Dual Quadro FX3700's in SLI, 3D vision, XPx64, quad buffered stereo Is it worth it to add anothe
I sometimes experience some lag in rendering huge high res stereo imagery using 3D vision.
I am not really good with specs.
Can someone tell me how much performance I would gain by going to SLI in quad buffered stereo with 3D vision?
I read that each card could handle individual "sides" of the stereo pair(s)

panning & zooming speeds are good when I am zoomed in close, but as I zoom out, the performance really starts to drop (with one card).
I sometimes experience some lag in rendering huge high res stereo imagery using 3D vision.

I am not really good with specs.

Can someone tell me how much performance I would gain by going to SLI in quad buffered stereo with 3D vision?

I read that each card could handle individual "sides" of the stereo pair(s)



panning & zooming speeds are good when I am zoomed in close, but as I zoom out, the performance really starts to drop (with one card).

#1
Posted 05/26/2010 05:49 PM   
I sometimes experience some lag in rendering huge high res stereo imagery using 3D vision.
I am not really good with specs.
Can someone tell me how much performance I would gain by going to SLI in quad buffered stereo with 3D vision?
I read that each card could handle individual "sides" of the stereo pair(s)

panning & zooming speeds are good when I am zoomed in close, but as I zoom out, the performance really starts to drop (with one card).
I sometimes experience some lag in rendering huge high res stereo imagery using 3D vision.

I am not really good with specs.

Can someone tell me how much performance I would gain by going to SLI in quad buffered stereo with 3D vision?

I read that each card could handle individual "sides" of the stereo pair(s)



panning & zooming speeds are good when I am zoomed in close, but as I zoom out, the performance really starts to drop (with one card).

#2
Posted 05/26/2010 05:49 PM   
[quote name='GPLavoie' post='1062696' date='May 26 2010, 06:49 PM']I sometimes experience some lag in rendering huge high res stereo imagery using 3D vision.
I am not really good with specs.
Can someone tell me how much performance I would gain by going to SLI in quad buffered stereo with 3D vision?
I read that each card could handle individual "sides" of the stereo pair(s)

panning & zooming speeds are good when I am zoomed in close, but as I zoom out, the performance really starts to drop (with one card).[/quote]


not sure fx 3700 are sli enabled.
quad buffered stereo mostly does not work with multiple video cards.
read appendix c in NVIDIA_Control_Panel_Quick_Start_Guide.pdf for the driver you use. (eg 197.59_WinXP_Quadro_Release_Notes.pdf)

Bigben
[quote name='GPLavoie' post='1062696' date='May 26 2010, 06:49 PM']I sometimes experience some lag in rendering huge high res stereo imagery using 3D vision.

I am not really good with specs.

Can someone tell me how much performance I would gain by going to SLI in quad buffered stereo with 3D vision?

I read that each card could handle individual "sides" of the stereo pair(s)



panning & zooming speeds are good when I am zoomed in close, but as I zoom out, the performance really starts to drop (with one card).





not sure fx 3700 are sli enabled.

quad buffered stereo mostly does not work with multiple video cards.

read appendix c in NVIDIA_Control_Panel_Quick_Start_Guide.pdf for the driver you use. (eg 197.59_WinXP_Quadro_Release_Notes.pdf)



Bigben

#3
Posted 05/26/2010 10:24 PM   
[quote name='GPLavoie' post='1062696' date='May 26 2010, 06:49 PM']I sometimes experience some lag in rendering huge high res stereo imagery using 3D vision.
I am not really good with specs.
Can someone tell me how much performance I would gain by going to SLI in quad buffered stereo with 3D vision?
I read that each card could handle individual "sides" of the stereo pair(s)

panning & zooming speeds are good when I am zoomed in close, but as I zoom out, the performance really starts to drop (with one card).[/quote]


not sure fx 3700 are sli enabled.
quad buffered stereo mostly does not work with multiple video cards.
read appendix c in NVIDIA_Control_Panel_Quick_Start_Guide.pdf for the driver you use. (eg 197.59_WinXP_Quadro_Release_Notes.pdf)

Bigben
[quote name='GPLavoie' post='1062696' date='May 26 2010, 06:49 PM']I sometimes experience some lag in rendering huge high res stereo imagery using 3D vision.

I am not really good with specs.

Can someone tell me how much performance I would gain by going to SLI in quad buffered stereo with 3D vision?

I read that each card could handle individual "sides" of the stereo pair(s)



panning & zooming speeds are good when I am zoomed in close, but as I zoom out, the performance really starts to drop (with one card).





not sure fx 3700 are sli enabled.

quad buffered stereo mostly does not work with multiple video cards.

read appendix c in NVIDIA_Control_Panel_Quick_Start_Guide.pdf for the driver you use. (eg 197.59_WinXP_Quadro_Release_Notes.pdf)



Bigben

#4
Posted 05/26/2010 10:24 PM   
Scroll To Top