One of the biggest german computer gaming magazines is testing 3D vision in July 2015!
http://www.pcgames.de/Nvidia-Firma-17445/Specials/Praxis-Test-Nvidia-3D-Vision-2-1163420/
This test has been released in their pcgh-magazine a few weeks ago.
We discussed that in their forum:
http://extreme.pcgameshardware.de/pcgh-print/387537-sammelthread-feedback-zur-ausgabe-06-2015-a-4.html#post7379007
... and in my 3D Vision thread:
http://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1326497
A few months before I contacted them and offered helping with infos like helixmod, our 3D Vision rating list and other toppics in my thread. But no resonance and always argumentations that 3D Vision isn´t worth to be tested.
But suddenly they published this 3D Vision test without any basic 3D Vision informations. Not suprising that their 3D Vision conclusion after testing was poorly. This test is very bad publicity for 3D Vision from two unprepared journalists :-(
A few months before I contacted them and offered helping with infos like helixmod, our 3D Vision rating list and other toppics in my thread. But no resonance and always argumentations that 3D Vision isn´t worth to be tested.
But suddenly they published this 3D Vision test without any basic 3D Vision informations. Not suprising that their 3D Vision conclusion after testing was poorly. This test is very bad publicity for 3D Vision from two unprepared journalists :-(
I suppose the silver lining is that it dispels nvidia's advertising that their 3D Vision driver is ready out of the box for the general public, not a mess as we all know it to be.
Hopefully it acts as a kick up nVidsia's back sides to do a better job.
...or it could fall upon deaf ears, as previous cries for better support have :/
I suppose the silver lining is that it dispels nvidia's advertising that their 3D Vision driver is ready out of the box for the general public, not a mess as we all know it to be.
Hopefully it acts as a kick up nVidsia's back sides to do a better job.
...or it could fall upon deaf ears, as previous cries for better support have :/
Windows 10 64-bit, Intel 7700K @ 5.1GHz, 16GB 3600MHz CL15 DDR4 RAM, 2x GTX 1080 SLI, Asus Maximus IX Hero, Sound Blaster ZxR, PCIe Quad SSD, Oculus Rift CV1, DLP Link PGD-150 glasses, ViewSonic PJD6531w 3D DLP Projector @ 1280x800 120Hz native / 2560x1600 120Hz DSR 3D Gaming.
http://www.pcgames.de/Nvidia-Firma-17445/Specials/Praxis-Test-Nvidia-3D-Vision-2-1163420/
Win 8.1 pro 64 bit, Gigabyte Z87X-D3H - i7-4770K@3.5 - 32 GB, 2x Geforce TITAN SLI (EVGA), 3x ASUS 3D-Vision-Monitors
We discussed that in their forum:
http://extreme.pcgameshardware.de/pcgh-print/387537-sammelthread-feedback-zur-ausgabe-06-2015-a-4.html#post7379007
... and in my 3D Vision thread:
http://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1326497
A few months before I contacted them and offered helping with infos like helixmod, our 3D Vision rating list and other toppics in my thread. But no resonance and always argumentations that 3D Vision isn´t worth to be tested.
But suddenly they published this 3D Vision test without any basic 3D Vision informations. Not suprising that their 3D Vision conclusion after testing was poorly. This test is very bad publicity for 3D Vision from two unprepared journalists :-(
System: http://www.sysprofile.de/id159419
Nvidia 3D Vision - Virtual Reality - 3D Gaming:
http://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1546633
Hopefully it acts as a kick up nVidsia's back sides to do a better job.
...or it could fall upon deaf ears, as previous cries for better support have :/
Windows 10 64-bit, Intel 7700K @ 5.1GHz, 16GB 3600MHz CL15 DDR4 RAM, 2x GTX 1080 SLI, Asus Maximus IX Hero, Sound Blaster ZxR, PCIe Quad SSD, Oculus Rift CV1, DLP Link PGD-150 glasses, ViewSonic PJD6531w 3D DLP Projector @ 1280x800 120Hz native / 2560x1600 120Hz DSR 3D Gaming.