Keep seeing the advert for it, its quite cool, but i wondered if you could use this for 3D vision. If it did work, would it work better than the 120hz monitors available now?
At £1500, its purely a query, i have no chance of actually buying it!
Keep seeing the advert for it, its quite cool, but i wondered if you could use this for 3D vision. If it did work, would it work better than the 120hz monitors available now?
At £1500, its purely a query, i have no chance of actually buying it!
In general if they are not labeled with 3D-Ready they probably aren't. These high refresh rate TVs tech. are typically used for smoothing out the motion and not necessarily applicable to 3D gaming. It's best to send the manufacture an email to enquire.
Keep seeing the advert for it, its quite cool, but i wondered if you could use this for 3D vision. If it did work, would it work better than the 120hz monitors available now?
At £1500, its purely a query, i have no chance of actually buying it!
In general if they are not labeled with 3D-Ready they probably aren't. These high refresh rate TVs tech. are typically used for smoothing out the motion and not necessarily applicable to 3D gaming. It's best to send the manufacture an email to enquire.
Keep seeing the advert for it, its quite cool, but i wondered if you could use this for 3D vision. If it did work, would it work better than the 120hz monitors available now?
At £1500, its purely a query, i have no chance of actually buying it!
They are not the same ratings. The 200Hz is for the TV internally creating/interpolating extra frames to give the smoothness to motions. The 120Hz rating is for actual frame transferred/display from PC to TV. From this, I surmise that the TV itself can handle the switching rate but lacks the special circuit to process the input from 3D gaming. That's all I can guess. No doubts other expert in the field can offer much better explanations.
[quote name='I-E-D' post='545789' date='May 27 2009, 08:58 AM']Right thanks... But why would 3D vision work on 120hz but not 200hz?[/quote]
They are not the same ratings. The 200Hz is for the TV internally creating/interpolating extra frames to give the smoothness to motions. The 120Hz rating is for actual frame transferred/display from PC to TV. From this, I surmise that the TV itself can handle the switching rate but lacks the special circuit to process the input from 3D gaming. That's all I can guess. No doubts other expert in the field can offer much better explanations.
[quote name='I-E-D' post='545789' date='May 27 2009, 08:58 AM']Right thanks... But why would 3D vision work on 120hz but not 200hz?
[quote name='I-E-D' post='545789' date='May 27 2009, 04:58 PM']Right thanks... But why would 3D vision work on 120hz but not 200hz?[/quote]
This 'motionflow' marketing nonsense is just a way of interpolating the output to create a smoother appearance. They do no accept an input signal beyond 60hz and i dont think there are any LCDs beyond the current 22" that do. You would have to get a projector to go any bigger.
[quote name='I-E-D' post='545789' date='May 27 2009, 04:58 PM']Right thanks... But why would 3D vision work on 120hz but not 200hz?
This 'motionflow' marketing nonsense is just a way of interpolating the output to create a smoother appearance. They do no accept an input signal beyond 60hz and i dont think there are any LCDs beyond the current 22" that do. You would have to get a projector to go any bigger.
And i thought 200hz was good :o
[url="http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/Products/VIERA+Plasma+and+LCD+TVs/Overview/VIERA+|+600Hz+NeoPDP/2323941/index.html#anker_2323941"]Panasonic NeoPDP[/url]
600hz apprently. it also has a "game mode" which claims to speed up the response time. I think thats just another way of making money.
I actually got confused by the claims too, so I contacted them asking about it..
No response but i did suspect it was rubbish. Why would it take so long to get a 22" capable and then produce 52 and 62" screens, which had even higher htz, If it seems to good to be true, it usually is, and unfortunately this particular heart stopper proves it.
I actually got confused by the claims too, so I contacted them asking about it..
No response but i did suspect it was rubbish. Why would it take so long to get a 22" capable and then produce 52 and 62" screens, which had even higher htz, If it seems to good to be true, it usually is, and unfortunately this particular heart stopper proves it.
Keep seeing the advert for it, its quite cool, but i wondered if you could use this for 3D vision. If it did work, would it work better than the 120hz monitors available now?
At £1500, its purely a query, i have no chance of actually buying it!
Cheers
I-E-D
Keep seeing the advert for it, its quite cool, but i wondered if you could use this for 3D vision. If it did work, would it work better than the 120hz monitors available now?
At £1500, its purely a query, i have no chance of actually buying it!
Cheers
I-E-D
[quote name='I-E-D' post='545713' date='May 27 2009, 04:58 AM'][url="http://www.sony.co.uk/product/t32-z-series/kdl-40z4500"]Sony Bravia 200hz[/url]
Keep seeing the advert for it, its quite cool, but i wondered if you could use this for 3D vision. If it did work, would it work better than the 120hz monitors available now?
At £1500, its purely a query, i have no chance of actually buying it!
Cheers
I-E-D[/quote]
[quote name='I-E-D' post='545713' date='May 27 2009, 04:58 AM']Sony Bravia 200hz
Keep seeing the advert for it, its quite cool, but i wondered if you could use this for 3D vision. If it did work, would it work better than the 120hz monitors available now?
At £1500, its purely a query, i have no chance of actually buying it!
Cheers
I-E-D
Xeon X5675 hex cores @4.4 GHz, GTX 1070, win10 pro
i7 7700k 5GHz, RTX 2080, win10 pro
Benq 2720Z, w1070, Oculus Rift cv1, Samsung Odyssey+
[quote name='I-E-D' post='545789' date='May 27 2009, 08:58 AM']Right thanks... But why would 3D vision work on 120hz but not 200hz?[/quote]
[quote name='I-E-D' post='545789' date='May 27 2009, 08:58 AM']Right thanks... But why would 3D vision work on 120hz but not 200hz?
Xeon X5675 hex cores @4.4 GHz, GTX 1070, win10 pro
i7 7700k 5GHz, RTX 2080, win10 pro
Benq 2720Z, w1070, Oculus Rift cv1, Samsung Odyssey+
This 'motionflow' marketing nonsense is just a way of interpolating the output to create a smoother appearance. They do no accept an input signal beyond 60hz and i dont think there are any LCDs beyond the current 22" that do. You would have to get a projector to go any bigger.
This 'motionflow' marketing nonsense is just a way of interpolating the output to create a smoother appearance. They do no accept an input signal beyond 60hz and i dont think there are any LCDs beyond the current 22" that do. You would have to get a projector to go any bigger.
[url="http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/Products/VIERA+Plasma+and+LCD+TVs/Overview/VIERA+|+600Hz+NeoPDP/2323941/index.html#anker_2323941"]Panasonic NeoPDP[/url]
600hz apprently. it also has a "game mode" which claims to speed up the response time. I think thats just another way of making money.
[url="http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_GB/Products/VIERA+Plasma+and+LCD+TVs/Overview/VIERA+|+600Hz+NeoPDP/2323941/index.html#anker_2323941"]Panasonic NeoPDP[/url]
600hz apprently. it also has a "game mode" which claims to speed up the response time. I think thats just another way of making money.
No response but i did suspect it was rubbish. Why would it take so long to get a 22" capable and then produce 52 and 62" screens, which had even higher htz, If it seems to good to be true, it usually is, and unfortunately this particular heart stopper proves it.
No response but i did suspect it was rubbish. Why would it take so long to get a 22" capable and then produce 52 and 62" screens, which had even higher htz, If it seems to good to be true, it usually is, and unfortunately this particular heart stopper proves it.
bit like the 100hz telly's which do the same thing but fewer times to reduce the flicker
bit like the 100hz telly's which do the same thing but fewer times to reduce the flicker