(from page 36)
"The first comparable thing to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 that comes to the mind are the powerful yet gas-guzzling SUVs that are used for cross-country drives with heavy loads, comfortably. Often stereotyped with fuel-inefficiency, those vehicles don't compromise one bit on performance, space, passenger comfort, loads of accessories, utilities and features. Same is the case with GeForce GTX 480. The card sports solid overall build quality. It offers all the features you'd want from a graphics card of this generation, plus a lot of features which surprisingly have takers. This is the most powerful graphics processor till date, and one of the most complex pieces of silicon ever made with NVIDIA packing 3.2 billion transistors into a chip.
The GeForce GTX 480 shines in nearly all games in our test bench, giving out the highest performance figures for a single-GPU graphics card. It especially performs well in some of the newest DirectX 11 generation tests, something worth discerning. The fact that it's a single GPU accelerator works to its advantage. Multi-GPU graphics cards require application profiles specific to the game you're playing, could encounter certain limitations when running in windowed modes, among other more trivial issues. A single-GPU graphics card by design eliminates most of those.
For a larger part of our review, the GTX 480 doles out performance higher than the GeForce GTX 295, and stays in the second place. In DirectX 11 applications, particularly in tests involving heavy geometry processing load using hardware tessellation, the GTX 480 shines due to NVIDIA's distributed and parallelized implementation of hardware tessellation processing units on the GPU.
At the highest resolutions however, we expected more from the GTX 480. With 1.5 GB of memory and over 170 GB/s of memory bandwidth at its disposal, it should have been able to motorboat through high-resolution tests. At 2560 x 1600 pixel resolution, the GeForce GTX 295 takes a slight performance lead. This isn't acceptable for a card of its stature. The performance advantage the GTX 480 has over competing graphics cards seems to go down with increase in resolution. Either that's because it's faster in lower resolutions (around the 1080p mark), or that it's slower with higher resolutions."
Here's another, translated via Google:
[url="http://snipr.com/gtx480"]http://snipr.com/gtx480[/url]
(from page 18)
"Then there is Vision 3D, stereoscopy technology from Nvidia. In our original test we noticed a lot of good points about the software, regretting that the screens are not level. AMD still does not offer equivalent on this point and allows the GTX 480 in any case raise the level of performance and play these games comfortably. In SLI mode it is even possible to play 3D on multiple monitors which is a plus."
"The first comparable thing to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 that comes to the mind are the powerful yet gas-guzzling SUVs that are used for cross-country drives with heavy loads, comfortably. Often stereotyped with fuel-inefficiency, those vehicles don't compromise one bit on performance, space, passenger comfort, loads of accessories, utilities and features. Same is the case with GeForce GTX 480. The card sports solid overall build quality. It offers all the features you'd want from a graphics card of this generation, plus a lot of features which surprisingly have takers. This is the most powerful graphics processor till date, and one of the most complex pieces of silicon ever made with NVIDIA packing 3.2 billion transistors into a chip.
The GeForce GTX 480 shines in nearly all games in our test bench, giving out the highest performance figures for a single-GPU graphics card. It especially performs well in some of the newest DirectX 11 generation tests, something worth discerning. The fact that it's a single GPU accelerator works to its advantage. Multi-GPU graphics cards require application profiles specific to the game you're playing, could encounter certain limitations when running in windowed modes, among other more trivial issues. A single-GPU graphics card by design eliminates most of those.
For a larger part of our review, the GTX 480 doles out performance higher than the GeForce GTX 295, and stays in the second place. In DirectX 11 applications, particularly in tests involving heavy geometry processing load using hardware tessellation, the GTX 480 shines due to NVIDIA's distributed and parallelized implementation of hardware tessellation processing units on the GPU.
At the highest resolutions however, we expected more from the GTX 480. With 1.5 GB of memory and over 170 GB/s of memory bandwidth at its disposal, it should have been able to motorboat through high-resolution tests. At 2560 x 1600 pixel resolution, the GeForce GTX 295 takes a slight performance lead. This isn't acceptable for a card of its stature. The performance advantage the GTX 480 has over competing graphics cards seems to go down with increase in resolution. Either that's because it's faster in lower resolutions (around the 1080p mark), or that it's slower with higher resolutions."
"Then there is Vision 3D, stereoscopy technology from Nvidia. In our original test we noticed a lot of good points about the software, regretting that the screens are not level. AMD still does not offer equivalent on this point and allows the GTX 480 in any case raise the level of performance and play these games comfortably. In SLI mode it is even possible to play 3D on multiple monitors which is a plus."
Well, this confirms it, there is absolutely no reason to replace my gtx295 for this thing (my wallet is thanking me now). It also confirms that Metro2033 needs some serious optimization. I started playing last night with 3d vision and it's dominating my computer, but I don't understand why considering it's basically a hallway shooter.
Well, this confirms it, there is absolutely no reason to replace my gtx295 for this thing (my wallet is thanking me now). It also confirms that Metro2033 needs some serious optimization. I started playing last night with 3d vision and it's dominating my computer, but I don't understand why considering it's basically a hallway shooter.
Asus Maximus Hero VII
i7 4790k @ 4.8ghz
SLI MSI Gaming 980 @ 1.5ghz
16gb Gskill @ 2400mhz
2x Samsung 840 500gb
Corsair HX1000i
Custom water loop
un78hu9000 with 3dplay on checkerboard 1080p
I'm concerened with the power consumption. Can I run this card with my current power supply? I know that the GTX 480 involves like 40 watts on a single rail or something? No one is making mention of this so I assume that this card will work with my current power supply but better safe than sorry.
I'm concerened with the power consumption. Can I run this card with my current power supply? I know that the GTX 480 involves like 40 watts on a single rail or something? No one is making mention of this so I assume that this card will work with my current power supply but better safe than sorry.
[quote name='redcubelilj' post='1027871' date='Mar 27 2010, 12:43 AM']Well, this confirms it, there is absolutely no reason to replace my gtx295 for this thing (my wallet is thanking me now). It also confirms that Metro2033 needs some serious optimization. I started playing last night with 3d vision and it's dominating my computer, but I don't understand why considering it's basically a hallway shooter.[/quote]
it has some intense lighting and texture/bumpmap effects.
[quote name='redcubelilj' post='1027871' date='Mar 27 2010, 12:43 AM']Well, this confirms it, there is absolutely no reason to replace my gtx295 for this thing (my wallet is thanking me now). It also confirms that Metro2033 needs some serious optimization. I started playing last night with 3d vision and it's dominating my computer, but I don't understand why considering it's basically a hallway shooter.
it has some intense lighting and texture/bumpmap effects.
[quote name='redcubelilj' post='1027871' date='Mar 26 2010, 08:43 PM']Well, this confirms it, there is absolutely no reason to replace my gtx295 for this thing (my wallet is thanking me now). It also confirms that Metro2033 needs some serious optimization. I started playing last night with 3d vision and it's dominating my computer, but I don't understand why considering it's basically a hallway shooter.[/quote]
It looks like it's no more than just a semi-optimized console port. In a world where most of the money wasn't from the profits reaped from catering to the xbox360/PS3 crowd, you'd have a much better desktop game. At least on the PC end of things you can end up with the bragging rights of some of the most ridiculously rendered DX11 eye-candy anyone has ever seen, but you'll practically need a 2nd mortgage to do it at the high resolutions most gamers prefer.
Having my future system built around a 3D LCD projector makes everything a little saner, if not completely ideal. The big con is is having to play in 1024x768 (or possible 1280x1024 if I want to stick w/ 4:3 which I do) Not a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice stepping down to this sort of resolution, but I'm lucky in that there just are no cost-effective 1080p projector options available now or likely in the near future. So I was really very happy that the 470 didn't tank when it came to real-world testing because that's the card I've had my eye on.
At my intended resolutions, the 470 should run everything out there now (and for maybe even the next year's worth of releases) at medium to maxed detail levels [b]in 3D[/b] on the 17 foot screen I'm setting up. If I have a little more in my budget when it's time to pull the trigger, maybe I'll splurge for the 480, but I think that money could be better spent on another set of 3D glasses, better sound, nicer screen, etc.
No, the 470 looks just right for my upgrade path. I just hope they are in supply in the next month or 2 in range of $320-360 or better. Given that the 470 tests identically to the ~300$ 5850, I doubt that nvidia will be able to get away with selling the 470 for much more than that past the initial demand.
[quote name='redcubelilj' post='1027871' date='Mar 26 2010, 08:43 PM']Well, this confirms it, there is absolutely no reason to replace my gtx295 for this thing (my wallet is thanking me now). It also confirms that Metro2033 needs some serious optimization. I started playing last night with 3d vision and it's dominating my computer, but I don't understand why considering it's basically a hallway shooter.
It looks like it's no more than just a semi-optimized console port. In a world where most of the money wasn't from the profits reaped from catering to the xbox360/PS3 crowd, you'd have a much better desktop game. At least on the PC end of things you can end up with the bragging rights of some of the most ridiculously rendered DX11 eye-candy anyone has ever seen, but you'll practically need a 2nd mortgage to do it at the high resolutions most gamers prefer.
Having my future system built around a 3D LCD projector makes everything a little saner, if not completely ideal. The big con is is having to play in 1024x768 (or possible 1280x1024 if I want to stick w/ 4:3 which I do) Not a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice stepping down to this sort of resolution, but I'm lucky in that there just are no cost-effective 1080p projector options available now or likely in the near future. So I was really very happy that the 470 didn't tank when it came to real-world testing because that's the card I've had my eye on.
At my intended resolutions, the 470 should run everything out there now (and for maybe even the next year's worth of releases) at medium to maxed detail levels in 3D on the 17 foot screen I'm setting up. If I have a little more in my budget when it's time to pull the trigger, maybe I'll splurge for the 480, but I think that money could be better spent on another set of 3D glasses, better sound, nicer screen, etc.
No, the 470 looks just right for my upgrade path. I just hope they are in supply in the next month or 2 in range of $320-360 or better. Given that the 470 tests identically to the ~300$ 5850, I doubt that nvidia will be able to get away with selling the 470 for much more than that past the initial demand.
If those reviews are correct it appears that Nvidia has the most powerful single gpu card but in terms of heat and power consumption it's hurting.
:( well I guess I will stick to dx9 and dx10 games for a while.
Disappointed. :(
Intel Core i9-9820x @ 3.30GHZ
32 gig Ram
2 EVGA RTX 2080 ti Gaming
3 X ASUS ROG SWIFT 27 144Hz G-SYNC Gaming 3D Monitor [PG278Q]
1 X ASUS VG278HE
Nvidia 3Dvision
Oculus Rift
HTC VIVE
Windows 10
[quote name='msm903' post='1027973' date='Mar 26 2010, 09:57 PM']If those reviews are correct it appears that Nvidia has the most powerful single gpu card but in terms of heat and power consumption it's hurting.
:( well I guess I will stick to dx9 and dx10 games for a while.
Disappointed. :([/quote]
HAHAHAHA man that is not what I thought you were saying till I read it all.. thanks really made me laugh..
But you are so right.. and this is what some were saying before launch day.. not good at all. So now watch them REALLY push PHYSX.. haha..
[quote name='msm903' post='1027973' date='Mar 26 2010, 09:57 PM']If those reviews are correct it appears that Nvidia has the most powerful single gpu card but in terms of heat and power consumption it's hurting.
:( well I guess I will stick to dx9 and dx10 games for a while.
Disappointed. :(
HAHAHAHA man that is not what I thought you were saying till I read it all.. thanks really made me laugh..
But you are so right.. and this is what some were saying before launch day.. not good at all. So now watch them REALLY push PHYSX.. haha..
[quote name='Axim' post='1027953' date='Mar 27 2010, 04:06 AM']It looks like it's no more than just a semi-optimized console port. In a world where most of the money wasn't from the profits reaped from catering to the xbox360/PS3 crowd, you'd have a much better desktop game. At least on the PC end of things you can end up with the bragging rights of some of the most ridiculously rendered DX11 eye-candy anyone has ever seen, but you'll practically need a 2nd mortgage to do it at the high resolutions most gamers prefer.
Having my future system built around a 3D LCD projector makes everything a little saner, if not completely ideal. The big con is is having to play in 1024x768 (or possible 1280x1024 if I want to stick w/ 4:3 which I do) Not a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice stepping down to this sort of resolution, but I'm lucky in that there just are no cost-effective 1080p projector options available now or likely in the near future. So I was really very happy that the 470 didn't tank when it came to real-world testing because that's the card I've had my eye on.
At my intended resolutions, the 470 should run everything out there now (and for maybe even the next year's worth of releases) at medium to maxed detail levels [b]in 3D[/b] on the 17 foot screen I'm setting up. If I have a little more in my budget when it's time to pull the trigger, maybe I'll splurge for the 480, but I think that money could be better spent on another set of 3D glasses, better sound, nicer screen, etc.
No, the 470 looks just right for my upgrade path. I just hope they are in supply in the next month or 2 in range of $320-360 or better. Given that the 470 tests identically to the ~300$ 5850, I doubt that nvidia will be able to get away with selling the 470 for much more than that past the initial demand.[/quote]
metro isnt a bad port, it is just very graphically intensive and IMHO it looks awesome, the motion blur is fantastic and the effects it can achieve in dx11 are really something.
a gtx 470 wont handle games in 4 years time at max settings. think of a graphics card from 4 years ago and try playing a new game on it today. good luck with that...
[quote name='Axim' post='1027953' date='Mar 27 2010, 04:06 AM']It looks like it's no more than just a semi-optimized console port. In a world where most of the money wasn't from the profits reaped from catering to the xbox360/PS3 crowd, you'd have a much better desktop game. At least on the PC end of things you can end up with the bragging rights of some of the most ridiculously rendered DX11 eye-candy anyone has ever seen, but you'll practically need a 2nd mortgage to do it at the high resolutions most gamers prefer.
Having my future system built around a 3D LCD projector makes everything a little saner, if not completely ideal. The big con is is having to play in 1024x768 (or possible 1280x1024 if I want to stick w/ 4:3 which I do) Not a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice stepping down to this sort of resolution, but I'm lucky in that there just are no cost-effective 1080p projector options available now or likely in the near future. So I was really very happy that the 470 didn't tank when it came to real-world testing because that's the card I've had my eye on.
At my intended resolutions, the 470 should run everything out there now (and for maybe even the next year's worth of releases) at medium to maxed detail levels in 3D on the 17 foot screen I'm setting up. If I have a little more in my budget when it's time to pull the trigger, maybe I'll splurge for the 480, but I think that money could be better spent on another set of 3D glasses, better sound, nicer screen, etc.
No, the 470 looks just right for my upgrade path. I just hope they are in supply in the next month or 2 in range of $320-360 or better. Given that the 470 tests identically to the ~300$ 5850, I doubt that nvidia will be able to get away with selling the 470 for much more than that past the initial demand.
metro isnt a bad port, it is just very graphically intensive and IMHO it looks awesome, the motion blur is fantastic and the effects it can achieve in dx11 are really something.
a gtx 470 wont handle games in 4 years time at max settings. think of a graphics card from 4 years ago and try playing a new game on it today. good luck with that...
[quote name='Qazax' post='1028125' date='Mar 27 2010, 08:25 AM']metro isnt a bad port, it is just very graphically intensive and IMHO it looks awesome, the motion blur is fantastic and the effects it can achieve in dx11 are really something.
a gtx 470 wont handle games in 4 years time at max settings. think of a graphics card from 4 years ago and try playing a new game on it today. good luck with that...[/quote]
4? more years....since when did I start running for re-election? :) My wallet would love it if I could get 4 years out of any tech but that hasn't happened since my x51v and I know how rare that's been.
As for metro, more customized video settings should have been included...not a bad port overall yet it could have been a lot better.
[url="http://snipr.com/fermi3"]http://snipr.com/fermi3[/url] . "Because designing GPUs this big is 'f*cking hard'" -NVIDIA’s VP of Product Marketing Ujesh Desai on GF100
[quote name='Qazax' post='1028125' date='Mar 27 2010, 08:25 AM']metro isnt a bad port, it is just very graphically intensive and IMHO it looks awesome, the motion blur is fantastic and the effects it can achieve in dx11 are really something.
a gtx 470 wont handle games in 4 years time at max settings. think of a graphics card from 4 years ago and try playing a new game on it today. good luck with that...
4? more years....since when did I start running for re-election? :) My wallet would love it if I could get 4 years out of any tech but that hasn't happened since my x51v and I know how rare that's been.
As for metro, more customized video settings should have been included...not a bad port overall yet it could have been a lot better.
(from page 36)
"The first comparable thing to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 that comes to the mind are the powerful yet gas-guzzling SUVs that are used for cross-country drives with heavy loads, comfortably. Often stereotyped with fuel-inefficiency, those vehicles don't compromise one bit on performance, space, passenger comfort, loads of accessories, utilities and features. Same is the case with GeForce GTX 480. The card sports solid overall build quality. It offers all the features you'd want from a graphics card of this generation, plus a lot of features which surprisingly have takers. This is the most powerful graphics processor till date, and one of the most complex pieces of silicon ever made with NVIDIA packing 3.2 billion transistors into a chip.
The GeForce GTX 480 shines in nearly all games in our test bench, giving out the highest performance figures for a single-GPU graphics card. It especially performs well in some of the newest DirectX 11 generation tests, something worth discerning. The fact that it's a single GPU accelerator works to its advantage. Multi-GPU graphics cards require application profiles specific to the game you're playing, could encounter certain limitations when running in windowed modes, among other more trivial issues. A single-GPU graphics card by design eliminates most of those.
For a larger part of our review, the GTX 480 doles out performance higher than the GeForce GTX 295, and stays in the second place. In DirectX 11 applications, particularly in tests involving heavy geometry processing load using hardware tessellation, the GTX 480 shines due to NVIDIA's distributed and parallelized implementation of hardware tessellation processing units on the GPU.
At the highest resolutions however, we expected more from the GTX 480. With 1.5 GB of memory and over 170 GB/s of memory bandwidth at its disposal, it should have been able to motorboat through high-resolution tests. At 2560 x 1600 pixel resolution, the GeForce GTX 295 takes a slight performance lead. This isn't acceptable for a card of its stature. The performance advantage the GTX 480 has over competing graphics cards seems to go down with increase in resolution. Either that's because it's faster in lower resolutions (around the 1080p mark), or that it's slower with higher resolutions."
Here's another, translated via Google:
[url="http://snipr.com/gtx480"]http://snipr.com/gtx480[/url]
(from page 18)
"Then there is Vision 3D, stereoscopy technology from Nvidia. In our original test we noticed a lot of good points about the software, regretting that the screens are not level. AMD still does not offer equivalent on this point and allows the GTX 480 in any case raise the level of performance and play these games comfortably. In SLI mode it is even possible to play 3D on multiple monitors which is a plus."
(from page 36)
"The first comparable thing to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 that comes to the mind are the powerful yet gas-guzzling SUVs that are used for cross-country drives with heavy loads, comfortably. Often stereotyped with fuel-inefficiency, those vehicles don't compromise one bit on performance, space, passenger comfort, loads of accessories, utilities and features. Same is the case with GeForce GTX 480. The card sports solid overall build quality. It offers all the features you'd want from a graphics card of this generation, plus a lot of features which surprisingly have takers. This is the most powerful graphics processor till date, and one of the most complex pieces of silicon ever made with NVIDIA packing 3.2 billion transistors into a chip.
The GeForce GTX 480 shines in nearly all games in our test bench, giving out the highest performance figures for a single-GPU graphics card. It especially performs well in some of the newest DirectX 11 generation tests, something worth discerning. The fact that it's a single GPU accelerator works to its advantage. Multi-GPU graphics cards require application profiles specific to the game you're playing, could encounter certain limitations when running in windowed modes, among other more trivial issues. A single-GPU graphics card by design eliminates most of those.
For a larger part of our review, the GTX 480 doles out performance higher than the GeForce GTX 295, and stays in the second place. In DirectX 11 applications, particularly in tests involving heavy geometry processing load using hardware tessellation, the GTX 480 shines due to NVIDIA's distributed and parallelized implementation of hardware tessellation processing units on the GPU.
At the highest resolutions however, we expected more from the GTX 480. With 1.5 GB of memory and over 170 GB/s of memory bandwidth at its disposal, it should have been able to motorboat through high-resolution tests. At 2560 x 1600 pixel resolution, the GeForce GTX 295 takes a slight performance lead. This isn't acceptable for a card of its stature. The performance advantage the GTX 480 has over competing graphics cards seems to go down with increase in resolution. Either that's because it's faster in lower resolutions (around the 1080p mark), or that it's slower with higher resolutions."
Here's another, translated via Google:
http://snipr.com/gtx480
(from page 18)
"Then there is Vision 3D, stereoscopy technology from Nvidia. In our original test we noticed a lot of good points about the software, regretting that the screens are not level. AMD still does not offer equivalent on this point and allows the GTX 480 in any case raise the level of performance and play these games comfortably. In SLI mode it is even possible to play 3D on multiple monitors which is a plus."
Asus Maximus Hero VII
i7 4790k @ 4.8ghz
SLI MSI Gaming 980 @ 1.5ghz
16gb Gskill @ 2400mhz
2x Samsung 840 500gb
Corsair HX1000i
Custom water loop
un78hu9000 with 3dplay on checkerboard 1080p
English is my 2nd language...
Vista 64
ASUS P8P67Pro
I-7 2600k @ 3.4Ghz
Msi GTX 580
Msi GTX 460 PhysX
4G ram HyperX DDR3
3D vision user
Panasonic 3DHDTV VT25
[url="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817611009"]http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16817611009[/url]
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16817611009
4770k @ 4.2 Water cooled
32 Gigs DDR 3 2400
GTX Titan X SLI
Obsidian 800D
EVGA 1300 watt
1 Terabyte SSD raid 0
ASUS 27 inch 3D monitor 3D vision 2.
it has some intense lighting and texture/bumpmap effects.
it has some intense lighting and texture/bumpmap effects.
_ NVLDDMKM problems_ | _ problems getting a driver for a laptop graphics card_ | _What PSU do I need?_
[quote name='The Professor' date='11 August 2011 - 10:33 AM' timestamp='1313055223' post='1277858']
I think Qazax is a pretty cool guy. eh kills aleins and doesnt afraid of anything.
check my blog - cybereality.com
System:
Intel I7 920 overclocked to 4ghz
Asus Rampage Extreme II
2 Ge-force 480 in SLI
GTX 295 PhysX Card
12gb ddr3 2000mhz ram
Intel SSD in RAID 0
BR RW
1000w Sony surround sound
NVIDIA 3D Vision
3d displays tested:
Mitsubishi 65" DLP 3d HDTV (good old 1080p checkerboard since 2007!!!)
Panasonic VT25 (nice 2d but I returned it due to cross talk)
Acer H5360 720p on 130" screen (the best 3d)
23" Acer LCD monitor (horrible cross talk- sold it)
Samsung 65D8000
It looks like it's no more than just a semi-optimized console port. In a world where most of the money wasn't from the profits reaped from catering to the xbox360/PS3 crowd, you'd have a much better desktop game. At least on the PC end of things you can end up with the bragging rights of some of the most ridiculously rendered DX11 eye-candy anyone has ever seen, but you'll practically need a 2nd mortgage to do it at the high resolutions most gamers prefer.
Having my future system built around a 3D LCD projector makes everything a little saner, if not completely ideal. The big con is is having to play in 1024x768 (or possible 1280x1024 if I want to stick w/ 4:3 which I do) Not a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice stepping down to this sort of resolution, but I'm lucky in that there just are no cost-effective 1080p projector options available now or likely in the near future. So I was really very happy that the 470 didn't tank when it came to real-world testing because that's the card I've had my eye on.
At my intended resolutions, the 470 should run everything out there now (and for maybe even the next year's worth of releases) at medium to maxed detail levels [b]in 3D[/b] on the 17 foot screen I'm setting up. If I have a little more in my budget when it's time to pull the trigger, maybe I'll splurge for the 480, but I think that money could be better spent on another set of 3D glasses, better sound, nicer screen, etc.
No, the 470 looks just right for my upgrade path. I just hope they are in supply in the next month or 2 in range of $320-360 or better. Given that the 470 tests identically to the ~300$ 5850, I doubt that nvidia will be able to get away with selling the 470 for much more than that past the initial demand.
It looks like it's no more than just a semi-optimized console port. In a world where most of the money wasn't from the profits reaped from catering to the xbox360/PS3 crowd, you'd have a much better desktop game. At least on the PC end of things you can end up with the bragging rights of some of the most ridiculously rendered DX11 eye-candy anyone has ever seen, but you'll practically need a 2nd mortgage to do it at the high resolutions most gamers prefer.
Having my future system built around a 3D LCD projector makes everything a little saner, if not completely ideal. The big con is is having to play in 1024x768 (or possible 1280x1024 if I want to stick w/ 4:3 which I do) Not a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice stepping down to this sort of resolution, but I'm lucky in that there just are no cost-effective 1080p projector options available now or likely in the near future. So I was really very happy that the 470 didn't tank when it came to real-world testing because that's the card I've had my eye on.
At my intended resolutions, the 470 should run everything out there now (and for maybe even the next year's worth of releases) at medium to maxed detail levels in 3D on the 17 foot screen I'm setting up. If I have a little more in my budget when it's time to pull the trigger, maybe I'll splurge for the 480, but I think that money could be better spent on another set of 3D glasses, better sound, nicer screen, etc.
No, the 470 looks just right for my upgrade path. I just hope they are in supply in the next month or 2 in range of $320-360 or better. Given that the 470 tests identically to the ~300$ 5850, I doubt that nvidia will be able to get away with selling the 470 for much more than that past the initial demand.
And another review
And another review
Watercool any gpu cheap, AKA- "The Mod"
:( well I guess I will stick to dx9 and dx10 games for a while.
Disappointed. :(
:( well I guess I will stick to dx9 and dx10 games for a while.
Disappointed. :(
Intel Core i9-9820x @ 3.30GHZ
32 gig Ram
2 EVGA RTX 2080 ti Gaming
3 X ASUS ROG SWIFT 27 144Hz G-SYNC Gaming 3D Monitor [PG278Q]
1 X ASUS VG278HE
Nvidia 3Dvision
Oculus Rift
HTC VIVE
Windows 10
:( well I guess I will stick to dx9 and dx10 games for a while.
Disappointed. :([/quote]
HAHAHAHA man that is not what I thought you were saying till I read it all.. thanks really made me laugh..
But you are so right.. and this is what some were saying before launch day.. not good at all. So now watch them REALLY push PHYSX.. haha..
:( well I guess I will stick to dx9 and dx10 games for a while.
Disappointed. :(
HAHAHAHA man that is not what I thought you were saying till I read it all.. thanks really made me laugh..
But you are so right.. and this is what some were saying before launch day.. not good at all. So now watch them REALLY push PHYSX.. haha..
Having my future system built around a 3D LCD projector makes everything a little saner, if not completely ideal. The big con is is having to play in 1024x768 (or possible 1280x1024 if I want to stick w/ 4:3 which I do) Not a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice stepping down to this sort of resolution, but I'm lucky in that there just are no cost-effective 1080p projector options available now or likely in the near future. So I was really very happy that the 470 didn't tank when it came to real-world testing because that's the card I've had my eye on.
At my intended resolutions, the 470 should run everything out there now (and for maybe even the next year's worth of releases) at medium to maxed detail levels [b]in 3D[/b] on the 17 foot screen I'm setting up. If I have a little more in my budget when it's time to pull the trigger, maybe I'll splurge for the 480, but I think that money could be better spent on another set of 3D glasses, better sound, nicer screen, etc.
No, the 470 looks just right for my upgrade path. I just hope they are in supply in the next month or 2 in range of $320-360 or better. Given that the 470 tests identically to the ~300$ 5850, I doubt that nvidia will be able to get away with selling the 470 for much more than that past the initial demand.[/quote]
metro isnt a bad port, it is just very graphically intensive and IMHO it looks awesome, the motion blur is fantastic and the effects it can achieve in dx11 are really something.
a gtx 470 wont handle games in 4 years time at max settings. think of a graphics card from 4 years ago and try playing a new game on it today. good luck with that...
Having my future system built around a 3D LCD projector makes everything a little saner, if not completely ideal. The big con is is having to play in 1024x768 (or possible 1280x1024 if I want to stick w/ 4:3 which I do) Not a lot of people would be willing to sacrifice stepping down to this sort of resolution, but I'm lucky in that there just are no cost-effective 1080p projector options available now or likely in the near future. So I was really very happy that the 470 didn't tank when it came to real-world testing because that's the card I've had my eye on.
At my intended resolutions, the 470 should run everything out there now (and for maybe even the next year's worth of releases) at medium to maxed detail levels in 3D on the 17 foot screen I'm setting up. If I have a little more in my budget when it's time to pull the trigger, maybe I'll splurge for the 480, but I think that money could be better spent on another set of 3D glasses, better sound, nicer screen, etc.
No, the 470 looks just right for my upgrade path. I just hope they are in supply in the next month or 2 in range of $320-360 or better. Given that the 470 tests identically to the ~300$ 5850, I doubt that nvidia will be able to get away with selling the 470 for much more than that past the initial demand.
metro isnt a bad port, it is just very graphically intensive and IMHO it looks awesome, the motion blur is fantastic and the effects it can achieve in dx11 are really something.
a gtx 470 wont handle games in 4 years time at max settings. think of a graphics card from 4 years ago and try playing a new game on it today. good luck with that...
_ NVLDDMKM problems_ | _ problems getting a driver for a laptop graphics card_ | _What PSU do I need?_
[quote name='The Professor' date='11 August 2011 - 10:33 AM' timestamp='1313055223' post='1277858']
I think Qazax is a pretty cool guy. eh kills aleins and doesnt afraid of anything.
a gtx 470 wont handle games in 4 years time at max settings. think of a graphics card from 4 years ago and try playing a new game on it today. good luck with that...[/quote]
4? more years....since when did I start running for re-election? :) My wallet would love it if I could get 4 years out of any tech but that hasn't happened since my x51v and I know how rare that's been.
As for metro, more customized video settings should have been included...not a bad port overall yet it could have been a lot better.
Sean
more reviews:
[url="http://snipr.com/fermi2"]http://snipr.com/fermi2[/url]
[url="http://snipr.com/fermi3"]http://snipr.com/fermi3[/url] . "Because designing GPUs this big is 'f*cking hard'" -NVIDIA’s VP of Product Marketing Ujesh Desai on GF100
a gtx 470 wont handle games in 4 years time at max settings. think of a graphics card from 4 years ago and try playing a new game on it today. good luck with that...
4? more years....since when did I start running for re-election? :) My wallet would love it if I could get 4 years out of any tech but that hasn't happened since my x51v and I know how rare that's been.
As for metro, more customized video settings should have been included...not a bad port overall yet it could have been a lot better.
Sean
more reviews:
http://snipr.com/fermi2
http://snipr.com/fermi3 . "Because designing GPUs this big is 'f*cking hard'" -NVIDIA’s VP of Product Marketing Ujesh Desai on GF100
while the settings are a bit limited, you should be able to configure it easily enough in the config file?
while the settings are a bit limited, you should be able to configure it easily enough in the config file?
_ NVLDDMKM problems_ | _ problems getting a driver for a laptop graphics card_ | _What PSU do I need?_
[quote name='The Professor' date='11 August 2011 - 10:33 AM' timestamp='1313055223' post='1277858']
I think Qazax is a pretty cool guy. eh kills aleins and doesnt afraid of anything.