Bought a 3D ready monitor, have had 0 luck making anything go 3d...
  2 / 3    
[quote name='Deo' date='01 December 2011 - 11:04 AM' timestamp='1322733876' post='1335743']
I dont think the hdmi 1.4 blu-ray 3D is real-time update, I think its just a default 'first selection' as it never detected my monitor. No options work




[/quote]
i installed 3dtv play to go with my projector, but it also said hdmi 1.4 bluray 3d

it wasn't until i updated my drivers to the latest version that it allowed me to play 3d games. my projector wasn't on the hardware list, i was on 275.xx drivers but an update allowed nvidia to recognize it. it leads me to believe that you need to wait for the support to be made available. nvidia and other companies really need to provide support before they release monitor/projector/tv to the public especially one that advertised 3d games on the pc, yet no software supports.
[quote name='Deo' date='01 December 2011 - 11:04 AM' timestamp='1322733876' post='1335743']

I dont think the hdmi 1.4 blu-ray 3D is real-time update, I think its just a default 'first selection' as it never detected my monitor. No options work











i installed 3dtv play to go with my projector, but it also said hdmi 1.4 bluray 3d



it wasn't until i updated my drivers to the latest version that it allowed me to play 3d games. my projector wasn't on the hardware list, i was on 275.xx drivers but an update allowed nvidia to recognize it. it leads me to believe that you need to wait for the support to be made available. nvidia and other companies really need to provide support before they release monitor/projector/tv to the public especially one that advertised 3d games on the pc, yet no software supports.

#16
Posted 12/02/2011 05:46 PM   
You have to wait till they support it because they think all users are dumb(some are.)The updates set the size of you tv/monitor/etc. Also if you are hdmi 1.3(3d vision) or hdmi 1.4(3d tv play) etc. Also they dont want to allow specific monitors that are ment for amd /shock.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':shock:' />
You have to wait till they support it because they think all users are dumb(some are.)The updates set the size of you tv/monitor/etc. Also if you are hdmi 1.3(3d vision) or hdmi 1.4(3d tv play) etc. Also they dont want to allow specific monitors that are ment for amd /shock.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':shock:' />

Co-founder of helixmod.blog.com

If you like one of my helixmod patches and want to donate. Can send to me through paypal - eqzitara@yahoo.com

#17
Posted 12/02/2011 07:05 PM   
I believe this monitor is supported when you connect it via DL DVI. We support the two new Acer passive monitors.

What drivers are you using?
I believe this monitor is supported when you connect it via DL DVI. We support the two new Acer passive monitors.



What drivers are you using?

#18
Posted 12/02/2011 09:56 PM   
[quote name='andrewf@nvidia' date='02 December 2011 - 04:56 PM' timestamp='1322863002' post='1336634']
I believe this monitor is supported when you connect it via DL DVI. We support the two new Acer passive monitors.

What drivers are you using?
[/quote]

If you support those monitors.. Why can't you support the lg d2342 passive monitor ?
[quote name='andrewf@nvidia' date='02 December 2011 - 04:56 PM' timestamp='1322863002' post='1336634']

I believe this monitor is supported when you connect it via DL DVI. We support the two new Acer passive monitors.



What drivers are you using?





If you support those monitors.. Why can't you support the lg d2342 passive monitor ?

#19
Posted 12/03/2011 03:13 AM   
[quote name='andrewf@nvidia' date='02 December 2011 - 09:56 PM' timestamp='1322863002' post='1336634']
I believe this monitor is supported when you connect it via DL DVI. We support the two new Acer passive monitors.

What drivers are you using?
[/quote]

Hi there, i'm using 290.36, i will try and obtain a dvi.. not used it before though, this monitor only has 1 dvi port.. or am i mistaken about the terminology?

edit: in fact it doesnt even have a dvi.. just hdmi x2 and vga
[quote name='andrewf@nvidia' date='02 December 2011 - 09:56 PM' timestamp='1322863002' post='1336634']

I believe this monitor is supported when you connect it via DL DVI. We support the two new Acer passive monitors.



What drivers are you using?





Hi there, i'm using 290.36, i will try and obtain a dvi.. not used it before though, this monitor only has 1 dvi port.. or am i mistaken about the terminology?



edit: in fact it doesnt even have a dvi.. just hdmi x2 and vga

#20
Posted 12/03/2011 12:42 PM   
[quote name='CoppDog' date='02 December 2011 - 06:13 PM' timestamp='1322882033' post='1336768']
If you support those monitors.. Why can't you support the lg d2342 passive monitor ?
[/quote]

Acer stepped up and payed for 3D Vision certification.(which is passes on to the custumer) LG opted to pay TriDef for 3D support and got blacklisted.


[quote name='Deo' date='03 December 2011 - 03:42 AM' timestamp='1322916176' post='1336914']
Hi there, i'm using 290.36, i will try and obtain a dvi.. not used it before though, this monitor only has 1 dvi port.. or am i mistaken about the terminology?

edit: in fact it doesnt even have a dvi.. just hdmi x2 and vga
[/quote]

You would think it would have a DVI(not a DVI-D) connection, on the LG passive monitor (D2342P) the DVI connection had the least ghosting and crosstalk.

Looks like Nvidia might be supporting it via the VGA connection?
[quote name='CoppDog' date='02 December 2011 - 06:13 PM' timestamp='1322882033' post='1336768']

If you support those monitors.. Why can't you support the lg d2342 passive monitor ?





Acer stepped up and payed for 3D Vision certification.(which is passes on to the custumer) LG opted to pay TriDef for 3D support and got blacklisted.





[quote name='Deo' date='03 December 2011 - 03:42 AM' timestamp='1322916176' post='1336914']

Hi there, i'm using 290.36, i will try and obtain a dvi.. not used it before though, this monitor only has 1 dvi port.. or am i mistaken about the terminology?



edit: in fact it doesnt even have a dvi.. just hdmi x2 and vga





You would think it would have a DVI(not a DVI-D) connection, on the LG passive monitor (D2342P) the DVI connection had the least ghosting and crosstalk.



Looks like Nvidia might be supporting it via the VGA connection?

#21
Posted 12/03/2011 02:05 PM   
[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 02:05 PM' timestamp='1322921101' post='1336940']
Acer stepped up and payed for 3D Vision certification.(which is passes on to the custumer) LG opted to pay TriDef for 3D support and got blacklisted.




You would think it would have a DVI(not a DVI-D) connection, on the LG passive monitor (D2342P) the DVI connection had the least ghosting and crosstalk.

Looks like Nvidia might be supporting it via the VGA connection?
[/quote]

Im not sure man... I doubt it. isnt VGA an old school port for older graphics cards?
All dual link dvi's ive seen are just dvi to dvi. This monitor is quite new afaik..
[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 02:05 PM' timestamp='1322921101' post='1336940']

Acer stepped up and payed for 3D Vision certification.(which is passes on to the custumer) LG opted to pay TriDef for 3D support and got blacklisted.









You would think it would have a DVI(not a DVI-D) connection, on the LG passive monitor (D2342P) the DVI connection had the least ghosting and crosstalk.



Looks like Nvidia might be supporting it via the VGA connection?





Im not sure man... I doubt it. isnt VGA an old school port for older graphics cards?

All dual link dvi's ive seen are just dvi to dvi. This monitor is quite new afaik..

#22
Posted 12/03/2011 02:32 PM   
[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 03:05 PM' timestamp='1322921101' post='1336940']
Acer stepped up and payed for 3D Vision certification.(which is passes on to the custumer) LG opted to pay TriDef for 3D support and got blacklisted.[/quote]Is that a fact or just an assumption of yours?
[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 03:05 PM' timestamp='1322921101' post='1336940']

Acer stepped up and payed for 3D Vision certification.(which is passes on to the custumer) LG opted to pay TriDef for 3D support and got blacklisted.Is that a fact or just an assumption of yours?

#23
Posted 12/03/2011 02:56 PM   
LG opted to use TriDef for 3D with their D2342P passive monitor = fact

Acer payed for Nvidia 3D vision support for their new passive monitors = fact

Nvidia would like every 3D display made to purchase 3D Vision certification = fact

HDMI 1.3 displays and HDMI 1.4 3D monitors that do not purchase Nvidia 3D Vision certification are officially unsupported = fact

The cost of 3D certification is passed on to the customer = fact (you think they do it for free?)
LG opted to use TriDef for 3D with their D2342P passive monitor = fact



Acer payed for Nvidia 3D vision support for their new passive monitors = fact



Nvidia would like every 3D display made to purchase 3D Vision certification = fact



HDMI 1.3 displays and HDMI 1.4 3D monitors that do not purchase Nvidia 3D Vision certification are officially unsupported = fact



The cost of 3D certification is passed on to the customer = fact (you think they do it for free?)

#24
Posted 12/03/2011 03:12 PM   
Nvidia does seem to be making a very clear distinction with the products they support between HDTVs and PC Monitors.

[list]

[*]HDTV 3D Vision support = 3DTV Play = $40 software buy-in in lieu of manufacturer certification. Cost of 3D Vision support paid by customer.
[*]LCD/Monitor support = 3D Vision certified = manufacturer licenses and pays for certification and customer pays directly through cost of 3D Vision hardware. Cost of 3D Vision support paid by both.
[/list]

In the past, Monitors that didn't use 3D Vision hardware (glasses, emitter) were locked out and had no chance of 3D Vision support but apparently this has changed with this "3D Vision optimized" label that allows you to use a Monitor mfg's glasses and hardware solution (and native output) and still get 3D Vision support. I would assume 100% of the cost for support/certification in this case is paid by the mfg and passed onto the consumer indirectly. I think its a positive overall and a step in the right direction, as it will offer more alternatives and perhaps open the door to more officially supported formats like SBS and CB since the Geforce drivers support a non-standard output with row interleaved on these Acer panels.
Nvidia does seem to be making a very clear distinction with the products they support between HDTVs and PC Monitors.






  • HDTV 3D Vision support = 3DTV Play = $40 software buy-in in lieu of manufacturer certification. Cost of 3D Vision support paid by customer.
  • LCD/Monitor support = 3D Vision certified = manufacturer licenses and pays for certification and customer pays directly through cost of 3D Vision hardware. Cost of 3D Vision support paid by both.




In the past, Monitors that didn't use 3D Vision hardware (glasses, emitter) were locked out and had no chance of 3D Vision support but apparently this has changed with this "3D Vision optimized" label that allows you to use a Monitor mfg's glasses and hardware solution (and native output) and still get 3D Vision support. I would assume 100% of the cost for support/certification in this case is paid by the mfg and passed onto the consumer indirectly. I think its a positive overall and a step in the right direction, as it will offer more alternatives and perhaps open the door to more officially supported formats like SBS and CB since the Geforce drivers support a non-standard output with row interleaved on these Acer panels.

-=HeliX=- Mod 3DV Game Fixes
My 3D Vision Games List Ratings

Intel Core i7 5930K @4.5GHz | Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5 | Win10 x64 Pro | Corsair H105
Nvidia GeForce Titan X SLI Hybrid | ROG Swift PG278Q 144Hz + 3D Vision/G-Sync | 32GB Adata DDR4 2666
Intel Samsung 950Pro SSD | Samsung EVO 4x1 RAID 0 |
Yamaha VX-677 A/V Receiver | Polk Audio RM6880 7.1 | LG Blu-Ray
Auzen X-Fi HT HD | Logitech G710/G502/G27 | Corsair Air 540 | EVGA P2-1200W

#25
Posted 12/03/2011 05:49 PM   
Interlaced is available for the Toshiba 3D HDTVs, see the thumbnail in this post http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=215588&hl=mocca&st=20

Weird thing was, that option was unavailable on the Passive 47LW5700 LG 3D HDTV I was using a few months ago and returned due to lag, interpolation artifacts and problems with ghosting/color bugs.

As far as I know, this option is still not available to LG Passive owners.
Interlaced is available for the Toshiba 3D HDTVs, see the thumbnail in this post http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=215588&hl=mocca&st=20



Weird thing was, that option was unavailable on the Passive 47LW5700 LG 3D HDTV I was using a few months ago and returned due to lag, interpolation artifacts and problems with ghosting/color bugs.



As far as I know, this option is still not available to LG Passive owners.

#26
Posted 12/03/2011 06:17 PM   
[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']
LG opted to use TriDef for 3D with their D2342P passive monitor = fact[/quote]ok

[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']
Acer payed for Nvidia 3D vision support for their new passive monitors = fact[/quote]source?

[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']
Nvidia would like every 3D display made to purchase 3D Vision certification = fact[/quote]source? Is there any monitor that supports 120Hz through dual-link dvi which is not supported by 3DVision? The LG d2342 doesn't seem to support Dual-Link DVI, so it's not a suitable device for 3DVision, it's suitable for 3DTV Play at best.

[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']HDMI 1.3 displays and HDMI 1.4 3D monitors that do not purchase Nvidia 3D Vision certification are officially unsupported = fact[/quote]I'm pretty sure that they didn't get royalties for all these 3d TV models: [url="http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/3dtv-play-requirements-uk.html"]http://www.nvidia.co...rements-uk.html[/url]

[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']
The cost of 3D certification is passed on to the customer = fact (you think they do it for free?)
[/quote]
So, you're actually making this up without knowing anything. At least unless you show us some sources for your claims.
[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']

LG opted to use TriDef for 3D with their D2342P passive monitor = factok



[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']

Acer payed for Nvidia 3D vision support for their new passive monitors = factsource?



[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']

Nvidia would like every 3D display made to purchase 3D Vision certification = factsource? Is there any monitor that supports 120Hz through dual-link dvi which is not supported by 3DVision? The LG d2342 doesn't seem to support Dual-Link DVI, so it's not a suitable device for 3DVision, it's suitable for 3DTV Play at best.



[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']HDMI 1.3 displays and HDMI 1.4 3D monitors that do not purchase Nvidia 3D Vision certification are officially unsupported = factI'm pretty sure that they didn't get royalties for all these 3d TV models: http://www.nvidia.co...rements-uk.html



[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 04:12 PM' timestamp='1322925151' post='1336967']

The cost of 3D certification is passed on to the customer = fact (you think they do it for free?)



So, you're actually making this up without knowing anything. At least unless you show us some sources for your claims.

#27
Posted 12/03/2011 08:38 PM   
It has been stated by Mr Andrew Fear that Nvidia does not charge manufacturers to be supported via 3DTV Play.

You seriously think, that Nvidia would not rather see all of the Displays supported by 3DTV Play paying to be 3D Vision certified by them instead?

Bloody on his Blog specifically said Acer paid for Nvidia certification for use with 3D Vision, not 3DTV Play. Read the article and the comments, the link is in the thread!!
Andrew states in this thread, the monitors are supported.

I say "HDMI 1.3 displays and HDMI 1.4 3D monitors that do not purchase Nvidia 3D Vision certification are officially unsupported = fact"

You say "I'm pretty sure that they didn't get royalties for all these 3d TV models: http://www.nvidia.co...rements-uk.html"<--------what does this have to do with what I stated about HDMI 1.4 monitors not being supported as well as HDMI 1.3 displays, that do not pay for certification?

Do you really think that every cost that a manufacturer incurs is not passed on to the consumer? Really?
It has been stated by Mr Andrew Fear that Nvidia does not charge manufacturers to be supported via 3DTV Play.



You seriously think, that Nvidia would not rather see all of the Displays supported by 3DTV Play paying to be 3D Vision certified by them instead?



Bloody on his Blog specifically said Acer paid for Nvidia certification for use with 3D Vision, not 3DTV Play. Read the article and the comments, the link is in the thread!!

Andrew states in this thread, the monitors are supported.



I say "HDMI 1.3 displays and HDMI 1.4 3D monitors that do not purchase Nvidia 3D Vision certification are officially unsupported = fact"



You say "I'm pretty sure that they didn't get royalties for all these 3d TV models: http://www.nvidia.co...rements-uk.html"<--------what does this have to do with what I stated about HDMI 1.4 monitors not being supported as well as HDMI 1.3 displays, that do not pay for certification?



Do you really think that every cost that a manufacturer incurs is not passed on to the consumer? Really?

#28
Posted 12/03/2011 09:01 PM   
[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']
It has been stated by Mr Andrew Fear that Nvidia does not charge manufacturers to be supported via 3DTV Play.[/quote]So you call him a liar because Acer licenced the software to be used with their monitor?


[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']
You seriously think, that Nvidia would not rather see all of the Displays supported by 3DTV Play paying to be 3D Vision certified by them instead?[/quote]I don't think that nVidia is interested in earning money that way. This also only makes sense, if those manufacturors are actively promoting their hardware with the 3DVision feature. Those that do certainly DO have a marketing deal (who's paying who is open for debate, though). But most don't mention nVidia at all, and I would bet quite some money, that there is no money payed by either side. Maybe nVidia asks them for data or a testmodel, and that's that.

[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']
Bloody on his Blog specifically said Acer paid for Nvidia certification for use with 3D Vision, not 3DTV Play. Read the article and the comments, the link is in the thread!!
Andrew states in this thread, the monitors are supported.[/quote]Actually, he said: "[b]Update:[/b] Ok, so it is not exactly official 3D Vision support, but instead Acer has licensed the GeForce 3D software driver from Nvidia in order to get the same game support, features, etc. as 3D Vision-ready active monitors do offer, but in the form of a passive 3D solution."

So they licensed the software to be used with their monitor. It will probably be packaged with their monitor, at least a flyer with a activation code will be in there. So the owners of those displays don't have to pay for the software.

They DID NOT pay so that nVidia puts their monitor into the list of supported 3D Vision devices.

[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']
I say "HDMI 1.3 displays and HDMI 1.4 3D monitors that do not purchase Nvidia 3D Vision certification are officially unsupported = fact"

You say "I'm pretty sure that they didn't get royalties for all these 3d TV models: [url="http://www.nvidia.co...rements-uk.html%22--------what"]http://www.nvidia.co...rements-uk.html"<--------what[/url] does this have to do with what I stated about HDMI 1.4 monitors not being supported as well as HDMI 1.3 displays, that do not pay for certification?[/QUOTE]

Are we confusing 3DVision and 3DTV Play here?

I don't think that there are ANY [b]non[/b]-Duallink DVI, 120Hz supporting display devices actually supported by [b][i]3DVision.[/i][/b] Simply because you can never use nVidia's 3DVision glasses with them, you always have to use their own solution of separating the images. So these devices can only be supported by 3D TV Play - which can also be used as part of 3DVision of course, but they're still not 3DVision capable devices.

So maybe I just don't get your point here, or I might just be misinformed. That wouldn't be the first time, but I trust you'll enlighten me in that case.

[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']
Do you really think that every cost that a manufacturer incurs is not passed on to the consumer? Really?
[/quote]
Did I ever say that? But oth, if Acer pays for the inclusion of 3DVision, it's certainly not because out of the goodness of their heart. It's just a good point for marketing the monitor. So, yes, it's in the best interest of Acer. If you actually see a higher end price because of that - well, I wouldn't bet much on that. Prices are rounded up or down for competition reasons anyway, a couple of cents for licencing the software doesn't make much of a difference there.
[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']

It has been stated by Mr Andrew Fear that Nvidia does not charge manufacturers to be supported via 3DTV Play.So you call him a liar because Acer licenced the software to be used with their monitor?





[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']

You seriously think, that Nvidia would not rather see all of the Displays supported by 3DTV Play paying to be 3D Vision certified by them instead?I don't think that nVidia is interested in earning money that way. This also only makes sense, if those manufacturors are actively promoting their hardware with the 3DVision feature. Those that do certainly DO have a marketing deal (who's paying who is open for debate, though). But most don't mention nVidia at all, and I would bet quite some money, that there is no money payed by either side. Maybe nVidia asks them for data or a testmodel, and that's that.



[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']

Bloody on his Blog specifically said Acer paid for Nvidia certification for use with 3D Vision, not 3DTV Play. Read the article and the comments, the link is in the thread!!

Andrew states in this thread, the monitors are supported.Actually, he said: "Update: Ok, so it is not exactly official 3D Vision support, but instead Acer has licensed the GeForce 3D software driver from Nvidia in order to get the same game support, features, etc. as 3D Vision-ready active monitors do offer, but in the form of a passive 3D solution."



So they licensed the software to be used with their monitor. It will probably be packaged with their monitor, at least a flyer with a activation code will be in there. So the owners of those displays don't have to pay for the software.



They DID NOT pay so that nVidia puts their monitor into the list of supported 3D Vision devices.



[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']

I say "HDMI 1.3 displays and HDMI 1.4 3D monitors that do not purchase Nvidia 3D Vision certification are officially unsupported = fact"



You say "I'm pretty sure that they didn't get royalties for all these 3d TV models: http://www.nvidia.co...rements-uk.html"<--------what does this have to do with what I stated about HDMI 1.4 monitors not being supported as well as HDMI 1.3 displays, that do not pay for certification?[/QUOTE]



Are we confusing 3DVision and 3DTV Play here?



I don't think that there are ANY non-Duallink DVI, 120Hz supporting display devices actually supported by 3DVision. Simply because you can never use nVidia's 3DVision glasses with them, you always have to use their own solution of separating the images. So these devices can only be supported by 3D TV Play - which can also be used as part of 3DVision of course, but they're still not 3DVision capable devices.



So maybe I just don't get your point here, or I might just be misinformed. That wouldn't be the first time, but I trust you'll enlighten me in that case.



[quote name='D-Man11' date='03 December 2011 - 10:01 PM' timestamp='1322946109' post='1337120']

Do you really think that every cost that a manufacturer incurs is not passed on to the consumer? Really?



Did I ever say that? But oth, if Acer pays for the inclusion of 3DVision, it's certainly not because out of the goodness of their heart. It's just a good point for marketing the monitor. So, yes, it's in the best interest of Acer. If you actually see a higher end price because of that - well, I wouldn't bet much on that. Prices are rounded up or down for competition reasons anyway, a couple of cents for licencing the software doesn't make much of a difference there.

#29
Posted 12/03/2011 09:50 PM   
Wow you need a nap or something? I never called Andrew a liar, nor would I. I never looked at the way you suggested, I suppose Acer could be buying product keys or something along that line to distribute with these monitors.

Nvidia 3D Vision is NOT limited to Displays using DVI-D connection exclusively. Take a look at this Mitsubishi TV that is listed on the Nvidia compatibility list and look very closely at the picture showing the back of the WD-82837 3D HDTV, in fact, enlarge the picture. Suprise, suprise no DVI-D connection. http://www.amazon.com/Mitsubishi-WD-82837-82-Inch-1080p-Theater/dp/B001XUR5H2

http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-system-requirements.html

So you still want to say that these monitors could not, no way, no how fly under the 3D Vision banner?

Maybe Nvidia is creating another category called "Optomized for GeForce"?

Bloody also said a lil more in his comments:
"I still haven’t seen these new monitors as they were just announced, but the interesting thing is that although they support HDMI 1.4, the products like these two monitors that are “Optimized for GeForce” will not be limited to 1080p 24Hz 3D mode only. When used for gaming in stereo 3D mode the driver licensed from Nvidia will be outputting row interleaved 1080p at 60Hz. The HDMI 1.4 limitations for stereo 3D will be applied only when using consumer electronic devices…"

I may have read more into these statements, than I should have (by thinking it meant 3D Vision), but I was only trying to help a fellow 3D Gamer with the problem he was having. I had no idea that his was a passive monitor until I looked it up and clicked on the link to Bloody's review. There I saw that it was passive and saw where it said it was Nvidia supported. I suppose I should be a dousche and not attempt to help next time, least I be called out, crucified and falsely accused of calling people liars.
Wow you need a nap or something? I never called Andrew a liar, nor would I. I never looked at the way you suggested, I suppose Acer could be buying product keys or something along that line to distribute with these monitors.



Nvidia 3D Vision is NOT limited to Displays using DVI-D connection exclusively. Take a look at this Mitsubishi TV that is listed on the Nvidia compatibility list and look very closely at the picture showing the back of the WD-82837 3D HDTV, in fact, enlarge the picture. Suprise, suprise no DVI-D connection. http://www.amazon.com/Mitsubishi-WD-82837-82-Inch-1080p-Theater/dp/B001XUR5H2



http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-system-requirements.html



So you still want to say that these monitors could not, no way, no how fly under the 3D Vision banner?



Maybe Nvidia is creating another category called "Optomized for GeForce"?



Bloody also said a lil more in his comments:

"I still haven’t seen these new monitors as they were just announced, but the interesting thing is that although they support HDMI 1.4, the products like these two monitors that are “Optimized for GeForce” will not be limited to 1080p 24Hz 3D mode only. When used for gaming in stereo 3D mode the driver licensed from Nvidia will be outputting row interleaved 1080p at 60Hz. The HDMI 1.4 limitations for stereo 3D will be applied only when using consumer electronic devices…"



I may have read more into these statements, than I should have (by thinking it meant 3D Vision), but I was only trying to help a fellow 3D Gamer with the problem he was having. I had no idea that his was a passive monitor until I looked it up and clicked on the link to Bloody's review. There I saw that it was passive and saw where it said it was Nvidia supported. I suppose I should be a dousche and not attempt to help next time, least I be called out, crucified and falsely accused of calling people liars.

#30
Posted 12/03/2011 10:40 PM   
  2 / 3    
Scroll To Top