GT 740M 4GB DDR3 VRAM support 3d play?
  1 / 2    
Hello I have a NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 740M 4GB DDR3 VRAM in a Asus 17.3" N76VB-T4111H, i want to know how can i make this work On a Samsung f6400 3d, do i have to buy 3d vision kit, to use 3d TV play, how can i do this. Please,answer me Thank you
Hello

I have a NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 740M 4GB DDR3 VRAM in a Asus 17.3" N76VB-T4111H, i want to know how can i make this work On a Samsung f6400 3d, do i have to buy 3d vision kit, to use 3d TV play, how can i do this.

Please,answer me

Thank you

#1
Posted 08/02/2013 05:10 PM   
If you want to game, its too slow.
If you want to game, its too slow.

#2
Posted 08/02/2013 07:50 PM   
How do you mean to slow? Do i have to buy the 3d tool kit 2 ? If it is only to navigate, os watch media, how can i do it? Thnks for The answer
How do you mean to slow? Do i have to buy the 3d tool kit 2 ? If it is only to navigate, os watch media, how can i do it?

Thnks for The answer

#3
Posted 08/02/2013 07:51 PM   
You don't need to buy the glasses or emitter, you use the ones with your TV. Only certain TV's are 'meant' to work, if your TV isn't on the list of certified ones, you have to use EDID hacks to get it to work, which I'm afraid I can't tell you a whole lot about. Too slow as in when gaming in 3D the framerate will be too low to be usable, though it will do movies and such just fine.
You don't need to buy the glasses or emitter, you use the ones with your TV. Only certain TV's are 'meant' to work, if your TV isn't on the list of certified ones, you have to use EDID hacks to get it to work, which I'm afraid I can't tell you a whole lot about.

Too slow as in when gaming in 3D the framerate will be too low to be usable, though it will do movies and such just fine.

#4
Posted 08/02/2013 08:03 PM   
[quote="D-Man11"]3D HDTVs/Projectors that are HDMI 1.4 compliant are supported by Nvidia's 3DTV Play using the manufacturers glasses. 3DTV Play, currently costs $40. If you have a 3D Vision emitter it's "FREE" and enables as long as the emitter is connected to the PC. The Nvidia 3D Vision glasses will not work with a HD 3DTV, except for the select few HDMI 1.3 DLP TVs that were supported by 3D Vision. Erase the override you istalled(@OP). With recent drivers all HDMI 1.4 3D HDTVs should work and be auto-recognized, if for some reason your's is not recognized http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/2774/~/how-do-i-know-if-3dtv-play-supports-my-3d-tv%3F You need to use a HDMI connection, do not use the PC/VGA connection if it has one. You can use a DVI to HDMI cable. High speed cables are recommended but not necessay as long as the quality of the cable is good unless feaures offered by new cables such as arc or ethernet are required. Some TVs require that you rename to HDMI input to PC or perhaps Game, plzz read your owner's manual carefully. If it supports Checkerboard use it as your format of choice. (unless you have a Passive TV, then see http://3dvision-blog.com/7163-make-your-passive-3d-monitor-or-3d-hdtv-work-with-3d-vision/ My answer is aimed at all that happen upon this thread since the thread title leads me to believe that a few will. If using an AVR and it does not work, then connect directly to the TV to verify that it will work. Then use the support link provided previously to send Nvidia the AVR EDID to see if it can be supported. [/quote]
D-Man11 said:3D HDTVs/Projectors that are HDMI 1.4 compliant are supported by Nvidia's 3DTV Play using the manufacturers glasses.

3DTV Play, currently costs $40.

If you have a 3D Vision emitter it's "FREE" and enables as long as the emitter is connected to the PC.

The Nvidia 3D Vision glasses will not work with a HD 3DTV, except for the select few HDMI 1.3 DLP TVs that were supported by 3D Vision.

Erase the override you istalled(@OP). With recent drivers all HDMI 1.4 3D HDTVs should work and be auto-recognized, if for some reason your's is not recognized http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/2774/~/how-do-i-know-if-3dtv-play-supports-my-3d-tv%3F


You need to use a HDMI connection, do not use the PC/VGA connection if it has one. You can use a DVI to HDMI cable. High speed cables are recommended but not necessay as long as the quality of the cable is good unless feaures offered by new cables such as arc or ethernet are required. Some TVs require that you rename to HDMI input to PC or perhaps Game, plzz read your owner's manual carefully.

If it supports Checkerboard use it as your format of choice. (unless you have a Passive TV, then see http://3dvision-blog.com/7163-make-your-passive-3d-monitor-or-3d-hdtv-work-with-3d-vision/


My answer is aimed at all that happen upon this thread since the thread title leads me to believe that a few will.

If using an AVR and it does not work, then connect directly to the TV to verify that it will work. Then use the support link provided previously to send Nvidia the AVR EDID to see if it can be supported.

#5
Posted 08/02/2013 08:08 PM   
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

#6
Posted 08/02/2013 08:43 PM   
Bah! they have a GTX690 on the list but no Gtx590...lol instead they show it all the way to Riva TNT... -_-
Bah! they have a GTX690 on the list but no Gtx590...lol instead they show it all the way to Riva TNT... -_-

1x Palit RTX 2080Ti Pro Gaming OC(watercooled and overclocked to hell)
3x 3D Vision Ready Asus VG278HE monitors (5760x1080).
Intel i9 9900K (overclocked to 5.3 and watercooled ofc).
Asus Maximus XI Hero Mobo.
16 GB Team Group T-Force Dark Pro DDR4 @ 3600.
Lots of Disks:
- Raid 0 - 256GB Sandisk Extreme SSD.
- Raid 0 - WD Black - 2TB.
- SanDisk SSD PLUS 480 GB.
- Intel 760p 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD.
Creative Sound Blaster Z.
Windows 10 x64 Pro.
etc


My website with my fixes and OpenGL to 3D Vision wrapper:
http://3dsurroundgaming.com

(If you like some of the stuff that I've done and want to donate something, you can do it with PayPal at tavyhome@gmail.com)

#7
Posted 08/02/2013 09:35 PM   
Both are listed. EDIT: WAIT A MIN.... 590 is worse then a 570? WTF? 690 is worse then a 670? Are they testing on a PCI-express 2.0 board or something? That seems like limited bandwidth or lack of drivers. Is it messed up I can eyeball it and see its messed up?
Both are listed.

EDIT: WAIT A MIN.... 590 is worse then a 570? WTF?
690 is worse then a 670?

Are they testing on a PCI-express 2.0 board or something? That seems like limited bandwidth or lack of drivers. Is it messed up I can eyeball it and see its messed up?

Co-founder of helixmod.blog.com

If you like one of my helixmod patches and want to donate. Can send to me through paypal - eqzitara@yahoo.com

#8
Posted 08/02/2013 09:40 PM   
They are user submissions, you need to be subjective. A lot of systems are bottlenecked and/or poorly optomized.
They are user submissions, you need to be subjective.

A lot of systems are bottlenecked and/or poorly optomized.

#9
Posted 08/02/2013 09:51 PM   
[quote="eqzitara"]Both are listed. EDIT: WAIT A MIN.... 590 is worse then a 570? WTF? 690 is worse then a 670? Are they testing on a PCI-express 2.0 board or something? That seems like limited bandwidth or lack of drivers. Is it messed up I can eyeball it and see its messed up?[/quote] BINGO!!!! ^_^ Messed up or they are using a Pentium 1 MMX as a CPU ..lol
eqzitara said:Both are listed.

EDIT: WAIT A MIN.... 590 is worse then a 570? WTF?
690 is worse then a 670?

Are they testing on a PCI-express 2.0 board or something? That seems like limited bandwidth or lack of drivers. Is it messed up I can eyeball it and see its messed up?


BINGO!!!! ^_^
Messed up or they are using a Pentium 1 MMX as a CPU ..lol

1x Palit RTX 2080Ti Pro Gaming OC(watercooled and overclocked to hell)
3x 3D Vision Ready Asus VG278HE monitors (5760x1080).
Intel i9 9900K (overclocked to 5.3 and watercooled ofc).
Asus Maximus XI Hero Mobo.
16 GB Team Group T-Force Dark Pro DDR4 @ 3600.
Lots of Disks:
- Raid 0 - 256GB Sandisk Extreme SSD.
- Raid 0 - WD Black - 2TB.
- SanDisk SSD PLUS 480 GB.
- Intel 760p 256GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD.
Creative Sound Blaster Z.
Windows 10 x64 Pro.
etc


My website with my fixes and OpenGL to 3D Vision wrapper:
http://3dsurroundgaming.com

(If you like some of the stuff that I've done and want to donate something, you can do it with PayPal at tavyhome@gmail.com)

#10
Posted 08/02/2013 10:28 PM   
It's because its user submitted and complete nonsense. The Techpowerup charts are pretty good for judging cards, since they take into account every card at every resolution.
It's because its user submitted and complete nonsense. The Techpowerup charts are pretty good for judging cards, since they take into account every card at every resolution.

#11
Posted 08/02/2013 11:07 PM   
Actually, I'd trust these guys more than the link provided above. http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html According to their chart, a desktop GTX460 or GTX550TI beat the GTX740M. (only slightly better than the GTX640M before it) While I suppose it could be done (3D gaming that is) I recall GTX460SLI being to slow for my needs and upgraded to a GTX570SLI setup because of it.
Actually, I'd trust these guys more than the link provided above.


http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html


According to their chart, a desktop GTX460 or GTX550TI beat the GTX740M. (only slightly better than the GTX640M before it)

While I suppose it could be done (3D gaming that is) I recall GTX460SLI being to slow for my needs and upgraded to a GTX570SLI setup because of it.

i7-2600K-4.5Ghz/Corsair H100i/8GB/GTX780SC-SLI/Win7-64/1200W-PSU/Samsung 840-500GB SSD/Coolermaster-Tower/Benq 1080ST @ 100"

#12
Posted 08/02/2013 11:26 PM   
Id trust any like more then one I can visually see is messed up lol. I dont even know AMD/ATI cards. Like I dont even understand why someone would go through the massive amount of time doing that list when its so inaccurate. Oh wow, that notebookcheck one is amazing. Ive never seen one that good for PC gpu's. I always hate it when they just attach a number next to it and say "take my word for it." I haven't looked in a while but I thought TomsHardWare offers accurate benchmarks.
Id trust any like more then one I can visually see is messed up lol. I dont even know AMD/ATI cards. Like I dont even understand why someone would go through the massive amount of time doing that list when its so inaccurate.

Oh wow, that notebookcheck one is amazing. Ive never seen one that good for PC gpu's. I always hate it when they just attach a number next to it and say "take my word for it."

I haven't looked in a while but I thought TomsHardWare offers accurate benchmarks.

Co-founder of helixmod.blog.com

If you like one of my helixmod patches and want to donate. Can send to me through paypal - eqzitara@yahoo.com

#13
Posted 08/03/2013 12:34 AM   
So, answering my questiona, i just have to use an HDMI 1.4 cable, no toolkit, is this wright? Thank you for your answers
So, answering my questiona, i just have to use an HDMI 1.4 cable, no toolkit, is this wright?

Thank you for your answers

#14
Posted 08/03/2013 01:37 AM   
[quote="eqzitara"] I haven't looked in a while but I thought TomsHardWare offers accurate benchmarks.[/quote] Tom's does have reliable desktop benchmarks but does not test mobile parts or let you view mobile/desktop parts side-by-side on the same chart. Every time I get the silly idea that I want to upgrade my 3DPassive laptop to something I can play more than "The SIMS" on I surf by laptopcheck and compare whatever mobile GPU with common desktop ones and save myself a senseless/useless upgrade. ;)
eqzitara said:

I haven't looked in a while but I thought TomsHardWare offers accurate benchmarks.


Tom's does have reliable desktop benchmarks but does not test mobile parts or let you view mobile/desktop parts side-by-side on the same chart.

Every time I get the silly idea that I want to upgrade my 3DPassive laptop to something I can play more than "The SIMS" on I surf by laptopcheck and compare whatever mobile GPU with common desktop ones and save myself a senseless/useless upgrade. ;)

i7-2600K-4.5Ghz/Corsair H100i/8GB/GTX780SC-SLI/Win7-64/1200W-PSU/Samsung 840-500GB SSD/Coolermaster-Tower/Benq 1080ST @ 100"

#15
Posted 08/03/2013 01:40 AM   
  1 / 2    
Scroll To Top