Acer vs LG vs Alienware which monitor should i choose?
3 / 3
[quote name='dirtylarryuk' post='1080985' date='Jul 1 2010, 12:59 PM']Issue both for 5 days side by side in BC2 as both 2d and 3d, BC2 is pretty much the best 3d game there is right now and I play BC2 alot i saw NO difference in either screen both have a slight issue with sniper scopes and that's it and that's not a tech issue it's a code issue.
Both outperformed a samsung 3d tv doing fake 3d as well (which ghosted like a bitch). BTw I sent the samsung back as well the same model just about every AV forum says is the best tv ever made and my view is try again samung if you want to replace my 2d 1080p DLP screen. it's nice but not worth £3k. the amount of menu crap you have to trun off on the samsung to get ot PC game well was annoying.
The only difference in the cuurent second gen TN 3d panels for PC is the PCB for connections. And the connections being in the same spot like 1600p screens is a HUGE LARGE giveaway they are from the same plant. In 2d 24hz 60hz and 120hz both were as good as you can get and in 3d better than the gen1 1050p models. The only [b]real[/b] major difference is the design and the price as both the dell and acer have same warrenty in most places.
The exact same can be said of many DLP projectors where the only diff is the PCb and many use the same DLP unit. (although not all and there is some choice there).
By the way all the "new" 3d LED Tv's only come from 2 plants.
As for ghosting all LED and TN panels ghost to me as I'm used to 0.02ms on DLP, I sit and bitch about professional broadcast kit that cost 10-20x more than any home model. So I could see no major difference on AW vs Acer both were great TN panels in 2d or 3d. yes 27" LED N3d panels appear to be coming soon and they should be even better. but if you bother to splash out £300-400 for a AW or Acer you can enjoy media-tv and game 3d right now and the monitor won't be pointless in 6 months.[/quote]
I just got the gd245hq and i have only tested it in 2D. After I turned the OD off everything looked just great! And ppl it only take 5secs to turn it off BIG DEAL!
[quote name='dirtylarryuk' post='1080985' date='Jul 1 2010, 12:59 PM']Issue both for 5 days side by side in BC2 as both 2d and 3d, BC2 is pretty much the best 3d game there is right now and I play BC2 alot i saw NO difference in either screen both have a slight issue with sniper scopes and that's it and that's not a tech issue it's a code issue.
Both outperformed a samsung 3d tv doing fake 3d as well (which ghosted like a bitch). BTw I sent the samsung back as well the same model just about every AV forum says is the best tv ever made and my view is try again samung if you want to replace my 2d 1080p DLP screen. it's nice but not worth £3k. the amount of menu crap you have to trun off on the samsung to get ot PC game well was annoying.
The only difference in the cuurent second gen TN 3d panels for PC is the PCB for connections. And the connections being in the same spot like 1600p screens is a HUGE LARGE giveaway they are from the same plant. In 2d 24hz 60hz and 120hz both were as good as you can get and in 3d better than the gen1 1050p models. The only real major difference is the design and the price as both the dell and acer have same warrenty in most places.
The exact same can be said of many DLP projectors where the only diff is the PCb and many use the same DLP unit. (although not all and there is some choice there).
By the way all the "new" 3d LED Tv's only come from 2 plants.
As for ghosting all LED and TN panels ghost to me as I'm used to 0.02ms on DLP, I sit and bitch about professional broadcast kit that cost 10-20x more than any home model. So I could see no major difference on AW vs Acer both were great TN panels in 2d or 3d. yes 27" LED N3d panels appear to be coming soon and they should be even better. but if you bother to splash out £300-400 for a AW or Acer you can enjoy media-tv and game 3d right now and the monitor won't be pointless in 6 months.
I just got the gd245hq and i have only tested it in 2D. After I turned the OD off everything looked just great! And ppl it only take 5secs to turn it off BIG DEAL!
I might get the LG W2363D, or wait for a 1920x1200. the other have these problems:
[i]- Despite being 120hz, scrolling text and little things, like moving windows and the cursor on the desktop, become a blur. What proved to be hell to me was constantly losing my cursor on a white background when I moved it around, something that's never happened to me before on any screen I've used. Lines of text also had some issues while scrolling, sometimes changing from black to blue, just becoming a mess of black, other times staying normal. Setting the monitor to a lower response time just made the problem a hell of a lot worse...something I'd expect from a monitor at fraction of the AW2310.[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365[/url]
- [i]That's another thing I forgot to mention in my unbiased review: try putting a CRT next to this monitor, the input lag is clearly visible when dragging windows or playing fast paced FPS games like quakelive.[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=160941&st=80"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...60941&st=80[/url]
[i]- here's an experiment to show that OVERDRIVE does not cause the DISPLAY SHARPNESS
enter service menu
switch OD to OFF
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the sharpness should go away, and brightness should increase
switch OD to ON
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the brightness should decrease, sharpness doesnt come back
exit service menu (but dont restart the monitor)
go to [url="http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php"]http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php[/url]
notice that there's no oversharpening (the image is uniform gray when looked from distance, no blocks)
play a 3d game
notice that there's no ghosting (OVERDRIVE IS ACTIVE)
all in all, they goofed up with this monitor's firmware[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=160941&st=140"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...0941&st=140[/url]
[i]- The Acer shows from zero to about 15-16 ms delay compared to the ViewSonic, but have in mind that both displays are running a clone image (using DVI splitter) with resolution of 1680×1050 which is not the native one for the Full HD Acer display![/i]
[url="http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245hq-120hz-3d-vision-ready-monitor-review/"]http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245...monitor-review/[/url]
With OD or sharpness off, brightness and contrast levels are reset every time you change resolution, or turn off the monitor. You need to go into the menus and make a slight change and its restored.
I might get the LG W2363D, or wait for a 1920x1200. the other have these problems:
- Despite being 120hz, scrolling text and little things, like moving windows and the cursor on the desktop, become a blur. What proved to be hell to me was constantly losing my cursor on a white background when I moved it around, something that's never happened to me before on any screen I've used. Lines of text also had some issues while scrolling, sometimes changing from black to blue, just becoming a mess of black, other times staying normal. Setting the monitor to a lower response time just made the problem a hell of a lot worse...something I'd expect from a monitor at fraction of the AW2310.
- That's another thing I forgot to mention in my unbiased review: try putting a CRT next to this monitor, the input lag is clearly visible when dragging windows or playing fast paced FPS games like quakelive.
- The Acer shows from zero to about 15-16 ms delay compared to the ViewSonic, but have in mind that both displays are running a clone image (using DVI splitter) with resolution of 1680×1050 which is not the native one for the Full HD Acer display!
With OD or sharpness off, brightness and contrast levels are reset every time you change resolution, or turn off the monitor. You need to go into the menus and make a slight change and its restored.
I might get the LG W2363D, or wait for a 1920x1200. the other have these problems:
[i]- Despite being 120hz, scrolling text and little things, like moving windows and the cursor on the desktop, become a blur. What proved to be hell to me was constantly losing my cursor on a white background when I moved it around, something that's never happened to me before on any screen I've used. Lines of text also had some issues while scrolling, sometimes changing from black to blue, just becoming a mess of black, other times staying normal. Setting the monitor to a lower response time just made the problem a hell of a lot worse...something I'd expect from a monitor at fraction of the AW2310.[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365[/url]
- [i]That's another thing I forgot to mention in my unbiased review: try putting a CRT next to this monitor, the input lag is clearly visible when dragging windows or playing fast paced FPS games like quakelive.[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=160941&st=80"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...60941&st=80[/url]
[i]- here's an experiment to show that OVERDRIVE does not cause the DISPLAY SHARPNESS
enter service menu
switch OD to OFF
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the sharpness should go away, and brightness should increase
switch OD to ON
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the brightness should decrease, sharpness doesnt come back
exit service menu (but dont restart the monitor)
go to [url="http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php"]http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php[/url]
notice that there's no oversharpening (the image is uniform gray when looked from distance, no blocks)
play a 3d game
notice that there's no ghosting (OVERDRIVE IS ACTIVE)
all in all, they goofed up with this monitor's firmware[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=160941&st=140"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...0941&st=140[/url]
[i]- The Acer shows from zero to about 15-16 ms delay compared to the ViewSonic, but have in mind that both displays are running a clone image (using DVI splitter) with resolution of 1680×1050 which is not the native one for the Full HD Acer display![/i]
[url="http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245hq-120hz-3d-vision-ready-monitor-review/"]http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245...monitor-review/[/url]
With OD or sharpness off, brightness and contrast levels are reset every time you change resolution, or turn off the monitor. You need to go into the menus and make a slight change and its restored.
I might get the LG W2363D, or wait for a 1920x1200. the other have these problems:
- Despite being 120hz, scrolling text and little things, like moving windows and the cursor on the desktop, become a blur. What proved to be hell to me was constantly losing my cursor on a white background when I moved it around, something that's never happened to me before on any screen I've used. Lines of text also had some issues while scrolling, sometimes changing from black to blue, just becoming a mess of black, other times staying normal. Setting the monitor to a lower response time just made the problem a hell of a lot worse...something I'd expect from a monitor at fraction of the AW2310.
- That's another thing I forgot to mention in my unbiased review: try putting a CRT next to this monitor, the input lag is clearly visible when dragging windows or playing fast paced FPS games like quakelive.
- The Acer shows from zero to about 15-16 ms delay compared to the ViewSonic, but have in mind that both displays are running a clone image (using DVI splitter) with resolution of 1680×1050 which is not the native one for the Full HD Acer display!
With OD or sharpness off, brightness and contrast levels are reset every time you change resolution, or turn off the monitor. You need to go into the menus and make a slight change and its restored.
[quote name='darkultra' post='1107325' date='Aug 22 2010, 10:11 AM']I might get the LG W2363D, or wait for a 1920x1200. the other have these problems:[/quote]
I think you cannot go over 1920x1080 with 3d using dvi. So, there may not be anything over that resolution for a while. It may require a new standard beyond dvid. Its the refresh rate or something that maxes out the dvi interface. I would much rather have a 1920x1200 too. You can in 2d, but not 3d.
[quote name='darkultra' post='1107325' date='Aug 22 2010, 10:11 AM']I might get the LG W2363D, or wait for a 1920x1200. the other have these problems:
I think you cannot go over 1920x1080 with 3d using dvi. So, there may not be anything over that resolution for a while. It may require a new standard beyond dvid. Its the refresh rate or something that maxes out the dvi interface. I would much rather have a 1920x1200 too. You can in 2d, but not 3d.
[quote name='darkultra' post='1107325' date='Aug 22 2010, 10:11 AM']I might get the LG W2363D, or wait for a 1920x1200. the other have these problems:[/quote]
I think you cannot go over 1920x1080 with 3d using dvi. So, there may not be anything over that resolution for a while. It may require a new standard beyond dvid. Its the refresh rate or something that maxes out the dvi interface. I would much rather have a 1920x1200 too. You can in 2d, but not 3d.
[quote name='darkultra' post='1107325' date='Aug 22 2010, 10:11 AM']I might get the LG W2363D, or wait for a 1920x1200. the other have these problems:
I think you cannot go over 1920x1080 with 3d using dvi. So, there may not be anything over that resolution for a while. It may require a new standard beyond dvid. Its the refresh rate or something that maxes out the dvi interface. I would much rather have a 1920x1200 too. You can in 2d, but not 3d.
Both outperformed a samsung 3d tv doing fake 3d as well (which ghosted like a bitch). BTw I sent the samsung back as well the same model just about every AV forum says is the best tv ever made and my view is try again samung if you want to replace my 2d 1080p DLP screen. it's nice but not worth £3k. the amount of menu crap you have to trun off on the samsung to get ot PC game well was annoying.
The only difference in the cuurent second gen TN 3d panels for PC is the PCB for connections. And the connections being in the same spot like 1600p screens is a HUGE LARGE giveaway they are from the same plant. In 2d 24hz 60hz and 120hz both were as good as you can get and in 3d better than the gen1 1050p models. The only [b]real[/b] major difference is the design and the price as both the dell and acer have same warrenty in most places.
The exact same can be said of many DLP projectors where the only diff is the PCb and many use the same DLP unit. (although not all and there is some choice there).
By the way all the "new" 3d LED Tv's only come from 2 plants.
As for ghosting all LED and TN panels ghost to me as I'm used to 0.02ms on DLP, I sit and bitch about professional broadcast kit that cost 10-20x more than any home model. So I could see no major difference on AW vs Acer both were great TN panels in 2d or 3d. yes 27" LED N3d panels appear to be coming soon and they should be even better. but if you bother to splash out £300-400 for a AW or Acer you can enjoy media-tv and game 3d right now and the monitor won't be pointless in 6 months.[/quote]
I just got the gd245hq and i have only tested it in 2D. After I turned the OD off everything looked just great! And ppl it only take 5secs to turn it off BIG DEAL!
Both outperformed a samsung 3d tv doing fake 3d as well (which ghosted like a bitch). BTw I sent the samsung back as well the same model just about every AV forum says is the best tv ever made and my view is try again samung if you want to replace my 2d 1080p DLP screen. it's nice but not worth £3k. the amount of menu crap you have to trun off on the samsung to get ot PC game well was annoying.
The only difference in the cuurent second gen TN 3d panels for PC is the PCB for connections. And the connections being in the same spot like 1600p screens is a HUGE LARGE giveaway they are from the same plant. In 2d 24hz 60hz and 120hz both were as good as you can get and in 3d better than the gen1 1050p models. The only real major difference is the design and the price as both the dell and acer have same warrenty in most places.
The exact same can be said of many DLP projectors where the only diff is the PCb and many use the same DLP unit. (although not all and there is some choice there).
By the way all the "new" 3d LED Tv's only come from 2 plants.
As for ghosting all LED and TN panels ghost to me as I'm used to 0.02ms on DLP, I sit and bitch about professional broadcast kit that cost 10-20x more than any home model. So I could see no major difference on AW vs Acer both were great TN panels in 2d or 3d. yes 27" LED N3d panels appear to be coming soon and they should be even better. but if you bother to splash out £300-400 for a AW or Acer you can enjoy media-tv and game 3d right now and the monitor won't be pointless in 6 months.
I just got the gd245hq and i have only tested it in 2D. After I turned the OD off everything looked just great! And ppl it only take 5secs to turn it off BIG DEAL!
[i]- Despite being 120hz, scrolling text and little things, like moving windows and the cursor on the desktop, become a blur. What proved to be hell to me was constantly losing my cursor on a white background when I moved it around, something that's never happened to me before on any screen I've used. Lines of text also had some issues while scrolling, sometimes changing from black to blue, just becoming a mess of black, other times staying normal. Setting the monitor to a lower response time just made the problem a hell of a lot worse...something I'd expect from a monitor at fraction of the AW2310.[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365[/url]
- [i]That's another thing I forgot to mention in my unbiased review: try putting a CRT next to this monitor, the input lag is clearly visible when dragging windows or playing fast paced FPS games like quakelive.[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=160941&st=80"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...60941&st=80[/url]
[i]- here's an experiment to show that OVERDRIVE does not cause the DISPLAY SHARPNESS
enter service menu
switch OD to OFF
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the sharpness should go away, and brightness should increase
switch OD to ON
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the brightness should decrease, sharpness doesnt come back
exit service menu (but dont restart the monitor)
go to [url="http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php"]http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php[/url]
notice that there's no oversharpening (the image is uniform gray when looked from distance, no blocks)
play a 3d game
notice that there's no ghosting (OVERDRIVE IS ACTIVE)
all in all, they goofed up with this monitor's firmware[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=160941&st=140"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...0941&st=140[/url]
[i]- The Acer shows from zero to about 15-16 ms delay compared to the ViewSonic, but have in mind that both displays are running a clone image (using DVI splitter) with resolution of 1680×1050 which is not the native one for the Full HD Acer display![/i]
[url="http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245hq-120hz-3d-vision-ready-monitor-review/"]http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245...monitor-review/[/url]
[url="http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/3688/acergd245hqoverdrive1.jpg"]http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/3688/ac...qoverdrive1.jpg[/url]
With OD or sharpness off, brightness and contrast levels are reset every time you change resolution, or turn off the monitor. You need to go into the menus and make a slight change and its restored.
- Despite being 120hz, scrolling text and little things, like moving windows and the cursor on the desktop, become a blur. What proved to be hell to me was constantly losing my cursor on a white background when I moved it around, something that's never happened to me before on any screen I've used. Lines of text also had some issues while scrolling, sometimes changing from black to blue, just becoming a mess of black, other times staying normal. Setting the monitor to a lower response time just made the problem a hell of a lot worse...something I'd expect from a monitor at fraction of the AW2310.
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365
- That's another thing I forgot to mention in my unbiased review: try putting a CRT next to this monitor, the input lag is clearly visible when dragging windows or playing fast paced FPS games like quakelive.
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...60941&st=80
- here's an experiment to show that OVERDRIVE does not cause the DISPLAY SHARPNESS
enter service menu
switch OD to OFF
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the sharpness should go away, and brightness should increase
switch OD to ON
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the brightness should decrease, sharpness doesnt come back
exit service menu (but dont restart the monitor)
go to http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php
notice that there's no oversharpening (the image is uniform gray when looked from distance, no blocks)
play a 3d game
notice that there's no ghosting (OVERDRIVE IS ACTIVE)
all in all, they goofed up with this monitor's firmware
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...0941&st=140
- The Acer shows from zero to about 15-16 ms delay compared to the ViewSonic, but have in mind that both displays are running a clone image (using DVI splitter) with resolution of 1680×1050 which is not the native one for the Full HD Acer display!
http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245...monitor-review/
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/3688/ac...qoverdrive1.jpg
With OD or sharpness off, brightness and contrast levels are reset every time you change resolution, or turn off the monitor. You need to go into the menus and make a slight change and its restored.
Benefits of 120Hz.
[i]- Despite being 120hz, scrolling text and little things, like moving windows and the cursor on the desktop, become a blur. What proved to be hell to me was constantly losing my cursor on a white background when I moved it around, something that's never happened to me before on any screen I've used. Lines of text also had some issues while scrolling, sometimes changing from black to blue, just becoming a mess of black, other times staying normal. Setting the monitor to a lower response time just made the problem a hell of a lot worse...something I'd expect from a monitor at fraction of the AW2310.[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365[/url]
- [i]That's another thing I forgot to mention in my unbiased review: try putting a CRT next to this monitor, the input lag is clearly visible when dragging windows or playing fast paced FPS games like quakelive.[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=160941&st=80"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...60941&st=80[/url]
[i]- here's an experiment to show that OVERDRIVE does not cause the DISPLAY SHARPNESS
enter service menu
switch OD to OFF
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the sharpness should go away, and brightness should increase
switch OD to ON
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the brightness should decrease, sharpness doesnt come back
exit service menu (but dont restart the monitor)
go to [url="http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php"]http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php[/url]
notice that there's no oversharpening (the image is uniform gray when looked from distance, no blocks)
play a 3d game
notice that there's no ghosting (OVERDRIVE IS ACTIVE)
all in all, they goofed up with this monitor's firmware[/i]
[url="http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=160941&st=140"]http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...0941&st=140[/url]
[i]- The Acer shows from zero to about 15-16 ms delay compared to the ViewSonic, but have in mind that both displays are running a clone image (using DVI splitter) with resolution of 1680×1050 which is not the native one for the Full HD Acer display![/i]
[url="http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245hq-120hz-3d-vision-ready-monitor-review/"]http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245...monitor-review/[/url]
[url="http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/3688/acergd245hqoverdrive1.jpg"]http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/3688/ac...qoverdrive1.jpg[/url]
With OD or sharpness off, brightness and contrast levels are reset every time you change resolution, or turn off the monitor. You need to go into the menus and make a slight change and its restored.
- Despite being 120hz, scrolling text and little things, like moving windows and the cursor on the desktop, become a blur. What proved to be hell to me was constantly losing my cursor on a white background when I moved it around, something that's never happened to me before on any screen I've used. Lines of text also had some issues while scrolling, sometimes changing from black to blue, just becoming a mess of black, other times staying normal. Setting the monitor to a lower response time just made the problem a hell of a lot worse...something I'd expect from a monitor at fraction of the AW2310.
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=157365
- That's another thing I forgot to mention in my unbiased review: try putting a CRT next to this monitor, the input lag is clearly visible when dragging windows or playing fast paced FPS games like quakelive.
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...60941&st=80
- here's an experiment to show that OVERDRIVE does not cause the DISPLAY SHARPNESS
enter service menu
switch OD to OFF
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the sharpness should go away, and brightness should increase
switch OD to ON
go to Reset, hit the 3rd button
the brightness should decrease, sharpness doesnt come back
exit service menu (but dont restart the monitor)
go to http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/sharpness.php
notice that there's no oversharpening (the image is uniform gray when looked from distance, no blocks)
play a 3d game
notice that there's no ghosting (OVERDRIVE IS ACTIVE)
all in all, they goofed up with this monitor's firmware
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtop...0941&st=140
- The Acer shows from zero to about 15-16 ms delay compared to the ViewSonic, but have in mind that both displays are running a clone image (using DVI splitter) with resolution of 1680×1050 which is not the native one for the Full HD Acer display!
http://3dvision-blog.com/acer-aspire-gd245...monitor-review/
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/3688/ac...qoverdrive1.jpg
With OD or sharpness off, brightness and contrast levels are reset every time you change resolution, or turn off the monitor. You need to go into the menus and make a slight change and its restored.
Benefits of 120Hz.
I think you cannot go over 1920x1080 with 3d using dvi. So, there may not be anything over that resolution for a while. It may require a new standard beyond dvid. Its the refresh rate or something that maxes out the dvi interface. I would much rather have a 1920x1200 too. You can in 2d, but not 3d.
I think you cannot go over 1920x1080 with 3d using dvi. So, there may not be anything over that resolution for a while. It may require a new standard beyond dvid. Its the refresh rate or something that maxes out the dvi interface. I would much rather have a 1920x1200 too. You can in 2d, but not 3d.
I think you cannot go over 1920x1080 with 3d using dvi. So, there may not be anything over that resolution for a while. It may require a new standard beyond dvid. Its the refresh rate or something that maxes out the dvi interface. I would much rather have a 1920x1200 too. You can in 2d, but not 3d.
I think you cannot go over 1920x1080 with 3d using dvi. So, there may not be anything over that resolution for a while. It may require a new standard beyond dvid. Its the refresh rate or something that maxes out the dvi interface. I would much rather have a 1920x1200 too. You can in 2d, but not 3d.