Is Passive Polarized 3D glasses solution must halved the resolution? Active shutter glasses are now
1 / 3
As title. I want to enable a 3D home theatre and was looking into Acer H5360 projector.
This projector is not expensive if compare to the 5 active shutter glasses that I need to get for my family.
Will there be any 3D-TV coming up will able to utilize the cheap passive polarized glasses without sacrificing the screen resolution? I heard that all the polarized 3D-TV yet now will halved the resolution. Any idea we can share?
As title. I want to enable a 3D home theatre and was looking into Acer H5360 projector.
This projector is not expensive if compare to the 5 active shutter glasses that I need to get for my family.
Will there be any 3D-TV coming up will able to utilize the cheap passive polarized glasses without sacrificing the screen resolution? I heard that all the polarized 3D-TV yet now will halved the resolution. Any idea we can share?
As title. I want to enable a 3D home theatre and was looking into Acer H5360 projector.
This projector is not expensive if compare to the 5 active shutter glasses that I need to get for my family.
Will there be any 3D-TV coming up will able to utilize the cheap passive polarized glasses without sacrificing the screen resolution? I heard that all the polarized 3D-TV yet now will halved the resolution. Any idea we can share?
As title. I want to enable a 3D home theatre and was looking into Acer H5360 projector.
This projector is not expensive if compare to the 5 active shutter glasses that I need to get for my family.
Will there be any 3D-TV coming up will able to utilize the cheap passive polarized glasses without sacrificing the screen resolution? I heard that all the polarized 3D-TV yet now will halved the resolution. Any idea we can share?
Things are balanced, with frame sequential solutions using active shutter glasses the display itself is a bit more affordable, but the glasses are more expensive. And with passive polarized solutions the displays are more expensive and the glasses are cheaper. This however should not be that much of an an issue, unless you consider using it with many viewers at the same time... for 1-2 pairs the difference is not big, but if you have to buy 5-10 pairs of glasses for example or more things look quite different.
Almost all passively polarized displays provide you with half the horizontal resolution due to the use of single display panel and overlaying it with filter that polarizes differently each even and odd line, so in the end when using it in 3D mode you don't get a Full HD resolution, although in 2D mode the display is fully capable of providing 1080p resolution. One example that provides full resolution even in 3D mode while still using passive polarization was the iZ3D monitor that actually had 2 LCD panels, but recently they've announced that they are stopping to produce the monitors... and they were 22-inch with resolution 1680x1050 only.
But when talking about 3D projectors, if you consider that you'll need two projectors with two polarization filters and a silver screen, then the money you'll need to play for the complete solution will most likely go over the price of the Acer 3D DLP projector with 5 pairs of 3D Vision shutter glasses. If only for movies, then you might consider getting cheaper DLP-Link shutter glasses that will also work with the projector, but with them you will not have the option to play games in stereo 3D mode. The good news is that by using two projectors you will still have the full resolution, but making this two projector setup work with 3D videos and movies is not as straightforward as a single 3D DLP projector for example and you might have some trouble making things work the way you want them to. And if you consider to go for a high-end single projector 3D solution that is intended for home cinema use, then the price of the glasses will be your last problem... ;)
Things are balanced, with frame sequential solutions using active shutter glasses the display itself is a bit more affordable, but the glasses are more expensive. And with passive polarized solutions the displays are more expensive and the glasses are cheaper. This however should not be that much of an an issue, unless you consider using it with many viewers at the same time... for 1-2 pairs the difference is not big, but if you have to buy 5-10 pairs of glasses for example or more things look quite different.
Almost all passively polarized displays provide you with half the horizontal resolution due to the use of single display panel and overlaying it with filter that polarizes differently each even and odd line, so in the end when using it in 3D mode you don't get a Full HD resolution, although in 2D mode the display is fully capable of providing 1080p resolution. One example that provides full resolution even in 3D mode while still using passive polarization was the iZ3D monitor that actually had 2 LCD panels, but recently they've announced that they are stopping to produce the monitors... and they were 22-inch with resolution 1680x1050 only.
But when talking about 3D projectors, if you consider that you'll need two projectors with two polarization filters and a silver screen, then the money you'll need to play for the complete solution will most likely go over the price of the Acer 3D DLP projector with 5 pairs of 3D Vision shutter glasses. If only for movies, then you might consider getting cheaper DLP-Link shutter glasses that will also work with the projector, but with them you will not have the option to play games in stereo 3D mode. The good news is that by using two projectors you will still have the full resolution, but making this two projector setup work with 3D videos and movies is not as straightforward as a single 3D DLP projector for example and you might have some trouble making things work the way you want them to. And if you consider to go for a high-end single projector 3D solution that is intended for home cinema use, then the price of the glasses will be your last problem... ;)
Things are balanced, with frame sequential solutions using active shutter glasses the display itself is a bit more affordable, but the glasses are more expensive. And with passive polarized solutions the displays are more expensive and the glasses are cheaper. This however should not be that much of an an issue, unless you consider using it with many viewers at the same time... for 1-2 pairs the difference is not big, but if you have to buy 5-10 pairs of glasses for example or more things look quite different.
Almost all passively polarized displays provide you with half the horizontal resolution due to the use of single display panel and overlaying it with filter that polarizes differently each even and odd line, so in the end when using it in 3D mode you don't get a Full HD resolution, although in 2D mode the display is fully capable of providing 1080p resolution. One example that provides full resolution even in 3D mode while still using passive polarization was the iZ3D monitor that actually had 2 LCD panels, but recently they've announced that they are stopping to produce the monitors... and they were 22-inch with resolution 1680x1050 only.
But when talking about 3D projectors, if you consider that you'll need two projectors with two polarization filters and a silver screen, then the money you'll need to play for the complete solution will most likely go over the price of the Acer 3D DLP projector with 5 pairs of 3D Vision shutter glasses. If only for movies, then you might consider getting cheaper DLP-Link shutter glasses that will also work with the projector, but with them you will not have the option to play games in stereo 3D mode. The good news is that by using two projectors you will still have the full resolution, but making this two projector setup work with 3D videos and movies is not as straightforward as a single 3D DLP projector for example and you might have some trouble making things work the way you want them to. And if you consider to go for a high-end single projector 3D solution that is intended for home cinema use, then the price of the glasses will be your last problem... ;)
Things are balanced, with frame sequential solutions using active shutter glasses the display itself is a bit more affordable, but the glasses are more expensive. And with passive polarized solutions the displays are more expensive and the glasses are cheaper. This however should not be that much of an an issue, unless you consider using it with many viewers at the same time... for 1-2 pairs the difference is not big, but if you have to buy 5-10 pairs of glasses for example or more things look quite different.
Almost all passively polarized displays provide you with half the horizontal resolution due to the use of single display panel and overlaying it with filter that polarizes differently each even and odd line, so in the end when using it in 3D mode you don't get a Full HD resolution, although in 2D mode the display is fully capable of providing 1080p resolution. One example that provides full resolution even in 3D mode while still using passive polarization was the iZ3D monitor that actually had 2 LCD panels, but recently they've announced that they are stopping to produce the monitors... and they were 22-inch with resolution 1680x1050 only.
But when talking about 3D projectors, if you consider that you'll need two projectors with two polarization filters and a silver screen, then the money you'll need to play for the complete solution will most likely go over the price of the Acer 3D DLP projector with 5 pairs of 3D Vision shutter glasses. If only for movies, then you might consider getting cheaper DLP-Link shutter glasses that will also work with the projector, but with them you will not have the option to play games in stereo 3D mode. The good news is that by using two projectors you will still have the full resolution, but making this two projector setup work with 3D videos and movies is not as straightforward as a single 3D DLP projector for example and you might have some trouble making things work the way you want them to. And if you consider to go for a high-end single projector 3D solution that is intended for home cinema use, then the price of the glasses will be your last problem... ;)
so TV & monitor really cannot utilize passive polarized without halved the resolution right?
(not possible to use two layer of display panel?)
but how about projector? since it is not necessary to be assembled as a "board shape", then it is possible to pack two individual light channel that pass through two display panels corresponding to R&L eye images then emit to screen altogether. if this can of projector available in market then no need two projectors right?
so TV & monitor really cannot utilize passive polarized without halved the resolution right?
(not possible to use two layer of display panel?)
but how about projector? since it is not necessary to be assembled as a "board shape", then it is possible to pack two individual light channel that pass through two display panels corresponding to R&L eye images then emit to screen altogether. if this can of projector available in market then no need two projectors right?
so TV & monitor really cannot utilize passive polarized without halved the resolution right?
(not possible to use two layer of display panel?)
but how about projector? since it is not necessary to be assembled as a "board shape", then it is possible to pack two individual light channel that pass through two display panels corresponding to R&L eye images then emit to screen altogether. if this can of projector available in market then no need two projectors right?
so TV & monitor really cannot utilize passive polarized without halved the resolution right?
(not possible to use two layer of display panel?)
but how about projector? since it is not necessary to be assembled as a "board shape", then it is possible to pack two individual light channel that pass through two display panels corresponding to R&L eye images then emit to screen altogether. if this can of projector available in market then no need two projectors right?
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
[quote name='tritosine' post='1121806' date='Sep 24 2010, 02:57 PM']Ok now I have time to respond in detail.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.[/quote]
Hi. Where can I get a polarizing modulator for my H5360 for $400? Thanks.
[quote name='tritosine' post='1121806' date='Sep 24 2010, 02:57 PM']Ok now I have time to respond in detail.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
Hi. Where can I get a polarizing modulator for my H5360 for $400? Thanks.
This projector is not expensive if compare to the 5 active shutter glasses that I need to get for my family.
Will there be any 3D-TV coming up will able to utilize the cheap passive polarized glasses without sacrificing the screen resolution? I heard that all the polarized 3D-TV yet now will halved the resolution. Any idea we can share?
Thanks!
This projector is not expensive if compare to the 5 active shutter glasses that I need to get for my family.
Will there be any 3D-TV coming up will able to utilize the cheap passive polarized glasses without sacrificing the screen resolution? I heard that all the polarized 3D-TV yet now will halved the resolution. Any idea we can share?
Thanks!
This projector is not expensive if compare to the 5 active shutter glasses that I need to get for my family.
Will there be any 3D-TV coming up will able to utilize the cheap passive polarized glasses without sacrificing the screen resolution? I heard that all the polarized 3D-TV yet now will halved the resolution. Any idea we can share?
Thanks!
This projector is not expensive if compare to the 5 active shutter glasses that I need to get for my family.
Will there be any 3D-TV coming up will able to utilize the cheap passive polarized glasses without sacrificing the screen resolution? I heard that all the polarized 3D-TV yet now will halved the resolution. Any idea we can share?
Thanks!
Almost all passively polarized displays provide you with half the horizontal resolution due to the use of single display panel and overlaying it with filter that polarizes differently each even and odd line, so in the end when using it in 3D mode you don't get a Full HD resolution, although in 2D mode the display is fully capable of providing 1080p resolution. One example that provides full resolution even in 3D mode while still using passive polarization was the iZ3D monitor that actually had 2 LCD panels, but recently they've announced that they are stopping to produce the monitors... and they were 22-inch with resolution 1680x1050 only.
But when talking about 3D projectors, if you consider that you'll need two projectors with two polarization filters and a silver screen, then the money you'll need to play for the complete solution will most likely go over the price of the Acer 3D DLP projector with 5 pairs of 3D Vision shutter glasses. If only for movies, then you might consider getting cheaper DLP-Link shutter glasses that will also work with the projector, but with them you will not have the option to play games in stereo 3D mode. The good news is that by using two projectors you will still have the full resolution, but making this two projector setup work with 3D videos and movies is not as straightforward as a single 3D DLP projector for example and you might have some trouble making things work the way you want them to. And if you consider to go for a high-end single projector 3D solution that is intended for home cinema use, then the price of the glasses will be your last problem... ;)
Almost all passively polarized displays provide you with half the horizontal resolution due to the use of single display panel and overlaying it with filter that polarizes differently each even and odd line, so in the end when using it in 3D mode you don't get a Full HD resolution, although in 2D mode the display is fully capable of providing 1080p resolution. One example that provides full resolution even in 3D mode while still using passive polarization was the iZ3D monitor that actually had 2 LCD panels, but recently they've announced that they are stopping to produce the monitors... and they were 22-inch with resolution 1680x1050 only.
But when talking about 3D projectors, if you consider that you'll need two projectors with two polarization filters and a silver screen, then the money you'll need to play for the complete solution will most likely go over the price of the Acer 3D DLP projector with 5 pairs of 3D Vision shutter glasses. If only for movies, then you might consider getting cheaper DLP-Link shutter glasses that will also work with the projector, but with them you will not have the option to play games in stereo 3D mode. The good news is that by using two projectors you will still have the full resolution, but making this two projector setup work with 3D videos and movies is not as straightforward as a single 3D DLP projector for example and you might have some trouble making things work the way you want them to. And if you consider to go for a high-end single projector 3D solution that is intended for home cinema use, then the price of the glasses will be your last problem... ;)
My 3D Vision Blog - 3dvision-blog.com
Almost all passively polarized displays provide you with half the horizontal resolution due to the use of single display panel and overlaying it with filter that polarizes differently each even and odd line, so in the end when using it in 3D mode you don't get a Full HD resolution, although in 2D mode the display is fully capable of providing 1080p resolution. One example that provides full resolution even in 3D mode while still using passive polarization was the iZ3D monitor that actually had 2 LCD panels, but recently they've announced that they are stopping to produce the monitors... and they were 22-inch with resolution 1680x1050 only.
But when talking about 3D projectors, if you consider that you'll need two projectors with two polarization filters and a silver screen, then the money you'll need to play for the complete solution will most likely go over the price of the Acer 3D DLP projector with 5 pairs of 3D Vision shutter glasses. If only for movies, then you might consider getting cheaper DLP-Link shutter glasses that will also work with the projector, but with them you will not have the option to play games in stereo 3D mode. The good news is that by using two projectors you will still have the full resolution, but making this two projector setup work with 3D videos and movies is not as straightforward as a single 3D DLP projector for example and you might have some trouble making things work the way you want them to. And if you consider to go for a high-end single projector 3D solution that is intended for home cinema use, then the price of the glasses will be your last problem... ;)
Almost all passively polarized displays provide you with half the horizontal resolution due to the use of single display panel and overlaying it with filter that polarizes differently each even and odd line, so in the end when using it in 3D mode you don't get a Full HD resolution, although in 2D mode the display is fully capable of providing 1080p resolution. One example that provides full resolution even in 3D mode while still using passive polarization was the iZ3D monitor that actually had 2 LCD panels, but recently they've announced that they are stopping to produce the monitors... and they were 22-inch with resolution 1680x1050 only.
But when talking about 3D projectors, if you consider that you'll need two projectors with two polarization filters and a silver screen, then the money you'll need to play for the complete solution will most likely go over the price of the Acer 3D DLP projector with 5 pairs of 3D Vision shutter glasses. If only for movies, then you might consider getting cheaper DLP-Link shutter glasses that will also work with the projector, but with them you will not have the option to play games in stereo 3D mode. The good news is that by using two projectors you will still have the full resolution, but making this two projector setup work with 3D videos and movies is not as straightforward as a single 3D DLP projector for example and you might have some trouble making things work the way you want them to. And if you consider to go for a high-end single projector 3D solution that is intended for home cinema use, then the price of the glasses will be your last problem... ;)
My 3D Vision Blog - 3dvision-blog.com
[url="http://www.ultimate3dheaven.com/dlp3dwiglfis.html"]http://www.ultimate3dheaven.com/dlp3dwiglfis.html[/url]
http://www.ultimate3dheaven.com/dlp3dwiglfis.html
[url="http://www.ultimate3dheaven.com/dlp3dwiglfis.html"]http://www.ultimate3dheaven.com/dlp3dwiglfis.html[/url]
http://www.ultimate3dheaven.com/dlp3dwiglfis.html
(not possible to use two layer of display panel?)
but how about projector? since it is not necessary to be assembled as a "board shape", then it is possible to pack two individual light channel that pass through two display panels corresponding to R&L eye images then emit to screen altogether. if this can of projector available in market then no need two projectors right?
(not possible to use two layer of display panel?)
but how about projector? since it is not necessary to be assembled as a "board shape", then it is possible to pack two individual light channel that pass through two display panels corresponding to R&L eye images then emit to screen altogether. if this can of projector available in market then no need two projectors right?
(not possible to use two layer of display panel?)
but how about projector? since it is not necessary to be assembled as a "board shape", then it is possible to pack two individual light channel that pass through two display panels corresponding to R&L eye images then emit to screen altogether. if this can of projector available in market then no need two projectors right?
(not possible to use two layer of display panel?)
but how about projector? since it is not necessary to be assembled as a "board shape", then it is possible to pack two individual light channel that pass through two display panels corresponding to R&L eye images then emit to screen altogether. if this can of projector available in market then no need two projectors right?
Pub compatible stuff is guess what, expensive!!!
And constant light is not something to be excited at as a consumer, it translates to worse motion resolution.
Pub compatible stuff is guess what, expensive!!!
And constant light is not something to be excited at as a consumer, it translates to worse motion resolution.
Pub compatible stuff is guess what, expensive!!!
And constant light is not something to be excited at as a consumer, it translates to worse motion resolution.
Pub compatible stuff is guess what, expensive!!!
And constant light is not something to be excited at as a consumer, it translates to worse motion resolution.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.[/quote]
Hi. Where can I get a polarizing modulator for my H5360 for $400? Thanks.
You'll need a silverscreen. Thats goin to be more expensive than a family worth of glasses, even if you do it yourself . If you buy it , its like 600 usd. Then you need a polarizing modulator for H5360, another 400 usd.
Hi. Where can I get a polarizing modulator for my H5360 for $400? Thanks.