I am the new one-spending 3000€+ on 3D rig...need help
  3 / 4    
[quote="eitan8385"]All I’m saying is this comparison you’re trying to make is not reliable and it could never be. It’s just perpetuating this obsessive compulsive tendency to look for flaws.. As I said there’s no perfect tv/monitor .. just accept it and go on man.[/quote]We will have to agree to disagree... We should be able to find the better one. I won't resign. .
eitan8385 said:All I’m saying is this comparison you’re trying to make is not reliable and it could never be. It’s just perpetuating this obsessive compulsive tendency to look for flaws..
As I said there’s no perfect tv/monitor .. just accept it and go on man.
We will have to agree to disagree... We should be able to find the better one. I won't resign.



.
Hi, I can speak for playing on projector. I am using 40 inch LCD TV for 2D playing. It is my small regular PC monitor. Even though it has great low input lag and game mode - its good for FPS, day time work. Then I switch to GAME BEAST to my FullHD projector with 3D Vision 2 and it is completely different world. The size (over 3 meters, LOL!) and surroundings is so big that it will make you feel much more inside, especially with 3D! Plus you can use projector for watching 3D or 2D movies so it has much better usage. Every since I do not recommend nothing else than projector - forget about monitor, forget about 4K TV + projector is not that expensive. I bought my Acer 3D FullHD projector on ebay for 200 EURs with only 600 hours used on lamp.
Hi, I can speak for playing on projector. I am using 40 inch LCD TV for 2D playing. It is my small regular PC monitor. Even though it has great low input lag and game mode - its good for FPS, day time work.

Then I switch to GAME BEAST to my FullHD projector with 3D Vision 2 and it is completely different world. The size (over 3 meters, LOL!) and surroundings is so big that it will make you feel much more inside, especially with 3D! Plus you can use projector for watching 3D or 2D movies so it has much better usage.

Every since I do not recommend nothing else than projector - forget about monitor, forget about 4K TV + projector is not that expensive. I bought my Acer 3D FullHD projector on ebay for 200 EURs with only 600 hours used on lamp.

#32
Posted 03/19/2018 05:55 PM   
Increased display/screen size does not necessarily improve the immersive experience, especially if the resulting game texture resolution does not improve to match the scale. Note that a 27 in display viewed at 27 in, a 48 in TV viewed at 48 in, and a 10 ft screen viewed at 10 ft all provide the same 3D visual FOV.
Increased display/screen size does not necessarily improve the immersive experience, especially if the resulting game texture resolution does not improve to match the scale. Note that a 27 in display viewed at 27 in, a 48 in TV viewed at 48 in, and a 10 ft screen viewed at 10 ft all provide the same 3D visual FOV.

#33
Posted 03/19/2018 06:36 PM   
yes there is imersion still in monitor. but i gotta disagree that big sceen is the same as monitor or tv viewed from a specific distance. It theoreticly is but no IT´s not the same. I don´t say there is nothing wrong with choosing a monitor or OLED tv. there is menefits there also.
yes there is imersion still in monitor. but i gotta disagree that big sceen is the same as monitor or tv viewed from a specific distance. It theoreticly is but no IT´s not the same.
I don´t say there is nothing wrong with choosing a monitor or OLED tv. there is menefits there also.

CoreX9 Custom watercooling (valkswagen polo radiator)
I7-8700k@stock
TitanX pascal with shitty stock cooler
Win7/10
Video: Passive 3D fullhd 3D@60hz/channel Denon x1200w /Hc5 x 2 Geobox501->eeColorBoxes->polarizers/omega filttersCustom made silverscreen
Ocupation: Enterprenior.Painting/surfacing/constructions
Interests/skills:
3D gaming,3D movies, 3D printing,Drums, Bass and guitar.
Suomi - FINLAND - perkele

#34
Posted 03/19/2018 10:33 PM   
[quote="whyme466"]Increased display/screen size does not necessarily improve the immersive experience, especially if the resulting game texture resolution does not improve to match the scale. Note that a 27 in display viewed at 27 in, a 48 in TV viewed at 48 in, and a 10 ft screen viewed at 10 ft all provide the same 3D visual FOV. [/quote] I don't believe this is true. Have you used a projector? While the actual arc-seconds of your view are in fact the same, you are also changing the vergence of your eyes to look at the wall instead of the monitor. This tells your brain that it is further away, and makes everything seem more realistic, more life-size. This is part of the reason why VR feels life-like, and why they set the focal distance to 2m. When I play on projector and use some pop-out effect to bring it into the room, critters like the Alien at life size, in my room, are vastly more impressive and immersive than playing on monitor. See my signature. I've played both, a lot. My up close monitor takes up the same amount of FOV as my projector, but there is absolutely no comparison, the projector is a far superior experience. It is still my opinion that the best 3D Vision experience is found with projectors, including 720p. People always talk about 720p as if it is unacceptable, because 720 < 1080, and clearly it's bad. Which it would be, if you were using 720p on a monitor. But, we are talking about an image farther away, on a screen. @Quantummagic: Since you are studying differences at present, be sure to look up the Carlton-Bale graphs for perceived resolution and what you can actually see. The short story is that if you are up close to a 4K TV you can justify the higher resolution, but if it's across the room from you, then 4K is a waste because human eyes cannot resolve those pixels at distance. The upshot of studying that is that 720p for a projector is perfectly acceptable. But only because we are running in 3D Vision, and have two different perspectives, which doubles the resolution that we see. In cyclops mode, I can see the pixels for 720p, in 3D Vision I cannot. The other advantage of running 720p projector is that you can either supersample for AA, or you can enable every single graphic effect, and not overload your video card. Running at 1440p or 4K interleave up close is the opposite, you need extra horsepower to make it work. Lastly, everyone has different preferences and what is most important for them in terms of the visuals. There is no one-perfect 3D display tech for everyone, it depends upon what is most important to you. For me for example, crosstalk/ghosting is my pet peeve, and 720p projectors also have zero crosstalk. The best you can get outside of a separate screen for each eye. But, the drawback is it's not as bright an image. Some people cannot tolerate a dimmer image, some people need their 3D gear to double up as a TV, some people simply don't have space. We are all also tripped up because no one person on this board has experience with every single display technology. We only know for sure what we have personally tried, and so you need to sift through the different experiences and personal requirements. For example, I have not tried passive 4K displays, which are reported to be very good. Nor dual-projector setups. Other people have never tried projectors but are still sure they aren't any good because 720 < 1080. My best guess of optimal 3D display, based on long term studying, and reading these sorts of threads over the years. Goal for me is immersion, and low crosstalk. Willing to buy expensive hardware, including beefy GPU. I have not personally experienced all of these. [olist] [.]Dual 1080p projectors, one for each eye. (60Hz)[/.] [.]Passive 4K[/.] [.]720p projector @120Hz[/.] [.]1440p Monitor[/.] [.]Sony HMZ-T1[/.] [.]Virtual TV in VR[/.] [.]4K TV active 3D[/.] [.]1080p Monitor[/.] [.]1080p Active TV[/.] [/olist] If I missed something, let me know and I'll add them. If you don't like my list, state your case and tell me why it should change.
whyme466 said:Increased display/screen size does not necessarily improve the immersive experience, especially if the resulting game texture resolution does not improve to match the scale. Note that a 27 in display viewed at 27 in, a 48 in TV viewed at 48 in, and a 10 ft screen viewed at 10 ft all provide the same 3D visual FOV.

I don't believe this is true. Have you used a projector?

While the actual arc-seconds of your view are in fact the same, you are also changing the vergence of your eyes to look at the wall instead of the monitor. This tells your brain that it is further away, and makes everything seem more realistic, more life-size. This is part of the reason why VR feels life-like, and why they set the focal distance to 2m.

When I play on projector and use some pop-out effect to bring it into the room, critters like the Alien at life size, in my room, are vastly more impressive and immersive than playing on monitor. See my signature. I've played both, a lot. My up close monitor takes up the same amount of FOV as my projector, but there is absolutely no comparison, the projector is a far superior experience.


It is still my opinion that the best 3D Vision experience is found with projectors, including 720p. People always talk about 720p as if it is unacceptable, because 720 < 1080, and clearly it's bad. Which it would be, if you were using 720p on a monitor.

But, we are talking about an image farther away, on a screen.

@Quantummagic: Since you are studying differences at present, be sure to look up the Carlton-Bale graphs for perceived resolution and what you can actually see. The short story is that if you are up close to a 4K TV you can justify the higher resolution, but if it's across the room from you, then 4K is a waste because human eyes cannot resolve those pixels at distance.

The upshot of studying that is that 720p for a projector is perfectly acceptable. But only because we are running in 3D Vision, and have two different perspectives, which doubles the resolution that we see. In cyclops mode, I can see the pixels for 720p, in 3D Vision I cannot.

The other advantage of running 720p projector is that you can either supersample for AA, or you can enable every single graphic effect, and not overload your video card. Running at 1440p or 4K interleave up close is the opposite, you need extra horsepower to make it work.


Lastly, everyone has different preferences and what is most important for them in terms of the visuals. There is no one-perfect 3D display tech for everyone, it depends upon what is most important to you.

For me for example, crosstalk/ghosting is my pet peeve, and 720p projectors also have zero crosstalk. The best you can get outside of a separate screen for each eye. But, the drawback is it's not as bright an image. Some people cannot tolerate a dimmer image, some people need their 3D gear to double up as a TV, some people simply don't have space.

We are all also tripped up because no one person on this board has experience with every single display technology. We only know for sure what we have personally tried, and so you need to sift through the different experiences and personal requirements. For example, I have not tried passive 4K displays, which are reported to be very good. Nor dual-projector setups. Other people have never tried projectors but are still sure they aren't any good because 720 < 1080.

My best guess of optimal 3D display, based on long term studying, and reading these sorts of threads over the years. Goal for me is immersion, and low crosstalk. Willing to buy expensive hardware, including beefy GPU. I have not personally experienced all of these.
  1. Dual 1080p projectors, one for each eye. (60Hz)
  2. Passive 4K
  3. 720p projector @120Hz
  4. 1440p Monitor
  5. Sony HMZ-T1
  6. Virtual TV in VR
  7. 4K TV active 3D
  8. 1080p Monitor
  9. 1080p Active TV


If I missed something, let me know and I'll add them. If you don't like my list, state your case and tell me why it should change.

Acer H5360 (1280x720@120Hz) - ASUS VG248QE with GSync mod - 3D Vision 1&2 - Driver 372.54
GTX 970 - i5-4670K@4.2GHz - 12GB RAM - Win7x64+evilKB2670838 - 4 Disk X25 RAID
SAGER NP9870-S - GTX 980 - i7-6700K - Win10 Pro 1607
Latest 3Dmigoto Release
Bo3b's School for ShaderHackers

#35
Posted 03/19/2018 10:34 PM   
[quote="bo3b"] I don't believe this is true. Have you used a projector? While the actual arc-seconds of your view are in fact the same, you are also changing the vergence of your eyes to look at the wall instead of the monitor. This tells your brain that it is further away, and makes everything seem more realistic, more life-size. This is part of the reason why VR feels life-like, and why they set the focal distance to 2m. [/quote] I never tried projector in 3D,..in fact my only 3D was when Nvidia Vision came out first, on too dark monitors. Tested for 5 mins. But I am very sure the immersion on projector is much better, it's the same effect with the moon. If the moon is closer to horizont, it appears much bigger, even if the arcseconds are the same, because the brain make subconsciousness comparison with the sizes on the horizon, resulting in a bigger perceived moon. Same effect like bo3B said. The PG278QR is ordered, but maybe I compare to a second one and will return one of them. (Never returned anything, so should be ok) [color="orange"] What is the 2nd Monitor I should order, to compare it too the PG278QR? Maybe a BenQ....but which,...any other come to mind? [/color]
bo3b said:
I don't believe this is true. Have you used a projector?

While the actual arc-seconds of your view are in fact the same, you are also changing the vergence of your eyes to look at the wall instead of the monitor. This tells your brain that it is further away, and makes everything seem more realistic, more life-size. This is part of the reason why VR feels life-like, and why they set the focal distance to 2m.


I never tried projector in 3D,..in fact my only 3D was when Nvidia Vision came out first, on too dark monitors.
Tested for 5 mins.

But I am very sure the immersion on projector is much better, it's the same effect with the moon.
If the moon is closer to horizont, it appears much bigger, even if the arcseconds are the same, because the brain make subconsciousness comparison with the sizes on the horizon, resulting in a bigger perceived moon.

Same effect like bo3B said.

The PG278QR is ordered, but maybe I compare to a second one and will return one of them.
(Never returned anything, so should be ok)

What is the 2nd Monitor I should order, to compare it too the PG278QR?
Maybe a BenQ....but which,...any other come to mind?

+Inter-Tech m-908 Tower with INFINTY MIRROR
+Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming 2.0
G.Skill Trident Z RGB 16GB DDR4
+Intel Core i7-8700K
+Gigabyte RTX 2080
+DEEPCOOL GAMMAXX GT BK RGB CPU-Kühler
+Samsung 960 EVO 500GB SSD M.2, Samsung 860 PRO 500GB SSD, 2TB HDD
+Thermaltake Smart RGB 700W PC-Netzteil
+Monitor: PG278QR

#36
Posted 03/19/2018 11:54 PM   
@bo3b, we had a poster that uses a $20,000 Christy projector using a Dual Link DVI connection @120Hz 1080P. I would put it at the top of the list, if anyone could afford it :P With the Pro Quality Optical Lens, Optical (not digital) Lens Shift and High Intensity Bulbs (Oshram?), it has to be the hands down winner of anything past to present :) Not to mention that you can achieve a Theatre size screen with it. As far as what posters here have owned, he has the best. I know there are better than his, some using a Laser source for light. But no one owning one, has ever posted here. Only that one guy. I've always been curious, if there's any merit to StereoMirror displays. Such as the most common one from Planar years ago. I've always wondered if the monitors themselves are distracting, or do you simply focus on the mirror and not even notice them. http://www.planar.com/media/211327/mn-planar-sd2220w.pdf [img]https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgisa.ru%2Fpic%2Fart%2Fgis51940.jpg&f=1[/img]
@bo3b, we had a poster that uses a $20,000 Christy projector using a Dual Link DVI connection @120Hz 1080P. I would put it at the top of the list, if anyone could afford it :P

With the Pro Quality Optical Lens, Optical (not digital) Lens Shift and High Intensity Bulbs (Oshram?), it has to be the hands down winner of anything past to present :)

Not to mention that you can achieve a Theatre size screen with it.

As far as what posters here have owned, he has the best. I know there are better than his, some using a Laser source for light. But no one owning one, has ever posted here. Only that one guy.


I've always been curious, if there's any merit to StereoMirror displays. Such as the most common one from Planar years ago.

I've always wondered if the monitors themselves are distracting, or do you simply focus on the mirror and not even notice them.


http://www.planar.com/media/211327/mn-planar-sd2220w.pdf


Image

#37
Posted 03/19/2018 11:56 PM   
Need to buy some lottery tickets or sell the house https://www.christiedigital.com/en-us/3d/products-and-solutions/projectors/mirage-4k25-3-chip-dlp-projector For a quantum leap in image processing, look no further than the Christie® Mirage 4K. Delivering the highest DLP® resolution on the market today, the Mirage 4K is based on Christie’s unique TruLife™ electronics, giving you unprecedented image fidelity, life-like vibrant colors and up to 25,000 lumens for the brightest 3D immersive experience. Additionally, you have the added value of Xenon®-based illumination, providing the most natural color accuracy, uniformity and stability over time. Christie TruLife supports a video-processing pipeline of up to 1.2 Gigapixels per second, which is 10 times faster than full high-definition bandwidth. This provides flexibility in supporting various 3D interconnectivity formats, including: single sequential 4K 120Hz input, dual interleaved 4K 60Hz signals and 4K 60Hz sequential frame-doubled, with all three formats resulting in 120Hz 4K output. Based on Christie’s superior design, engineering and manufacturing, the Mirage 4K product line provides 24/7 reliability, ease of service and consistent performance for years of operation. At Christie, we help our customers create and share the world’s best visual experiences. Features 4K (4096 x 2160) resolution World’s first and only DLP® 4K projector at 120Hz performance Flexibility in supporting various 3D interconnectivity formats Single sequential 4K 120Hz Dual interleaved 4K 60Hz 4K 60Hz sequential frame-doubled All three modes resulting in 120Hz 4K output Additionally the Mirage 4K Features true 2K scaling to 4K with these formats: Single sequential 4K 120Hz Dual interleaved 4K 60Hz 4K 60Hz sequential frame-doubled Up to 25,000 lumens brightness 24/7 use capability Christie Twist™ warping, blending and scaling
Need to buy some lottery tickets or sell the house


https://www.christiedigital.com/en-us/3d/products-and-solutions/projectors/mirage-4k25-3-chip-dlp-projector


For a quantum leap in image processing, look no further than the Christie® Mirage 4K. Delivering the highest DLP® resolution on the market today, the Mirage 4K is based on Christie’s unique TruLife™ electronics, giving you unprecedented image fidelity, life-like vibrant colors and up to 25,000 lumens for the brightest 3D immersive experience. Additionally, you have the added value of Xenon®-based illumination, providing the most natural color accuracy, uniformity and stability over time.

Christie TruLife supports a video-processing pipeline of up to 1.2 Gigapixels per second, which is 10 times faster than full high-definition bandwidth. This provides flexibility in supporting various 3D interconnectivity formats, including: single sequential 4K 120Hz input, dual interleaved 4K 60Hz signals and 4K 60Hz sequential frame-doubled, with all three formats resulting in 120Hz 4K output.

Based on Christie’s superior design, engineering and manufacturing, the Mirage 4K product line provides 24/7 reliability, ease of service and consistent performance for years of operation.

At Christie, we help our customers create and share the world’s best visual experiences.

Features

4K (4096 x 2160) resolution
World’s first and only DLP® 4K projector at 120Hz performance
Flexibility in supporting various 3D interconnectivity formats
Single sequential 4K 120Hz
Dual interleaved 4K 60Hz
4K 60Hz sequential frame-doubled
All three modes resulting in 120Hz 4K output
Additionally the Mirage 4K Features true 2K scaling to 4K with these formats:
Single sequential 4K 120Hz
Dual interleaved 4K 60Hz
4K 60Hz sequential frame-doubled
Up to 25,000 lumens brightness
24/7 use capability
Christie Twist™ warping, blending and scaling

#38
Posted 03/20/2018 12:46 AM   
And yet still with that christie you left with a stobo lightsource am i right ? Bo3b had great list. I would say the best if you want it currently is dual projector rig made with 2 projectors that have xenon light sources you can use the omega white light filtters and get good colors and you get to use normal smooth white screen. You could propably get couple 3-chip dlp projectors used in 10-15k range. Yes and they are still fullhd for that money. And Yes they whack the Jesús out of Any cheap 4K projectors though they have so "low" resolution. I think Bo3b has a point when he says the 720p is quite ok to watch as stereo. And most of the 4K amazenes is Ceaused by people as they stand in front of a 4K tv in the store and eyeball it from 10" away. When Sony announced the first full 4k projector i was at the fairshow and to it not looked a bit different than fullhd at that time. Offcourse higher ress lookes a slight better especially if you don't use AA but i would TaKe couple 3-chip dlp projectors in a heart beat over same Price 4K projector. With my 1080p projectors (Lets say its kind of 4K ish in 3D ) i have NEVER asked for more resolution. I have tried dual projection, Lg 950 passive 4K tv, active monitors , active projectors. All have their Quirks.
And yet still with that christie you left with a stobo lightsource am i right ?

Bo3b had great list.

I would say the best if you want it currently is dual projector rig made with 2 projectors that have xenon light sources you can use the omega white light filtters and get good colors and you get to use normal smooth white screen. You could propably get couple 3-chip dlp projectors used in 10-15k range.
Yes and they are still fullhd for that money. And Yes they whack the Jesús out of Any cheap 4K projectors though they have so "low" resolution.

I think Bo3b has a point when he says the 720p is quite ok to watch as stereo. And most of the 4K amazenes is Ceaused by people as they stand in front of a 4K tv in the store and eyeball it from 10" away.
When Sony announced the first full 4k projector i was at the fairshow and to it not looked a bit different than fullhd at that time.
Offcourse higher ress lookes a slight better especially if you don't use AA but i would TaKe couple 3-chip dlp projectors in a heart beat over same Price 4K projector. With my 1080p projectors (Lets say its kind of 4K ish in 3D ) i have NEVER asked for more resolution.

I have tried dual projection, Lg 950 passive 4K tv, active monitors , active projectors. All have their Quirks.

CoreX9 Custom watercooling (valkswagen polo radiator)
I7-8700k@stock
TitanX pascal with shitty stock cooler
Win7/10
Video: Passive 3D fullhd 3D@60hz/channel Denon x1200w /Hc5 x 2 Geobox501->eeColorBoxes->polarizers/omega filttersCustom made silverscreen
Ocupation: Enterprenior.Painting/surfacing/constructions
Interests/skills:
3D gaming,3D movies, 3D printing,Drums, Bass and guitar.
Suomi - FINLAND - perkele

#39
Posted 03/20/2018 05:02 AM   
Certainly one of the advantages to dual projection, is the fact that you can use 2D projectors. Also the fact that 2 light sources, increases the overall image brightness. But setup and move-ability/portability, make it very unattractive. Not to mention image alignment and hot spotting. Plus the need for a special screen, if using polarized filters. Of course, if you are using the anaglyph Omega filters, you can use any surface, but you also suffer eye rivalry, just like any anaglyph format. Also the inherent color fidelity loss with anaglyph formats, though it is better with Omega vs other options. So imo, a single projector solution, is far superior, in every way. That's if a single projector option is available, in your desired resolution. Of course budget/price range are a huge factor to both options.
Certainly one of the advantages to dual projection, is the fact that you can use 2D projectors. Also the fact that 2 light sources, increases the overall image brightness.

But setup and move-ability/portability, make it very unattractive. Not to mention image alignment and hot spotting.

Plus the need for a special screen, if using polarized filters.

Of course, if you are using the anaglyph Omega filters, you can use any surface, but you also suffer eye rivalry, just like any anaglyph format. Also the inherent color fidelity loss with anaglyph formats, though it is better with Omega vs other options.

So imo, a single projector solution, is far superior, in every way. That's if a single projector option is available, in your desired resolution. Of course budget/price range are a huge factor to both options.

#40
Posted 03/20/2018 11:04 AM   
i would not say move-ability is any concern but to 1% of users. Nor the alignment eather. It´s jus needs to be somewhere there, at the same ballpark. no need for pixel precise. though with the need of 3d demultiplexer you get it at the same price. Hotspotting is not any issue with good screen. Omega filtters work quite good with Sxrd projectors. And with 3D lut boxes you get pretty good results. i Used mine for a long time. i switched to polarizers mainly for enhanced brightness over omega filtters. they eat light especially if you do 3D lut to correct the color balance. It´s a shame as the silverlscreen is never that smooth as a regular screen. it´s always at best still little grany. In no way it´s for lazy operator. the fireing up is like you are in a missile control center trying to find the launch abort button LOL But if you wan´t to project and can´t stand RBE and active that´s about all that´s left. And it´s good image wise so i would not say single is no where superiour. And you gotta remember when my projector fails i always have a spare to use LOL ok i´ll admit it, i don´t recommend dual projection It´s like drugs, once you get it there is no other way and it´s destined to suck your wallet dry LOL
i would not say move-ability is any concern but to 1% of users. Nor the alignment eather. It´s jus needs to be somewhere there, at the same ballpark. no need for pixel precise. though with the need of 3d demultiplexer you get it at the same price. Hotspotting is not any issue with good screen.

Omega filtters work quite good with Sxrd projectors. And with 3D lut boxes you get pretty good results. i Used mine for a long time. i switched to polarizers mainly for enhanced brightness over omega filtters. they eat light especially if you do 3D lut to correct the color balance.
It´s a shame as the silverlscreen is never that smooth as a regular screen. it´s always at best still little grany.

In no way it´s for lazy operator. the fireing up is like you are in a missile control center trying to find the launch abort button LOL
But if you wan´t to project and can´t stand RBE and active that´s about all that´s left.
And it´s good image wise so i would not say single is no where superiour.

And you gotta remember when my projector fails i always have a spare to use LOL

ok i´ll admit it, i don´t recommend dual projection It´s like drugs, once you get it there is no other way and it´s destined to suck your wallet dry LOL

CoreX9 Custom watercooling (valkswagen polo radiator)
I7-8700k@stock
TitanX pascal with shitty stock cooler
Win7/10
Video: Passive 3D fullhd 3D@60hz/channel Denon x1200w /Hc5 x 2 Geobox501->eeColorBoxes->polarizers/omega filttersCustom made silverscreen
Ocupation: Enterprenior.Painting/surfacing/constructions
Interests/skills:
3D gaming,3D movies, 3D printing,Drums, Bass and guitar.
Suomi - FINLAND - perkele

#41
Posted 03/20/2018 04:10 PM   
[quote="Metal-O-Holic"]yes there is imersion still in monitor. but i gotta disagree that big sceen is the same as monitor or tv viewed from a specific distance. It theoreticly is but no IT´s not the same. I don´t say there is nothing wrong with choosing a monitor or OLED tv. there is menefits there also. [/quote] This is what my friends which do not have projector used to say. Once I did show them playin on projector including 3D, they want the same. Comparing monitor and Projector is silly. [b]For thread creator - go for projector, forget monitors. You will use it not only for 3D, but also for Movies. There is no better way in 3D Vision world.[/b]
Metal-O-Holic said:yes there is imersion still in monitor. but i gotta disagree that big sceen is the same as monitor or tv viewed from a specific distance. It theoreticly is but no IT´s not the same.
I don´t say there is nothing wrong with choosing a monitor or OLED tv. there is menefits there also.


This is what my friends which do not have projector used to say. Once I did show them playin on projector including 3D, they want the same. Comparing monitor and Projector is silly.

For thread creator - go for projector, forget monitors. You will use it not only for 3D, but also for Movies. There is no better way in 3D Vision world.

#42
Posted 03/20/2018 04:57 PM   
I've tested my ASUS ASUS 27" ROG Swift PG278QR: (I'll add pictures soon) [url]https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/828986/3d-vision/which-is-the-best-3d-monitor-/post/5309936/#5309936[/url] .
I've tested my ASUS ASUS 27" ROG Swift PG278QR: (I'll add pictures soon)

https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/828986/3d-vision/which-is-the-best-3d-monitor-/post/5309936/#5309936



.
Done, Full 3D testing is online: [url]https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/828986/3d-vision/which-is-the-best-3d-monitor-/post/5309936/#5309936[/url]
[quote="bo3b"] "My best guess of optimal 3D display, based on long term studying, and reading these sorts of threads over the years. Goal for me is immersion, and low crosstalk. Willing to buy expensive hardware, including beefy GPU. I have not personally experienced all of these" "end quote" [b] Thats not true Bob, I'm sure you've been to a IMAX cinema "or whatever there called where you live" , Thats Dual projectors. ... i think .. lol[/b]
bo3b said:

"My best guess of optimal 3D display, based on long term studying, and reading these sorts of threads over the years. Goal for me is immersion, and low crosstalk. Willing to buy expensive hardware, including beefy GPU. I have not personally experienced all of these"


"end quote"


Thats not true Bob, I'm sure you've been to a IMAX cinema "or whatever there called where you live" , Thats Dual projectors. ... i think .. lol

#45
Posted 04/04/2018 01:48 AM   
  3 / 4    
Scroll To Top