the only reason I can think is because it will be extremely costly and most likely they wouldn't get a good return on it. Not to mention the quality of the panels with the current tech isn't the best. you will have bigger screens and more bands of ghosting for at least $600 US a pop.
the only reason I can think is because it will be extremely costly and most likely they wouldn't get a good return on it. Not to mention the quality of the panels with the current tech isn't the best. you will have bigger screens and more bands of ghosting for at least $600 US a pop.
Intel Core i9-9820x @ 3.30GHZ
32 gig Ram
2 EVGA RTX 2080 ti Gaming
3 X ASUS ROG SWIFT 27 144Hz G-SYNC Gaming 3D Monitor [PG278Q]
1 X ASUS VG278HE
Nvidia 3Dvision
Oculus Rift
HTC VIVE
Windows 10
Asus has showcased and delayed a 27" 120Hz 3D Ready LCD for quite awhile now, but given there was no mention of an imminent release or even any buzz/coverage of it at Computex last week, that's bad news for those who have been waiting for it. There's a few new 23-24" options available though from LG and Asus.
As for why, its probably difficult getting the 120Hz and necessary refresh/latency timing on larger substrates, as larger panels probably suffer even more imperfections and ghosting issues we already see on the periphery of current 23-24" models. I imagine these are the same reason we probably won't see IPS or PVA/MVA 120Hz panels as those panel technologies simply can't achieve the low 8.3ms per frame needed for total latency for 120 frames per second. Maybe with OLED-based panels, but until then we're probably stuck with TN panels.
Asus has showcased and delayed a 27" 120Hz 3D Ready LCD for quite awhile now, but given there was no mention of an imminent release or even any buzz/coverage of it at Computex last week, that's bad news for those who have been waiting for it. There's a few new 23-24" options available though from LG and Asus.
As for why, its probably difficult getting the 120Hz and necessary refresh/latency timing on larger substrates, as larger panels probably suffer even more imperfections and ghosting issues we already see on the periphery of current 23-24" models. I imagine these are the same reason we probably won't see IPS or PVA/MVA 120Hz panels as those panel technologies simply can't achieve the low 8.3ms per frame needed for total latency for 120 frames per second. Maybe with OLED-based panels, but until then we're probably stuck with TN panels.
Forget monitors. I have witnessed 3D in the new viera 60 inch and its amazing. Just have to wait for the 3DTV Play software.
By delivering a full 1080p-resolution image to each eye, Panasonic’s Full HD 3D technology offers consumers the highest possible visual experience. Panasonic will ship in the Spring of 2010 four 3D models in sizes including 50-inch class (49.9 inches measured diagonally) , 54-inch class (54 inches measured diagonally), 58-inch class (58 inches measured diagonally) and 65-inch class (65 inches measured diagonally). In addition, all four 3D VIERA televisions feature Panasonic’s VIERA CAST™ IPTV functionality and all models are THX certified.
Forget monitors. I have witnessed 3D in the new viera 60 inch and its amazing. Just have to wait for the 3DTV Play software.
By delivering a full 1080p-resolution image to each eye, Panasonic’s Full HD 3D technology offers consumers the highest possible visual experience. Panasonic will ship in the Spring of 2010 four 3D models in sizes including 50-inch class (49.9 inches measured diagonally) , 54-inch class (54 inches measured diagonally), 58-inch class (58 inches measured diagonally) and 65-inch class (65 inches measured diagonally). In addition, all four 3D VIERA televisions feature Panasonic’s VIERA CAST™ IPTV functionality and all models are THX certified.
I'm actually very surprised there isn't already a 30" (as in 2560x1600 resolution) monitor at 120 Hz and I'm kind of dumbfounded as to why there isn't one. It's not like 30" monitors aren't already super expensive (pretty much been in the $1000+ club for years), so I don't see how it could possibly be a bad business decision to add another option to the niche enthusiast gamer market. It would probably sell better than normal 30" monitors since you'll not only have the pre-existing 30" niche/professional market buyers looking into it, but also 3D Vision enthusiasts as well as gamers that just care about frame rate + resolution.
It seems like even less of a risk than Samsung trying to push a 22" monitor for $400 since the 30" monitors are already aimed towards the niche, non-mainstream market. People gawked at the prices of the first 22" 120 Hz monitors because of the markup from normal 22" monitors, but when you're looking at a monitor that's already over $1000, an increase of, say, $300-500 to add 120 Hz doesn't seem so bad.
If anything, with Eyefinity and Nvidia Surround being in the rich boys toys market, it seems kind of dumb that we don't already have our 30" 120 Hz beast. I know I'd go for that in a second over Nvidia 3D Surround.
I'm actually very surprised there isn't already a 30" (as in 2560x1600 resolution) monitor at 120 Hz and I'm kind of dumbfounded as to why there isn't one. It's not like 30" monitors aren't already super expensive (pretty much been in the $1000+ club for years), so I don't see how it could possibly be a bad business decision to add another option to the niche enthusiast gamer market. It would probably sell better than normal 30" monitors since you'll not only have the pre-existing 30" niche/professional market buyers looking into it, but also 3D Vision enthusiasts as well as gamers that just care about frame rate + resolution.
It seems like even less of a risk than Samsung trying to push a 22" monitor for $400 since the 30" monitors are already aimed towards the niche, non-mainstream market. People gawked at the prices of the first 22" 120 Hz monitors because of the markup from normal 22" monitors, but when you're looking at a monitor that's already over $1000, an increase of, say, $300-500 to add 120 Hz doesn't seem so bad.
If anything, with Eyefinity and Nvidia Surround being in the rich boys toys market, it seems kind of dumb that we don't already have our 30" 120 Hz beast. I know I'd go for that in a second over Nvidia 3D Surround.
Q6600 @ 3.0 GHz
4GB DDR2 800
GTX 280
3D Vision w/Samsung 2233rz
Vista 64
[quote name='slipstream' post='1075350' date='Jun 18 2010, 03:11 AM']Forget monitors. I have witnessed 3D in the new viera 60 inch and its amazing. Just have to wait for the 3DTV Play software.
By delivering a full 1080p-resolution image to each eye, Panasonic’s Full HD 3D technology offers consumers the highest possible visual experience. Panasonic will ship in the Spring of 2010 four 3D models in sizes including 50-inch class (49.9 inches measured diagonally) , 54-inch class (54 inches measured diagonally), 58-inch class (58 inches measured diagonally) and 65-inch class (65 inches measured diagonally). In addition, all four 3D VIERA televisions feature Panasonic’s VIERA CAST™ IPTV functionality and all models are THX certified.[/quote]
[quote name='slipstream' post='1075350' date='Jun 18 2010, 03:11 AM']Forget monitors. I have witnessed 3D in the new viera 60 inch and its amazing. Just have to wait for the 3DTV Play software.
By delivering a full 1080p-resolution image to each eye, Panasonic’s Full HD 3D technology offers consumers the highest possible visual experience. Panasonic will ship in the Spring of 2010 four 3D models in sizes including 50-inch class (49.9 inches measured diagonally) , 54-inch class (54 inches measured diagonally), 58-inch class (58 inches measured diagonally) and 65-inch class (65 inches measured diagonally). In addition, all four 3D VIERA televisions feature Panasonic’s VIERA CAST™ IPTV functionality and all models are THX certified.
[quote name='3D schmeedee' post='1075388' date='Jun 18 2010, 05:23 AM']I'm actually very surprised there isn't already a 30" (as in 2560x1600 resolution) monitor at 120 Hz and I'm kind of dumbfounded as to why there isn't one. It's not like 30" monitors aren't already super expensive (pretty much been in the $1000+ club for years), so I don't see how it could possibly be a bad business decision to add another option to the niche enthusiast gamer market. It would probably sell better than normal 30" monitors since you'll not only have the pre-existing 30" niche/professional market buyers looking into it, but also 3D Vision enthusiasts as well as gamers that just care about frame rate + resolution.
It seems like even less of a risk than Samsung trying to push a 22" monitor for $400 since the 30" monitors are already aimed towards the niche, non-mainstream market. People gawked at the prices of the first 22" 120 Hz monitors because of the markup from normal 22" monitors, but when you're looking at a monitor that's already over $1000, an increase of, say, $300-500 to add 120 Hz doesn't seem so bad.
If anything, with Eyefinity and Nvidia Surround being in the rich boys toys market, it seems kind of dumb that we don't already have our 30" 120 Hz beast. I know I'd go for that in a second over Nvidia 3D Surround.[/quote]
I'm not surprised at all really that there's no 2560x1600 120Hz capable monitor as 1080p @ 120Hz is the limit for DL-DVI bandwidth and is roughly the equivalent of 2560x1600 @ 60Hz. We'd need Quad-Link DVI support for that kind of resolution and refresh rate and that's simply not available yet on the consumer desktop space as of yet. Some Quadro parts do support it but its definitely still limited to the professional/workstation space.
Also, people looking at those types of monitors are generally interested in IPS panels for the best 2D image quality possible and I'm not sure we'll ever see IPS or PVA/MVA display types that satisfy the 8.3ms total latency requirements of 120Hz. On a display that large with TN panels, there'd probably be considerable color-shifting and viewing angle problems just viewing it straight on, not to mention more ghosting/refresh rate issues at the top and the bottom of the display that are already a problem on the 23-24" panels.
[quote name='3D schmeedee' post='1075388' date='Jun 18 2010, 05:23 AM']I'm actually very surprised there isn't already a 30" (as in 2560x1600 resolution) monitor at 120 Hz and I'm kind of dumbfounded as to why there isn't one. It's not like 30" monitors aren't already super expensive (pretty much been in the $1000+ club for years), so I don't see how it could possibly be a bad business decision to add another option to the niche enthusiast gamer market. It would probably sell better than normal 30" monitors since you'll not only have the pre-existing 30" niche/professional market buyers looking into it, but also 3D Vision enthusiasts as well as gamers that just care about frame rate + resolution.
It seems like even less of a risk than Samsung trying to push a 22" monitor for $400 since the 30" monitors are already aimed towards the niche, non-mainstream market. People gawked at the prices of the first 22" 120 Hz monitors because of the markup from normal 22" monitors, but when you're looking at a monitor that's already over $1000, an increase of, say, $300-500 to add 120 Hz doesn't seem so bad.
If anything, with Eyefinity and Nvidia Surround being in the rich boys toys market, it seems kind of dumb that we don't already have our 30" 120 Hz beast. I know I'd go for that in a second over Nvidia 3D Surround.
I'm not surprised at all really that there's no 2560x1600 120Hz capable monitor as 1080p @ 120Hz is the limit for DL-DVI bandwidth and is roughly the equivalent of 2560x1600 @ 60Hz. We'd need Quad-Link DVI support for that kind of resolution and refresh rate and that's simply not available yet on the consumer desktop space as of yet. Some Quadro parts do support it but its definitely still limited to the professional/workstation space.
Also, people looking at those types of monitors are generally interested in IPS panels for the best 2D image quality possible and I'm not sure we'll ever see IPS or PVA/MVA display types that satisfy the 8.3ms total latency requirements of 120Hz. On a display that large with TN panels, there'd probably be considerable color-shifting and viewing angle problems just viewing it straight on, not to mention more ghosting/refresh rate issues at the top and the bottom of the display that are already a problem on the 23-24" panels.
[quote name='DanielJoy' post='1075683' date='Jun 18 2010, 06:07 PM']all 1080p 3d tvs can only game at 720p. i hope this changes soon.[/quote]
I'm sure it'll change but I'm not sure how soon it'll happen. HDTV and HT component makers need something to upgrade to to compel users to buy new tech in 2-3 years after all. I'd expect HDMI 1.5 a, b, c or 1.6 a, b, c, d to support higher resolutions at 60Hz per eye some day, but this probably won't happen for 2-3 more years maybe when the next gen consoles are out and the 2nd or 3rd gen of HDTVs are available that support true 120Hz signal inputs. None of the current 3D Ready HDTVs can from what I've read, its all 60Hz input using the various HDMI 1.4 frame packing standards you detailed.
[quote name='DanielJoy' post='1075683' date='Jun 18 2010, 06:07 PM']all 1080p 3d tvs can only game at 720p. i hope this changes soon.
I'm sure it'll change but I'm not sure how soon it'll happen. HDTV and HT component makers need something to upgrade to to compel users to buy new tech in 2-3 years after all. I'd expect HDMI 1.5 a, b, c or 1.6 a, b, c, d to support higher resolutions at 60Hz per eye some day, but this probably won't happen for 2-3 more years maybe when the next gen consoles are out and the 2nd or 3rd gen of HDTVs are available that support true 120Hz signal inputs. None of the current 3D Ready HDTVs can from what I've read, its all 60Hz input using the various HDMI 1.4 frame packing standards you detailed.
why is there only these small 23 inch monitors for 3d? why isnt anyone making a 30 inch?
why is there only these small 23 inch monitors for 3d? why isnt anyone making a 30 inch?
Intel Core i9-9820x @ 3.30GHZ
32 gig Ram
2 EVGA RTX 2080 ti Gaming
3 X ASUS ROG SWIFT 27 144Hz G-SYNC Gaming 3D Monitor [PG278Q]
1 X ASUS VG278HE
Nvidia 3Dvision
Oculus Rift
HTC VIVE
Windows 10
As for why, its probably difficult getting the 120Hz and necessary refresh/latency timing on larger substrates, as larger panels probably suffer even more imperfections and ghosting issues we already see on the periphery of current 23-24" models. I imagine these are the same reason we probably won't see IPS or PVA/MVA 120Hz panels as those panel technologies simply can't achieve the low 8.3ms per frame needed for total latency for 120 frames per second. Maybe with OLED-based panels, but until then we're probably stuck with TN panels.
As for why, its probably difficult getting the 120Hz and necessary refresh/latency timing on larger substrates, as larger panels probably suffer even more imperfections and ghosting issues we already see on the periphery of current 23-24" models. I imagine these are the same reason we probably won't see IPS or PVA/MVA 120Hz panels as those panel technologies simply can't achieve the low 8.3ms per frame needed for total latency for 120 frames per second. Maybe with OLED-based panels, but until then we're probably stuck with TN panels.
-=HeliX=- Mod 3DV Game Fixes
My 3D Vision Games List Ratings
Intel Core i7 5930K @4.5GHz | Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5 | Win10 x64 Pro | Corsair H105
Nvidia GeForce Titan X SLI Hybrid | ROG Swift PG278Q 144Hz + 3D Vision/G-Sync | 32GB Adata DDR4 2666
Intel Samsung 950Pro SSD | Samsung EVO 4x1 RAID 0 |
Yamaha VX-677 A/V Receiver | Polk Audio RM6880 7.1 | LG Blu-Ray
Auzen X-Fi HT HD | Logitech G710/G502/G27 | Corsair Air 540 | EVGA P2-1200W
By delivering a full 1080p-resolution image to each eye, Panasonic’s Full HD 3D technology offers consumers the highest possible visual experience. Panasonic will ship in the Spring of 2010 four 3D models in sizes including 50-inch class (49.9 inches measured diagonally) , 54-inch class (54 inches measured diagonally), 58-inch class (58 inches measured diagonally) and 65-inch class (65 inches measured diagonally). In addition, all four 3D VIERA televisions feature Panasonic’s VIERA CAST™ IPTV functionality and all models are THX certified.
By delivering a full 1080p-resolution image to each eye, Panasonic’s Full HD 3D technology offers consumers the highest possible visual experience. Panasonic will ship in the Spring of 2010 four 3D models in sizes including 50-inch class (49.9 inches measured diagonally) , 54-inch class (54 inches measured diagonally), 58-inch class (58 inches measured diagonally) and 65-inch class (65 inches measured diagonally). In addition, all four 3D VIERA televisions feature Panasonic’s VIERA CAST™ IPTV functionality and all models are THX certified.
Win 7 64 - i7 4770k 4.5ghz - Corsair hydro water cooled - MSI Z87-GD65 mobo - MSI GTX 780ti Gaming twin frozr 3GB - 16GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 RAM - 500 GB SSD - Corsair 760 PSU
It seems like even less of a risk than Samsung trying to push a 22" monitor for $400 since the 30" monitors are already aimed towards the niche, non-mainstream market. People gawked at the prices of the first 22" 120 Hz monitors because of the markup from normal 22" monitors, but when you're looking at a monitor that's already over $1000, an increase of, say, $300-500 to add 120 Hz doesn't seem so bad.
If anything, with Eyefinity and Nvidia Surround being in the rich boys toys market, it seems kind of dumb that we don't already have our 30" 120 Hz beast. I know I'd go for that in a second over Nvidia 3D Surround.
It seems like even less of a risk than Samsung trying to push a 22" monitor for $400 since the 30" monitors are already aimed towards the niche, non-mainstream market. People gawked at the prices of the first 22" 120 Hz monitors because of the markup from normal 22" monitors, but when you're looking at a monitor that's already over $1000, an increase of, say, $300-500 to add 120 Hz doesn't seem so bad.
If anything, with Eyefinity and Nvidia Surround being in the rich boys toys market, it seems kind of dumb that we don't already have our 30" 120 Hz beast. I know I'd go for that in a second over Nvidia 3D Surround.
Q6600 @ 3.0 GHz
4GB DDR2 800
GTX 280
3D Vision w/Samsung 2233rz
Vista 64
By delivering a full 1080p-resolution image to each eye, Panasonic’s Full HD 3D technology offers consumers the highest possible visual experience. Panasonic will ship in the Spring of 2010 four 3D models in sizes including 50-inch class (49.9 inches measured diagonally) , 54-inch class (54 inches measured diagonally), 58-inch class (58 inches measured diagonally) and 65-inch class (65 inches measured diagonally). In addition, all four 3D VIERA televisions feature Panasonic’s VIERA CAST™ IPTV functionality and all models are THX certified.[/quote]
ok, what exactly is this 3DTV Play Software?
By delivering a full 1080p-resolution image to each eye, Panasonic’s Full HD 3D technology offers consumers the highest possible visual experience. Panasonic will ship in the Spring of 2010 four 3D models in sizes including 50-inch class (49.9 inches measured diagonally) , 54-inch class (54 inches measured diagonally), 58-inch class (58 inches measured diagonally) and 65-inch class (65 inches measured diagonally). In addition, all four 3D VIERA televisions feature Panasonic’s VIERA CAST™ IPTV functionality and all models are THX certified.
ok, what exactly is this 3DTV Play Software?
[url="http://www.mtbs3d.com/cgi-bin/news.cgi"]http://www.mtbs3d.com/cgi-bin/news.cgi[/url]
NVIDIA 3DTV Play only supports the following mandatory HDMI 1.4a 3D formats:
o Frame Packing
- 1080p @ 23.98/24Hz
- 720p @ 50 or 59.94/60Hz
o Side-by-Side Horizontal
- 1080i @ 50 or 59.94/60Hz
o Top-and-Bottom
- 720p @ 50 or 59.94/60Hz
- 1080p @ 23.97/24Hz
http://www.mtbs3d.com/cgi-bin/news.cgi
NVIDIA 3DTV Play only supports the following mandatory HDMI 1.4a 3D formats:
o Frame Packing
- 1080p @ 23.98/24Hz
- 720p @ 50 or 59.94/60Hz
o Side-by-Side Horizontal
- 1080i @ 50 or 59.94/60Hz
o Top-and-Bottom
- 720p @ 50 or 59.94/60Hz
- 1080p @ 23.97/24Hz
System:
Intel I7 920 overclocked to 4ghz
Asus Rampage Extreme II
2 Ge-force 480 in SLI
GTX 295 PhysX Card
12gb ddr3 2000mhz ram
Intel SSD in RAID 0
BR RW
1000w Sony surround sound
NVIDIA 3D Vision
3d displays tested:
Mitsubishi 65" DLP 3d HDTV (good old 1080p checkerboard since 2007!!!)
Panasonic VT25 (nice 2d but I returned it due to cross talk)
Acer H5360 720p on 130" screen (the best 3d)
23" Acer LCD monitor (horrible cross talk- sold it)
Samsung 65D8000
It seems like even less of a risk than Samsung trying to push a 22" monitor for $400 since the 30" monitors are already aimed towards the niche, non-mainstream market. People gawked at the prices of the first 22" 120 Hz monitors because of the markup from normal 22" monitors, but when you're looking at a monitor that's already over $1000, an increase of, say, $300-500 to add 120 Hz doesn't seem so bad.
If anything, with Eyefinity and Nvidia Surround being in the rich boys toys market, it seems kind of dumb that we don't already have our 30" 120 Hz beast. I know I'd go for that in a second over Nvidia 3D Surround.[/quote]
I'm not surprised at all really that there's no 2560x1600 120Hz capable monitor as 1080p @ 120Hz is the limit for DL-DVI bandwidth and is roughly the equivalent of 2560x1600 @ 60Hz. We'd need Quad-Link DVI support for that kind of resolution and refresh rate and that's simply not available yet on the consumer desktop space as of yet. Some Quadro parts do support it but its definitely still limited to the professional/workstation space.
Also, people looking at those types of monitors are generally interested in IPS panels for the best 2D image quality possible and I'm not sure we'll ever see IPS or PVA/MVA display types that satisfy the 8.3ms total latency requirements of 120Hz. On a display that large with TN panels, there'd probably be considerable color-shifting and viewing angle problems just viewing it straight on, not to mention more ghosting/refresh rate issues at the top and the bottom of the display that are already a problem on the 23-24" panels.
It seems like even less of a risk than Samsung trying to push a 22" monitor for $400 since the 30" monitors are already aimed towards the niche, non-mainstream market. People gawked at the prices of the first 22" 120 Hz monitors because of the markup from normal 22" monitors, but when you're looking at a monitor that's already over $1000, an increase of, say, $300-500 to add 120 Hz doesn't seem so bad.
If anything, with Eyefinity and Nvidia Surround being in the rich boys toys market, it seems kind of dumb that we don't already have our 30" 120 Hz beast. I know I'd go for that in a second over Nvidia 3D Surround.
I'm not surprised at all really that there's no 2560x1600 120Hz capable monitor as 1080p @ 120Hz is the limit for DL-DVI bandwidth and is roughly the equivalent of 2560x1600 @ 60Hz. We'd need Quad-Link DVI support for that kind of resolution and refresh rate and that's simply not available yet on the consumer desktop space as of yet. Some Quadro parts do support it but its definitely still limited to the professional/workstation space.
Also, people looking at those types of monitors are generally interested in IPS panels for the best 2D image quality possible and I'm not sure we'll ever see IPS or PVA/MVA display types that satisfy the 8.3ms total latency requirements of 120Hz. On a display that large with TN panels, there'd probably be considerable color-shifting and viewing angle problems just viewing it straight on, not to mention more ghosting/refresh rate issues at the top and the bottom of the display that are already a problem on the 23-24" panels.
-=HeliX=- Mod 3DV Game Fixes
My 3D Vision Games List Ratings
Intel Core i7 5930K @4.5GHz | Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5 | Win10 x64 Pro | Corsair H105
Nvidia GeForce Titan X SLI Hybrid | ROG Swift PG278Q 144Hz + 3D Vision/G-Sync | 32GB Adata DDR4 2666
Intel Samsung 950Pro SSD | Samsung EVO 4x1 RAID 0 |
Yamaha VX-677 A/V Receiver | Polk Audio RM6880 7.1 | LG Blu-Ray
Auzen X-Fi HT HD | Logitech G710/G502/G27 | Corsair Air 540 | EVGA P2-1200W
I'm sure it'll change but I'm not sure how soon it'll happen. HDTV and HT component makers need something to upgrade to to compel users to buy new tech in 2-3 years after all. I'd expect HDMI 1.5 a, b, c or 1.6 a, b, c, d to support higher resolutions at 60Hz per eye some day, but this probably won't happen for 2-3 more years maybe when the next gen consoles are out and the 2nd or 3rd gen of HDTVs are available that support true 120Hz signal inputs. None of the current 3D Ready HDTVs can from what I've read, its all 60Hz input using the various HDMI 1.4 frame packing standards you detailed.
I'm sure it'll change but I'm not sure how soon it'll happen. HDTV and HT component makers need something to upgrade to to compel users to buy new tech in 2-3 years after all. I'd expect HDMI 1.5 a, b, c or 1.6 a, b, c, d to support higher resolutions at 60Hz per eye some day, but this probably won't happen for 2-3 more years maybe when the next gen consoles are out and the 2nd or 3rd gen of HDTVs are available that support true 120Hz signal inputs. None of the current 3D Ready HDTVs can from what I've read, its all 60Hz input using the various HDMI 1.4 frame packing standards you detailed.
-=HeliX=- Mod 3DV Game Fixes
My 3D Vision Games List Ratings
Intel Core i7 5930K @4.5GHz | Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5 | Win10 x64 Pro | Corsair H105
Nvidia GeForce Titan X SLI Hybrid | ROG Swift PG278Q 144Hz + 3D Vision/G-Sync | 32GB Adata DDR4 2666
Intel Samsung 950Pro SSD | Samsung EVO 4x1 RAID 0 |
Yamaha VX-677 A/V Receiver | Polk Audio RM6880 7.1 | LG Blu-Ray
Auzen X-Fi HT HD | Logitech G710/G502/G27 | Corsair Air 540 | EVGA P2-1200W