Nvidia already gives us a hint for the release date in store.nvidia.com:
"NVIDIA wants to keep the party going and has decided to give you another week"
Let's enjoy the waiting party~~
I'm totally disappointed. I'm so stupid that I trusted Nvidia and bought their product (and recommended others to buy, extremely stupid!). I have a PS3 but I chose to buy the Windows version of COD:BO and Deadrising 2 because Nvidia told us 3DTV Play is available in Nov. I have been very patient during last month but now its December, we see nothing released.
The most frustrating thing is that Nvidia, such a big firm doesn't know what is responsibility. At least they should explain something. People like me is being 3DTV Played, being played by Nvidia.
Nvidia already gives us a hint for the release date in store.nvidia.com:
"NVIDIA wants to keep the party going and has decided to give you another week"
Let's enjoy the waiting party~~
I'm totally disappointed. I'm so stupid that I trusted Nvidia and bought their product (and recommended others to buy, extremely stupid!). I have a PS3 but I chose to buy the Windows version of COD:BO and Deadrising 2 because Nvidia told us 3DTV Play is available in Nov. I have been very patient during last month but now its December, we see nothing released.
The most frustrating thing is that Nvidia, such a big firm doesn't know what is responsibility. At least they should explain something. People like me is being 3DTV Played, being played by Nvidia.
Tridef sucks and doesn't even compare to 3DTV Play. I've tried both and know what I'm saying. Don't expect any miracles from Tridef, it's crap.
It's full HD is done by checkerboared mode, so it's not the full resolution per eye, it's only half. With 3DTV Play you get full resolution per eye. I can honestly say that 720p with 3DTV Play looks better than 1080p Tridef.
Go in the web and read about the differences between side-by-side, checkerboard, frame package (3DTV Play) and Frame Sequential (3D Vision). Honestly the best one is frame sequential cause allows 1080p 120hz, the best one by far, but it's only for PC displays and 3D Vision, it's not likely for a TV to have DVI-DL input. The second best 3D mode is frame package that allows 1080p 24hz and 720p 60hz, it's way better than SBS, under-over, checkerboard, interlaced among others.
Tridef sucks and doesn't even compare to 3DTV Play. I've tried both and know what I'm saying. Don't expect any miracles from Tridef, it's crap.
It's full HD is done by checkerboared mode, so it's not the full resolution per eye, it's only half. With 3DTV Play you get full resolution per eye. I can honestly say that 720p with 3DTV Play looks better than 1080p Tridef.
Go in the web and read about the differences between side-by-side, checkerboard, frame package (3DTV Play) and Frame Sequential (3D Vision). Honestly the best one is frame sequential cause allows 1080p 120hz, the best one by far, but it's only for PC displays and 3D Vision, it's not likely for a TV to have DVI-DL input. The second best 3D mode is frame package that allows 1080p 24hz and 720p 60hz, it's way better than SBS, under-over, checkerboard, interlaced among others.
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bits - Core i7 2600K @ 4.5ghz - Asus Maximus IV Extreme Z68 - Geforce EVGA GTX 690 - 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 (2T) - Thermaltake Armor+ - SSD Intel 510 Series Sata3 256GB - HD WD Caviar Black Sata3 64mb 2TB - HD WD Caviar Black 1TB Sata3 64mb - Bose Sound System - LG H20L GGW Blu Ray/DVD/CD RW - LG GH20 DVD RAM - PSU Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W - Samsung S27A950D 3D Vision Ready + 3D HDTV SAMSUNG PL63C7000 3DTVPLAY + ROLLERMOD CHECKERBOARD
Time to bin the Nvidia card. AMD here i come. Roll on HD6970.
Moved to Nvidia for 3DTV Play. Big mistake. [size="6"]Nvidia Comms[/size] to existing customers are absolutely [size="6"]shocking[/size]. SH** at best. Its not as if AMD are going to release a competing software product to warrant this "Secrecy". Also, people are/were willing to pay for this software & now starting to look for alternatives.
Atleast I'll get Stereo 3D & full audio bitstreaming with the new Top end AMD card.
Andrew@Nvidia, anything you can say to change our minds?
I have been stung by Nvidia twice now and it has seriously started to leave a bad taste.
1 GPU on laptop died after 6 months (8600 GPU) Repaired under warranty and died again 3 months later. Epic failure.
2 Bought GTX 480 expecting to play 3D games on my 3DTV, big fail.
I think Nvidia need to learn about customer satisfaction/retention with positive actions.
Time to bin the Nvidia card. AMD here i come. Roll on HD6970.
Moved to Nvidia for 3DTV Play. Big mistake. Nvidia Comms to existing customers are absolutely shocking. SH** at best. Its not as if AMD are going to release a competing software product to warrant this "Secrecy". Also, people are/were willing to pay for this software & now starting to look for alternatives.
Atleast I'll get Stereo 3D & full audio bitstreaming with the new Top end AMD card.
Andrew@Nvidia, anything you can say to change our minds?
I have been stung by Nvidia twice now and it has seriously started to leave a bad taste.
1 GPU on laptop died after 6 months (8600 GPU) Repaired under warranty and died again 3 months later. Epic failure.
2 Bought GTX 480 expecting to play 3D games on my 3DTV, big fail.
I think Nvidia need to learn about customer satisfaction/retention with positive actions.
[quote name='francomg' date='02 December 2010 - 12:41 AM' timestamp='1291221680' post='1154248']
Tridef sucks and doesn't even compare to 3DTV Play. I've tried both and know what I'm saying. Don't expect any miracles from Tridef, it's crap.
It's full HD is done by checkerboared mode, so it's not the full resolution per eye, it's only half. With 3DTV Play you get full resolution per eye. I can honestly say that 720p with 3DTV Play looks better than 1080p Tridef.
Go in the web and read about the differences between side-by-side, checkerboard, frame package (3DTV Play) and Frame Sequential (3D Vision). Honestly the best one is frame sequential cause allows 1080p 120hz, the best one by far, but it's only for PC displays and 3D Vision, it's not likely for a TV to have DVI-DL input. The second best 3D mode is frame package that allows 1080p 24hz and 720p 60hz, it's way better than SBS, under-over, checkerboard, interlaced among others.
[/quote]
Even I didn't compare Tridef and 3DTV Play, I have no doubt that 3DTV Play should be better than Tridef overall because 3DTV Play is a software specially developed for Nvidia chipset only, and it can be optimized by using any proprietary hardware feature. If Tridef is more superior in this case, Nvidia staff should dig a hole and hide.
But I have a silly question here (not related to Tridef vs 3DTV Play). Why 720p@60Hz frame packaging (FP) is better than side-by-side (SBS) 1080p@60Hz in teams of picture quality?
Regarding pixel count, in each 1/60 second, 720p FP offers each eye 1280x720 (921,600) pixels, while 1080p SBS offers each eye 960x1080 (1,036,800) pixels.
With the same frequency, 1080p SBS provides >10% more pixel information than 720p FP for each eye. So why 720p@60Hz FP is better than 1080p@60Hz SBS?
[quote name='francomg' date='02 December 2010 - 12:41 AM' timestamp='1291221680' post='1154248']
Tridef sucks and doesn't even compare to 3DTV Play. I've tried both and know what I'm saying. Don't expect any miracles from Tridef, it's crap.
It's full HD is done by checkerboared mode, so it's not the full resolution per eye, it's only half. With 3DTV Play you get full resolution per eye. I can honestly say that 720p with 3DTV Play looks better than 1080p Tridef.
Go in the web and read about the differences between side-by-side, checkerboard, frame package (3DTV Play) and Frame Sequential (3D Vision). Honestly the best one is frame sequential cause allows 1080p 120hz, the best one by far, but it's only for PC displays and 3D Vision, it's not likely for a TV to have DVI-DL input. The second best 3D mode is frame package that allows 1080p 24hz and 720p 60hz, it's way better than SBS, under-over, checkerboard, interlaced among others.
Even I didn't compare Tridef and 3DTV Play, I have no doubt that 3DTV Play should be better than Tridef overall because 3DTV Play is a software specially developed for Nvidia chipset only, and it can be optimized by using any proprietary hardware feature. If Tridef is more superior in this case, Nvidia staff should dig a hole and hide.
But I have a silly question here (not related to Tridef vs 3DTV Play). Why 720p@60Hz frame packaging (FP) is better than side-by-side (SBS) 1080p@60Hz in teams of picture quality?
Regarding pixel count, in each 1/60 second, 720p FP offers each eye 1280x720 (921,600) pixels, while 1080p SBS offers each eye 960x1080 (1,036,800) pixels.
With the same frequency, 1080p SBS provides >10% more pixel information than 720p FP for each eye. So why 720p@60Hz FP is better than 1080p@60Hz SBS?
Itomeshi... it's almost cute to read your "defend the corporation" spiel. If you really are a software producer, or a drone of any importance at all in a large company, surely you must realise this is the drive of the dark force... Marketing. Yes, all the overpaid bloodsuckers who were too stupid to become lawyers - and that's saying something, if you have had the bad luck to ever meet one of those drooling suits.
You can fire up the test wizard in the NVIDIA control panel without a 3D Vision set and see that it works fine already. On the NVIDIA web site itself it states that the 3D Vision system is not even used in the 3D TV Play setup, but must be plugged into a USB port to prove that you have had the money sucked out of you like a good consumer. And now the delays, as was intelligently pointed out by Mr. Soapbox above, are just to squeeze as many cents out of people during the pre-christmas rush who can enjoy plugging the 3D Vision system into their system as an unattractive dust gatherer while they use their self-contained 3D TV (which synchs refresh rates with its own glasses, by the way - not through the HDMI cable as you suggested).
I, for one, am going to reward the NVIDIA marketing team with their 'genius' move - and I'm sure the presentation to upper management was made with the usual sickload of Corporate Power Phrases ("moving forward", "owning the" *something* "space", "the end game", etc)- by paying them 0 (zero) dollars instead of the 39.99 (not 40! Shame to the marketer who rounds to the nearest decimal!) dollars expected RRP. Because I am going to download it illegally, and I am going to enjoy every second of it and counting how many other seeds I am downloading from, people who also enjoy giving the big don't argue to this sort of dead-dog humping business practise.
And I welcome you to set your internet police on me, but I fear that they may not fit into the standard, human-sized aeroplane seats that they would be obliged to take if the wanted to come and arrest me, so you have to arrange some other form of transport. Possibly a cargo jet, judging from the size of the average American law enforcement official.
Itomeshi... it's almost cute to read your "defend the corporation" spiel. If you really are a software producer, or a drone of any importance at all in a large company, surely you must realise this is the drive of the dark force... Marketing. Yes, all the overpaid bloodsuckers who were too stupid to become lawyers - and that's saying something, if you have had the bad luck to ever meet one of those drooling suits.
You can fire up the test wizard in the NVIDIA control panel without a 3D Vision set and see that it works fine already. On the NVIDIA web site itself it states that the 3D Vision system is not even used in the 3D TV Play setup, but must be plugged into a USB port to prove that you have had the money sucked out of you like a good consumer. And now the delays, as was intelligently pointed out by Mr. Soapbox above, are just to squeeze as many cents out of people during the pre-christmas rush who can enjoy plugging the 3D Vision system into their system as an unattractive dust gatherer while they use their self-contained 3D TV (which synchs refresh rates with its own glasses, by the way - not through the HDMI cable as you suggested).
I, for one, am going to reward the NVIDIA marketing team with their 'genius' move - and I'm sure the presentation to upper management was made with the usual sickload of Corporate Power Phrases ("moving forward", "owning the" *something* "space", "the end game", etc)- by paying them 0 (zero) dollars instead of the 39.99 (not 40! Shame to the marketer who rounds to the nearest decimal!) dollars expected RRP. Because I am going to download it illegally, and I am going to enjoy every second of it and counting how many other seeds I am downloading from, people who also enjoy giving the big don't argue to this sort of dead-dog humping business practise.
And I welcome you to set your internet police on me, but I fear that they may not fit into the standard, human-sized aeroplane seats that they would be obliged to take if the wanted to come and arrest me, so you have to arrange some other form of transport. Possibly a cargo jet, judging from the size of the average American law enforcement official.
[quote name='ToxicX' date='23 November 2010 - 11:18 PM' timestamp='1290550689' post='1150665']
I will be getting an EU Samsung PS50C685 3D plasma (US version called PS50C687 I think) later this week.
Sending PM in the hope of getting instructions to feed you tech specs to get the TV into the next update.
ToxicX
[/quote]
I have an Samsung PS50C687 3d Plasma, unfortunatly the 3DTV Play driver does support the PS50C687.
Do u plan to add the Samsung PS687C 3d Plasma Support on the next Update?
[quote name='Medic0815' date='09 January 2011 - 10:22 AM' timestamp='1294557774' post='1174031']
I have an Samsung PS50C687 3d Plasma, unfortunatly the 3DTV Play driver does support the PS50C687.
Do u plan to add the Samsung PS687C 3d Plasma Support on the next Update?
[/quote]
Post your request here:
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=181948&st=0
In the meantime use the EEDID override hack:
http://blog.bagearon.com/?p=38
[quote name='M8DNanite' date='09 January 2011 - 12:31 PM' timestamp='1294572707' post='1174104']
Post your request here:
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=181948&st=0
In the meantime use the EEDID override hack:
http://blog.bagearon.com/?p=38
[/quote]
"NVIDIA wants to keep the party going and has decided to give you another week"
Let's enjoy the waiting party~~
I'm totally disappointed. I'm so stupid that I trusted Nvidia and bought their product (and recommended others to buy, extremely stupid!). I have a PS3 but I chose to buy the Windows version of COD:BO and Deadrising 2 because Nvidia told us 3DTV Play is available in Nov. I have been very patient during last month but now its December, we see nothing released.
The most frustrating thing is that Nvidia, such a big firm doesn't know what is responsibility. At least they should explain something. People like me is being 3DTV Played, being played by Nvidia.
"NVIDIA wants to keep the party going and has decided to give you another week"
Let's enjoy the waiting party~~
I'm totally disappointed. I'm so stupid that I trusted Nvidia and bought their product (and recommended others to buy, extremely stupid!). I have a PS3 but I chose to buy the Windows version of COD:BO and Deadrising 2 because Nvidia told us 3DTV Play is available in Nov. I have been very patient during last month but now its December, we see nothing released.
The most frustrating thing is that Nvidia, such a big firm doesn't know what is responsibility. At least they should explain something. People like me is being 3DTV Played, being played by Nvidia.
It's full HD is done by checkerboared mode, so it's not the full resolution per eye, it's only half. With 3DTV Play you get full resolution per eye. I can honestly say that 720p with 3DTV Play looks better than 1080p Tridef.
Go in the web and read about the differences between side-by-side, checkerboard, frame package (3DTV Play) and Frame Sequential (3D Vision). Honestly the best one is frame sequential cause allows 1080p 120hz, the best one by far, but it's only for PC displays and 3D Vision, it's not likely for a TV to have DVI-DL input. The second best 3D mode is frame package that allows 1080p 24hz and 720p 60hz, it's way better than SBS, under-over, checkerboard, interlaced among others.
It's full HD is done by checkerboared mode, so it's not the full resolution per eye, it's only half. With 3DTV Play you get full resolution per eye. I can honestly say that 720p with 3DTV Play looks better than 1080p Tridef.
Go in the web and read about the differences between side-by-side, checkerboard, frame package (3DTV Play) and Frame Sequential (3D Vision). Honestly the best one is frame sequential cause allows 1080p 120hz, the best one by far, but it's only for PC displays and 3D Vision, it's not likely for a TV to have DVI-DL input. The second best 3D mode is frame package that allows 1080p 24hz and 720p 60hz, it's way better than SBS, under-over, checkerboard, interlaced among others.
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bits - Core i7 2600K @ 4.5ghz - Asus Maximus IV Extreme Z68 - Geforce EVGA GTX 690 - 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 9-9-9-24 (2T) - Thermaltake Armor+ - SSD Intel 510 Series Sata3 256GB - HD WD Caviar Black Sata3 64mb 2TB - HD WD Caviar Black 1TB Sata3 64mb - Bose Sound System - LG H20L GGW Blu Ray/DVD/CD RW - LG GH20 DVD RAM - PSU Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W - Samsung S27A950D 3D Vision Ready + 3D HDTV SAMSUNG PL63C7000 3DTVPLAY + ROLLERMOD CHECKERBOARD
Moved to Nvidia for 3DTV Play. Big mistake. [size="6"]Nvidia Comms[/size] to existing customers are absolutely [size="6"]shocking[/size]. SH** at best. Its not as if AMD are going to release a competing software product to warrant this "Secrecy". Also, people are/were willing to pay for this software & now starting to look for alternatives.
Atleast I'll get Stereo 3D & full audio bitstreaming with the new Top end AMD card.
Andrew@Nvidia, anything you can say to change our minds?
I have been stung by Nvidia twice now and it has seriously started to leave a bad taste.
1 GPU on laptop died after 6 months (8600 GPU) Repaired under warranty and died again 3 months later. Epic failure.
2 Bought GTX 480 expecting to play 3D games on my 3DTV, big fail.
I think Nvidia need to learn about customer satisfaction/retention with positive actions.
Moved to Nvidia for 3DTV Play. Big mistake. Nvidia Comms to existing customers are absolutely shocking. SH** at best. Its not as if AMD are going to release a competing software product to warrant this "Secrecy". Also, people are/were willing to pay for this software & now starting to look for alternatives.
Atleast I'll get Stereo 3D & full audio bitstreaming with the new Top end AMD card.
Andrew@Nvidia, anything you can say to change our minds?
I have been stung by Nvidia twice now and it has seriously started to leave a bad taste.
1 GPU on laptop died after 6 months (8600 GPU) Repaired under warranty and died again 3 months later. Epic failure.
2 Bought GTX 480 expecting to play 3D games on my 3DTV, big fail.
I think Nvidia need to learn about customer satisfaction/retention with positive actions.
Tridef sucks and doesn't even compare to 3DTV Play. I've tried both and know what I'm saying. Don't expect any miracles from Tridef, it's crap.
It's full HD is done by checkerboared mode, so it's not the full resolution per eye, it's only half. With 3DTV Play you get full resolution per eye. I can honestly say that 720p with 3DTV Play looks better than 1080p Tridef.
Go in the web and read about the differences between side-by-side, checkerboard, frame package (3DTV Play) and Frame Sequential (3D Vision). Honestly the best one is frame sequential cause allows 1080p 120hz, the best one by far, but it's only for PC displays and 3D Vision, it's not likely for a TV to have DVI-DL input. The second best 3D mode is frame package that allows 1080p 24hz and 720p 60hz, it's way better than SBS, under-over, checkerboard, interlaced among others.
[/quote]
Even I didn't compare Tridef and 3DTV Play, I have no doubt that 3DTV Play should be better than Tridef overall because 3DTV Play is a software specially developed for Nvidia chipset only, and it can be optimized by using any proprietary hardware feature. If Tridef is more superior in this case, Nvidia staff should dig a hole and hide.
But I have a silly question here (not related to Tridef vs 3DTV Play). Why 720p@60Hz frame packaging (FP) is better than side-by-side (SBS) 1080p@60Hz in teams of picture quality?
Regarding pixel count, in each 1/60 second, 720p FP offers each eye 1280x720 (921,600) pixels, while 1080p SBS offers each eye 960x1080 (1,036,800) pixels.
With the same frequency, 1080p SBS provides >10% more pixel information than 720p FP for each eye. So why 720p@60Hz FP is better than 1080p@60Hz SBS?
Tridef sucks and doesn't even compare to 3DTV Play. I've tried both and know what I'm saying. Don't expect any miracles from Tridef, it's crap.
It's full HD is done by checkerboared mode, so it's not the full resolution per eye, it's only half. With 3DTV Play you get full resolution per eye. I can honestly say that 720p with 3DTV Play looks better than 1080p Tridef.
Go in the web and read about the differences between side-by-side, checkerboard, frame package (3DTV Play) and Frame Sequential (3D Vision). Honestly the best one is frame sequential cause allows 1080p 120hz, the best one by far, but it's only for PC displays and 3D Vision, it's not likely for a TV to have DVI-DL input. The second best 3D mode is frame package that allows 1080p 24hz and 720p 60hz, it's way better than SBS, under-over, checkerboard, interlaced among others.
Even I didn't compare Tridef and 3DTV Play, I have no doubt that 3DTV Play should be better than Tridef overall because 3DTV Play is a software specially developed for Nvidia chipset only, and it can be optimized by using any proprietary hardware feature. If Tridef is more superior in this case, Nvidia staff should dig a hole and hide.
But I have a silly question here (not related to Tridef vs 3DTV Play). Why 720p@60Hz frame packaging (FP) is better than side-by-side (SBS) 1080p@60Hz in teams of picture quality?
Regarding pixel count, in each 1/60 second, 720p FP offers each eye 1280x720 (921,600) pixels, while 1080p SBS offers each eye 960x1080 (1,036,800) pixels.
With the same frequency, 1080p SBS provides >10% more pixel information than 720p FP for each eye. So why 720p@60Hz FP is better than 1080p@60Hz SBS?
You can fire up the test wizard in the NVIDIA control panel without a 3D Vision set and see that it works fine already. On the NVIDIA web site itself it states that the 3D Vision system is not even used in the 3D TV Play setup, but must be plugged into a USB port to prove that you have had the money sucked out of you like a good consumer. And now the delays, as was intelligently pointed out by Mr. Soapbox above, are just to squeeze as many cents out of people during the pre-christmas rush who can enjoy plugging the 3D Vision system into their system as an unattractive dust gatherer while they use their self-contained 3D TV (which synchs refresh rates with its own glasses, by the way - not through the HDMI cable as you suggested).
I, for one, am going to reward the NVIDIA marketing team with their 'genius' move - and I'm sure the presentation to upper management was made with the usual sickload of Corporate Power Phrases ("moving forward", "owning the" *something* "space", "the end game", etc)- by paying them 0 (zero) dollars instead of the 39.99 (not 40! Shame to the marketer who rounds to the nearest decimal!) dollars expected RRP. Because I am going to download it illegally, and I am going to enjoy every second of it and counting how many other seeds I am downloading from, people who also enjoy giving the big don't argue to this sort of dead-dog humping business practise.
And I welcome you to set your internet police on me, but I fear that they may not fit into the standard, human-sized aeroplane seats that they would be obliged to take if the wanted to come and arrest me, so you have to arrange some other form of transport. Possibly a cargo jet, judging from the size of the average American law enforcement official.
You can fire up the test wizard in the NVIDIA control panel without a 3D Vision set and see that it works fine already. On the NVIDIA web site itself it states that the 3D Vision system is not even used in the 3D TV Play setup, but must be plugged into a USB port to prove that you have had the money sucked out of you like a good consumer. And now the delays, as was intelligently pointed out by Mr. Soapbox above, are just to squeeze as many cents out of people during the pre-christmas rush who can enjoy plugging the 3D Vision system into their system as an unattractive dust gatherer while they use their self-contained 3D TV (which synchs refresh rates with its own glasses, by the way - not through the HDMI cable as you suggested).
I, for one, am going to reward the NVIDIA marketing team with their 'genius' move - and I'm sure the presentation to upper management was made with the usual sickload of Corporate Power Phrases ("moving forward", "owning the" *something* "space", "the end game", etc)- by paying them 0 (zero) dollars instead of the 39.99 (not 40! Shame to the marketer who rounds to the nearest decimal!) dollars expected RRP. Because I am going to download it illegally, and I am going to enjoy every second of it and counting how many other seeds I am downloading from, people who also enjoy giving the big don't argue to this sort of dead-dog humping business practise.
And I welcome you to set your internet police on me, but I fear that they may not fit into the standard, human-sized aeroplane seats that they would be obliged to take if the wanted to come and arrest me, so you have to arrange some other form of transport. Possibly a cargo jet, judging from the size of the average American law enforcement official.
I will be getting an EU Samsung PS50C685 3D plasma (US version called PS50C687 I think) later this week.
Sending PM in the hope of getting instructions to feed you tech specs to get the TV into the next update.
ToxicX
[/quote]
I have an Samsung PS50C687 3d Plasma, unfortunatly the 3DTV Play driver does support the PS50C687.
Do u plan to add the Samsung PS687C 3d Plasma Support on the next Update?
Medi
I will be getting an EU Samsung PS50C685 3D plasma (US version called PS50C687 I think) later this week.
Sending PM in the hope of getting instructions to feed you tech specs to get the TV into the next update.
ToxicX
I have an Samsung PS50C687 3d Plasma, unfortunatly the 3DTV Play driver does support the PS50C687.
Do u plan to add the Samsung PS687C 3d Plasma Support on the next Update?
Medi
I have an Samsung PS50C687 3d Plasma, unfortunatly the 3DTV Play driver does support the PS50C687.
Do u plan to add the Samsung PS687C 3d Plasma Support on the next Update?
[/quote]
Post your request here:
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=181948&st=0
In the meantime use the EEDID override hack:
http://blog.bagearon.com/?p=38
I have an Samsung PS50C687 3d Plasma, unfortunatly the 3DTV Play driver does support the PS50C687.
Do u plan to add the Samsung PS687C 3d Plasma Support on the next Update?
Post your request here:
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=181948&st=0
In the meantime use the EEDID override hack:
http://blog.bagearon.com/?p=38
Samsung 50" 3DTV Plasma - PS50C7705 (Nordic European version of the North American PN50C8000 and UK PS50C7000)
Post your request here:
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=181948&st=0
In the meantime use the EEDID override hack:
http://blog.bagearon.com/?p=38
[/quote]
Thank you for ur fast reply.
Post your request here:
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=181948&st=0
In the meantime use the EEDID override hack:
http://blog.bagearon.com/?p=38
Thank you for ur fast reply.