Brilliant.
Edit : Aparently new trailer is made out of in-game fotages. We all love theirs CGI animations (not less then Blizzards) but this time i think we need engine`s build gameplay.
Cant fucking wait to play games that looks like this CGI, it's about time so heres hoping Valves steam machine will set the baseline very high so we pc gamers once again wont be draged down forever of these weak consoles like PS4/Xbone.
If those consoles set the baseline we are in for the same shit we pretty much have seen for years now, sorry but it's a fact so come on Valve, crush this nasty shitty things called consoles once and for all.
Nvidia - Valve - Intel start making your own Pc Only games as you know it's well over time!!
Cant fucking wait to play games that looks like this CGI, it's about time so heres hoping Valves steam machine will set the baseline very high so we pc gamers once again wont be draged down forever of these weak consoles like PS4/Xbone.
If those consoles set the baseline we are in for the same shit we pretty much have seen for years now, sorry but it's a fact so come on Valve, crush this nasty shitty things called consoles once and for all.
Nvidia - Valve - Intel start making your own Pc Only games as you know it's well over time!!
The Witcher games are amazing. I don't really know what the English language versions sound like, but the Polish ones have probably the most believable voice acting and screenwriting of any game I've ever played.
I love Skyrim, but after playing a Witcher game, it sounds like a grade school production. The dialogue is so cheesy and fake it becomes borderline offensive and makes me wonder how they can get away with it.
[quote="JnLoader"] heres hoping Valves steam machine will set the baseline very high so we pc gamers once again wont be draged down forever of these weak consoles like PS4/Xbone.[/quote]
If anything, I think the Steam Machines might become the lowest common denominator. There will be all sorts of configurations, and some of them will reportedly have nothing but intel GPUs. :/
Though I can't really see Steam Machines ever taking off anyway. If they released them a year ago, then maybe. Hardcore PC gamers were never going to be particularly interested, and as for everyone else: who's going to bother buying a Steam box next year before they buy a PS4 and/or Xbone?
Valve is not exactly known for making failures, so maybe it'll work. But then again, they're also not known for making hardware. Talking about it, yes. Actually doing it (let alone doing it successfully), no.
I don't know that Steam Machines will be particularly good for PC gaming - at least not any time soon. It may well save PC gaming in 5 years time when Windows has faded into irrelevance, has become outright hostile to the desktop, and DirectX has stalled. Then, Valve and Linux will probably be our saviours. But until then, I don't think Steam Machines will be doing us many favours, with their so-so hardware and their push towards simplifying gaming for big screens.
The Witcher games are amazing. I don't really know what the English language versions sound like, but the Polish ones have probably the most believable voice acting and screenwriting of any game I've ever played.
I love Skyrim, but after playing a Witcher game, it sounds like a grade school production. The dialogue is so cheesy and fake it becomes borderline offensive and makes me wonder how they can get away with it.
JnLoader said: heres hoping Valves steam machine will set the baseline very high so we pc gamers once again wont be draged down forever of these weak consoles like PS4/Xbone.
If anything, I think the Steam Machines might become the lowest common denominator. There will be all sorts of configurations, and some of them will reportedly have nothing but intel GPUs. :/
Though I can't really see Steam Machines ever taking off anyway. If they released them a year ago, then maybe. Hardcore PC gamers were never going to be particularly interested, and as for everyone else: who's going to bother buying a Steam box next year before they buy a PS4 and/or Xbone?
Valve is not exactly known for making failures, so maybe it'll work. But then again, they're also not known for making hardware. Talking about it, yes. Actually doing it (let alone doing it successfully), no.
I don't know that Steam Machines will be particularly good for PC gaming - at least not any time soon. It may well save PC gaming in 5 years time when Windows has faded into irrelevance, has become outright hostile to the desktop, and DirectX has stalled. Then, Valve and Linux will probably be our saviours. But until then, I don't think Steam Machines will be doing us many favours, with their so-so hardware and their push towards simplifying gaming for big screens.
You forget one thing
Valve is collaborating with OCulusVR... I wouldn't be surprised if Oculus will work better/best on the SteamOS /Steam Machine rather than on Windows or normal PCs:))
I think they think that we ought to think :)) this is the Ace in their sleeve;))
Valve is collaborating with OCulusVR... I wouldn't be surprised if Oculus will work better/best on the SteamOS /Steam Machine rather than on Windows or normal PCs:))
I think they think that we ought to think :)) this is the Ace in their sleeve;))
1x Palit RTX 2080Ti Pro Gaming OC(watercooled and overclocked to hell)
3x 3D Vision Ready Asus VG278HE monitors (5760x1080).
Intel i9 9900K (overclocked to 5.3 and watercooled ofc).
Asus Maximus XI Hero Mobo.
16 GB Team Group T-Force Dark Pro DDR4 @ 3600.
Lots of Disks:
- Raid 0 - 256GB Sandisk Extreme SSD.
- Raid 0 - WD Black - 2TB.
- SanDisk SSD PLUS 480 GB.
- Intel 760p 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD.
Creative Sound Blaster Z.
Windows 10 x64 Pro.
etc
Unreal Engine 4 looks promising and it looks like they're taking their time to actually finish it before the release, it might also be well optimized not like the CrashBite 3.0 from DICE.
as for steam machines I'm not sure... next-gen consoles will struggle with 4k gaming at anything above 30fps straight away. It depends on how soon 4k will catch up with the mainstream.
As far as I see it steam box is a 'console' that can be upgraded, so you can buy one plug it and play with nvidia geforce experience like software that will set the settings in line with what you have on-board, but you can upgrade it anytime probably relatively easy so an average Joe can to it himself that way you can put another GPU / CPU in the box every 2-3 years and it will never get outdated. Its an interesting idea that will not hold gaming tech like ps3/x360 did for several years now (they really pushed dx9 to its limits).
Unreal Engine 4 looks promising and it looks like they're taking their time to actually finish it before the release, it might also be well optimized not like the CrashBite 3.0 from DICE.
as for steam machines I'm not sure... next-gen consoles will struggle with 4k gaming at anything above 30fps straight away. It depends on how soon 4k will catch up with the mainstream.
As far as I see it steam box is a 'console' that can be upgraded, so you can buy one plug it and play with nvidia geforce experience like software that will set the settings in line with what you have on-board, but you can upgrade it anytime probably relatively easy so an average Joe can to it himself that way you can put another GPU / CPU in the box every 2-3 years and it will never get outdated. Its an interesting idea that will not hold gaming tech like ps3/x360 did for several years now (they really pushed dx9 to its limits).
Co-founder/Web host of helixmod.blog.com
Donations for web hosting @ paypal -eqzitara@yahoo.com
or
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=791918
Other good news from E3 are that Nvidia still work very close with CD Project RED end they are adding several new features to this new engine for The Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk 2077.
This is part of the tekst from E3 conference.
"At this point we got to see a demo of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt showing off some of the new fur and hair tech Nvidia is working with CD Projekt Red to implement. It was an exclusive demo, too, as I got to see The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt today and those wolves did not have the sort of fur Nvidia was showing us. Imagine the softest, most gorgeous coat of fur and then imagine it on a wolf that could tear your throat out. It was beautiful in motion and I doubt any game could pull it off like The Witcher 3 could. How will Cyberpunk 2077 add fur to the game though? Hmm..."
I cant find the source anymore but its legit.
They do work together and that means 3D is still there. I do belive.
EDIT:
Here is a video and picture of this features.
http://www.strategyinformer.com/news/23482/nvidia-confirm-pc-technology-present-in-the-witcher-3-batman-arkham-origins
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198014296177/
Could go either way imo. It depends on how much nvidia is willing to pay for 3D support. [Which is why everyone should legitimately buy 3d tv play/3d vision]
Developers expect compensation for "Nvidia features."
Though apparently Witcher 3 is same engine as witcher 2 but revamped.
Cyberpunk 2077 is new engine but tbh cyberpunk 2077 is at least 2-4 years down the line I have a feeling.
Not gonna lie.... fur/hair [enhancements] is the dumbest idea I've ever heard. Maybe its small steps to the bigger picture but I just see it as competition AMD's tressfx[hair] but its not worth fighting about.... dumb idea. I may be wrong and forced to eat my words but I dunno. Other areas can be improved better. Like hair/fur reacts perfectly to breeze. What about cloth, grass, etc? It requires two parts, Tressfx/fur[whatever its called] + physx. Physx the first part makes sense. It effects everything equally, physx alone does a good job at this. But when you enhance hair/fur it just stands out as opposed to rest of world. Its never dirty, its sheens, ugh. Like I know its going to be more of the same for a long time. In tomb raider she'd go through mud, blood, dirt but always look out of a Maybelene commerical.
I remember watching natural selection 2's " rel="nofollow" target = "_blank"> dynamic infestation and being amazed. Innovation is so rare nowadays due to costs. Its just sad that videocard companies are handing out the paychecks for features. I really don't care if hair/fur is perfected in my life time......I didn't play with barbie as a child. Its like getting models down perfect but not doing facial animations. It just creates something perfect that looks odd in contrast.
This is gonna sound strange but one thing I've never seen a developer attempt is realistic musculature[Tendons, muscles, veins etc]. I just want to live to see the day when an enemy strains to pick up a warhammer [veins popping at neck,muscles tighten in arm, and legs are braced to ground]. Like witcher 2 I see the fur moving perfectly, okay. But seriously watch video and I will say they got a very furry animal down pat right? But all it does is make the wolf look flabby. Underneath that fur coat is static. It tries to hide this fact by making it ridiculous furry which in turn makes it look more flabby.
Maybe its just me but I hate these features that don't change the game visually[imo]. It just feels like a trick being played on people.
Co-founder/Web host of helixmod.blog.com
Donations for web hosting @ paypal -eqzitara@yahoo.com
or
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=791918
It is the third time I am playing through The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings and I still cannot phantom how beautilful this game is with 3D Vision. Looks absolutely stunning and you can see all the details clearly as they were meant to be.
OS: Windows 7 64 bit Ultimate
CPU: Core i7 990X 3.47 Ghz
CPU cooling: Corsair H110 Hydro series
RAM: 12 GB DDR3 Kingston HyperX (1600 MHz)
Sound card: SB X-Fi Fata1ty Platinum THX Certified
Speaker set: Creative Labs GigaWorks 5.1 ProGamer G500 THX Certified
Mouse: Steelseries Sensei Frost Blue
Keyboard: Logitech G19
Motherboard: ASUS Rampage III Extreme
Case: Corsair Obsidian 650D
Harddisk 1: WD Caviar 500 Gb (7200 rpm)
Harddisk 2: Seagate Barracude 2 TB (7200 rpm)
SSD: OZC Vertex 3 120 Gb
PSU: OZC 1250 ZX Gold Certified
GPU: EVGA Signature NVidia GeForce GTX690
Monitor: ASUS VG236 3D Vision Ready
3 pair of 3D Vision 1 glasses and 1 pair of 3D Vision 2 glasses
i can't belive that more users criticize something (3D vision in this case) before try it.
sorry my bad enghish!!
i7 4970k@4.5Ghz, SLI GTX1080Ti Aorus Gigabyte Xtreme, 16GB G Skill 2400hrz, 3*PG258Q in 3D surround.
Anyway - i am waiting for this weekend to see this new awesome (obviously) gameplay from VGX show.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198014296177/
[MonitorSizeOverride][Global/Base Profile Tweaks][Depth=IPD]
Heh, you pretty much described gay marriage opponents.
I like the witcher for its mature story so many games are lacking.
I've read all the books when I was younger so I was familiar with the characters and the game got me in pretty fast. I would love to play TW3 in 3d thats for sure.
Acer H5360 / BenQ XL2420T + 3D Vision 2 Kit - EVGA GTX 980TI 6GB - i7-3930K@4.0GHz - DX79SI- 16GB RAM@2133 - Win10x64 Home - HTC VIVE
http://www.projectaon.org/en/Main/Books
[MonitorSizeOverride][Global/Base Profile Tweaks][Depth=IPD]
All this made me laugh so bad :) Brilliant.
Edit : Aparently new trailer is made out of in-game fotages. We all love theirs CGI animations (not less then Blizzards) but this time i think we need engine`s build gameplay.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198014296177/
If those consoles set the baseline we are in for the same shit we pretty much have seen for years now, sorry but it's a fact so come on Valve, crush this nasty shitty things called consoles once and for all.
Nvidia - Valve - Intel start making your own Pc Only games as you know it's well over time!!
I love Skyrim, but after playing a Witcher game, it sounds like a grade school production. The dialogue is so cheesy and fake it becomes borderline offensive and makes me wonder how they can get away with it.
If anything, I think the Steam Machines might become the lowest common denominator. There will be all sorts of configurations, and some of them will reportedly have nothing but intel GPUs. :/
Though I can't really see Steam Machines ever taking off anyway. If they released them a year ago, then maybe. Hardcore PC gamers were never going to be particularly interested, and as for everyone else: who's going to bother buying a Steam box next year before they buy a PS4 and/or Xbone?
Valve is not exactly known for making failures, so maybe it'll work. But then again, they're also not known for making hardware. Talking about it, yes. Actually doing it (let alone doing it successfully), no.
I don't know that Steam Machines will be particularly good for PC gaming - at least not any time soon. It may well save PC gaming in 5 years time when Windows has faded into irrelevance, has become outright hostile to the desktop, and DirectX has stalled. Then, Valve and Linux will probably be our saviours. But until then, I don't think Steam Machines will be doing us many favours, with their so-so hardware and their push towards simplifying gaming for big screens.
Valve is collaborating with OCulusVR... I wouldn't be surprised if Oculus will work better/best on the SteamOS /Steam Machine rather than on Windows or normal PCs:))
I think they think that we ought to think :)) this is the Ace in their sleeve;))
1x Palit RTX 2080Ti Pro Gaming OC(watercooled and overclocked to hell)
3x 3D Vision Ready Asus VG278HE monitors (5760x1080).
Intel i9 9900K (overclocked to 5.3 and watercooled ofc).
Asus Maximus XI Hero Mobo.
16 GB Team Group T-Force Dark Pro DDR4 @ 3600.
Lots of Disks:
- Raid 0 - 256GB Sandisk Extreme SSD.
- Raid 0 - WD Black - 2TB.
- SanDisk SSD PLUS 480 GB.
- Intel 760p 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD.
Creative Sound Blaster Z.
Windows 10 x64 Pro.
etc
My website with my fixes and OpenGL to 3D Vision wrapper:
http://3dsurroundgaming.com
(If you like some of the stuff that I've done and want to donate something, you can do it with PayPal at tavyhome@gmail.com)
as for steam machines I'm not sure... next-gen consoles will struggle with 4k gaming at anything above 30fps straight away. It depends on how soon 4k will catch up with the mainstream.
As far as I see it steam box is a 'console' that can be upgraded, so you can buy one plug it and play with nvidia geforce experience like software that will set the settings in line with what you have on-board, but you can upgrade it anytime probably relatively easy so an average Joe can to it himself that way you can put another GPU / CPU in the box every 2-3 years and it will never get outdated. Its an interesting idea that will not hold gaming tech like ps3/x360 did for several years now (they really pushed dx9 to its limits).
Acer H5360 / BenQ XL2420T + 3D Vision 2 Kit - EVGA GTX 980TI 6GB - i7-3930K@4.0GHz - DX79SI- 16GB RAM@2133 - Win10x64 Home - HTC VIVE