Who needs help?
bo3b and myself.
Actually, we are looking for volunteers.
For what you may ask. Well bo3b PMd me several weeks back asking if I would be interested in writing a 3D Vision buyer's guide. I told him I wasn't his Huckleberry due to the fact that my actual hands on experience was lacking.
I know a fair about the various displays but do not own a 4K 3D HDTV and have not closely followed enough the various models that you all own and use or the most current EDID to use or how to enable HDR.
What we'd like to see. is something along the lines of the thread by Pauldusler for the Optoma UHD 40
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/1079987
The idea is to have the information in one easy to find place, that could be linked to. One for 4K 3D HDTVs, another for monitors, another for HMDs.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
So bo3b PMd me about writing a buyer's guide, I told him
[quote="D-Man11"] I think the best thing to do, is point people at the thread by john105 and tell them to use official monitors. WhiteListed/Certified/Plug and Play is the easiest confirmed route to go for new non savvy users[/quote]
My thought is that by pointing them to the list, we'd simply let them do the leg work on what to buy. How much research they put into the effort was up to them. IMO it's all subjective...like how big is your desk, how powerful is your PC, what types of games do you play, do you also watch movies, etc...
I also believe that the best experience for the vast majority is a plug and play experience with a certified monitor. For too many, simple things like EDID overrides are too much to comprehend.
So anyway, bo3b's response
[quote="bo3b"]I was thinking more along the lines of something that would detail the current 'best' stuff anyone could buy. So, rather than a comprehensive list, just the stuff that is currently available. For example, the PG278QR seems like the best monitor for now. The projector that Paul is using would be for projectors. I've no idea for TVs. [/quote]
Anyway, I once again declined, due to my lack of hands on and incomplete familiarity, I asked him if it would be ok with him if I mentioned the PM and started a thread to see if there might be others willing to step up to the plate where I am not.
So any help or thoughts?
If not, we understand.
For what you may ask. Well bo3b PMd me several weeks back asking if I would be interested in writing a 3D Vision buyer's guide. I told him I wasn't his Huckleberry due to the fact that my actual hands on experience was lacking.
I know a fair about the various displays but do not own a 4K 3D HDTV and have not closely followed enough the various models that you all own and use or the most current EDID to use or how to enable HDR.
So bo3b PMd me about writing a buyer's guide, I told him
D-Man11 said: I think the best thing to do, is point people at the thread by john105 and tell them to use official monitors. WhiteListed/Certified/Plug and Play is the easiest confirmed route to go for new non savvy users
My thought is that by pointing them to the list, we'd simply let them do the leg work on what to buy. How much research they put into the effort was up to them. IMO it's all subjective...like how big is your desk, how powerful is your PC, what types of games do you play, do you also watch movies, etc...
I also believe that the best experience for the vast majority is a plug and play experience with a certified monitor. For too many, simple things like EDID overrides are too much to comprehend.
So anyway, bo3b's response
bo3b said:I was thinking more along the lines of something that would detail the current 'best' stuff anyone could buy. So, rather than a comprehensive list, just the stuff that is currently available. For example, the PG278QR seems like the best monitor for now. The projector that Paul is using would be for projectors. I've no idea for TVs.
Anyway, I once again declined, due to my lack of hands on and incomplete familiarity, I asked him if it would be ok with him if I mentioned the PM and started a thread to see if there might be others willing to step up to the plate where I am not.
Hmm, actually I just saw this for 4K 3DHD TVs, while looking for something else. I must have been out of town back then.
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/1023184/3d-vision/basic-guide-for-passive-3dtvs-edids-4k-upscaling/
[s]BTW, if anyone has the link for the thread for going below Nvidia's minimum setting of 1 for depth, I'd sure appreciate it, if you could share it.[/s] Found it
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/1071763/reduce-stereoseparation-below-1-/
I don't know if it is a best approach to make a list of "Best displays" because what is best for me is not best for you.
I think it would be better to make a list with most promising ones and detail the advantages and disadvantages.
A big disadvantage for me might not be a problem for you so everyone could take the decision by himself when he sees some details.
For Ex. 55/65E6V - Passive 4D HDR Display.
Works Interlaced input (Tridef; Superdepth 3D 3Dvision Edid - Link)
Pro: High Image quality 3820x1080/ Eye
HDR Capable
Fast response
OLED - best Black
Light Glasses, no Flicker
Very low Ghosting
Cons: OLED susceptible to burn-in
High power GPU necessary
Medium Input-Latency approx 45ms
High Price
Limited availability
Avegant Glyph - 720p Head mounted Display with FOV 40-45
Pros: DLP Retinal projection - Great image quality
720p can be delivered by weaker GPUs
Fast response
Very low inputlag <10ms Estimation
Very Cheap (125-300$)
Suports 3DTV play, SBS, Full resolution TAB with custom EDID -(link)
Head tracking
Very Customizable IPD, Diopter, nose adjustment.
Supports 120HZ
Very easy to put on and take off
0 Ghosting
Cons: Can get uncomfortable for prolonged use
Not suitable for VR
Edges of the screen might not be in focus
Contasnt humm in headphones
Not produced anymore, limited availability
I don't know if it is a best approach to make a list of "Best displays" because what is best for me is not best for you.
I think it would be better to make a list with most promising ones and detail the advantages and disadvantages.
A big disadvantage for me might not be a problem for you so everyone could take the decision by himself when he sees some details.
For Ex. 55/65E6V - Passive 4D HDR Display.
Works Interlaced input (Tridef; Superdepth 3D 3Dvision Edid - Link)
Pro: High Image quality 3820x1080/ Eye
HDR Capable
Fast response
OLED - best Black
Light Glasses, no Flicker
Very low Ghosting
Cons: OLED susceptible to burn-in
High power GPU necessary
Medium Input-Latency approx 45ms
High Price
Limited availability
Avegant Glyph - 720p Head mounted Display with FOV 40-45
Pros: DLP Retinal projection - Great image quality
720p can be delivered by weaker GPUs
Fast response
Very low inputlag <10ms Estimation
Very Cheap (125-300$)
Suports 3DTV play, SBS, Full resolution TAB with custom EDID -(link)
Head tracking
Very Customizable IPD, Diopter, nose adjustment.
Supports 120HZ
Very easy to put on and take off
0 Ghosting
Cons: Can get uncomfortable for prolonged use
Not suitable for VR
Edges of the screen might not be in focus
Contasnt humm in headphones
Not produced anymore, limited availability
Intel i7 8086K
Gigabyte GTX 1080Ti Aorus Extreme
DDR4 2x8gb 3200mhz Cl14
TV LG OLED65E6V
Avegant Glyph
Windows 10 64bits
Yes, the whole thing is very subjective.
Such as projectors are awesome due to the image size, but require that you have a room that's is big enough with light control.
Of course their is always the option of Ultra Short Throw projectors for tight spaces, but that in itself presents a problem, because the screen surface must be perfectly flat or the imperfections/ripples prominently present themselves.
Such as projectors are awesome due to the image size, but require that you have a room that's is big enough with light control.
Of course their is always the option of Ultra Short Throw projectors for tight spaces, but that in itself presents a problem, because the screen surface must be perfectly flat or the imperfections/ripples prominently present themselves.
Can I ask, is this supposed to be a beginners guide of how to get 3d working on the displays in the best way?
Or is this part of a bigger generic 3d vision guide? Also it might be obvious but what's the actual objective of the guide and who's is aimed at?
I do have time on my hands to help.
Well as bo3b said
[quote="bo3b"] I was thinking more along the lines of something that would detail the current 'best' stuff anyone could buy. So, rather than a comprehensive list, just the stuff that is currently available. For example, the PG278QR seems like the best monitor for now. The projector that Paul is using would be for projectors. I've no idea for TVs.[/quote]
Best stuff referring to display aka monitors, tvs, projectors and HMDs. He's going to do it himself, if no one else will. Sometime in between working on his current 3D Vision in VR Viewing app, that he is working on with pauldusler and starting on a 3D Vision replacement of some type of 3rd party/middleware
I'm not sure exactly what he had in mind specifically, we didn't get into detail. I asked him to chime in on this thread when he has a chance.
Of course if the device is not plug and play and/or any hoops are required to get it working, some links/a guide/tutorial would be great.
bo3b said: I was thinking more along the lines of something that would detail the current 'best' stuff anyone could buy. So, rather than a comprehensive list, just the stuff that is currently available. For example, the PG278QR seems like the best monitor for now. The projector that Paul is using would be for projectors. I've no idea for TVs.
Best stuff referring to display aka monitors, tvs, projectors and HMDs. He's going to do it himself, if no one else will. Sometime in between working on his current 3D Vision in VR Viewing app, that he is working on with pauldusler and starting on a 3D Vision replacement of some type of 3rd party/middleware
I'm not sure exactly what he had in mind specifically, we didn't get into detail. I asked him to chime in on this thread when he has a chance.
Of course if the device is not plug and play and/or any hoops are required to get it working, some links/a guide/tutorial would be great.
[quote="D-Man11"][quote="bo3b"]For example, the PG278QR seems like the best monitor for now.[/quote][/quote]
I always found it a bit unfair that this particular model gets all the attention on this board. It might be the best one available, I don't really know. But I didn't see much discussion at all about other recent models (other than maybe Dell S2716DG and another ASUS model - PG27VQ). Acer, HP and Dell/Alienware released several new 3D Vision Ready models in the last few years (the last model being as recent as 2018), and I think they should at least be considered. How do we know if the PG278QR is superior if nobody here even tried these other models?
bo3b said:For example, the PG278QR seems like the best monitor for now.
I always found it a bit unfair that this particular model gets all the attention on this board. It might be the best one available, I don't really know. But I didn't see much discussion at all about other recent models (other than maybe Dell S2716DG and another ASUS model - PG27VQ). Acer, HP and Dell/Alienware released several new 3D Vision Ready models in the last few years (the last model being as recent as 2018), and I think they should at least be considered. How do we know if the PG278QR is superior if nobody here even tried these other models?
[quote="john105"][quote="D-Man11"][quote="bo3b"]For example, the PG278QR seems like the best monitor for now.[/quote][/quote]
I always found it a bit unfair that this particular model gets all the attention on this board. It might be the best one available, I don't really know. But I didn't see much discussion at all about other recent models (other than maybe Dell S2417DG and another ASUS model - PG27VQ). Acer, HP and Dell/Alienware released several new 3D Vision Ready models in the last few years (the last model being as recent as 2018), and I think they should at least be considered. How do we know if the PG278QR is superior if nobody here even tried these other models?[/quote]
It's a fair point but the evidence seems conclusive that the PG278QR is the 'best' screen. If you have other specific panels in mind it would help if you name them so we can at least add them to the discussion.
We're all in the same boat.
bo3b said:For example, the PG278QR seems like the best monitor for now.
I always found it a bit unfair that this particular model gets all the attention on this board. It might be the best one available, I don't really know. But I didn't see much discussion at all about other recent models (other than maybe Dell S2417DG and another ASUS model - PG27VQ). Acer, HP and Dell/Alienware released several new 3D Vision Ready models in the last few years (the last model being as recent as 2018), and I think they should at least be considered. How do we know if the PG278QR is superior if nobody here even tried these other models?
It's a fair point but the evidence seems conclusive that the PG278QR is the 'best' screen. If you have other specific panels in mind it would help if you name them so we can at least add them to the discussion.
We're all in the same boat.
Gigabyte RTX2080TI Gaming OC, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
[quote="rustyk21"]It's a fair point but the evidence seems conclusive that the PG278QR is the 'best' screen.[/quote]
The best compared to what? Maybe some older models, but I searched the forum using the names of some latest 3D Vision ready monitors, and there's almost zero info. The problem is nobody tried them, but they might be better or at least as good as the PG278QR is.
[quote="rustyk21"]If you have other specific panels in mind it would help if you name them so we can at least add them to the discussion.[/quote]
I don't have any specific panels in mind. My point is if some guide will be created, it should say something like "there are several alternatives; choose the PG278QR if you want to get a well known good monitor", but not "the PG278QR is the best, end of story".
rustyk21 said:It's a fair point but the evidence seems conclusive that the PG278QR is the 'best' screen.
The best compared to what? Maybe some older models, but I searched the forum using the names of some latest 3D Vision ready monitors, and there's almost zero info. The problem is nobody tried them, but they might be better or at least as good as the PG278QR is.
rustyk21 said:If you have other specific panels in mind it would help if you name them so we can at least add them to the discussion.
I don't have any specific panels in mind. My point is if some guide will be created, it should say something like "there are several alternatives; choose the PG278QR if you want to get a well known good monitor", but not "the PG278QR is the best, end of story".
This was kind of my thought. THe PG278QR might be out of the price range for some. Or not even available at all in certain parts of the world. Some people might have a compatible monitor and not even know it, none of this will matter as soon as the 3D Vision kits can not be found to purchase.
I'd could still easily recommend to a person to buy one and the kit, due to the many games that are fixed, The plug and play nature of white listed (certified) displays makes it easy.
But at the same time, unless a 3rd party app is made for the emitter, they might be better served buying something like the HD27HDR, UHD 40 / 50 or a 3D HDTV or HMD.
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/1107119/3d-vision/the-ultimate-nvidia-3d-vision-dlp-display/
Plus there are other things to consider, like ease of return and warranty. In case something goes wrong with the display.
This was kind of my thought. THe PG278QR might be out of the price range for some. Or not even available at all in certain parts of the world. Some people might have a compatible monitor and not even know it, none of this will matter as soon as the 3D Vision kits can not be found to purchase.
I'd could still easily recommend to a person to buy one and the kit, due to the many games that are fixed, The plug and play nature of white listed (certified) displays makes it easy.
[quote="john105"][quote="rustyk21"]It's a fair point but the evidence seems conclusive that the PG278QR is the 'best' screen.[/quote]
The best compared to what? Maybe some older models, but I searched the forum using the names of some latest 3D Vision ready monitors, and there's almost zero info. The problem is nobody tried them, but they might be better or at least as good as the PG278QR is.
[quote="rustyk21"]If you have other specific panels in mind it would help if you name them so we can at least add them to the discussion.[/quote]
I don't have any specific panels in mind. My point is if some guide will be created, it should say something like "there are several alternatives; choose the PG278QR if you want to get a well known good monitor", but not "the PG278QR is the best, end of story".[/quote]
Well again, which latest 3d vision screens are you talking about? 'Best' is subjective. We can be specific but it needs to be objective and we need to know which screens we are talking about. There's no agenda here in terms of 3d performance.
If you have some alternative screens in mind then please add them to the mix. I don't even own a PG278QR but by all the accounts of members on here it's the highest quality 3d vision monitor.
Clearly there are alternative 3d vision displays.
rustyk21 said:It's a fair point but the evidence seems conclusive that the PG278QR is the 'best' screen.
The best compared to what? Maybe some older models, but I searched the forum using the names of some latest 3D Vision ready monitors, and there's almost zero info. The problem is nobody tried them, but they might be better or at least as good as the PG278QR is.
rustyk21 said:If you have other specific panels in mind it would help if you name them so we can at least add them to the discussion.
I don't have any specific panels in mind. My point is if some guide will be created, it should say something like "there are several alternatives; choose the PG278QR if you want to get a well known good monitor", but not "the PG278QR is the best, end of story".
Well again, which latest 3d vision screens are you talking about? 'Best' is subjective. We can be specific but it needs to be objective and we need to know which screens we are talking about. There's no agenda here in terms of 3d performance.
If you have some alternative screens in mind then please add them to the mix. I don't even own a PG278QR but by all the accounts of members on here it's the highest quality 3d vision monitor.
Clearly there are alternative 3d vision displays.
Gigabyte RTX2080TI Gaming OC, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
I have an S2716DG and love it, but just about everyone that bought one returned it because of crosstalk and inversion. But at the same time, they simply might have expected it to be perfect out of the box and never touched the settings. It could also very well be quality control issues.
Personally, I couldn't see paying the price difference between this an the Asus at the time I bought it, especially since I was able to get it for $375.00 on a special sale.
It does however use an inferior back lighting method
https://www.displayninja.com/dell-s2716dg-review/
https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/dell-s2716dg/
https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_s2716dg.htm
I have an S2716DG and love it, but just about everyone that bought one returned it because of crosstalk and inversion. But at the same time, they simply might have expected it to be perfect out of the box and never touched the settings. It could also very well be quality control issues.
Personally, I couldn't see paying the price difference between this an the Asus at the time I bought it, especially since I was able to get it for $375.00 on a special sale.
Anyway, looks like half my post was lost, but point is that this isn't rtings. It's off topic now but you're not going to get proper back to back comparisons.
If a new screen comes up then name it so we can compare.
Clearly for a given budget/screen size there are superior options
Anyway, looks like half my post was lost, but point is that this isn't rtings. It's off topic now but you're not going to get proper back to back comparisons.
If a new screen comes up then name it so we can compare.
Clearly for a given budget/screen size there are superior options
Gigabyte RTX2080TI Gaming OC, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
masterotaku actually had bad pixels on his, his other issues could have been related to a bad panel as well.
[url]https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/933762/3d-vision/dell-s2716dg-impressions/post/4877387/#4877387[/url]
[url]https://www.overclock.net/forum/44-monitors-displays/1577511-dell-s2716dg-1440-144-hz-g-sync-owners-thread-212.html#post_24931631[/url]
[quote="mistersvin21"]I've managed to test Asus ROG PG278Q lately, and i can say they are identical - these both have just the same issues: strange "shadows" around objects/characters and pixel inversion at 1440. Mb this (i mean those strange duplicate shadows) is somehow connected with separate emtitter, i'm not sure, it can be just a coincidence (my benq XL2420TX has emitter built in and has no problems).But i'm not the only one who is seeing this.
P.S. This can be acceptable and can be not a problem itself, but in this case i must say Benq Xl2420TX is much better though it is 24"/1080p only. So i'm definitly staying with it until VR.[/quote]
The PG278QR is a newer version than these older models and many actually upgraded from these and stated that their experience was better.
mistersvin21 said:I've managed to test Asus ROG PG278Q lately, and i can say they are identical - these both have just the same issues: strange "shadows" around objects/characters and pixel inversion at 1440. Mb this (i mean those strange duplicate shadows) is somehow connected with separate emtitter, i'm not sure, it can be just a coincidence (my benq XL2420TX has emitter built in and has no problems).But i'm not the only one who is seeing this.
P.S. This can be acceptable and can be not a problem itself, but in this case i must say Benq Xl2420TX is much better though it is 24"/1080p only. So i'm definitly staying with it until VR.
The PG278QR is a newer version than these older models and many actually upgraded from these and stated that their experience was better.
bo3b and myself.
Actually, we are looking for volunteers.
For what you may ask. Well bo3b PMd me several weeks back asking if I would be interested in writing a 3D Vision buyer's guide. I told him I wasn't his Huckleberry due to the fact that my actual hands on experience was lacking.
I know a fair about the various displays but do not own a 4K 3D HDTV and have not closely followed enough the various models that you all own and use or the most current EDID to use or how to enable HDR.
What we'd like to see. is something along the lines of the thread by Pauldusler for the Optoma UHD 40
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/1079987
The idea is to have the information in one easy to find place, that could be linked to. One for 4K 3D HDTVs, another for monitors, another for HMDs.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
So bo3b PMd me about writing a buyer's guide, I told him
My thought is that by pointing them to the list, we'd simply let them do the leg work on what to buy. How much research they put into the effort was up to them. IMO it's all subjective...like how big is your desk, how powerful is your PC, what types of games do you play, do you also watch movies, etc...
I also believe that the best experience for the vast majority is a plug and play experience with a certified monitor. For too many, simple things like EDID overrides are too much to comprehend.
So anyway, bo3b's response
Anyway, I once again declined, due to my lack of hands on and incomplete familiarity, I asked him if it would be ok with him if I mentioned the PM and started a thread to see if there might be others willing to step up to the plate where I am not.
So any help or thoughts?
If not, we understand.
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/1023184/3d-vision/basic-guide-for-passive-3dtvs-edids-4k-upscaling/
BTW, if anyone has the link for the thread for going below Nvidia's minimum setting of 1 for depth, I'd sure appreciate it, if you could share it.Found ithttps://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/1071763/reduce-stereoseparation-below-1-/
I think it would be better to make a list with most promising ones and detail the advantages and disadvantages.
A big disadvantage for me might not be a problem for you so everyone could take the decision by himself when he sees some details.
For Ex. 55/65E6V - Passive 4D HDR Display.
Works Interlaced input (Tridef; Superdepth 3D 3Dvision Edid - Link)
Pro: High Image quality 3820x1080/ Eye
HDR Capable
Fast response
OLED - best Black
Light Glasses, no Flicker
Very low Ghosting
Cons: OLED susceptible to burn-in
High power GPU necessary
Medium Input-Latency approx 45ms
High Price
Limited availability
Avegant Glyph - 720p Head mounted Display with FOV 40-45
Pros: DLP Retinal projection - Great image quality
720p can be delivered by weaker GPUs
Fast response
Very low inputlag <10ms Estimation
Very Cheap (125-300$)
Suports 3DTV play, SBS, Full resolution TAB with custom EDID -(link)
Head tracking
Very Customizable IPD, Diopter, nose adjustment.
Supports 120HZ
Very easy to put on and take off
0 Ghosting
Cons: Can get uncomfortable for prolonged use
Not suitable for VR
Edges of the screen might not be in focus
Contasnt humm in headphones
Not produced anymore, limited availability
Intel i7 8086K
Gigabyte GTX 1080Ti Aorus Extreme
DDR4 2x8gb 3200mhz Cl14
TV LG OLED65E6V
Avegant Glyph
Windows 10 64bits
Such as projectors are awesome due to the image size, but require that you have a room that's is big enough with light control.
Of course their is always the option of Ultra Short Throw projectors for tight spaces, but that in itself presents a problem, because the screen surface must be perfectly flat or the imperfections/ripples prominently present themselves.
Or is this part of a bigger generic 3d vision guide? Also it might be obvious but what's the actual objective of the guide and who's is aimed at?
I do have time on my hands to help.
Gigabyte RTX2080TI Gaming OC, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
Best stuff referring to display aka monitors, tvs, projectors and HMDs. He's going to do it himself, if no one else will. Sometime in between working on his current 3D Vision in VR Viewing app, that he is working on with pauldusler and starting on a 3D Vision replacement of some type of 3rd party/middleware
I'm not sure exactly what he had in mind specifically, we didn't get into detail. I asked him to chime in on this thread when he has a chance.
Of course if the device is not plug and play and/or any hoops are required to get it working, some links/a guide/tutorial would be great.
I always found it a bit unfair that this particular model gets all the attention on this board. It might be the best one available, I don't really know. But I didn't see much discussion at all about other recent models (other than maybe Dell S2716DG and another ASUS model - PG27VQ). Acer, HP and Dell/Alienware released several new 3D Vision Ready models in the last few years (the last model being as recent as 2018), and I think they should at least be considered. How do we know if the PG278QR is superior if nobody here even tried these other models?
It's a fair point but the evidence seems conclusive that the PG278QR is the 'best' screen. If you have other specific panels in mind it would help if you name them so we can at least add them to the discussion.
We're all in the same boat.
Gigabyte RTX2080TI Gaming OC, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
The best compared to what? Maybe some older models, but I searched the forum using the names of some latest 3D Vision ready monitors, and there's almost zero info. The problem is nobody tried them, but they might be better or at least as good as the PG278QR is.
I don't have any specific panels in mind. My point is if some guide will be created, it should say something like "there are several alternatives; choose the PG278QR if you want to get a well known good monitor", but not "the PG278QR is the best, end of story".
I'd could still easily recommend to a person to buy one and the kit, due to the many games that are fixed, The plug and play nature of white listed (certified) displays makes it easy.
But at the same time, unless a 3rd party app is made for the emitter, they might be better served buying something like the HD27HDR, UHD 40 / 50 or a 3D HDTV or HMD.
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/1107119/3d-vision/the-ultimate-nvidia-3d-vision-dlp-display/
Plus there are other things to consider, like ease of return and warranty. In case something goes wrong with the display.
Well again, which latest 3d vision screens are you talking about? 'Best' is subjective. We can be specific but it needs to be objective and we need to know which screens we are talking about. There's no agenda here in terms of 3d performance.
If you have some alternative screens in mind then please add them to the mix. I don't even own a PG278QR but by all the accounts of members on here it's the highest quality 3d vision monitor.
Clearly there are alternative 3d vision displays.
Gigabyte RTX2080TI Gaming OC, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
Personally, I couldn't see paying the price difference between this an the Asus at the time I bought it, especially since I was able to get it for $375.00 on a special sale.
It does however use an inferior back lighting method
https://www.displayninja.com/dell-s2716dg-review/
https://pcmonitors.info/reviews/dell-s2716dg/
https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/dell_s2716dg.htm
Gigabyte RTX2080TI Gaming OC, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
If a new screen comes up then name it so we can compare.
Clearly for a given budget/screen size there are superior options
Gigabyte RTX2080TI Gaming OC, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/933762/3d-vision/dell-s2716dg-impressions/post/4877387/#4877387
https://www.overclock.net/forum/44-monitors-displays/1577511-dell-s2716dg-1440-144-hz-g-sync-owners-thread-212.html#post_24931631
The PG278QR is a newer version than these older models and many actually upgraded from these and stated that their experience was better.