It's been established that there is a driver bottleneck with 3d vision where in some situations it won't scale past 3 cores.
The answer therefore is that it's the IPC that counts the most. Intel still outperforms AMD in that respect, plus they generally will clock higher than the AMD equivalents.
So, Intel is better than AMD, but it's academic to a point, as it depends on the game, the settings and your graphics cards.
It's been established that there is a driver bottleneck with 3d vision where in some situations it won't scale past 3 cores.
The answer therefore is that it's the IPC that counts the most. Intel still outperforms AMD in that respect, plus they generally will clock higher than the AMD equivalents.
So, Intel is better than AMD, but it's academic to a point, as it depends on the game, the settings and your graphics cards.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
Do you think my 2600k @ 4.7-4.8ghz is better than the Ryzen @ 4.0ghz?
Edit: is it a good idea to disable hyper threading and try to overclock even further?
The answer therefore is that it's the IPC that counts the most. Intel still outperforms AMD in that respect, plus they generally will clock higher than the AMD equivalents.
So, Intel is better than AMD, but it's academic to a point, as it depends on the game, the settings and your graphics cards.
GTX 1070 SLI, I7-6700k ~ 4.4Ghz, 3x BenQ XL2420T, BenQ TK800, LG 55EG960V (3D OLED), Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Crucial M4 SSD, 3D vision kit, Xpand x104 glasses, Corsair HX1000i, Win 10 pro 64/Win 7 64https://www.3dmark.com/fs/9529310
Edit: is it a good idea to disable hyper threading and try to overclock even further?