[quote="Siberian_Khatru"]Dark Void was one of my favorites in 3D. [/quote]
Still playing it. Using the disk installed version updated with a PhysX patch, and it's fantastic. Steam's version was given a bunch of incorrect serial codes by Capcom, as I found out to my cost.
Siberian_Khatru said:Dark Void was one of my favorites in 3D.
Still playing it. Using the disk installed version updated with a PhysX patch, and it's fantastic. Steam's version was given a bunch of incorrect serial codes by Capcom, as I found out to my cost.
[quote="mrorange55"][quote="Conan481"]Just got my Titan X Superclocked and getting about 40% to 50% better performance in 3D vision then a single GTX 980. In Far Cry 4 I couldn't get over 40 frames and with the same settings I'm getting upto 60 FPS with the Titan.
As for Far Cry 4? One of the best damn 3D fix's ever! Siberian_Khatru must have been playing in fake 3D mode because there is no way he would be talking shit about the far cry 4 fix which is almost perfect.
Thanks guys for keeping 3D alive! Lets hope Witcher 3 is going to be 3D out of the box.[/quote]
Which Titan X did you buy. Do you have an idea by any chance which one of the different version on the market is the fastest?? Didn't find any info on this. Thanks in advance.[/quote]
I got the EVGA superclocked because it was the only one available from newegg at the time, but all GTX Titan X right now are reference design, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Superclocked is nice because it comes OC from the factory and I think it's worth 50.00, especially because it will also probably overclock higher then a non superclocked version.
Conan481 said:Just got my Titan X Superclocked and getting about 40% to 50% better performance in 3D vision then a single GTX 980. In Far Cry 4 I couldn't get over 40 frames and with the same settings I'm getting upto 60 FPS with the Titan.
As for Far Cry 4? One of the best damn 3D fix's ever! Siberian_Khatru must have been playing in fake 3D mode because there is no way he would be talking shit about the far cry 4 fix which is almost perfect.
Thanks guys for keeping 3D alive! Lets hope Witcher 3 is going to be 3D out of the box.
Which Titan X did you buy. Do you have an idea by any chance which one of the different version on the market is the fastest?? Didn't find any info on this. Thanks in advance.
I got the EVGA superclocked because it was the only one available from newegg at the time, but all GTX Titan X right now are reference design, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Superclocked is nice because it comes OC from the factory and I think it's worth 50.00, especially because it will also probably overclock higher then a non superclocked version.
Thanks conan. I think the EVGA is a good choice too. A bit more expensive but I want to keep this card for at least 2 - 3 years, so it should be worth it.
Thanks conan. I think the EVGA is a good choice too. A bit more expensive but I want to keep this card for at least 2 - 3 years, so it should be worth it.
OFF-TOPIC
[quote="mrorange55"] but I want to keep this card for at least 2 - 3 years, so it should be worth it.[/quote]
2 years from now = Pascal with 3x memory bandwidth. You can cross out that "3 years" scenario already. ;)
First HBM Radeon cards will be 1,5 years old in March 2017. HBM medium range cards should be available by then.
I really cannot see any demanding gamer just sit through 2016 and early 2017, when all the HBM goodnes happens.
:D
Although... a few studid decissions and HBM cards below 999$ price range, could be postponed all the way to 2019.
You never know what crazy idea Nvidia will pull out of the hat.
AMD will probably follow, so for now, all options are open.
I already see some news about Pascal with only 0,75TB/s, instead of promised 1TB/s. I hope it's just a stupid mistake or misinformation, but...
Well... we'll have to wait and see.
On the positive side - if HBM gen 1 can reach 0,64TB/s on Radeon in 2015, then how can HBM gen-2 stop at 0,75TB/s?
mrorange55 said: but I want to keep this card for at least 2 - 3 years, so it should be worth it.
2 years from now = Pascal with 3x memory bandwidth. You can cross out that "3 years" scenario already. ;)
First HBM Radeon cards will be 1,5 years old in March 2017. HBM medium range cards should be available by then.
I really cannot see any demanding gamer just sit through 2016 and early 2017, when all the HBM goodnes happens.
:D
Although... a few studid decissions and HBM cards below 999$ price range, could be postponed all the way to 2019.
You never know what crazy idea Nvidia will pull out of the hat.
AMD will probably follow, so for now, all options are open.
I already see some news about Pascal with only 0,75TB/s, instead of promised 1TB/s. I hope it's just a stupid mistake or misinformation, but...
Well... we'll have to wait and see.
On the positive side - if HBM gen 1 can reach 0,64TB/s on Radeon in 2015, then how can HBM gen-2 stop at 0,75TB/s?
[quote="Conan481"][quote="mrorange55"][quote="Conan481"]Just got my Titan X Superclocked and getting about 40% to 50% better performance in 3D vision then a single GTX 980. In Far Cry 4 I couldn't get over 40 frames and with the same settings I'm getting upto 60 FPS with the Titan. As for Far Cry 4? One of the best damn 3D fix's ever! Siberian_Khatru must have been playing in fake 3D mode because there is no way he would be talking shit about the far cry 4 fix which is almost perfect. Thanks guys for keeping 3D alive! Lets hope Witcher 3 is going to be 3D out of the box.[/quote] Which Titan X did you buy. Do you have an idea by any chance which one of the different version on the market is the fastest?? Didn't find any info on this. Thanks in advance.[/quote] I got the EVGA superclocked because it was the only one available from newegg at the time, but all GTX Titan X right now are reference design, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Superclocked is nice because it comes OC from the factory and I think it's worth 50.00, especially because it will also probably overclock higher then a non superclocked version.[/quote]
No it won`t. The only difference is the bios and the GPU/Memory Clock got changed. You can do it yourself for free. The Voltage on both cards is the same. On stock Voltage you can go even higher thou.
Conan481 said:Just got my Titan X Superclocked and getting about 40% to 50% better performance in 3D vision then a single GTX 980. In Far Cry 4 I couldn't get over 40 frames and with the same settings I'm getting upto 60 FPS with the Titan. As for Far Cry 4? One of the best damn 3D fix's ever! Siberian_Khatru must have been playing in fake 3D mode because there is no way he would be talking shit about the far cry 4 fix which is almost perfect. Thanks guys for keeping 3D alive! Lets hope Witcher 3 is going to be 3D out of the box.
Which Titan X did you buy. Do you have an idea by any chance which one of the different version on the market is the fastest?? Didn't find any info on this. Thanks in advance.
I got the EVGA superclocked because it was the only one available from newegg at the time, but all GTX Titan X right now are reference design, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Superclocked is nice because it comes OC from the factory and I think it's worth 50.00, especially because it will also probably overclock higher then a non superclocked version.
No it won`t. The only difference is the bios and the GPU/Memory Clock got changed. You can do it yourself for free. The Voltage on both cards is the same. On stock Voltage you can go even higher thou.
[quote="SKAUT"][quote="Conan481"][quote="mrorange55"][quote="Conan481"]Just got my Titan X Superclocked and getting about 40% to 50% better performance in 3D vision then a single GTX 980. In Far Cry 4 I couldn't get over 40 frames and with the same settings I'm getting upto 60 FPS with the Titan. As for Far Cry 4? One of the best damn 3D fix's ever! Siberian_Khatru must have been playing in fake 3D mode because there is no way he would be talking shit about the far cry 4 fix which is almost perfect. Thanks guys for keeping 3D alive! Lets hope Witcher 3 is going to be 3D out of the box.[/quote] Which Titan X did you buy. Do you have an idea by any chance which one of the different version on the market is the fastest?? Didn't find any info on this. Thanks in advance.[/quote] I got the EVGA superclocked because it was the only one available from newegg at the time, but all GTX Titan X right now are reference design, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Superclocked is nice because it comes OC from the factory and I think it's worth 50.00, especially because it will also probably overclock higher then a non superclocked version.[/quote]
No it won`t. The only difference is the bios and the GPU/Memory Clock got changed. You can do it yourself for free. The Voltage on both cards is the same. On stock Voltage you can go even higher thou.[/quote]
Well some cards are VERY poor for overclocking, and some people don't want to do it themselves. I was reading on a forum that EVGA at least tests the superclocked cards for decent overclocks and cards that fail go as the standard edition. Of course this could all be BS, but for 50.00, who really cares when your spending 1000.00, and no withcher 3 either. LOL
Conan481 said:Just got my Titan X Superclocked and getting about 40% to 50% better performance in 3D vision then a single GTX 980. In Far Cry 4 I couldn't get over 40 frames and with the same settings I'm getting upto 60 FPS with the Titan. As for Far Cry 4? One of the best damn 3D fix's ever! Siberian_Khatru must have been playing in fake 3D mode because there is no way he would be talking shit about the far cry 4 fix which is almost perfect. Thanks guys for keeping 3D alive! Lets hope Witcher 3 is going to be 3D out of the box.
Which Titan X did you buy. Do you have an idea by any chance which one of the different version on the market is the fastest?? Didn't find any info on this. Thanks in advance.
I got the EVGA superclocked because it was the only one available from newegg at the time, but all GTX Titan X right now are reference design, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Superclocked is nice because it comes OC from the factory and I think it's worth 50.00, especially because it will also probably overclock higher then a non superclocked version.
No it won`t. The only difference is the bios and the GPU/Memory Clock got changed. You can do it yourself for free. The Voltage on both cards is the same. On stock Voltage you can go even higher thou.
Well some cards are VERY poor for overclocking, and some people don't want to do it themselves. I was reading on a forum that EVGA at least tests the superclocked cards for decent overclocks and cards that fail go as the standard edition. Of course this could all be BS, but for 50.00, who really cares when your spending 1000.00, and no withcher 3 either. LOL
I am here with Conan. I am not an overclocking expert - just played a bit recently with my GTX680 reference card in order to get some more power out of it. For 50 bucks in order to get professional and well-tested overclocking is totally okay from my point. And I heard only good about EVGA. With a look into my games library, where I spent thousands of euros, I really don't care to pay a bit more for great hardware. ;)
@ RonsonPL, all interesting thouhgts... but honestly I can not wait any longer to get a new card. My mentionned GTX680 is just to old and in order to play without problems in 3D, maybe with a VR headset in the future, for the next two years I just have to buy the best card available on the market right now and that is the Titan X. For the reason of the 4VRAM of the GTX980 I skipped it. And SLI is not an option for me. I will consider it in my next rig in 2 years but for now I stay with a Single GPU without changing to much in my rig (RAM, processor and everything else is still fine). I am honest, I am definitely not a Hardware Expert like most of you guys here. I just want to enjoysome of the newest games with 3D vision after work. :D
I am here with Conan. I am not an overclocking expert - just played a bit recently with my GTX680 reference card in order to get some more power out of it. For 50 bucks in order to get professional and well-tested overclocking is totally okay from my point. And I heard only good about EVGA. With a look into my games library, where I spent thousands of euros, I really don't care to pay a bit more for great hardware. ;)
@ RonsonPL, all interesting thouhgts... but honestly I can not wait any longer to get a new card. My mentionned GTX680 is just to old and in order to play without problems in 3D, maybe with a VR headset in the future, for the next two years I just have to buy the best card available on the market right now and that is the Titan X. For the reason of the 4VRAM of the GTX980 I skipped it. And SLI is not an option for me. I will consider it in my next rig in 2 years but for now I stay with a Single GPU without changing to much in my rig (RAM, processor and everything else is still fine). I am honest, I am definitely not a Hardware Expert like most of you guys here. I just want to enjoysome of the newest games with 3D vision after work. :D
That's my understanding too. Each individual card has different overclocking potential. Naturally, the manufacturer is going to select the best ones to ship as factory overclocked, to minimise failures and expensive RMAs. (edit: got ninja'd by Mr Orange)
I've heard nothing but good things about EVGA too, though I was very put off by the one card I owned of theirs, due to the noise. It was a modest GTX 650 that I bought for PhysX, but it sounded like a Soviet tractor. It was way louder than my 2 Titans combined.
Even after I modified the VBIOS to reduce the minimum fan speed from 30% to the lowest it would go (I think it was about 3%), it was still the loudest part of my system at idle. Pretty annoying for a PhysX card that can go for weeks without being used.
Eventually, I unplugged the internal fan entirely and just ran the thing with whatever little passive cooling it had. I stuck an extra fan inside the case blowing towards it, and even another little fan attached to the back of the case, sucking air out of the 650. I think I even underclocked it a little. I got it down a couple of degrees maybe, but it still got to the high 90s at load (though as a PhysX card at load, it wasn't always at load)
In the end though, I thought to hell with it, and just replaced it with a 650ti from Zotac, which is a lot quieter.
Are EVGA coolers always so lousy? Maybe it's just the low-end cards - I'm guessing the high-end titan and 980 cards use the stock nvidia cooler, which is awesome.
That's my understanding too. Each individual card has different overclocking potential. Naturally, the manufacturer is going to select the best ones to ship as factory overclocked, to minimise failures and expensive RMAs. (edit: got ninja'd by Mr Orange)
I've heard nothing but good things about EVGA too, though I was very put off by the one card I owned of theirs, due to the noise. It was a modest GTX 650 that I bought for PhysX, but it sounded like a Soviet tractor. It was way louder than my 2 Titans combined.
Even after I modified the VBIOS to reduce the minimum fan speed from 30% to the lowest it would go (I think it was about 3%), it was still the loudest part of my system at idle. Pretty annoying for a PhysX card that can go for weeks without being used.
Eventually, I unplugged the internal fan entirely and just ran the thing with whatever little passive cooling it had. I stuck an extra fan inside the case blowing towards it, and even another little fan attached to the back of the case, sucking air out of the 650. I think I even underclocked it a little. I got it down a couple of degrees maybe, but it still got to the high 90s at load (though as a PhysX card at load, it wasn't always at load)
In the end though, I thought to hell with it, and just replaced it with a 650ti from Zotac, which is a lot quieter.
Are EVGA coolers always so lousy? Maybe it's just the low-end cards - I'm guessing the high-end titan and 980 cards use the stock nvidia cooler, which is awesome.
[quote="Pirateguybrush"][quote="Siberian_Khatru"]The fix is fine but I didn't get any great sense of depth when playing the game in 3D.[/quote] This may be a silly question, but did you try adjusting the depth/convergence settings? And are you certain you weren't playing in compatibility mode?[/quote]
I was not in compatibility mode. I always play with high convergence. I guess the problem with the Far Cry 4 fix is that it feels like a fix.
I thought about trying the 3D again but then I remembered that getting rid of the fix the last time screwed up my Far Cry 4 install causing hitching while running.
I'll stick to DOA 5 for my 3D fix for now.
Siberian_Khatru said:The fix is fine but I didn't get any great sense of depth when playing the game in 3D.
This may be a silly question, but did you try adjusting the depth/convergence settings? And are you certain you weren't playing in compatibility mode?
I was not in compatibility mode. I always play with high convergence. I guess the problem with the Far Cry 4 fix is that it feels like a fix.
I thought about trying the 3D again but then I remembered that getting rid of the fix the last time screwed up my Far Cry 4 install causing hitching while running.
I'll stick to DOA 5 for my 3D fix for now.
4770k @ 4.2 Water cooled
32 Gigs DDR 3 2400
GTX Titan X SLI
Obsidian 800D
EVGA 1300 watt
1 Terabyte SSD raid 0
ASUS 27 inch 3D monitor 3D vision 2.
For the record, NVIDIA has stipulated that all Titan cards sold have to stick to reference design. EVGA can still identify better yields and give them a boost in the bios, but it's still the same "card" as any other Titan X.
For the record, NVIDIA has stipulated that all Titan cards sold have to stick to reference design. EVGA can still identify better yields and give them a boost in the bios, but it's still the same "card" as any other Titan X.
[quote="Drayth"]For the record, NVIDIA has stipulated that all Titan cards sold have to stick to reference design. EVGA can still identify better yields and give them a boost in the bios, but it's still the same "card" as any other Titan X. [/quote]
Yep. the story is simple. Nvidia produce them and send them to the sellers and they put them is theirs package with theirs sticker on it and that`s it. Nothing magical is happening in the midddle. Nothing like better type of Bios or componnents. Only bios with different clock values on the OC version.
Friend of mine got one with his own Bios Upgrade and runs it on 1450 gpu clock ! sweet.
Drayth said:For the record, NVIDIA has stipulated that all Titan cards sold have to stick to reference design. EVGA can still identify better yields and give them a boost in the bios, but it's still the same "card" as any other Titan X.
Yep. the story is simple. Nvidia produce them and send them to the sellers and they put them is theirs package with theirs sticker on it and that`s it. Nothing magical is happening in the midddle. Nothing like better type of Bios or componnents. Only bios with different clock values on the OC version.
Friend of mine got one with his own Bios Upgrade and runs it on 1450 gpu clock ! sweet.
EVGA cards in general have an higher ASIC which makes them overclock better without any mods also EVGA warranty is solid and it the first company that within minute you speaking to a tech. (human)
Due to EVGA being sold out I purchased an ASUS titan x and the $29 extra for the SC version is worth it see overclocker.net.
EVGA cards in general have an higher ASIC which makes them overclock better without any mods also EVGA warranty is solid and it the first company that within minute you speaking to a tech. (human)
Due to EVGA being sold out I purchased an ASUS titan x and the $29 extra for the SC version is worth it see overclocker.net.
Gigabyte Z370 Gaming 7 32GB Ram i9-9900K GigaByte Aorus Extreme Gaming 2080TI (single) Game Blaster Z Windows 10 X64 build #17763.195 Define R6 Blackout Case Corsair H110i GTX Sandisk 1TB (OS) SanDisk 2TB SSD (Games) Seagate EXOs 8 and 12 TB drives Samsung UN46c7000 HD TV Samsung UN55HU9000 UHD TVCurrently using ACER PASSIVE EDID override on 3D TVs LG 55
[quote="Siberian_Khatru"][quote="Pirateguybrush"][quote="Siberian_Khatru"]The fix is fine but I didn't get any great sense of depth when playing the game in 3D.[/quote] This may be a silly question, but did you try adjusting the depth/convergence settings? And are you certain you weren't playing in compatibility mode?[/quote]I was not in compatibility mode. I always play with high convergence. I guess the problem with the Far Cry 4 fix is that it feels like a fix.
I thought about trying the 3D again but then I remembered that getting rid of the fix the last time screwed up my Far Cry 4 install causing hitching while running.
I'll stick to DOA 5 for my 3D fix for now. [/quote]
This is confusing, can you post a snapshot of what you are seeing? It's entirely possible there are still glitches in the game that we'd like to fix.
I don't understand what you mean by it "feels like a fix"? Technology wise, there is no difference between what we do as hackers and what a game developer can do. It should be the same image at the end. Can you describe what makes it "feel like a fix?" How does this seem different than DOA 5?
Here's an example of what we are seeing, that as far as I know is flawless. Mike made a terrific start on the fix, and DarkStarSword really hit it out of the park.
[img]https://forums.geforce.com/cmd/default/download-comment-attachment/63691/[/img]
If that is not similar to what you are seeing, we'd like to know.
Siberian_Khatru said:The fix is fine but I didn't get any great sense of depth when playing the game in 3D.
This may be a silly question, but did you try adjusting the depth/convergence settings? And are you certain you weren't playing in compatibility mode?
I was not in compatibility mode. I always play with high convergence. I guess the problem with the Far Cry 4 fix is that it feels like a fix.
I thought about trying the 3D again but then I remembered that getting rid of the fix the last time screwed up my Far Cry 4 install causing hitching while running.
I'll stick to DOA 5 for my 3D fix for now.
This is confusing, can you post a snapshot of what you are seeing? It's entirely possible there are still glitches in the game that we'd like to fix.
I don't understand what you mean by it "feels like a fix"? Technology wise, there is no difference between what we do as hackers and what a game developer can do. It should be the same image at the end. Can you describe what makes it "feel like a fix?" How does this seem different than DOA 5?
Here's an example of what we are seeing, that as far as I know is flawless. Mike made a terrific start on the fix, and DarkStarSword really hit it out of the park.
If that is not similar to what you are seeing, we'd like to know.
Acer H5360 (1280x720@120Hz) - ASUS VG248QE with GSync mod - 3D Vision 1&2 - Driver 372.54
GTX 970 - i5-4670K@4.2GHz - 12GB RAM - Win7x64+evilKB2670838 - 4 Disk X25 RAID
SAGER NP9870-S - GTX 980 - i7-6700K - Win10 Pro 1607 Latest 3Dmigoto Release Bo3b's School for ShaderHackers
How true that is.
Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.4Ghz, 3x GTX Titan, 16GB Tactical Tracer LED, CPU/GPU Dual-Loop Water-Cooled - Driver 331.82, DX11.0
Still playing it. Using the disk installed version updated with a PhysX patch, and it's fantastic. Steam's version was given a bunch of incorrect serial codes by Capcom, as I found out to my cost.
Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.4Ghz, 3x GTX Titan, 16GB Tactical Tracer LED, CPU/GPU Dual-Loop Water-Cooled - Driver 331.82, DX11.0
I got the EVGA superclocked because it was the only one available from newegg at the time, but all GTX Titan X right now are reference design, so it doesn't matter which one you get. Superclocked is nice because it comes OC from the factory and I think it's worth 50.00, especially because it will also probably overclock higher then a non superclocked version.
Intel Core i7-3820, 4 X 3,60 GHz overclocked to 4,50 GHz ; EVGA Titan X 12VRAM ; 16 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR-1600 (4x 4 GB) ; Asus VG278H 27-inch incl. 3D vision 2 glasses, integrated transmitter ; Xbox One Elite wireless controller ; Windows 10HTC VIVE 2,5 m2 roomscale3D VISION GAMERS - VISIT ME ON STEAM and feel free to add me: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198064106555 YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1UE5TPoF0HX0HVpF_E4uPQ STEAM CURATOR: https://store.steampowered.com/curator/33611530-Streaming-Deluxe/
2 years from now = Pascal with 3x memory bandwidth. You can cross out that "3 years" scenario already. ;)
First HBM Radeon cards will be 1,5 years old in March 2017. HBM medium range cards should be available by then.
I really cannot see any demanding gamer just sit through 2016 and early 2017, when all the HBM goodnes happens.
:D
Although... a few studid decissions and HBM cards below 999$ price range, could be postponed all the way to 2019.
You never know what crazy idea Nvidia will pull out of the hat.
AMD will probably follow, so for now, all options are open.
I already see some news about Pascal with only 0,75TB/s, instead of promised 1TB/s. I hope it's just a stupid mistake or misinformation, but...
Well... we'll have to wait and see.
On the positive side - if HBM gen 1 can reach 0,64TB/s on Radeon in 2015, then how can HBM gen-2 stop at 0,75TB/s?
No it won`t. The only difference is the bios and the GPU/Memory Clock got changed. You can do it yourself for free. The Voltage on both cards is the same. On stock Voltage you can go even higher thou.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198014296177/
Well some cards are VERY poor for overclocking, and some people don't want to do it themselves. I was reading on a forum that EVGA at least tests the superclocked cards for decent overclocks and cards that fail go as the standard edition. Of course this could all be BS, but for 50.00, who really cares when your spending 1000.00, and no withcher 3 either. LOL
@ RonsonPL, all interesting thouhgts... but honestly I can not wait any longer to get a new card. My mentionned GTX680 is just to old and in order to play without problems in 3D, maybe with a VR headset in the future, for the next two years I just have to buy the best card available on the market right now and that is the Titan X. For the reason of the 4VRAM of the GTX980 I skipped it. And SLI is not an option for me. I will consider it in my next rig in 2 years but for now I stay with a Single GPU without changing to much in my rig (RAM, processor and everything else is still fine). I am honest, I am definitely not a Hardware Expert like most of you guys here. I just want to enjoysome of the newest games with 3D vision after work. :D
Intel Core i7-3820, 4 X 3,60 GHz overclocked to 4,50 GHz ; EVGA Titan X 12VRAM ; 16 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR-1600 (4x 4 GB) ; Asus VG278H 27-inch incl. 3D vision 2 glasses, integrated transmitter ; Xbox One Elite wireless controller ; Windows 10HTC VIVE 2,5 m2 roomscale3D VISION GAMERS - VISIT ME ON STEAM and feel free to add me: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198064106555 YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1UE5TPoF0HX0HVpF_E4uPQ STEAM CURATOR: https://store.steampowered.com/curator/33611530-Streaming-Deluxe/
I've heard nothing but good things about EVGA too, though I was very put off by the one card I owned of theirs, due to the noise. It was a modest GTX 650 that I bought for PhysX, but it sounded like a Soviet tractor. It was way louder than my 2 Titans combined.
Even after I modified the VBIOS to reduce the minimum fan speed from 30% to the lowest it would go (I think it was about 3%), it was still the loudest part of my system at idle. Pretty annoying for a PhysX card that can go for weeks without being used.
Eventually, I unplugged the internal fan entirely and just ran the thing with whatever little passive cooling it had. I stuck an extra fan inside the case blowing towards it, and even another little fan attached to the back of the case, sucking air out of the 650. I think I even underclocked it a little. I got it down a couple of degrees maybe, but it still got to the high 90s at load (though as a PhysX card at load, it wasn't always at load)
In the end though, I thought to hell with it, and just replaced it with a 650ti from Zotac, which is a lot quieter.
Are EVGA coolers always so lousy? Maybe it's just the low-end cards - I'm guessing the high-end titan and 980 cards use the stock nvidia cooler, which is awesome.
|CPU: i7-2700k @ 4.5Ghz
|Cooler: Zalman 9900 Max
|MB: MSI Military Class II Z68 GD-80
|RAM: Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3
|SSDs: Seagate 600 240GB; Crucial M4 128GB
|HDDs: Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Seagate Barracuda 500GB
|PS: OCZ ZX Series 1250watt
|Case: Antec 1200 V3
|Monitors: Asus 3D VG278HE; Asus 3D VG236H; Samsung 3D 51" Plasma;
|GPU:MSI 1080GTX "Duke"
|OS: Windows 10 Pro X64
I was not in compatibility mode. I always play with high convergence. I guess the problem with the Far Cry 4 fix is that it feels like a fix.
I thought about trying the 3D again but then I remembered that getting rid of the fix the last time screwed up my Far Cry 4 install causing hitching while running.
I'll stick to DOA 5 for my 3D fix for now.
4770k @ 4.2 Water cooled
32 Gigs DDR 3 2400
GTX Titan X SLI
Obsidian 800D
EVGA 1300 watt
1 Terabyte SSD raid 0
ASUS 27 inch 3D monitor 3D vision 2.
Yep. the story is simple. Nvidia produce them and send them to the sellers and they put them is theirs package with theirs sticker on it and that`s it. Nothing magical is happening in the midddle. Nothing like better type of Bios or componnents. Only bios with different clock values on the OC version.
Friend of mine got one with his own Bios Upgrade and runs it on 1450 gpu clock ! sweet.
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198014296177/
Due to EVGA being sold out I purchased an ASUS titan x and the $29 extra for the SC version is worth it see overclocker.net.
Gigabyte Z370 Gaming 7 32GB Ram i9-9900K GigaByte Aorus Extreme Gaming 2080TI (single) Game Blaster Z Windows 10 X64 build #17763.195 Define R6 Blackout Case Corsair H110i GTX Sandisk 1TB (OS) SanDisk 2TB SSD (Games) Seagate EXOs 8 and 12 TB drives Samsung UN46c7000 HD TV Samsung UN55HU9000 UHD TVCurrently using ACER PASSIVE EDID override on 3D TVs LG 55
This is confusing, can you post a snapshot of what you are seeing? It's entirely possible there are still glitches in the game that we'd like to fix.
I don't understand what you mean by it "feels like a fix"? Technology wise, there is no difference between what we do as hackers and what a game developer can do. It should be the same image at the end. Can you describe what makes it "feel like a fix?" How does this seem different than DOA 5?
Here's an example of what we are seeing, that as far as I know is flawless. Mike made a terrific start on the fix, and DarkStarSword really hit it out of the park.
If that is not similar to what you are seeing, we'd like to know.
Acer H5360 (1280x720@120Hz) - ASUS VG248QE with GSync mod - 3D Vision 1&2 - Driver 372.54
GTX 970 - i5-4670K@4.2GHz - 12GB RAM - Win7x64+evilKB2670838 - 4 Disk X25 RAID
SAGER NP9870-S - GTX 980 - i7-6700K - Win10 Pro 1607
Latest 3Dmigoto Release
Bo3b's School for ShaderHackers