Batman: Arkham City in 3D Vision
  14 / 15    
Thank you for your answer. This was at around 15-20% depth, i think. I too am playing on a 24" at about 2-3 feet from the screen. I've been preferring lower depth (sub 25%) on most games. Am i understanding you correctly that if i want to play Arkham City at lower depth i have to live with double images on close objects?
So the result is that you HAVE to have depth at 60%+ if you want to avoid these double images?

I just installed Nvidia 3d vision a few days ago and still have only tested a limited amount of games. However when playing Arkham Asylum i'm able to (without any adjustments to convergence even) to have both batman in the foreground as well as objects in a distance both clear/aligned/no double images. Both at low and high depth settings. I'm also not experiencing any flickering in the image. I was mainly trying to recreate this experience in arkham city - but between the flickering and just having the depth and convergence settings to adjust i struggle to find a way.


EDIT: When i got home this evening i went to try the Arkham City again to see how it would work with higher divergence and just not trying to align everything through divergence. For some reason the game was working a lot better. There is no flickering to speak of, with depth at between 30-50% everything, both near and far, is properly aligned.
I'll assume that this means that my previous issues - both with not being able to align things and the flickering to have been caused by some bug. Thanks for the help and good intentions the game is simply magnificent now.
Thank you for your answer. This was at around 15-20% depth, i think. I too am playing on a 24" at about 2-3 feet from the screen. I've been preferring lower depth (sub 25%) on most games. Am i understanding you correctly that if i want to play Arkham City at lower depth i have to live with double images on close objects?

So the result is that you HAVE to have depth at 60%+ if you want to avoid these double images?



I just installed Nvidia 3d vision a few days ago and still have only tested a limited amount of games. However when playing Arkham Asylum i'm able to (without any adjustments to convergence even) to have both batman in the foreground as well as objects in a distance both clear/aligned/no double images. Both at low and high depth settings. I'm also not experiencing any flickering in the image. I was mainly trying to recreate this experience in arkham city - but between the flickering and just having the depth and convergence settings to adjust i struggle to find a way.





EDIT: When i got home this evening i went to try the Arkham City again to see how it would work with higher divergence and just not trying to align everything through divergence. For some reason the game was working a lot better. There is no flickering to speak of, with depth at between 30-50% everything, both near and far, is properly aligned.

I'll assume that this means that my previous issues - both with not being able to align things and the flickering to have been caused by some bug. Thanks for the help and good intentions the game is simply magnificent now.

Posted 02/03/2012 10:33 AM   
The easiest way for us to help you calibrate your settings is to snap a 3D screenshot by hitting Alt-F1 which will drop a screen to your %:\\users\documents\Nvstereoscopic.IMG folder. Then upload that screen here or 3DVisionlive.com

It sounds like you are calibrating convergence so that objects either align while you are focusing on Batman instead of focusing on objects behind Batman, and then bringing him into focus. A "safe" setting for Batman is to set Depth to ~50%, then adjust convergence so that Batman looks like a single-image (screen depth). Then everything between Batman and the camera appears to pop-out, everything beyond Batman has depth. From there you can adjust whether Batman is further inside or outside the screen, I think it may be more comfortable for most people to have Batman a bit inside the screen instead of at screen depth or popping out.
The easiest way for us to help you calibrate your settings is to snap a 3D screenshot by hitting Alt-F1 which will drop a screen to your %:\\users\documents\Nvstereoscopic.IMG folder. Then upload that screen here or 3DVisionlive.com



It sounds like you are calibrating convergence so that objects either align while you are focusing on Batman instead of focusing on objects behind Batman, and then bringing him into focus. A "safe" setting for Batman is to set Depth to ~50%, then adjust convergence so that Batman looks like a single-image (screen depth). Then everything between Batman and the camera appears to pop-out, everything beyond Batman has depth. From there you can adjust whether Batman is further inside or outside the screen, I think it may be more comfortable for most people to have Batman a bit inside the screen instead of at screen depth or popping out.

-=HeliX=- Mod 3DV Game Fixes
My 3D Vision Games List Ratings

Intel Core i7 5930K @4.5GHz | Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5 | Win10 x64 Pro | Corsair H105
Nvidia GeForce Titan X SLI Hybrid | ROG Swift PG278Q 144Hz + 3D Vision/G-Sync | 32GB Adata DDR4 2666
Intel Samsung 950Pro SSD | Samsung EVO 4x1 RAID 0 |
Yamaha VX-677 A/V Receiver | Polk Audio RM6880 7.1 | LG Blu-Ray
Auzen X-Fi HT HD | Logitech G710/G502/G27 | Corsair Air 540 | EVGA P2-1200W

Posted 02/03/2012 04:39 PM   
[code]- GPU: GTX 590
- Drive: 295.51
- Display type: Philips 47PFL7696T Passiv 3D
- Issues: No 3D at all on 720p 60Hz ore 1080p 24hz
Intel I7 860 Turbo mode
Windows 7 64 bit.
[/code]

Only game I can get amazing 3D with is Crysis 3 (Direct X 11) and Dirt 3. BF3 to, but I don't like play 3D in that game. In Batman and Mafia 2 I never get the 3D announcement on the screen. Have a standard fat HDMI cable. Is it that you think?

Answer is to install the 3D TV Play and all the game works. Trile verison but why to bye the product. I click on the link an came to Nvidia page and click and click and click andcame to a page ther the answer is you do it in the program but I came to came to Nvidia page and click and click and click and came to a page ther the answer is you do it in the program but...
- GPU: GTX 590

- Drive: 295.51

- Display type: Philips 47PFL7696T Passiv 3D

- Issues: No 3D at all on 720p 60Hz ore 1080p 24hz

Intel I7 860 Turbo mode

Windows 7 64 bit.




Only game I can get amazing 3D with is Crysis 3 (Direct X 11) and Dirt 3. BF3 to, but I don't like play 3D in that game. In Batman and Mafia 2 I never get the 3D announcement on the screen. Have a standard fat HDMI cable. Is it that you think?



Answer is to install the 3D TV Play and all the game works. Trile verison but why to bye the product. I click on the link an came to Nvidia page and click and click and click andcame to a page ther the answer is you do it in the program but I came to came to Nvidia page and click and click and click and came to a page ther the answer is you do it in the program but...

Posted 02/21/2012 07:44 PM   
Is it required to run Arkham City in 1280x720 at 60 to get 3D to work? I don't see a setting in the graphics control panel for Batman to set the refresh rate to 24 for 1920x1080 resolution. Still new to Nvidia's implementation of 3D on PC and I'm not entirely sure how it's supposed to work.

It's definitely in 3D when I select 1280, but I feel as if I'm losing out on visuals by lowering the resolution from 1920.
Is it required to run Arkham City in 1280x720 at 60 to get 3D to work? I don't see a setting in the graphics control panel for Batman to set the refresh rate to 24 for 1920x1080 resolution. Still new to Nvidia's implementation of 3D on PC and I'm not entirely sure how it's supposed to work.



It's definitely in 3D when I select 1280, but I feel as if I'm losing out on visuals by lowering the resolution from 1920.

Posted 04/04/2012 05:01 AM   
[quote name='aphesian' date='03 April 2012 - 11:01 PM' timestamp='1333515660' post='1391763']
Is it required to run Arkham City in 1280x720 at 60 to get 3D to work? I don't see a setting in the graphics control panel for Batman to set the refresh rate to 24 for 1920x1080 resolution. Still new to Nvidia's implementation of 3D on PC and I'm not entirely sure how it's supposed to work.

It's definitely in 3D when I select 1280, but I feel as if I'm losing out on visuals by lowering the resolution from 1920.
[/quote]

Are you trying to play it on a monitor or tv? I haven't had any issues running it in 1920x1080 on a monitor. I always leave the refresh rate at 120hz though. Why would you do otherwise?
[quote name='aphesian' date='03 April 2012 - 11:01 PM' timestamp='1333515660' post='1391763']

Is it required to run Arkham City in 1280x720 at 60 to get 3D to work? I don't see a setting in the graphics control panel for Batman to set the refresh rate to 24 for 1920x1080 resolution. Still new to Nvidia's implementation of 3D on PC and I'm not entirely sure how it's supposed to work.



It's definitely in 3D when I select 1280, but I feel as if I'm losing out on visuals by lowering the resolution from 1920.





Are you trying to play it on a monitor or tv? I haven't had any issues running it in 1920x1080 on a monitor. I always leave the refresh rate at 120hz though. Why would you do otherwise?

|CPU: i7-2700k @ 4.5Ghz
|Cooler: Zalman 9900 Max
|MB: MSI Military Class II Z68 GD-80
|RAM: Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3
|SSDs: Seagate 600 240GB; Crucial M4 128GB
|HDDs: Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Seagate Barracuda 500GB
|PS: OCZ ZX Series 1250watt
|Case: Antec 1200 V3
|Monitors: Asus 3D VG278HE; Asus 3D VG236H; Samsung 3D 51" Plasma;
|GPU:MSI 1080GTX "Duke"
|OS: Windows 10 Pro X64

Posted 04/04/2012 12:20 PM   
I'm playing it on a TV (LG 47LM6700). I've had no problems with 3D on the PS3 or 360, but anytime I try games with my PC the results seem lackluster in comparison (PC is an i7 2600 with a GTX 580). Just seems like I'm missing some crucial step in the configuration process to make the games work properly on the PC, especially when I read reviews by users touting that PC 3D is far superior.
I'm playing it on a TV (LG 47LM6700). I've had no problems with 3D on the PS3 or 360, but anytime I try games with my PC the results seem lackluster in comparison (PC is an i7 2600 with a GTX 580). Just seems like I'm missing some crucial step in the configuration process to make the games work properly on the PC, especially when I read reviews by users touting that PC 3D is far superior.

Posted 04/04/2012 06:01 PM   
Hmm... I see. Well I'm sorry I don't know squat about 3D TV play issues. I only game on a monitor.
Hmm... I see. Well I'm sorry I don't know squat about 3D TV play issues. I only game on a monitor.

|CPU: i7-2700k @ 4.5Ghz
|Cooler: Zalman 9900 Max
|MB: MSI Military Class II Z68 GD-80
|RAM: Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3
|SSDs: Seagate 600 240GB; Crucial M4 128GB
|HDDs: Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Seagate Barracuda 500GB
|PS: OCZ ZX Series 1250watt
|Case: Antec 1200 V3
|Monitors: Asus 3D VG278HE; Asus 3D VG236H; Samsung 3D 51" Plasma;
|GPU:MSI 1080GTX "Duke"
|OS: Windows 10 Pro X64

Posted 04/04/2012 09:35 PM   
Hi guys. Please help me. I'm thinking to buy nvidia 3D vision (ASUS VG278H LCD 1920x1080 with 3D classes). My comp. specifications is Corei7 420@3,8GHz, 6GB DDR3, GTX590, GTX560 for PhysX (296.10 WHQL drivers) and 1920x1200 LCD. I read, that 3D in this game is awesome, amazing. BUT I am afraid about low framerates :( Now, Batman AC goes hardly 60 FPS. There is still little stuttering problem with DX11 enabled (last patch doesn't fix DX11 stuttering). I playing it anyway, love DX11 effects, I have hardly 45 - 50 FPS in some graphic difficult scenes (DX 11-tes. normal, physX-high, everything on max)

When I buy and enable 3D, there goes performance down to half, for my case, it will be 30-35 FPS. And for me, this framerate is unplayable for any game. I must have 60 FPS. minimal 50 FPS.
Will I be able to play Batman with smooth framerates with these settings with 3D vision and with my cpu spec.?

Thanks for your answers.
BR
Hi guys. Please help me. I'm thinking to buy nvidia 3D vision (ASUS VG278H LCD 1920x1080 with 3D classes). My comp. specifications is Corei7 420@3,8GHz, 6GB DDR3, GTX590, GTX560 for PhysX (296.10 WHQL drivers) and 1920x1200 LCD. I read, that 3D in this game is awesome, amazing. BUT I am afraid about low framerates :( Now, Batman AC goes hardly 60 FPS. There is still little stuttering problem with DX11 enabled (last patch doesn't fix DX11 stuttering). I playing it anyway, love DX11 effects, I have hardly 45 - 50 FPS in some graphic difficult scenes (DX 11-tes. normal, physX-high, everything on max)



When I buy and enable 3D, there goes performance down to half, for my case, it will be 30-35 FPS. And for me, this framerate is unplayable for any game. I must have 60 FPS. minimal 50 FPS.

Will I be able to play Batman with smooth framerates with these settings with 3D vision and with my cpu spec.?



Thanks for your answers.

BR

Posted 04/10/2012 10:56 AM   
[quote name='Tomas.Jarri' date='10 April 2012 - 04:56 AM' timestamp='1334055414' post='1394187']
Hi guys. Please help me. I'm thinking to buy nvidia 3D vision (ASUS VG278H LCD 1920x1080 with 3D classes). My comp. specifications is Corei7 420@3,8GHz, 6GB DDR3, GTX590, GTX560 for PhysX (296.10 WHQL drivers) and 1920x1200 LCD. I read, that 3D in this game is awesome, amazing. BUT I am afraid about low framerates :( Now, Batman AC goes hardly 60 FPS. There is still little stuttering problem with DX11 enabled (last patch doesn't fix DX11 stuttering). I playing it anyway, love DX11 effects, I have hardly 45 - 50 FPS in some graphic difficult scenes (DX 11-tes. normal, physX-high, everything on max)

When I buy and enable 3D, there goes performance down to half, for my case, it will be 30-35 FPS. And for me, this framerate is unplayable for any game. I must have 60 FPS. minimal 50 FPS.
Will I be able to play Batman with smooth framerates with these settings with 3D vision and with my cpu spec.?

Thanks for your answers.
BR
[/quote]

If I understand correctly, you already have the game and are getting as low as 45-50 FPS at times without 3D. So I think you've answered your own question - no, you won't be able to get 60 FPS, or even 50 FPS constant.

I am playing with the exact specs you described - DX11, Tessellation normal, PhysX high and all else on maximum. Please reference my PC specs below. My in-game benchmark is: [b]60FPS Max. 11FPS Min. 43FPS average.[/b] The game is very playable, as the extreme drop in FPS only happens in certain areas, usually in tight narrow alleyways (I have no idea why there).

I would suspect you would get very similar results.

Keep in mind though that the graphics stuttering/framerate issues are only in DX11 mode. If you switch to DX9 mode it all goes away, and you can have all the FPS you want. I personally enjoy the slightly enhanced graphics over extremely smooth FPS, so I live with the DX11 performance issues. But I promise you that playing in 3D in DX9 mode is a bazillion times better than no 3D in DX11! So don't hold back, it'll be the greatest gaming purchase you've ever made.
[quote name='Tomas.Jarri' date='10 April 2012 - 04:56 AM' timestamp='1334055414' post='1394187']

Hi guys. Please help me. I'm thinking to buy nvidia 3D vision (ASUS VG278H LCD 1920x1080 with 3D classes). My comp. specifications is Corei7 420@3,8GHz, 6GB DDR3, GTX590, GTX560 for PhysX (296.10 WHQL drivers) and 1920x1200 LCD. I read, that 3D in this game is awesome, amazing. BUT I am afraid about low framerates :( Now, Batman AC goes hardly 60 FPS. There is still little stuttering problem with DX11 enabled (last patch doesn't fix DX11 stuttering). I playing it anyway, love DX11 effects, I have hardly 45 - 50 FPS in some graphic difficult scenes (DX 11-tes. normal, physX-high, everything on max)



When I buy and enable 3D, there goes performance down to half, for my case, it will be 30-35 FPS. And for me, this framerate is unplayable for any game. I must have 60 FPS. minimal 50 FPS.

Will I be able to play Batman with smooth framerates with these settings with 3D vision and with my cpu spec.?



Thanks for your answers.

BR





If I understand correctly, you already have the game and are getting as low as 45-50 FPS at times without 3D. So I think you've answered your own question - no, you won't be able to get 60 FPS, or even 50 FPS constant.



I am playing with the exact specs you described - DX11, Tessellation normal, PhysX high and all else on maximum. Please reference my PC specs below. My in-game benchmark is: 60FPS Max. 11FPS Min. 43FPS average. The game is very playable, as the extreme drop in FPS only happens in certain areas, usually in tight narrow alleyways (I have no idea why there).



I would suspect you would get very similar results.



Keep in mind though that the graphics stuttering/framerate issues are only in DX11 mode. If you switch to DX9 mode it all goes away, and you can have all the FPS you want. I personally enjoy the slightly enhanced graphics over extremely smooth FPS, so I live with the DX11 performance issues. But I promise you that playing in 3D in DX9 mode is a bazillion times better than no 3D in DX11! So don't hold back, it'll be the greatest gaming purchase you've ever made.

|CPU: i7-2700k @ 4.5Ghz
|Cooler: Zalman 9900 Max
|MB: MSI Military Class II Z68 GD-80
|RAM: Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3
|SSDs: Seagate 600 240GB; Crucial M4 128GB
|HDDs: Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Seagate Barracuda 500GB
|PS: OCZ ZX Series 1250watt
|Case: Antec 1200 V3
|Monitors: Asus 3D VG278HE; Asus 3D VG236H; Samsung 3D 51" Plasma;
|GPU:MSI 1080GTX "Duke"
|OS: Windows 10 Pro X64

Posted 04/10/2012 12:41 PM   
[quote name='SnickerSnack' date='10 April 2012 - 01:41 PM' timestamp='1334061677' post='1394237']
If I understand correctly, you already have the game and are getting as low as 45-50 FPS at times without 3D. So I think you've answered your own question - no, you won't be able to get 60 FPS, or even 50 FPS constant.

I am playing with the exact specs you described - DX11, Tessellation normal, PhysX high and all else on maximum. Please reference my PC specs below. My in-game benchmark is: [b]60FPS Max. 11FPS Min. 43FPS average.[/b] The game is very playable, as the extreme drop in FPS only happens in certain areas, usually in tight narrow alleyways (I have no idea why there).

I would suspect you would get very similar results.

Keep in mind though that the graphics stuttering/framerate issues are only in DX11 mode. If you switch to DX9 mode it all goes away, and you can have all the FPS you want. I personally enjoy the slightly enhanced graphics over extremely smooth FPS, so I live with the DX11 performance issues. But I promise you that playing in 3D in DX9 mode is a bazillion times better than no 3D in DX11! So don't hold back, it'll be the greatest gaming purchase you've ever made.
[/quote]

Thanks for your answer.
You are playing with 3D and with DX11, and what FPS do you have outside??? when youre flying example around the church? Is it smooth? When I will buy this monitor with 3D, it will be + for me because of lower resolution. Now, I have 1920x1200, the new one have 1920x1080. For physX I have 560, I install new beta drivers today (301.24), GTX590 must be enough for 3D in 1920x1080 and with DX11-normal tess!what do you think?

And is it possible to switch 120hz monitor to 60Hz in 2D? Example on this monitor, ASUS VG278H
http://www.asus.com/Display/LCD_Monitors/VG278H/

thanks!
[quote name='SnickerSnack' date='10 April 2012 - 01:41 PM' timestamp='1334061677' post='1394237']

If I understand correctly, you already have the game and are getting as low as 45-50 FPS at times without 3D. So I think you've answered your own question - no, you won't be able to get 60 FPS, or even 50 FPS constant.



I am playing with the exact specs you described - DX11, Tessellation normal, PhysX high and all else on maximum. Please reference my PC specs below. My in-game benchmark is: 60FPS Max. 11FPS Min. 43FPS average. The game is very playable, as the extreme drop in FPS only happens in certain areas, usually in tight narrow alleyways (I have no idea why there).



I would suspect you would get very similar results.



Keep in mind though that the graphics stuttering/framerate issues are only in DX11 mode. If you switch to DX9 mode it all goes away, and you can have all the FPS you want. I personally enjoy the slightly enhanced graphics over extremely smooth FPS, so I live with the DX11 performance issues. But I promise you that playing in 3D in DX9 mode is a bazillion times better than no 3D in DX11! So don't hold back, it'll be the greatest gaming purchase you've ever made.





Thanks for your answer.

You are playing with 3D and with DX11, and what FPS do you have outside??? when youre flying example around the church? Is it smooth? When I will buy this monitor with 3D, it will be + for me because of lower resolution. Now, I have 1920x1200, the new one have 1920x1080. For physX I have 560, I install new beta drivers today (301.24), GTX590 must be enough for 3D in 1920x1080 and with DX11-normal tess!what do you think?



And is it possible to switch 120hz monitor to 60Hz in 2D? Example on this monitor, ASUS VG278H

http://www.asus.com/Display/LCD_Monitors/VG278H/



thanks!

Posted 04/10/2012 09:32 PM   
[quote name='Tomas.Jarri' date='10 April 2012 - 03:32 PM' timestamp='1334093522' post='1394486']
Thanks for your answer.
You are playing with 3D and with DX11, and what FPS do you have outside??? when youre flying example around the church? Is it smooth? When I will buy this monitor with 3D, it will be + for me because of lower resolution. Now, I have 1920x1200, the new one have 1920x1080. For physX I have 560, I install new beta drivers today (301.24), GTX590 must be enough for 3D in 1920x1080 and with DX11-normal tess!what do you think?
thanks!
[/quote]

Yes, flying around the church is smooth. Inside the church not so much. Probably in the 20s inside the church. Also at the very back of the church is an alleyway between the church and the wall with some riddler trophies in it - very poor fps there for some reason. But flying around the city and most indoor locations are around 40-50 fps for me.

You will benefit from the lower resolution of the new monitor, but you won't be able to tell really because that additional power will be needed to render the stereo 3D. Your 560 card is already overkill for PhsyX, so that won't affect the 3D performance any. The 590 should handle the game every bit as well as my 580, but you could probably benefit from more RAM. Do you really have 6gb RAM? Or was that supposed to be 16gb? 6 is an odd number for RAM capacity.
[quote name='Tomas.Jarri' date='10 April 2012 - 03:32 PM' timestamp='1334093522' post='1394486']

Thanks for your answer.

You are playing with 3D and with DX11, and what FPS do you have outside??? when youre flying example around the church? Is it smooth? When I will buy this monitor with 3D, it will be + for me because of lower resolution. Now, I have 1920x1200, the new one have 1920x1080. For physX I have 560, I install new beta drivers today (301.24), GTX590 must be enough for 3D in 1920x1080 and with DX11-normal tess!what do you think?

thanks!





Yes, flying around the church is smooth. Inside the church not so much. Probably in the 20s inside the church. Also at the very back of the church is an alleyway between the church and the wall with some riddler trophies in it - very poor fps there for some reason. But flying around the city and most indoor locations are around 40-50 fps for me.



You will benefit from the lower resolution of the new monitor, but you won't be able to tell really because that additional power will be needed to render the stereo 3D. Your 560 card is already overkill for PhsyX, so that won't affect the 3D performance any. The 590 should handle the game every bit as well as my 580, but you could probably benefit from more RAM. Do you really have 6gb RAM? Or was that supposed to be 16gb? 6 is an odd number for RAM capacity.

|CPU: i7-2700k @ 4.5Ghz
|Cooler: Zalman 9900 Max
|MB: MSI Military Class II Z68 GD-80
|RAM: Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3
|SSDs: Seagate 600 240GB; Crucial M4 128GB
|HDDs: Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Seagate Barracuda 500GB
|PS: OCZ ZX Series 1250watt
|Case: Antec 1200 V3
|Monitors: Asus 3D VG278HE; Asus 3D VG236H; Samsung 3D 51" Plasma;
|GPU:MSI 1080GTX "Duke"
|OS: Windows 10 Pro X64

Posted 04/10/2012 10:20 PM   
[quote name='SnickerSnack' date='10 April 2012 - 11:20 PM' timestamp='1334096441' post='1394515']
Yes, flying around the church is smooth. Inside the church not so much. Probably in the 20s inside the church. Also at the very back of the church is an alleyway between the church and the wall with some riddler trophies in it - very poor fps there for some reason. But flying around the city and most indoor locations are around 40-50 fps for me.

You will benefit from the lower resolution of the new monitor, but you won't be able to tell really because that additional power will be needed to render the stereo 3D. Your 560 card is already overkill for PhsyX, so that won't affect the 3D performance any. The 590 should handle the game every bit as well as my 580, but you could probably benefit from more RAM. Do you really have 6gb RAM? Or was that supposed to be 16gb? 6 is an odd number for RAM capacity.
[/quote]

Yes, I have 6GB Ram. I have tripple channel. MB Asus P6T Deluxe. This 6GB is enough.

Yes, I know what alleway do you mean. There is a riddler trophy for catwoman, too :) I dont have troping fps in this location.

You have with your 580 GTX 3GB 40-50 FPS in DX11-normal, FXAA-high and with PhysX-high in 3D?
I caant decide to buy 3D vision. Its really performance killer. When will I have 2x 590 in SLI, I will buy it, but I dont have money right now and I dont want to play with 40 fps. Its not smooth for me. I have hardly 60fps in 2D mode (DX11-normal, FXAA-high and with PhysX-high[with GTX560])

Can I come to you and see how it works? :) joking.
[quote name='SnickerSnack' date='10 April 2012 - 11:20 PM' timestamp='1334096441' post='1394515']

Yes, flying around the church is smooth. Inside the church not so much. Probably in the 20s inside the church. Also at the very back of the church is an alleyway between the church and the wall with some riddler trophies in it - very poor fps there for some reason. But flying around the city and most indoor locations are around 40-50 fps for me.



You will benefit from the lower resolution of the new monitor, but you won't be able to tell really because that additional power will be needed to render the stereo 3D. Your 560 card is already overkill for PhsyX, so that won't affect the 3D performance any. The 590 should handle the game every bit as well as my 580, but you could probably benefit from more RAM. Do you really have 6gb RAM? Or was that supposed to be 16gb? 6 is an odd number for RAM capacity.





Yes, I have 6GB Ram. I have tripple channel. MB Asus P6T Deluxe. This 6GB is enough.



Yes, I know what alleway do you mean. There is a riddler trophy for catwoman, too :) I dont have troping fps in this location.



You have with your 580 GTX 3GB 40-50 FPS in DX11-normal, FXAA-high and with PhysX-high in 3D?

I caant decide to buy 3D vision. Its really performance killer. When will I have 2x 590 in SLI, I will buy it, but I dont have money right now and I dont want to play with 40 fps. Its not smooth for me. I have hardly 60fps in 2D mode (DX11-normal, FXAA-high and with PhysX-high[with GTX560])



Can I come to you and see how it works? :) joking.

Posted 04/12/2012 08:42 AM   
[quote name='Tomas.Jarri' date='12 April 2012 - 02:42 AM' timestamp='1334220166' post='1395218']
Yes, I have 6GB Ram. I have tripple channel. MB Asus P6T Deluxe. This 6GB is enough.

Yes, I know what alleway do you mean. There is a riddler trophy for catwoman, too :) I dont have troping fps in this location.

You have with your 580 GTX 3GB 40-50 FPS in DX11-normal, FXAA-high and with PhysX-high in 3D?
I caant decide to buy 3D vision. Its really performance killer. When will I have 2x 590 in SLI, I will buy it, but I dont have money right now and I dont want to play with 40 fps. Its not smooth for me. I have hardly 60fps in 2D mode (DX11-normal, FXAA-high and with PhysX-high[with GTX560])

Can I come to you and see how it works? :) joking.
[/quote]

Well to each his own, but as I said before, you are really missing out on a fantastic experience. Remember that you can have 60 fps constant if you just switch to DX9 mode. The fps issues you are afraid of is only in DX11. The game still looks incredible in DX9. I don't think two 590s are going to help much anyway - it seems that the problem may simply be poor coding with DX11. You said yourself you have fps issues even in 2D. That shouldn't be the case with a system like yours. It must be a problem in the game engine itself.

When you do decide to buy 3D Vision and see how awesome it is you will wonder what you ever did without it!
[quote name='Tomas.Jarri' date='12 April 2012 - 02:42 AM' timestamp='1334220166' post='1395218']

Yes, I have 6GB Ram. I have tripple channel. MB Asus P6T Deluxe. This 6GB is enough.



Yes, I know what alleway do you mean. There is a riddler trophy for catwoman, too :) I dont have troping fps in this location.



You have with your 580 GTX 3GB 40-50 FPS in DX11-normal, FXAA-high and with PhysX-high in 3D?

I caant decide to buy 3D vision. Its really performance killer. When will I have 2x 590 in SLI, I will buy it, but I dont have money right now and I dont want to play with 40 fps. Its not smooth for me. I have hardly 60fps in 2D mode (DX11-normal, FXAA-high and with PhysX-high[with GTX560])



Can I come to you and see how it works? :) joking.





Well to each his own, but as I said before, you are really missing out on a fantastic experience. Remember that you can have 60 fps constant if you just switch to DX9 mode. The fps issues you are afraid of is only in DX11. The game still looks incredible in DX9. I don't think two 590s are going to help much anyway - it seems that the problem may simply be poor coding with DX11. You said yourself you have fps issues even in 2D. That shouldn't be the case with a system like yours. It must be a problem in the game engine itself.



When you do decide to buy 3D Vision and see how awesome it is you will wonder what you ever did without it!

|CPU: i7-2700k @ 4.5Ghz
|Cooler: Zalman 9900 Max
|MB: MSI Military Class II Z68 GD-80
|RAM: Corsair Vengence 16GB DDR3
|SSDs: Seagate 600 240GB; Crucial M4 128GB
|HDDs: Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Seagate Barracuda 500GB
|PS: OCZ ZX Series 1250watt
|Case: Antec 1200 V3
|Monitors: Asus 3D VG278HE; Asus 3D VG236H; Samsung 3D 51" Plasma;
|GPU:MSI 1080GTX "Duke"
|OS: Windows 10 Pro X64

Posted 04/12/2012 12:25 PM   
[quote name='SnickerSnack' date='12 April 2012 - 01:25 PM' timestamp='1334233545' post='1395287']
Well to each his own, but as I said before, you are really missing out on a fantastic experience. Remember that you can have 60 fps constant if you just switch to DX9 mode. The fps issues you are afraid of is only in DX11. The game still looks incredible in DX9. I don't think two 590s are going to help much anyway - it seems that the problem may simply be poor coding with DX11. You said yourself you have fps issues even in 2D. That shouldn't be the case with a system like yours. It must be a problem in the game engine itself.

When you do decide to buy 3D Vision and see how awesome it is you will wonder what you ever did without it!
[/quote]

Thanks for you replays, I appreciate it. Sure, you're right. Everybody say that is incredible with 3D, and yes, Batmas AC still looks perfect in DX9. Even Batman AA looks perfect in 3D, I heard. I'm sure that in DX9+3D would Batman AC goes 60 fps constant, just like Batman AA, because its good optimized in DX9, but there is another question for me :)

When you're answering me that good, I have one question. I choose to buy ASUS VG278H. It has lightboost,...
http://www.asus.com/Display/LCD_Monitors/VG278H/
This monitor has the best 3D performance, but primary, I want to use this monitor in 2D, of course. I red, that this monitor has no good performance in 2D.
And it's 27", what is good, but with 1920x1080. It has Pixel Pitch 0.311mm and I am playing meter a front of monitor. It means, that I have to use AA in every game, and AA it's killer performance, too (+3D). Must turn it off in Battlefield 3, I red. And I red, that this big pixels are seeing when watching on the monitor from short distance. what do you think? :D

How does it looks in 3D? example Crysis 2, or Battlefield 3 and maybe another games youre playing? What is the performance in 3D? I have to decide to spend 555 Euros for this LCD + classes. I am going to thinking of it :) Shame, that I cant see it somewhere.

And second question. If I have 120hz monitor, it means, for vsync, that I must have 120fps??? Or it is possible to swith to 60hz mode?
How do games go on 120hz LCD when go 60fps?
Thanks :D






Thanks maan.
[quote name='SnickerSnack' date='12 April 2012 - 01:25 PM' timestamp='1334233545' post='1395287']

Well to each his own, but as I said before, you are really missing out on a fantastic experience. Remember that you can have 60 fps constant if you just switch to DX9 mode. The fps issues you are afraid of is only in DX11. The game still looks incredible in DX9. I don't think two 590s are going to help much anyway - it seems that the problem may simply be poor coding with DX11. You said yourself you have fps issues even in 2D. That shouldn't be the case with a system like yours. It must be a problem in the game engine itself.



When you do decide to buy 3D Vision and see how awesome it is you will wonder what you ever did without it!





Thanks for you replays, I appreciate it. Sure, you're right. Everybody say that is incredible with 3D, and yes, Batmas AC still looks perfect in DX9. Even Batman AA looks perfect in 3D, I heard. I'm sure that in DX9+3D would Batman AC goes 60 fps constant, just like Batman AA, because its good optimized in DX9, but there is another question for me :)



When you're answering me that good, I have one question. I choose to buy ASUS VG278H. It has lightboost,...

http://www.asus.com/Display/LCD_Monitors/VG278H/

This monitor has the best 3D performance, but primary, I want to use this monitor in 2D, of course. I red, that this monitor has no good performance in 2D.

And it's 27", what is good, but with 1920x1080. It has Pixel Pitch 0.311mm and I am playing meter a front of monitor. It means, that I have to use AA in every game, and AA it's killer performance, too (+3D). Must turn it off in Battlefield 3, I red. And I red, that this big pixels are seeing when watching on the monitor from short distance. what do you think? :D



How does it looks in 3D? example Crysis 2, or Battlefield 3 and maybe another games youre playing? What is the performance in 3D? I have to decide to spend 555 Euros for this LCD + classes. I am going to thinking of it :) Shame, that I cant see it somewhere.



And second question. If I have 120hz monitor, it means, for vsync, that I must have 120fps??? Or it is possible to swith to 60hz mode?

How do games go on 120hz LCD when go 60fps?

Thanks :D













Thanks maan.

Posted 04/12/2012 02:11 PM   
Tomas Jarri, it really is up to one's preference how much AA a game needs, but I've found out that when gaming in 3D, you really don't need to use as high amounts of AA as one would need in plain 2D mode. Somehow the 3D seems to smooth out and hide the jaggy edges in many games. Also you can switch to 60hz mode in the control panel no problem, but vsync is automatically enabled and always on when in 120hz mode. But really, unless you're really anal about the amount of AA and Pixel Pithes and whatnot, you're going to love the monitor, especially in 3D. But to each their own I guess...
Tomas Jarri, it really is up to one's preference how much AA a game needs, but I've found out that when gaming in 3D, you really don't need to use as high amounts of AA as one would need in plain 2D mode. Somehow the 3D seems to smooth out and hide the jaggy edges in many games. Also you can switch to 60hz mode in the control panel no problem, but vsync is automatically enabled and always on when in 120hz mode. But really, unless you're really anal about the amount of AA and Pixel Pithes and whatnot, you're going to love the monitor, especially in 3D. But to each their own I guess...

Intel i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
Asus P8P67 PRO
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 8GB
nVidia GTX 660 SLI + nVidia 3D Vision
Asus Xonar Essence ST with AKG K601/Sennheiser HD 595
Corsair Force GT 120GB SSD + 5TB HDD Storage
Corsair AX 850 PSU
Coolermaster HAF 932 Case


HELIX MOD - A must for any 3D Vision gamer

Posted 04/13/2012 08:31 AM   
  14 / 15    
Scroll To Top