Battlefield 3 3DVision Benchmarks
  40 / 43    
Okay GordyMeow, there's no need to be so condescending to him [url="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/condescending?q=condescending"]Link to Dictionary[/url].
@conan48, I have found the fix after looking at the "log.log" file it showed "syntax error, unexpected *" I thought it was strange so looked at the copy & pasted info I put in the "injFX_Settings.h" file. Looking back on the forum on page 29 I found that Darkeyc has edited his post and missed off a simple "/" at the beginning of his line that says "below here". Therefore it should read;
below here
/*------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------
FILTER SELECTION
------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------*/
// Comment to deactivate an effect. Blah Blah Blah

That will get it working again conan48 and anyone else that was having a problem.
Okay GordyMeow, there's no need to be so condescending to him Link to Dictionary.

@conan48, I have found the fix after looking at the "log.log" file it showed "syntax error, unexpected *" I thought it was strange so looked at the copy & pasted info I put in the "injFX_Settings.h" file. Looking back on the forum on page 29 I found that Darkeyc has edited his post and missed off a simple "/" at the beginning of his line that says "below here". Therefore it should read;

below here

/*------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------

FILTER SELECTION

------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------*/

// Comment to deactivate an effect. Blah Blah Blah



That will get it working again conan48 and anyone else that was having a problem.

Posted 03/14/2012 10:47 PM   
I'm running the FXAA plugin at last and there is more colour and vibrance with it but I've just noticed it is only coming out in the left eye. The right eye stays at the normal colours. Anyone else seeing this?
I'm running the FXAA plugin at last and there is more colour and vibrance with it but I've just noticed it is only coming out in the left eye. The right eye stays at the normal colours. Anyone else seeing this?

Posted 03/18/2012 07:39 PM   
Ahhh this 40 fps lock is killing me

Any word on when will this be fixed?
Ahhh this 40 fps lock is killing me



Any word on when will this be fixed?

Posted 03/23/2012 12:00 AM   
Has anyone tested GTX 680's and 3D Vision for Battlefield 3? Will the 680's pull 60 FPS? My two GTX 580's only get 40FPS...
Has anyone tested GTX 680's and 3D Vision for Battlefield 3? Will the 680's pull 60 FPS? My two GTX 580's only get 40FPS...

Posted 03/28/2012 03:22 AM   
[quote name='Jewie27' date='27 March 2012 - 11:22 PM' timestamp='1332904932' post='1388844']
Has anyone tested GTX 680's and 3D Vision for Battlefield 3? Will the 680's pull 60 FPS? My two GTX 580's only get 40FPS...
[/quote]

No, NOTHING will get more than 40fps in this game. It is a limitation of the game engine.
[quote name='Jewie27' date='27 March 2012 - 11:22 PM' timestamp='1332904932' post='1388844']

Has anyone tested GTX 680's and 3D Vision for Battlefield 3? Will the 680's pull 60 FPS? My two GTX 580's only get 40FPS...





No, NOTHING will get more than 40fps in this game. It is a limitation of the game engine.

i7-6700k @ 4.5GHz, 2x 970 GTX SLI, 16GB DDR4 @ 3000mhz, MSI Gaming M7, Samsung 950 Pro m.2 SSD 512GB, 2x 1TB RAID 1, 850w EVGA, Corsair RGB 90 keyboard

Posted 03/28/2012 03:18 PM   
[quote name='Cheezeman' date='28 March 2012 - 03:18 PM' timestamp='1332947926' post='1389071']
No, NOTHING will get more than 40fps in this game. It is a limitation of the game engine.
[/quote]
I really don't believe that it's a limitation. How is it that it's possible to see 60fps in areas not too cluttered with debris? There must be a graphical setting that can be adjusted to gain more fps in busy areas. I'm (slowly) in the process of testing the game with different settings adjusted in Nvidia inspector to see if I can find that one little anomoly. I will keep you posted. (or not!)
[quote name='Cheezeman' date='28 March 2012 - 03:18 PM' timestamp='1332947926' post='1389071']

No, NOTHING will get more than 40fps in this game. It is a limitation of the game engine.



I really don't believe that it's a limitation. How is it that it's possible to see 60fps in areas not too cluttered with debris? There must be a graphical setting that can be adjusted to gain more fps in busy areas. I'm (slowly) in the process of testing the game with different settings adjusted in Nvidia inspector to see if I can find that one little anomoly. I will keep you posted. (or not!)

Posted 03/28/2012 10:07 PM   
I wonder if it's a Vram limitation. I run 1.5GB GTX 580's and it seems to use over 1400MB of vram on Ultra. Would 2GB or 4GB cards solve the issue? I hope DICE patches the game and fixes 3D performance.
I wonder if it's a Vram limitation. I run 1.5GB GTX 580's and it seems to use over 1400MB of vram on Ultra. Would 2GB or 4GB cards solve the issue? I hope DICE patches the game and fixes 3D performance.

Posted 03/29/2012 01:03 AM   
[quote name='Richie72' date='28 March 2012 - 06:07 PM' timestamp='1332972475' post='1389258']
I really don't believe that it's a limitation. How is it that it's possible to see 60fps in areas not too cluttered with debris? There must be a graphical setting that can be adjusted to gain more fps in busy areas. I'm (slowly) in the process of testing the game with different settings adjusted in Nvidia inspector to see if I can find that one little anomoly. I will keep you posted. (or not!)
[/quote]

Go back and look at my earlier posts in this thread - the game is not limited by CPU speed, GPU speed (either core or memory), RAM speed, and the scene easily fit within VRAM. It is absolutely a limitation of the game in areas with large view distances. There is even a guy with a 590GTX who sets everything to LOW settings and still gets capped at 40fps in these areas. In 2D is it exactly 80FPS in these areas (i.e. exactly double 40fps). I wish you luck but I don't have high hopes.
[quote name='Richie72' date='28 March 2012 - 06:07 PM' timestamp='1332972475' post='1389258']

I really don't believe that it's a limitation. How is it that it's possible to see 60fps in areas not too cluttered with debris? There must be a graphical setting that can be adjusted to gain more fps in busy areas. I'm (slowly) in the process of testing the game with different settings adjusted in Nvidia inspector to see if I can find that one little anomoly. I will keep you posted. (or not!)





Go back and look at my earlier posts in this thread - the game is not limited by CPU speed, GPU speed (either core or memory), RAM speed, and the scene easily fit within VRAM. It is absolutely a limitation of the game in areas with large view distances. There is even a guy with a 590GTX who sets everything to LOW settings and still gets capped at 40fps in these areas. In 2D is it exactly 80FPS in these areas (i.e. exactly double 40fps). I wish you luck but I don't have high hopes.

i7-6700k @ 4.5GHz, 2x 970 GTX SLI, 16GB DDR4 @ 3000mhz, MSI Gaming M7, Samsung 950 Pro m.2 SSD 512GB, 2x 1TB RAID 1, 850w EVGA, Corsair RGB 90 keyboard

Posted 03/29/2012 03:16 PM   
is there any news about getting the game to work in 3D mode ?
is there any news about getting the game to work in 3D mode ?




  • OS : Windows 7 64-bit
  • CPU : PhenomII X4 955 3.2 GHZ
  • MOBO : MSI 770-C45
  • RAM : 2*2GB DDR3-1333
  • V.G.A : GTX 570 TWIN FROZR II
  • MONITOR : ACER HN274H 3DVISION READY LED MONITOR
  • STORAGE : SSD 64GB + WD 1TB BLACK + WD500
  • POWER SUPPLY : Antec EarthWatts 650w
  • CHASSIS : COOLERMASTER CM690
  • SOUND CARD : Asus Xonar DX
  • SPEAKER SYSTEM : CREATIVE T6200

Posted 03/30/2012 11:37 AM   
[quote name='Sheruf' date='30 March 2012 - 11:37 AM' timestamp='1333107459' post='1389879']
is there any news about getting the game to work in 3D mode ?
[/quote]
Read the last few pages, it'll tell you all in that! It works very well in 3D visually.
[quote name='Sheruf' date='30 March 2012 - 11:37 AM' timestamp='1333107459' post='1389879']

is there any news about getting the game to work in 3D mode ?



Read the last few pages, it'll tell you all in that! It works very well in 3D visually.

Posted 03/30/2012 11:55 AM   
[quote name='Cheezeman' date='29 March 2012 - 06:16 PM' timestamp='1333034165' post='1389546']
Go back and look at my earlier posts in this thread - the game is not limited by CPU speed, GPU speed (either core or memory), RAM speed, and the scene easily fit within VRAM. It is absolutely a limitation of the game in areas with large view distances. There is even a guy with a 590GTX who sets everything to LOW settings and still gets capped at 40fps in these areas. In 2D is it exactly 80FPS in these areas (i.e. exactly double 40fps). I wish you luck but I don't have high hopes.
[/quote]

That would be me

I have a 590

everything set at LOW, i am limited to 40 fps.

I can not believe this game is rated 3Dvision ready.

Terrible.
[quote name='Cheezeman' date='29 March 2012 - 06:16 PM' timestamp='1333034165' post='1389546']

Go back and look at my earlier posts in this thread - the game is not limited by CPU speed, GPU speed (either core or memory), RAM speed, and the scene easily fit within VRAM. It is absolutely a limitation of the game in areas with large view distances. There is even a guy with a 590GTX who sets everything to LOW settings and still gets capped at 40fps in these areas. In 2D is it exactly 80FPS in these areas (i.e. exactly double 40fps). I wish you luck but I don't have high hopes.





That would be me



I have a 590



everything set at LOW, i am limited to 40 fps.



I can not believe this game is rated 3Dvision ready.



Terrible.

Posted 03/30/2012 02:48 PM   
How can we get DICE to look at this issue? I posted on Battlelog but they probably don't look at that.
How can we get DICE to look at this issue? I posted on Battlelog but they probably don't look at that.

Posted 03/31/2012 10:24 AM   
If this was a fixable issue someone from Nvidia or Dice would have responded somewhere...

I guess they are just ignoring us.
If this was a fixable issue someone from Nvidia or Dice would have responded somewhere...



I guess they are just ignoring us.

Posted 03/31/2012 09:44 PM   
[quote name='iARDAs' date='30 March 2012 - 02:48 PM' timestamp='1333118897' post='1389935']
That would be me

I have a 590

everything set at LOW, i am limited to 40 fps.

I can not believe this game is rated 3Dvision ready.

Terrible.
[/quote]

I think that if you do a .cfg file with the best command settings for ur case the game is great in 3D Vision, you just have to set the convergence, seperation, convergencezoom settings that suits you best. If you think about it, Metro 2033 is a 3D Vision game and looks great but you cannot even set the convergence as you please so I prefer it like BF3.
The game engine cap exists in 3D and in 2D so it has nothing to do with beeing 3D Vision ready. If anything we can complain about the framerate beeing capped in big maps. But beacause 80 Fps is great for 2D but not for 3D (40Fps for each eye) I wished DICE would fix this, of course.
Cheers
[quote name='iARDAs' date='30 March 2012 - 02:48 PM' timestamp='1333118897' post='1389935']

That would be me



I have a 590



everything set at LOW, i am limited to 40 fps.



I can not believe this game is rated 3Dvision ready.



Terrible.





I think that if you do a .cfg file with the best command settings for ur case the game is great in 3D Vision, you just have to set the convergence, seperation, convergencezoom settings that suits you best. If you think about it, Metro 2033 is a 3D Vision game and looks great but you cannot even set the convergence as you please so I prefer it like BF3.

The game engine cap exists in 3D and in 2D so it has nothing to do with beeing 3D Vision ready. If anything we can complain about the framerate beeing capped in big maps. But beacause 80 Fps is great for 2D but not for 3D (40Fps for each eye) I wished DICE would fix this, of course.

Cheers

Asus P8Z68-V Pro; i5 2500k@4.3Ghz; Inno3d iChill X3 gtx 1070 ; 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz; Asus Xonar DX; Vertex 3 120Gb SSD + 1TB HDD; Corsair Tx750w; CoolerMaster Storm Scout Case ; Benq W700 720p 3D Vision Projector & 88 inch Screen, Sony 5.1 Home Cinema. HTC Vive

Posted 04/18/2012 11:55 AM   
Hi there,

i got a new PC component especially for Battlefield 3, i got:

- 2600 K processor, overclocked to 4.4GHz
- ASRock Z668 Extreme4 Gen3 Motherboard
- G.Skill Sniper 8GB DDR3 1600MHz (2x4GB) CL9 1.5v
- ASUS 27" LED Monitor 120Hz + nVIDIA 3D Vision 2

some other pretty stuff such as NZXT 850W Bronze PSU, SSD, professional gaming mouse & keyboard

my nightmares are now about the graphics cards, i'm wondering what should i get!

after searching the web, i found that 2 GTX 570 SLI would do fine for 3D and Battlefield 3, but i think i should wait for the GTX 670Ti and get two of these monsters, my questions is: are there really so many problems related with Battlefield 3 and SLI? because i read so many threads on internet of which some people with GTX SLI encountering problems with Battlefield 3 such as freezing, crashes and most likely stuttering

thanks in advance
Hi there,



i got a new PC component especially for Battlefield 3, i got:



- 2600 K processor, overclocked to 4.4GHz

- ASRock Z668 Extreme4 Gen3 Motherboard

- G.Skill Sniper 8GB DDR3 1600MHz (2x4GB) CL9 1.5v

- ASUS 27" LED Monitor 120Hz + nVIDIA 3D Vision 2



some other pretty stuff such as NZXT 850W Bronze PSU, SSD, professional gaming mouse & keyboard



my nightmares are now about the graphics cards, i'm wondering what should i get!



after searching the web, i found that 2 GTX 570 SLI would do fine for 3D and Battlefield 3, but i think i should wait for the GTX 670Ti and get two of these monsters, my questions is: are there really so many problems related with Battlefield 3 and SLI? because i read so many threads on internet of which some people with GTX SLI encountering problems with Battlefield 3 such as freezing, crashes and most likely stuttering



thanks in advance

Posted 04/21/2012 06:51 PM   
  40 / 43    
Scroll To Top