Crysis2 with Dx11 upgrade with textures. LOOKS AWSOME SO FAR
I read these forums quite often, but I mostly always see compaints. I've been an HDMI 1.4 user since May 6 2010 prior to the release of 3DTV play ( Emailed Andrew about this). Its good that Nvidia opted to not support an industry which was willing to give us a new crapty input port for gaming such as HDMI 1.4a. (reference my handle)

http://www.s3dga.com/ GET INVOLVED IN THIS GROUP TO PROMOTE 1080p/60 300MHZ recieve/transmit HDMI ports.

But, www.s3dga.com was still providing us with inferior HDMI assets for gaming even though DUAL LINK DVI has been around for a while, and Dual Link DVI does not require a royaly fee for its incorporation. Now that we are all stuck with this inferior input port thanks to Silicon Image and HDMI on 3DTV, its nice to know NVIDIA still Pushes the limits of OUR 120hz monitors and GFX cards. WHERE DO WE GAMERS POST SO THAT HDMI KNOWS WE THINK THERE PRODECT IS CRAP? Andrew, got info?

I'm an early adopter of most things so you dont have to suffer.(but i failed to post about this issue earlier due to lack of knowledge) I just did not post enough info for you all to see the limitations of HDMI 1.4. But there was many in the community that pointed out its limitations since march 2010. Im glad Roller11 and others took the time to address the issues. I'm also happy to see Andrew Fear address the issues at hand on a DAILY basis;slthough, Andrew/Nvidia dont really have control over HDMI spec. For all that think otherwise, 1080p checkered board is inferior to 720p frame packing, try it. Checkerboard is very low res compared to 3dTV play 720P 3D. Stating otherwise, is your flawed EYE.


[b]Crysis2 with Dx11 upgrade with textures:

Why is it rated FAIR. IT looks Great in 275.50. I do not see any issues in the four levels I played. IT appears better then that crappy Transformers 3: Dark side of the moon, which had some graphical issues related to 3d conversion. I played the same four levels in the normal game and waited for dx11, but I can not tell whats better or worst except for the textures which are awsome now compared to the last time I played it.

If my senteces/words do not make sence or have errors.. im a wittle drunk now.... and felt I need to make a statement on the fact Crysis 2 plays better then before...... But I just finished reading 17 pages of the forums for over 15 hours and wanted to roll my comments all into one post. The most complelling statements were made from users who want a 3dtv to be equal to quality as am acer HN274H monitor. I agree, but I have the following three solutions which are not equal: Acer HN274H, TC-50VT25, and Samgsung LED DLP with sync port.
I'd like to see IPS pannels with .21 or less dot pitch with 120 hz 3d in 50 inch screens.

[/b]
I read these forums quite often, but I mostly always see compaints. I've been an HDMI 1.4 user since May 6 2010 prior to the release of 3DTV play ( Emailed Andrew about this). Its good that Nvidia opted to not support an industry which was willing to give us a new crapty input port for gaming such as HDMI 1.4a. (reference my handle)



http://www.s3dga.com/
GET INVOLVED IN THIS GROUP TO PROMOTE 1080p/60 300MHZ recieve/transmit HDMI ports.



But, www.s3dga.com was still providing us with inferior HDMI assets for gaming even though DUAL LINK DVI has been around for a while, and Dual Link DVI does not require a royaly fee for its incorporation. Now that we are all stuck with this inferior input port thanks to Silicon Image and HDMI on 3DTV, its nice to know NVIDIA still Pushes the limits of OUR 120hz monitors and GFX cards. WHERE DO WE GAMERS POST SO THAT HDMI KNOWS WE THINK THERE PRODECT IS CRAP? Andrew, got info?



I'm an early adopter of most things so you dont have to suffer.(but i failed to post about this issue earlier due to lack of knowledge) I just did not post enough info for you all to see the limitations of HDMI 1.4. But there was many in the community that pointed out its limitations since march 2010. Im glad Roller11 and others took the time to address the issues. I'm also happy to see Andrew Fear address the issues at hand on a DAILY basis;slthough, Andrew/Nvidia dont really have control over HDMI spec. For all that think otherwise, 1080p checkered board is inferior to 720p frame packing, try it. Checkerboard is very low res compared to 3dTV play 720P 3D. Stating otherwise, is your flawed EYE.





Crysis2 with Dx11 upgrade with textures:



Why is it rated FAIR. IT looks Great in 275.50. I do not see any issues in the four levels I played. IT appears better then that crappy Transformers 3: Dark side of the moon, which had some graphical issues related to 3d conversion. I played the same four levels in the normal game and waited for dx11, but I can not tell whats better or worst except for the textures which are awsome now compared to the last time I played it.



If my senteces/words do not make sence or have errors.. im a wittle drunk now.... and felt I need to make a statement on the fact Crysis 2 plays better then before...... But I just finished reading 17 pages of the forums for over 15 hours and wanted to roll my comments all into one post. The most complelling statements were made from users who want a 3dtv to be equal to quality as am acer HN274H monitor. I agree, but I have the following three solutions which are not equal: Acer HN274H, TC-50VT25, and Samgsung LED DLP with sync port.

I'd like to see IPS pannels with .21 or less dot pitch with 120 hz 3d in 50 inch screens.



#1
Posted 07/03/2011 10:34 AM   
The main reasons, halo around gun and some objects when played with more then 0% depth. Also some object render at the incorrect level. I think it is okay, but not nearly as good as it should have been.
The main reasons, halo around gun and some objects when played with more then 0% depth. Also some object render at the incorrect level. I think it is okay, but not nearly as good as it should have been.
#2
Posted 07/03/2011 12:03 PM   
Scroll To Top