3D glasses Who, when, where, better? must be a billion question of this kind and yet...???
Hi everyone,
First and foremost, thank you for taking the time and effort to read this post.
1) I am not happy with the brands LCD desktop support. To the last of chocies I may go with Samsung because I kind of trust their color temperature and contrast white/black. I will potentially never go with any of the other proposed brands. I sold TVs in the past, even though LCD desktop monitor is a complete different arena, I will not flame on specific brand but I will only say... no thank you!
2) I tried a 120 hz I think it was a 55 inch LCD OR DLP TV ( I cannot remember exactly!!!)at Sears with 3D glasses and watched a CGI feature. Ok they are not Nvidia, I must give this. Though I was horrified how I could see the shutters when the movie camera panned slowly left to right. It sounded like 1 image video then one lack screen then 1 image video then 1 black screen over and over as long as the camera panned and/or character where moving a bit faster than walking. No I do not have superman eyes... though my question is, will the same effect happen with Nividia glasses on my desktop?
3)In my understanding, even if the monitor is not 120 hz, Nividia software allow the viewer to see 3D using other methods, is that true and is it as good and efficient as 120 hz monitor 3d method?
4) I go back to Sears and Best buy every so often. I am interested in buying Nvidia but I never had the chance to try. Will Nvidia market department ever allow consumer to try in store before buying?
5)Will Nvidia ever be more agressive on LCD display makers to make display (120 hz/240 hz and higher)capable/ready?
6) Is Nvidia preparing to jump to 240 hz or why not up to 600 hz to make the fast moving objects with less artefacts as described in line 1 IF Nvidia 120 hz 3D glasses suffer some or equal to the issue described in line 1?
Thanks in advance,
Seb
P.S: I do watch movies on my desktop like a coach potatoe :P Although I work a lot in 3D and animate A LOT, I cannot afford to have issues/artefacts as described in line 1!!!!!
First and foremost, thank you for taking the time and effort to read this post.
1) I am not happy with the brands LCD desktop support. To the last of chocies I may go with Samsung because I kind of trust their color temperature and contrast white/black. I will potentially never go with any of the other proposed brands. I sold TVs in the past, even though LCD desktop monitor is a complete different arena, I will not flame on specific brand but I will only say... no thank you!
2) I tried a 120 hz I think it was a 55 inch LCD OR DLP TV ( I cannot remember exactly!!!)at Sears with 3D glasses and watched a CGI feature. Ok they are not Nvidia, I must give this. Though I was horrified how I could see the shutters when the movie camera panned slowly left to right. It sounded like 1 image video then one lack screen then 1 image video then 1 black screen over and over as long as the camera panned and/or character where moving a bit faster than walking. No I do not have superman eyes... though my question is, will the same effect happen with Nividia glasses on my desktop?
3)In my understanding, even if the monitor is not 120 hz, Nividia software allow the viewer to see 3D using other methods, is that true and is it as good and efficient as 120 hz monitor 3d method?
4) I go back to Sears and Best buy every so often. I am interested in buying Nvidia but I never had the chance to try. Will Nvidia market department ever allow consumer to try in store before buying?
5)Will Nvidia ever be more agressive on LCD display makers to make display (120 hz/240 hz and higher)capable/ready?
6) Is Nvidia preparing to jump to 240 hz or why not up to 600 hz to make the fast moving objects with less artefacts as described in line 1 IF Nvidia 120 hz 3D glasses suffer some or equal to the issue described in line 1?
Thanks in advance,
Seb
P.S: I do watch movies on my desktop like a coach potatoe :P Although I work a lot in 3D and animate A LOT, I cannot afford to have issues/artefacts as described in line 1!!!!!
Rumor has it, at universities they use LC shutterglasses that are made out of glass and only the glass cost > 1000 Eur . They use this with CRT.
Recently it's possible to make new light gates with micro and nano technology, I think with nanotechnology ( you know that invisibility cloak research )you can make pretty much ideal shutters, must be over >80% percent transparent , 100% opaque, >500hz , totally zero flicker.
Currently the situation is almost unthinkably bad, passive solves nothing but smears some more.
Rumor has it, at universities they use LC shutterglasses that are made out of glass and only the glass cost > 1000 Eur . They use this with CRT.
Recently it's possible to make new light gates with micro and nano technology, I think with nanotechnology ( you know that invisibility cloak research )you can make pretty much ideal shutters, must be over >80% percent transparent , 100% opaque, >500hz , totally zero flicker.
Currently the situation is almost unthinkably bad, passive solves nothing but smears some more.
Tobii quick facts
[size="5"]
World leader in eye tracking and eye control [/size] [i] ( oh yeah, wheres the military)[/i][size="5"]
Awarded for its world-patented technology and innovations [/size] [i]( only heard of em weeks ago) [/i]
[size="5"] World-leading communication solutions for people with disabilities [/size] [i]( obviously )[/i]
[size="5"]Offices in Sweden, the US, Germany, Japan, China and Norway [/size] [i] (that is, too few ) [/i]
[size="5"] One of Sweden’s fastest growing technology companies [/size] [i] ( too swede)[/i]
[size="5"] Founded in 2001 [/size] [i] ( too young) [/i]
[size="5"] 300 employees (Q2 2011) [/size] [i] ( way too few)[/i]
___________________________________________________________________
nVidia should compete with this company and make them some serious competition with 3D glasses. You know, arent putting eye tracking anywhere, put it in the lenses (both), and hide it with 21st grade technology.
nVidia should compete with this company and make them some serious competition with 3D glasses. You know, arent putting eye tracking anywhere, put it in the lenses (both), and hide it with 21st grade technology.
[quote]2) I tried a 120 hz I think it was a 55 inch LCD OR DLP TV ( I cannot remember exactly!!!)at Sears with 3D glasses and watched a CGI feature. Ok they are not Nvidia, I must give this. Though I was horrified how I could see the shutters when the movie camera panned slowly left to right. It sounded like 1 image video then one lack screen then 1 image video then 1 black screen over and over as long as the camera panned and/or character where moving a bit faster than walking. No I do not have superman eyes... though my question is, will the same effect happen with Nividia glasses on my desktop?[/quote]
2x60hz per eye is very smooth on DLP projector , definately won't see shutters unless you shake the picture very bad (stable 120fps is wonderful, definite prerequisite of headtracking imo).
Source material sounds wrong there, guess its 2x 30fps or something undecent.
Dunno why everyone is so reluctant making commercial mems glasses a reality, at worst it will be a collectors item, so silly.
http://vimeo.com/6177122
[size="5"]'Invisibility' two years away
by University of St Andrews
[size="1"].
.
.
.[/size]
[size="7"]2[/size] years ago[/size]
hot damn!! Our proactive MEMS argument just gained some extra valid gravity to it ,again. /cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':cool:' />
2) I tried a 120 hz I think it was a 55 inch LCD OR DLP TV ( I cannot remember exactly!!!)at Sears with 3D glasses and watched a CGI feature. Ok they are not Nvidia, I must give this. Though I was horrified how I could see the shutters when the movie camera panned slowly left to right. It sounded like 1 image video then one lack screen then 1 image video then 1 black screen over and over as long as the camera panned and/or character where moving a bit faster than walking. No I do not have superman eyes... though my question is, will the same effect happen with Nividia glasses on my desktop?
2x60hz per eye is very smooth on DLP projector , definately won't see shutters unless you shake the picture very bad (stable 120fps is wonderful, definite prerequisite of headtracking imo).
Source material sounds wrong there, guess its 2x 30fps or something undecent.
Dunno why everyone is so reluctant making commercial mems glasses a reality, at worst it will be a collectors item, so silly.
http://vimeo.com/6177122
'Invisibility' two years away
by University of St Andrews
.
.
.
.
2 years ago
hot damn!! Our proactive MEMS argument just gained some extra valid gravity to it ,again. /cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':cool:' />
First and foremost, thank you for taking the time and effort to read this post.
1) I am not happy with the brands LCD desktop support. To the last of chocies I may go with Samsung because I kind of trust their color temperature and contrast white/black. I will potentially never go with any of the other proposed brands. I sold TVs in the past, even though LCD desktop monitor is a complete different arena, I will not flame on specific brand but I will only say... no thank you!
2) I tried a 120 hz I think it was a 55 inch LCD OR DLP TV ( I cannot remember exactly!!!)at Sears with 3D glasses and watched a CGI feature. Ok they are not Nvidia, I must give this. Though I was horrified how I could see the shutters when the movie camera panned slowly left to right. It sounded like 1 image video then one lack screen then 1 image video then 1 black screen over and over as long as the camera panned and/or character where moving a bit faster than walking. No I do not have superman eyes... though my question is, will the same effect happen with Nividia glasses on my desktop?
3)In my understanding, even if the monitor is not 120 hz, Nividia software allow the viewer to see 3D using other methods, is that true and is it as good and efficient as 120 hz monitor 3d method?
4) I go back to Sears and Best buy every so often. I am interested in buying Nvidia but I never had the chance to try. Will Nvidia market department ever allow consumer to try in store before buying?
5)Will Nvidia ever be more agressive on LCD display makers to make display (120 hz/240 hz and higher)capable/ready?
6) Is Nvidia preparing to jump to 240 hz or why not up to 600 hz to make the fast moving objects with less artefacts as described in line 1 IF Nvidia 120 hz 3D glasses suffer some or equal to the issue described in line 1?
Thanks in advance,
Seb
P.S: I do watch movies on my desktop like a coach potatoe :P Although I work a lot in 3D and animate A LOT, I cannot afford to have issues/artefacts as described in line 1!!!!!
First and foremost, thank you for taking the time and effort to read this post.
1) I am not happy with the brands LCD desktop support. To the last of chocies I may go with Samsung because I kind of trust their color temperature and contrast white/black. I will potentially never go with any of the other proposed brands. I sold TVs in the past, even though LCD desktop monitor is a complete different arena, I will not flame on specific brand but I will only say... no thank you!
2) I tried a 120 hz I think it was a 55 inch LCD OR DLP TV ( I cannot remember exactly!!!)at Sears with 3D glasses and watched a CGI feature. Ok they are not Nvidia, I must give this. Though I was horrified how I could see the shutters when the movie camera panned slowly left to right. It sounded like 1 image video then one lack screen then 1 image video then 1 black screen over and over as long as the camera panned and/or character where moving a bit faster than walking. No I do not have superman eyes... though my question is, will the same effect happen with Nividia glasses on my desktop?
3)In my understanding, even if the monitor is not 120 hz, Nividia software allow the viewer to see 3D using other methods, is that true and is it as good and efficient as 120 hz monitor 3d method?
4) I go back to Sears and Best buy every so often. I am interested in buying Nvidia but I never had the chance to try. Will Nvidia market department ever allow consumer to try in store before buying?
5)Will Nvidia ever be more agressive on LCD display makers to make display (120 hz/240 hz and higher)capable/ready?
6) Is Nvidia preparing to jump to 240 hz or why not up to 600 hz to make the fast moving objects with less artefacts as described in line 1 IF Nvidia 120 hz 3D glasses suffer some or equal to the issue described in line 1?
Thanks in advance,
Seb
P.S: I do watch movies on my desktop like a coach potatoe :P Although I work a lot in 3D and animate A LOT, I cannot afford to have issues/artefacts as described in line 1!!!!!
Recently it's possible to make new light gates with micro and nano technology, I think with nanotechnology ( you know that invisibility cloak research )you can make pretty much ideal shutters, must be over >80% percent transparent , 100% opaque, >500hz , totally zero flicker.
Currently the situation is almost unthinkably bad, passive solves nothing but smears some more.
Recently it's possible to make new light gates with micro and nano technology, I think with nanotechnology ( you know that invisibility cloak research )you can make pretty much ideal shutters, must be over >80% percent transparent , 100% opaque, >500hz , totally zero flicker.
Currently the situation is almost unthinkably bad, passive solves nothing but smears some more.
[size="5"]
World leader in eye tracking and eye control [/size] [i] ( oh yeah, wheres the military)[/i][size="5"]
Awarded for its world-patented technology and innovations [/size] [i]( only heard of em weeks ago) [/i]
[size="5"] World-leading communication solutions for people with disabilities [/size] [i]( obviously )[/i]
[size="5"]Offices in Sweden, the US, Germany, Japan, China and Norway [/size] [i] (that is, too few ) [/i]
[size="5"] One of Sweden’s fastest growing technology companies [/size] [i] ( too swede)[/i]
[size="5"] Founded in 2001 [/size] [i] ( too young) [/i]
[size="5"] 300 employees (Q2 2011) [/size] [i] ( way too few)[/i]
___________________________________________________________________
nVidia should compete with this company and make them some serious competition with 3D glasses. You know, arent putting eye tracking anywhere, put it in the lenses (both), and hide it with 21st grade technology.
World leader in eye tracking and eye control ( oh yeah, wheres the military)
Awarded for its world-patented technology and innovations ( only heard of em weeks ago)
World-leading communication solutions for people with disabilities ( obviously )
Offices in Sweden, the US, Germany, Japan, China and Norway (that is, too few )
One of Sweden’s fastest growing technology companies ( too swede)
Founded in 2001 ( too young)
300 employees (Q2 2011) ( way too few)
___________________________________________________________________
nVidia should compete with this company and make them some serious competition with 3D glasses. You know, arent putting eye tracking anywhere, put it in the lenses (both), and hide it with 21st grade technology.
2x60hz per eye is very smooth on DLP projector , definately won't see shutters unless you shake the picture very bad (stable 120fps is wonderful, definite prerequisite of headtracking imo).
Source material sounds wrong there, guess its 2x 30fps or something undecent.
Dunno why everyone is so reluctant making commercial mems glasses a reality, at worst it will be a collectors item, so silly.
http://vimeo.com/6177122
[size="5"]'Invisibility' two years away
by University of St Andrews
[size="1"].
.
.
.[/size]
[size="7"]2[/size] years ago[/size]
hot damn!! Our proactive MEMS argument just gained some extra valid gravity to it ,again.
2x60hz per eye is very smooth on DLP projector , definately won't see shutters unless you shake the picture very bad (stable 120fps is wonderful, definite prerequisite of headtracking imo).
Source material sounds wrong there, guess its 2x 30fps or something undecent.
Dunno why everyone is so reluctant making commercial mems glasses a reality, at worst it will be a collectors item, so silly.
http://vimeo.com/6177122
'Invisibility' two years away
by University of St Andrews
.
.
.
.
2 years ago
hot damn!! Our proactive MEMS argument just gained some extra valid gravity to it ,again.