If you're talking about 3d, you can't push a 1080p/60hz/3d or 1080p/120hz/3d signal via HDMI. You can do 60hz in 2d, but not 3d.
If you're planning on using 3d on a projector, 720p/60hz is the way to go. The lower resolution is less noticeable than you'd expect.
There is one user who's claiming to have figured out a way to get a higher resolution signal to work (but not 1080p), and we're waiting on him to publish a guide. So this may change.
If you're talking about 3d, you can't push a 1080p/60hz/3d or 1080p/120hz/3d signal via HDMI. You can do 60hz in 2d, but not 3d.
If you're planning on using 3d on a projector, 720p/60hz is the way to go. The lower resolution is less noticeable than you'd expect.
There is one user who's claiming to have figured out a way to get a higher resolution signal to work (but not 1080p), and we're waiting on him to publish a guide. So this may change.
im talking about 1080p 60hz in 2d. i disagree however that the lower resolution is less noticeable, it's even more noticeable as the image is larger of course, 120" looked shotty so i had to reduce it to 80"..
a real shame that 1440p 3d isn't available in 3d, that would be awesome
im talking about 1080p 60hz in 2d. i disagree however that the lower resolution is less noticeable, it's even more noticeable as the image is larger of course, 120" looked shotty so i had to reduce it to 80"..
a real shame that 1440p 3d isn't available in 3d, that would be awesome
If you're planning on using 3d on a projector, 720p/60hz is the way to go. The lower resolution is less noticeable than you'd expect.
There is one user who's claiming to have figured out a way to get a higher resolution signal to work (but not 1080p), and we're waiting on him to publish a guide. So this may change.
a real shame that 1440p 3d isn't available in 3d, that would be awesome